%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SEU799^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:25:40 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.27s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 4 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 2 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 121 ( 6 ~; 2 |; 2 &; 100 @)
% ( 2 <=>; 9 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 7 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 5 ( 5 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 11 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 10 ^; 24 !; 0 ?; 34 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
dsetconstr: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $i ).
thf(decl_25,type,
dsetconstrEL: $o ).
thf(decl_26,type,
funcSet: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(decl_27,type,
injective: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_28,type,
injFuncSet: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(decl_29,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
thf(decl_30,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
thf(decl_31,type,
esk3_0: $i ).
thf(injFuncSetFuncIn,conjecture,
( dsetconstrEL
=> ! [X1: $i,X5: $i,X6: $i] :
( ( in @ X6 @ ( injFuncSet @ X1 @ X5 ) )
=> ( in @ X6 @ ( funcSet @ X1 @ X5 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.AkmfYrioeL/E---3.1_432532.p',injFuncSetFuncIn) ).
thf(injFuncSet,axiom,
( injFuncSet
= ( ^ [X1: $i,X5: $i] :
( dsetconstr @ ( funcSet @ X1 @ X5 )
@ ^ [X6: $i] : ( injective @ X1 @ X5 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.AkmfYrioeL/E---3.1_432532.p',injFuncSet) ).
thf(dsetconstrEL,axiom,
( dsetconstrEL
<=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3
@ ( dsetconstr @ X1
@ ^ [X4: $i] : ( X2 @ X4 ) ) )
=> ( in @ X3 @ X1 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.AkmfYrioeL/E---3.1_432532.p',dsetconstrEL) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( dsetconstrEL
=> ! [X1: $i,X5: $i,X6: $i] :
( ( in @ X6 @ ( injFuncSet @ X1 @ X5 ) )
=> ( in @ X6 @ ( funcSet @ X1 @ X5 ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[injFuncSetFuncIn]) ).
thf(c_0_4,plain,
( injFuncSet
= ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
( dsetconstr @ ( funcSet @ Z0 @ Z1 )
@ ^ [Z2: $i] : ( injective @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[injFuncSet]) ).
thf(c_0_5,plain,
( dsetconstrEL
<=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3
@ ( dsetconstr @ X1
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( X2 @ Z0 ) ) )
=> ( in @ X3 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[dsetconstrEL]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X13: $i,X14: $i > $o,X15: $i] :
( ( in @ X15 @ ( dsetconstr @ X13 @ X14 ) )
=> ( in @ X15 @ X13 ) )
=> ! [X1: $i,X5: $i,X6: $i] :
( ( in @ X6
@ ( dsetconstr @ ( funcSet @ X1 @ X5 )
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( injective @ X1 @ X5 @ Z0 ) ) )
=> ( in @ X6 @ ( funcSet @ X1 @ X5 ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5])]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X16: $i,X17: $i > $o,X18: $i] :
( ( ~ ( in @ X18 @ ( dsetconstr @ X16 @ X17 ) )
| ( in @ X18 @ X16 ) )
& ( in @ esk3_0
@ ( dsetconstr @ ( funcSet @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( injective @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 @ Z0 ) ) )
& ~ ( in @ esk3_0 @ ( funcSet @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i,X3: $i,X2: $i > $o] :
( ( in @ X1 @ X3 )
| ~ ( in @ X1 @ ( dsetconstr @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
in @ esk3_0 @ ( dsetconstr @ ( funcSet @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) @ ( injective @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ ( in @ esk3_0 @ ( funcSet @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEU799^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.19 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.19 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.19 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.19 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.19 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.19 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:36:49 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.19 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.19 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.24 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.25 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.AkmfYrioeL/E---3.1_432532.p
% 0.21/0.27 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.21/0.27 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLMNSFN.
% 0.21/0.27 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.27 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.27 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.27 % Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.27 % Starting lpo1_def_fix with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.27 % ehoh_best_sine_rwall with pid 432565 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Result found by ehoh_best_sine_rwall
% 0.21/0.27 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLMNSFN.
% 0.21/0.27 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.27 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.27 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.27 % Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.27 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.21/0.27 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/0.27 % Search class: HHUNF-FFSF22-SSFFMFBN
% 0.21/0.27 % partial match(1): HHUSF-FFSF22-SSFFMFBN
% 0.21/0.27 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.27 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.27 % SubtermCWHack with pid 432570 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.21/0.27 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLMNSFN.
% 0.21/0.27 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.27 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.27 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.27 % Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.27 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.21/0.27 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/0.27 % Search class: HHUNF-FFSF22-SSFFMFBN
% 0.21/0.27 % partial match(1): HHUSF-FFSF22-SSFFMFBN
% 0.21/0.27 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.27 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.27 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.27
% 0.21/0.27 % Proof found!
% 0.21/0.27 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.27 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.27 % Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.21/0.27 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 6
% 0.21/0.27 % Initial clauses : 3
% 0.21/0.27 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.21/0.27 % Processed clauses : 3
% 0.21/0.27 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % ...remaining for further processing : 3
% 0.21/0.27 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Generated clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.27 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Paramodulations : 1
% 0.21/0.27 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.27 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.27 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.27 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.27 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.27 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.27 % Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.21/0.27 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.27 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.27 % Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.27 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.27 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Termbank termtop insertions : 435
% 0.21/0.27 % Search garbage collected termcells : 145
% 0.21/0.27
% 0.21/0.27 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.27 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.27 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.27 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.27 % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.21/0.27
% 0.21/0.27 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.27 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.27 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.27 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.27 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.21/0.27 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------