↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEU783^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:31:21 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.27s
% Output   : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (   8 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  264 (  69 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (  11 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  319 (  24   ~;  16   |;  24   &; 226   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  27  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   18 (  15 usr;  11 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   68 (   0   ^;  52   !;  16   ?;  68   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    binunion: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    binunionIL: $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    kpair: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    breln1: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_16,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( binunionIL
    = ( ! [X0: $i,X2: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
         => ( in @ X2 @ ( binunion @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',binunionIL) ).

thf(f2,conjecture,
    ( binunionIL
   => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( breln1 @ X0 @ X1 )
       => ! [X2: $i] :
            ( ( breln1 @ X0 @ X2 )
           => ! [X3: $i] :
                ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
               => ! [X4: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ X4 @ X0 )
                   => ( ( in @ ( kpair @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X1 )
                     => ( in @ ( kpair @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( binunion @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',breln1unionIL) ).

thf(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( binunionIL
     => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( breln1 @ X0 @ X1 )
         => ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( breln1 @ X0 @ X2 )
             => ! [X3: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
                 => ! [X4: $i] :
                      ( ( in @ X4 @ X0 )
                     => ( ( in @ ( kpair @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X1 )
                       => ( in @ ( kpair @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( binunion @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ( binunionIL
    = ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
         => ( in @ X1 @ ( binunion @ X0 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i,X1: $i,X0: $i] :
        ( ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
          = $true )
       => ( ( in @ X1 @ ( binunion @ X0 @ X2 ) )
          = $true ) )
  <=> ( binunionIL = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ~ ( binunionIL
     => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( breln1 @ X0 @ X1 )
         => ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( breln1 @ X0 @ X2 )
             => ! [X3: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
                 => ! [X4: $i] :
                      ( ( in @ X4 @ X0 )
                     => ( ( in @ ( kpair @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X1 )
                       => ( in @ ( kpair @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( binunion @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ~ ( ( binunionIL = $true )
     => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( ( breln1 @ X0 @ X1 )
            = $true )
         => ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( ( breln1 @ X0 @ X2 )
                = $true )
             => ! [X3: $i] :
                  ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
                    = $true )
                 => ! [X4: $i] :
                      ( ( ( in @ X4 @ X0 )
                        = $true )
                     => ( ( ( in @ ( kpair @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X1 )
                          = $true )
                       => ( ( in @ ( kpair @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( binunion @ X1 @ X2 ) )
                          = $true ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X0: $i] :
        ( ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( in @ X1 @ ( binunion @ X0 @ X2 ) )
          = $true ) )
  <=> ( binunionIL = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ? [X2: $i] :
            ( ? [X3: $i] :
                ( ? [X4: $i] :
                    ( ( ( in @ ( kpair @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( binunion @ X1 @ X2 ) )
                     != $true )
                    & ( ( in @ ( kpair @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X1 )
                      = $true )
                    & ( ( in @ X4 @ X0 )
                      = $true ) )
                & ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
                  = $true ) )
            & ( ( breln1 @ X0 @ X2 )
              = $true ) )
        & ( ( breln1 @ X0 @ X1 )
          = $true ) )
    & ( binunionIL = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ? [X2: $i] :
            ( ( ( breln1 @ X0 @ X2 )
              = $true )
            & ? [X3: $i] :
                ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
                  = $true )
                & ? [X4: $i] :
                    ( ( ( in @ ( kpair @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( binunion @ X1 @ X2 ) )
                     != $true )
                    & ( ( in @ ( kpair @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X1 )
                      = $true )
                    & ( ( in @ X4 @ X0 )
                      = $true ) ) ) )
        & ( ( breln1 @ X0 @ X1 )
          = $true ) )
    & ( binunionIL = $true ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X0: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( in @ X1 @ ( binunion @ X0 @ X2 ) )
            = $true ) )
      | ( binunionIL != $true ) )
    & ( ( binunionIL = $true )
      | ? [X1: $i,X2: $i,X0: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
            = $true )
          & ( ( in @ X1 @ ( binunion @ X0 @ X2 ) )
           != $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X0 @ X2 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( in @ X0 @ ( binunion @ X2 @ X1 ) )
            = $true ) )
      | ( binunionIL != $true ) )
    & ( ( binunionIL = $true )
      | ? [X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X5 )
            = $true )
          & ( ( in @ X3 @ ( binunion @ X5 @ X4 ) )
           != $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X0 @ X2 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( in @ X0 @ ( binunion @ X2 @ X1 ) )
            = $true ) )
      | ( binunionIL != $true ) )
    & ( ( binunionIL = $true )
      | ( ( $true
          = ( in @ sK0 @ sK2 ) )
        & ( ( in @ sK0 @ ( binunion @ sK2 @ sK1 ) )
         != $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X3,sK0),skolemize(X4,sK1),skolemize(X5,sK2)],[f12]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( ( breln1 @ sK3 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    & ( ( in @ sK6 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    & ( ( in @ ( kpair @ sK6 @ sK7 ) @ ( binunion @ sK4 @ sK5 ) )
     != $true )
    & ( $true
      = ( in @ ( kpair @ sK6 @ sK7 ) @ sK4 ) )
    & ( ( in @ sK7 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    & ( ( breln1 @ sK3 @ sK4 )
      = $true )
    & ( binunionIL = $true ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3,sK4,sK5,sK6,sK7]),skolemize(X0,sK3),skolemize(X1,sK4),skolemize(X2,sK5),skolemize(X3,sK6),skolemize(X4,sK7)],[f10]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ X0 @ X2 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( in @ X0 @ ( binunion @ X2 @ X1 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( binunionIL != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    binunionIL = $true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( in @ ( kpair @ sK6 @ sK7 ) @ sK4 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( in @ ( kpair @ sK6 @ sK7 ) @ ( binunion @ sK4 @ sK5 ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ X0 @ X2 )
       != $true )
      | ( $true != $true )
      | ( ( in @ X0 @ ( binunion @ X2 @ X1 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f17,f18]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ X0 @ X2 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( in @ X0 @ ( binunion @ X2 @ X1 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ ( kpair @ sK6 @ sK7 ) @ ( binunion @ sK4 @ X0 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f30,f21]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( in @ ( kpair @ sK6 @ sK7 ) @ ( binunion @ sK4 @ X0 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f33]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    $true != $true,
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f22,f36]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f37]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU783^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.19  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:27:51 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.19  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.23  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.24  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.27  % (2195738)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.22/0.27  % (2195748)lrs+10_1_to=lpo:sil=128000:e2e=on:si=on:random_seed=2885418015:s2a=on:i=75:s2at=3:aac=none:bd=preordered:rtra=on:fe=abstraction_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.22/0.27  % (2195748) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-2195738-2195748"...
% 0.22/0.27  % (2195748)...printing done.
% 0.22/0.27  % (2195748)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.22/0.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.27  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.27  % (2195748)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.27  % (2195748)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.22/0.27  % (2195748)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.22/0.27  % (2195748)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.22/0.27  % (2195748)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/0.27  % (2195748)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.27  % (2195748)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.22/0.27  % (2195748)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.22/0.27  % (2195738)Success in time 0.026 s
% 0.22/0.27  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------