%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SEU808^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nThZJbF90R true
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:56:32 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Theorem 1.37s 1.08s
% Output : Refutation 1.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 9 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 28 ( 5 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 76 ( 4 ~; 1 |; 0 &; 61 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 8 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 3 ^; 8 !; 0 ?; 11 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk__1_type,type,
sk__1: $i ).
thf(in_type,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(omega_type,type,
omega: $i ).
thf(omegaS_type,type,
omegaS: $i > $i ).
thf(omegaSAx_type,type,
omegaSAx: $o ).
thf(setadjoin_type,type,
setadjoin: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(omegaS,axiom,
( omegaS
= ( ^ [Xx: $i] : ( setadjoin @ Xx @ Xx ) ) ) ).
thf('0',plain,
( omegaS
= ( ^ [Xx: $i] : ( setadjoin @ Xx @ Xx ) ) ),
inference(simplify_rw_rule,[status(thm)],[omegaS]) ).
thf('1',plain,
( omegaS
= ( ^ [V_1: $i] : ( setadjoin @ V_1 @ V_1 ) ) ),
define([status(thm)]) ).
thf(omegaSAx,axiom,
( omegaSAx
= ( ! [Xx: $i] :
( ( in @ Xx @ omega )
=> ( in @ ( setadjoin @ Xx @ Xx ) @ omega ) ) ) ) ).
thf('2',plain,
( omegaSAx
= ( ! [X4: $i] :
( ( in @ X4 @ omega )
=> ( in @ ( setadjoin @ X4 @ X4 ) @ omega ) ) ) ),
define([status(thm)]) ).
thf(omegaSp,conjecture,
( omegaSAx
=> ! [Xx: $i] :
( ( in @ Xx @ omega )
=> ( in @ ( omegaS @ Xx ) @ omega ) ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,conjecture,
( ! [X4: $i] :
( ( in @ X4 @ omega )
=> ( in @ ( setadjoin @ X4 @ X4 ) @ omega ) )
=> ! [X6: $i] :
( ( in @ X6 @ omega )
=> ( in @ ( setadjoin @ X6 @ X6 ) @ omega ) ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X4: $i] :
( ( in @ X4 @ omega )
=> ( in @ ( setadjoin @ X4 @ X4 ) @ omega ) )
=> ! [X6: $i] :
( ( in @ X6 @ omega )
=> ( in @ ( setadjoin @ X6 @ X6 ) @ omega ) ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl0,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( in @ ( setadjoin @ X0 @ X0 ) @ omega )
| ~ ( in @ X0 @ omega ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl1,plain,
~ ( in @ ( setadjoin @ sk__1 @ sk__1 ) @ omega ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl3,plain,
~ ( in @ sk__1 @ omega ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl0,zip_derived_cl1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl2,plain,
in @ sk__1 @ omega,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl5,plain,
$false,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl3,zip_derived_cl2]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.33 % Problem : SEU808^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.07/0.34 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nThZJbF90R true
% 0.12/0.54 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.54 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.54 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.54 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.54 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.54 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.54 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.54 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 16:09:23 EDT 2025
% 0.16/0.55 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.55 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.16/0.55 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.55 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.16/0.55 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.16/0.56 % Running in HO mode
% 0.17/0.88 % Total configuration time : 828
% 0.17/0.88 % Estimated wc time : 1656
% 0.17/0.88 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0
% 0.17/0.99 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s
% 0.17/1.04 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s
% 1.37/1.08 % Solved by lams/40_c.s.sh.
% 1.37/1.08 % done 2 iterations in 0.022s
% 1.37/1.08 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.37/1.08 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.37/1.08
% 1.37/1.08
% 1.37/1.08 % Terminating...
% 1.59/1.19 % Runner terminated.
% 1.59/1.21 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------