↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEU798^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:31:28 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.04s 0.22s
% Output   : Refutation 0.04s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   22
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  24 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  233 (  51 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  361 (  10   ~;   7   |;   9   &; 285   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  35  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   21 (  21   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   21 (  17 usr;   7 con; 0-4 aty)
%                                         (  15  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   81 (  39   ^;  36   !;   6   ?;  81   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    dsetconstr: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    dsetconstrI: $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    funcSet: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    injective: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    injFuncSet: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    vPI: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    db2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    db1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_18,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( dsetconstrI
    = ( ! [X1: $i > $o,X0: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
         => ( ( X1 @ X2 )
           => ( in @ X2
              @ ( dsetconstr @ X0
                @ ^ [X3: $i] : ( X1 @ X3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dsetconstrI) ).

thf(f2,axiom,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( dsetconstr @ ( funcSet @ X0 @ X1 )
          @ ^ [X2: $i] : ( injective @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 ) ) )
    = injFuncSet ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',injFuncSet) ).

thf(f3,conjecture,
    ( dsetconstrI
   => ! [X2: $i,X1: $i,X0: $i] :
        ( ( in @ X2 @ ( funcSet @ X0 @ X1 ) )
       => ( ( injective @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
         => ( in @ X2 @ ( injFuncSet @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',injFuncInInjFuncSet) ).

thf(f4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( dsetconstrI
     => ! [X2: $i,X1: $i,X0: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X2 @ ( funcSet @ X0 @ X1 ) )
         => ( ( injective @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
           => ( in @ X2 @ ( injFuncSet @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f3]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ( dsetconstrI
    = ( ! [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X2 @ X1 )
         => ( ( X0 @ X2 )
           => ( in @ X2
              @ ( dsetconstr @ X1
                @ ^ [X3: $i] : ( X0 @ X3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( dsetconstrI
    = ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
              @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
                  ( ( in @ Y0 @ Y1 )
                 => ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
                   => ( in @ Y0
                      @ ( dsetconstr @ Y1
                        @ ^ [Y3: $i] : ( Y2 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ~ ( dsetconstrI
     => ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X0 @ ( funcSet @ X2 @ X1 ) )
         => ( ( injective @ X2 @ X1 @ X0 )
           => ( in @ X0 @ ( injFuncSet @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ~ ( ( dsetconstrI = $true )
     => ! [X1: $i,X0: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ X0 @ ( funcSet @ X2 @ X1 ) )
            = $true )
         => ( ( ( injective @ X2 @ X1 @ X0 )
              = $true )
           => ( ( in @ X0 @ ( injFuncSet @ X2 @ X1 ) )
              = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( dsetconstr @ ( funcSet @ X0 @ X1 )
          @ ^ [X2: $i] : ( injective @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 ) ) )
    = injFuncSet ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( injFuncSet
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( dsetconstr @ ( funcSet @ Y0 @ Y1 )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i] : ( injective @ Y0 @ Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ? [X1: $i,X0: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( ( in @ X0 @ ( injFuncSet @ X2 @ X1 ) )
         != $true )
        & ( ( injective @ X2 @ X1 @ X0 )
          = $true )
        & ( ( in @ X0 @ ( funcSet @ X2 @ X1 ) )
          = $true ) )
    & ( dsetconstrI = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( ( in @ X0 @ ( funcSet @ X2 @ X1 ) )
          = $true )
        & ( ( in @ X0 @ ( injFuncSet @ X2 @ X1 ) )
         != $true )
        & ( ( injective @ X2 @ X1 @ X0 )
          = $true ) )
    & ( dsetconstrI = $true ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( ( in @ sK0 @ ( funcSet @ sK2 @ sK1 ) )
      = $true )
    & ( ( in @ sK0 @ ( injFuncSet @ sK2 @ sK1 ) )
     != $true )
    & ( $true
      = ( injective @ sK2 @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
    & ( dsetconstrI = $true ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2)],[f12]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( dsetconstrI
    = ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
              @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
                  ( ( in @ Y0 @ Y1 )
                 => ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
                   => ( in @ Y0
                      @ ( dsetconstr @ Y1
                        @ ^ [Y3: $i] : ( Y2 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( injFuncSet
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( dsetconstr @ ( funcSet @ Y0 @ Y1 )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i] : ( injective @ Y0 @ Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    dsetconstrI = $true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( injective @ sK2 @ sK1 @ sK0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ( in @ sK0 @ ( injFuncSet @ sK2 @ sK1 ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( in @ sK0 @ ( funcSet @ sK2 @ sK1 ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
              @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
                  ( ( in @ Y0 @ Y1 )
                 => ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
                   => ( in @ Y0
                      @ ( dsetconstr @ Y1
                        @ ^ [Y3: $i] : ( Y2 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f14,f16]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( in @ sK0
      @ ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
            ( dsetconstr @ ( funcSet @ Y0 @ Y1 )
            @ ^ [Y2: $i] : ( injective @ Y0 @ Y1 @ Y2 ) )
        @ sK2
        @ sK1 ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f18,f15]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
                @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
                    ( ( in @ Y0 @ Y1 )
                   => ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
                     => ( in @ Y0
                        @ ( dsetconstr @ Y1
                          @ ^ [Y3: $i] : ( Y2 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
        @ X1 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( !! @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
            @ ^ [Y1: $i > $o] :
                ( ( in @ X1 @ Y0 )
               => ( ( Y1 @ X1 )
                 => ( in @ X1 @ ( dsetconstr @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f24]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
            @ ^ [Y1: $i > $o] :
                ( ( in @ X1 @ Y0 )
               => ( ( Y1 @ X1 )
                 => ( in @ X1 @ ( dsetconstr @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) )
        @ X2 )
      = $true ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
        @ ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
            ( ( in @ X1 @ X2 )
           => ( ( Y0 @ X1 )
             => ( in @ X1 @ ( dsetconstr @ X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f26]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
            ( ( in @ X1 @ X2 )
           => ( ( Y0 @ X1 )
             => ( in @ X1 @ ( dsetconstr @ X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
        @ X3 )
      = $true ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ X1 @ X2 )
       => ( ( X3 @ X1 )
         => ( in @ X1 @ ( dsetconstr @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) )
      | ( ( ( X3 @ X1 )
         => ( in @ X1 @ ( dsetconstr @ X2 @ X3 ) ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( in @ X1 @ ( dsetconstr @ X2 @ X3 ) ) )
      | ( ( X3 @ X1 )
        = $false )
      | ( $false
        = ( in @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f30]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( in @ sK0 @ ( dsetconstr @ ( funcSet @ sK2 @ sK1 ) @ ( injective @ sK2 @ sK1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( ( in @ sK0 @ ( funcSet @ sK2 @ sK1 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( $false
      = ( injective @ sK2 @ sK1 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f32,f31]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ( ( ( in @ sK0 @ ( funcSet @ sK2 @ sK1 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( $false
      = ( injective @ sK2 @ sK1 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f37]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( injective @ sK2 @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true = $false ) ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f38,f19]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( injective @ sK2 @ sK1 @ sK0 ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f39]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    $true = $false,
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f17,f40]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f42]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU798^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.04/0.15  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.04/0.15  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/0.15  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.04/0.15  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.04/0.15  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/0.15  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/0.15  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.04/0.15  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:31:34 UTC 2026
% 0.04/0.15  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.04/0.15  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.04/0.18  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.04/0.18  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.04/0.21  % (183018)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.04/0.21  % (183029)WARNING Broken Constraint: if ho_split_queue_ratios(1,8) has been set then ho_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.04/0.21  % (183029)WARNING Broken Constraint: if sine_to_age_tolerance(5) has been set then sine_to_age(off) is equal to on or sine_to_pred_levels(off) is not equal to off or sine_level_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.04/0.21  % (183026)dis+1002_4:1_sfv=off:to=lpo:plsq=on:fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:spb=non_intro:acc=on:uwa=off:fd=preordered:foolp=on:s2agt=32:slsqc=1:slsq=on:random_seed=2021659707:hsq=on:hsqr=16,1:s2a=on:i=634:add=on:nm=16:nicw=on:rtra=on:gtg=position:ss=included:ixr=off:c=on:inj=on:ntd=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/634Mi)
% 0.04/0.21  % (183023)lrs+10_40_drc=off:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=3902185997:s2a=on:i=87:rtra=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/87Mi)
% 0.04/0.21  % (183025)lrs+10_1_cnfonf=off:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=2220392939:i=3:rtra=on:inj=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.04/0.22  % (183024)lrs+10_16_si=on:nwc=1.5:random_seed=1862045775:i=18:kws=arity_squared:rtra=on:fe=abstraction:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.04/0.22  % (183029)dis+1002_8_to=kbo:sil=128000:tgt=full:drc=off:si=on:sp=const_max:lma=off:spb=non_intro:cbe=off:uwa=interpreted_only:random_seed=604132367:hsqr=1,8:i=157:s2at=5:add=on:nm=2:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/157Mi)
% 0.04/0.22  % (183028)lrs+10_1_to=lpo:sil=128000:e2e=on:si=on:random_seed=2706577632:s2a=on:i=75:s2at=3:aac=none:bd=preordered:rtra=on:fe=abstraction_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.04/0.22  % (183027)dis+21_4_fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=off:foolp=on:random_seed=1660834628:i=24:av=off:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/24Mi)
% 0.04/0.22  % (183025)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.04/0.22  % (183025)------------------------------
% 0.04/0.22  % (183025)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.04/0.22  % (183025)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.04/0.22  % (183025)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.04/0.22  % (183025)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.04/0.22  % (183025)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.04/0.22  % (183025)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.04/0.22  % (183025)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.04/0.22  % (183023) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-183018-183023"...
% 0.04/0.22  % (183024) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-183018-183024"...
% 0.04/0.22  % (183027) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-183018-183027"...
% 0.04/0.22  % (183025)------------------------------
% 0.04/0.22  % (183025)------------------------------
% 0.04/0.22  % (183026) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-183018-183026"...
% 0.04/0.22  % (183029) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-183018-183029"...
% 0.04/0.22  % (183023)...printing done.
% 0.04/0.22  % (183024)...printing done.
% 0.04/0.22  % (183027)...printing done.
% 0.04/0.22  % (183024)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.04/0.22  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.04/0.22  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.04/0.22  % (183024)------------------------------
% 0.04/0.22  % (183024)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.04/0.22  % (183024)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.04/0.22  % (183024)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.04/0.22  % (183024)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.04/0.22  % (183024)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.04/0.22  % (183024)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.04/0.22  % (183024)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.04/0.22  % (183018)Success in time 0.025 s
% 0.04/0.22  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------