↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEU803^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:31:33 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.28s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   21
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  18 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  301 (  76 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   9 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  413 (  24   ~;  15   |;  23   &; 312   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  28  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   7   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   27 (  22 usr;   8 con; 0-4 aty)
%                                         (   4  !!;   7  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   82 (  28   ^;  40   !;  14   ?;  82   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    funcSet: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    ap: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    surjective: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    vPI: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    db2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    vSIGMA: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    vAND: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    db4: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    db3: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    db1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_16,type,
    vEQ: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( X0 > X0 > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_17,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_20,type,
    sK2: $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_22,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( surjective
    = ( ^ [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ! [X3: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
         => ? [X4: $i] :
              ( ( ( ap @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X4 )
                = X3 )
              & ( in @ X4 @ X0 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',surjective) ).

thf(f2,conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $i] :
      ( ! [X3: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
         => ( in @ ( X2 @ X3 ) @ X1 ) )
     => ! [X4: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X4 @ ( funcSet @ X1 @ X0 ) )
         => ( ! [X3: $i] :
                ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
               => ( ( ap @ X1 @ X0 @ X4 @ ( X2 @ X3 ) )
                  = X3 ) )
           => ( surjective @ X1 @ X0 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',leftInvIsSurj) ).

thf(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $i] :
        ( ! [X3: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
           => ( in @ ( X2 @ X3 ) @ X1 ) )
       => ! [X4: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X4 @ ( funcSet @ X1 @ X0 ) )
           => ( ! [X3: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
                 => ( ( ap @ X1 @ X0 @ X4 @ ( X2 @ X3 ) )
                    = X3 ) )
             => ( surjective @ X1 @ X0 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $i] :
        ( ! [X3: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
           => ( in @ ( X2 @ X3 ) @ X1 ) )
       => ! [X4: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X4 @ ( funcSet @ X1 @ X0 ) )
           => ( ! [X5: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ X5 @ X0 )
                 => ( ( ap @ X1 @ X0 @ X4 @ ( X2 @ X5 ) )
                    = X5 ) )
             => ( surjective @ X1 @ X0 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X2: $i > $i,X1: $i,X0: $i] :
        ( ! [X3: $i] :
            ( ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
              = $true )
           => ( ( in @ ( X2 @ X3 ) @ X1 )
              = $true ) )
       => ! [X4: $i] :
            ( ( ( in @ X4 @ ( funcSet @ X1 @ X0 ) )
              = $true )
           => ( ! [X5: $i] :
                  ( ( $true
                    = ( in @ X5 @ X0 ) )
                 => ( ( ap @ X1 @ X0 @ X4 @ ( X2 @ X5 ) )
                    = X5 ) )
             => ( ( surjective @ X1 @ X0 @ X4 )
                = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( surjective
    = ( ^ [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ! [X3: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
         => ? [X4: $i] :
              ( ( ( ap @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X4 )
                = X3 )
              & ( in @ X4 @ X0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( surjective
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i,Y2: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
              ( ( in @ Y3 @ Y1 )
             => ( ?? @ $i
                @ ^ [Y4: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ Y4 @ Y0 )
                    & ( ( ap @ Y0 @ Y1 @ Y2 @ Y4 )
                      = Y3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ? [X2: $i > $i,X1: $i,X0: $i] :
      ( ? [X4: $i] :
          ( ( ( surjective @ X1 @ X0 @ X4 )
           != $true )
          & ! [X5: $i] :
              ( ( ( ap @ X1 @ X0 @ X4 @ ( X2 @ X5 ) )
                = X5 )
              | ( $true
               != ( in @ X5 @ X0 ) ) )
          & ( ( in @ X4 @ ( funcSet @ X1 @ X0 ) )
            = $true ) )
      & ! [X3: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ ( X2 @ X3 ) @ X1 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
           != $true ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ? [X1: $i,X0: $i,X2: $i > $i] :
      ( ! [X3: $i] :
          ( ( ( in @ ( X2 @ X3 ) @ X1 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( in @ X3 @ X0 )
           != $true ) )
      & ? [X4: $i] :
          ( ( ( surjective @ X1 @ X0 @ X4 )
           != $true )
          & ! [X5: $i] :
              ( ( ( ap @ X1 @ X0 @ X4 @ ( X2 @ X5 ) )
                = X5 )
              | ( $true
               != ( in @ X5 @ X0 ) ) )
          & ( ( in @ X4 @ ( funcSet @ X1 @ X0 ) )
            = $true ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $i] :
      ( ! [X3: $i] :
          ( ( $true
            = ( in @ ( X2 @ X3 ) @ X0 ) )
          | ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
           != $true ) )
      & ? [X4: $i] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( surjective @ X0 @ X1 @ X4 ) )
          & ! [X5: $i] :
              ( ( ( ap @ X0 @ X1 @ X4 @ ( X2 @ X5 ) )
                = X5 )
              | ( ( in @ X5 @ X1 )
               != $true ) )
          & ( ( in @ X4 @ ( funcSet @ X0 @ X1 ) )
            = $true ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ! [X3: $i] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( in @ ( sK2 @ X3 ) @ sK0 ) )
        | ( $true
         != ( in @ X3 @ sK1 ) ) )
    & ( ( surjective @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK3 )
     != $true )
    & ! [X5: $i] :
        ( ( ( ap @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK3 @ ( sK2 @ X5 ) )
          = X5 )
        | ( ( in @ X5 @ sK1 )
         != $true ) )
    & ( $true
      = ( in @ sK3 @ ( funcSet @ sK0 @ sK1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2),skolemize(X4,sK3)],[f10]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( surjective
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i,Y2: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
              ( ( in @ Y3 @ Y1 )
             => ( ?? @ $i
                @ ^ [Y4: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ Y4 @ Y0 )
                    & ( ( ap @ Y0 @ Y1 @ Y2 @ Y4 )
                      = Y3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X5: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ X5 @ sK1 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( ap @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK3 @ ( sK2 @ X5 ) )
        = X5 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( surjective @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK3 )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ! [X3: $i] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( in @ X3 @ sK1 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( in @ ( sK2 @ X3 ) @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i,Y2: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
              ( ( in @ Y3 @ Y1 )
             => ( ?? @ $i
                @ ^ [Y4: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ Y4 @ Y0 )
                    & ( ( ap @ Y0 @ Y1 @ Y2 @ Y4 )
                      = Y3 ) ) ) ) )
      @ sK0
      @ sK1
      @ sK3 ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f15,f12]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( in @ Y0 @ sK1 )
         => ( ?? @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( in @ Y1 @ sK0 )
                & ( ( ap @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK3 @ Y1 )
                  = Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( in @ Y0 @ sK1 )
         => ( ?? @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( in @ Y1 @ sK0 )
                & ( ( ap @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK3 @ Y1 )
                  = Y0 ) ) ) )
      @ sK4 ) ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( ( in @ sK4 @ sK1 )
     => ( ?? @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( in @ Y0 @ sK0 )
            & ( ( ap @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK3 @ Y0 )
              = sK4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( ?? @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( in @ Y0 @ sK0 )
          & ( ( ap @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK3 @ Y0 )
            = sK4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( in @ sK4 @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( in @ Y0 @ sK0 )
            & ( ( ap @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK3 @ Y0 )
              = sK4 ) )
        @ X1 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( $false
      = ( ( in @ X1 @ sK0 )
        & ( ( ap @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK3 @ X1 )
          = sK4 ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( ( ap @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK3 @ X1 )
          = sK4 ) )
      | ( ( in @ X1 @ sK0 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f26]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( ap @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK3 @ X1 )
       != sK4 )
      | ( ( in @ X1 @ sK0 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( in @ ( sK2 @ sK4 ) @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f16,f24]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( in @ ( sK2 @ sK4 ) @ sK0 ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( ( ( ap @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK3 @ ( sK2 @ sK4 ) )
      = sK4 )
    | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f14,f24]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ( ( ap @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK3 @ ( sK2 @ sK4 ) )
    = sK4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f31]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( ( ( in @ ( sK2 @ sK4 ) @ sK0 )
      = $false )
    | ( sK4 != sK4 ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f28,f32]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ( in @ ( sK2 @ sK4 ) @ sK0 )
    = $false ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f33]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    $true = $false,
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f30,f34]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f36]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU803^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.17  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.17  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.17  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.17  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.17  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.17  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.17  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.17  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:34:52 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.17  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.17  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.21  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.22  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375546)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375561)dis+21_4_fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=off:foolp=on:random_seed=3920343668:i=24:av=off:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/24Mi)
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375559)lrs+10_1_cnfonf=off:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=2506049200:i=3:rtra=on:inj=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375558)lrs+10_16_si=on:nwc=1.5:random_seed=3826871434:i=18:kws=arity_squared:rtra=on:fe=abstraction:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375559)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375559)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375559)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375559)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375559)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375559)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375559)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375559)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375559)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375558) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-1375546-1375558"...
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375559)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375559)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375562)lrs+10_1_to=lpo:sil=128000:e2e=on:si=on:random_seed=449225803:s2a=on:i=75:s2at=3:aac=none:bd=preordered:rtra=on:fe=abstraction_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375561) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-1375546-1375561"...
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375557)lrs+10_40_drc=off:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=1312474857:s2a=on:i=87:rtra=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/87Mi)
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375558)...printing done.
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375561)...printing done.
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375558)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.28  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375558)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375558)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375558)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375558)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375558)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375558)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375558)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375558)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.20/0.28  % (1375546)Success in time 0.042 s
% 0.20/0.28  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------