↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SEU829^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:29:26 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 7.55s 3.71s
% Output   : Refutation 7.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   27
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   45 (  16 unt;   0 typ;   5 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  177 (  46 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  205 (  64   ~;  47   |;   0   &;  93   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   10 (  10   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   68 (  31   ^;  35   !;   0   ?;  68   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   2  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(subseteq_decl,type,
    subseteq: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(powerset_decl,type,
    powerset: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(emptyset_decl,type,
    emptyset: $i > $o ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $i > $o ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: $i ).

thf(sk3_decl,type,
    sk3: $i > $i ).

thf(sk4_decl,type,
    sk4: $i ).

thf(subseteq_def,definition,
    ( subseteq
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $o,B: $i > $o] :
        ! [C: $i] :
          ( ( A @ C )
         => ( B @ C ) ) ) ) ).

thf(powerset_def,definition,
    ( powerset
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $o,B: $i > $o] : ( subseteq @ B @ A ) ) ) ).

thf(emptyset_def,definition,
    ( emptyset
    = ( ^ [A: $i] : $false ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ~ ( sk1 @ A ) ) ) ).

thf(sk3_def,definition,
    ( sk3
    = ( ^ [A: $i] :
        @+[B: $i] :
          ~ ~ ( sk1 @ B ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ( powerset @ emptyset )
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $o] : ( A = emptyset ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( powerset @ emptyset )
   != ( ^ [A: $i > $o] : ( A = emptyset ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ( ( ^ [A: $i > $o] :
        ! [B: $i] :
          ~ ( A @ B ) )
   != ( ^ [A: $i > $o] :
          ( A
          = ( ^ [B: $i] : $false ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ( ( ^ [A: $i > $o] :
        ! [B: $i] :
          ~ ( A @ B ) )
   != ( ^ [A: $i > $o] :
          ( A
          = ( ^ [B: $i] : $false ) ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i] :
          ~ ( sk1 @ A ) )
   != ( sk1
      = ( ^ [A: $i] : $false ) ) ),
    inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ( ~ ! [A: $i] :
          ~ ( sk1 @ A )
    | ( sk1
     != ( ^ [A: $i] : $false ) ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ( sk1
     != ( ^ [A: $i] : $false ) )
    | ~ ! [A: $i] :
          ~ ( sk1 @ A ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ( ( sk1
     != ( ^ [A: $i] : $false ) )
    | ( sk1 @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[8]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ( ! [A: $i] :
        ~ ( sk1 @ A )
    | ( sk1
      = ( ^ [A: $i] : $false ) ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( ( sk1
      = ( ^ [A: $i] : $false ) )
    | ! [A: $i] :
        ~ ( sk1 @ A ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( sk1
        = ( ^ [B: $i] : $false ) )
      | ~ ( sk1 @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[9]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ( ( ( ^ [B: $i] : $false )
          = ( ^ [B: $i] : $false ) )
       != ( ! [B: $i] :
              ~ ( sk1 @ B ) ) )
      | ( sk1 != sk1 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[11,5]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ~ ! [B: $i] :
            ~ ( sk1 @ B )
      | ( sk1 != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ~ ! [B: $i] :
            ~ ( sk1 @ B ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[13:[]]) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ( sk1 @ ( sk3 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[14]) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( sk1
       != ( ^ [B: $i] : $false ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( sk1 @ ( sk3 @ A ) )
      | ( ( sk1 @ sk2 )
       != ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[10,21]) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( sk1
       != ( ^ [B: $i] : $false ) )
      | ( sk1 @ ( sk3 @ A ) )
      | ( ( sk1 @ sk2 )
       != ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[31]) ).

thf(33,plain,
    ( ( sk1
     != ( ^ [A: $i] : $false ) )
    | ( sk1 @ ( sk3 @ sk2 ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[32:[bind(A,$thf( sk2 ))]]) ).

thf(49,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk1 @ ( sk3 @ sk2 ) ) ),
    inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[33]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ( ( ^ [B: $i] : $false )
       != ( ^ [B: $i] : $false ) )
      | ( sk1 @ sk2 )
      | ( sk1 != sk1 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[11,10]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ( sk1 @ sk2 )
      | ( sk1 != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ( sk1 @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[16:[]]) ).

thf(62,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
      | ~ $true
      | ( sk1 @ sk2 )
      | ( ( sk1 @ ( sk3 @ sk2 ) )
       != ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[49,17]) ).

thf(63,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
      | ( sk1 @ sk2 )
      | ( ( sk1 @ ( sk3 @ sk2 ) )
       != ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[62]) ).

thf(64,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[63:[bind(A,$thf( sk3 @ sk2 ))]]) ).

thf(80,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( sk1 @ sk2 )
      | ~ $true
      | ( sk1 @ sk2 )
      | ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
       != ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[64,17]) ).

thf(81,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( sk1 @ sk2 )
      | ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
       != ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[80]) ).

thf(82,plain,
    sk1 @ sk2,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[81:[bind(A,$thf( sk4 ))]]) ).

thf(40,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ~ $true
      | ( sk1 @ ( sk3 @ B ) )
      | ( ( sk1 @ sk2 )
       != ( sk1 @ B ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[17,21]) ).

thf(41,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ( sk1 @ ( sk3 @ B ) )
      | ( ( sk1 @ sk2 )
       != ( sk1 @ B ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[40]) ).

thf(42,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ( sk1 @ ( sk3 @ sk2 ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[41:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( sk2 ))]]) ).

thf(117,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ $true
      | ( sk1 @ ( sk3 @ sk2 ) )
      | ( ( sk1 @ sk2 )
       != ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[82,42]) ).

thf(118,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( sk1 @ ( sk3 @ sk2 ) )
      | ( ( sk1 @ sk2 )
       != ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[117]) ).

thf(119,plain,
    sk1 @ ( sk3 @ sk2 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[118:[bind(A,$thf( sk2 ))]]) ).

thf(120,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( sk1
        = ( ^ [B: $i] : $false ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( ( sk1 @ sk2 )
       != ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[82,11]) ).

thf(121,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( sk1
        = ( ^ [B: $i] : $false ) )
      | ( ( sk1 @ sk2 )
       != ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[120]) ).

thf(122,plain,
    ( sk1
    = ( ^ [A: $i] : $false ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[121:[bind(A,$thf( sk2 ))]]) ).

thf(130,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( sk1 @ A ),
    inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[122]) ).

thf(145,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[119,130]) ).

thf(146,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[145]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SEU829^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.29  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.29  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:30:52 UTC 2026
% 0.26/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.26/0.30  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.35/1.13  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 2.02/1.40  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (264ms). 
% 2.02/1.42  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.73/2.02  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.73/2.04  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 3.21/2.17  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 3.28/2.21  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 3.28/2.22  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 3.28/2.22  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 3.28/2.23  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 7.55/3.70  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 7.55/3.71  % Time passed: 3198ms (effective reasoning time: 2276ms)
% 7.55/3.71  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 7.55/3.71  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 7.55/3.71  % No. of inferences in proof: 40
% 7.55/3.71  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 3198 ms resp. 2276 ms w/o parsing
% 7.11/3.80  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.11/3.80  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------