↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEU841^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:37:33 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.66s 1.47s
% Output   : Refutation 1.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   6 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   55 (  32 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   29 (  10   ~;   0   |;  15   &;   0   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   21 (  21   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    5 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   0   ^;   9   !;  12   ?;  21   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    sK0: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    sK1: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    sK2: a > $o ).

thf(f15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    sK2 != sK2,
    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f10,f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    sK1 = sK2,
    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f11,f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    sK0 = sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ( sK0 = sK2 )
    & ( sK1 = sK0 )
    & ( sK1 != sK2 ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f7,f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( X0 = X2 )
        & ( X0 = X1 )
        & ( X1 != X2 ) )
   => ( ( sK0 = sK2 )
      & ( sK1 = sK0 )
      & ( sK1 != sK2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ( X0 = X2 )
      & ( X0 = X1 )
      & ( X1 != X2 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X2: a > $o,X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
      ( ( X1 = X2 )
      & ( X0 = X2 )
      & ( X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ? [X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ( X0 != X1 )
      & ( X0 = X2 )
      & ( X1 = X2 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ( X0 = X2 )
          & ( X1 = X2 ) )
       => ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ( ( X1 = X2 )
          & ( X0 = X1 ) )
       => ( X0 = X2 ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( X1 = X2 )
        & ( X0 = X1 ) )
     => ( X0 = X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.V7fV0iNxpv/DTF2THF_15608.p',cGAZING_THM7) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    sK1 = sK0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    sK1 != sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem  : SEU841^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.13/0.31  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.31  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:35:16 EST 2026
% 0.13/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.31  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.19/0.41  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.19/0.41  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.19/0.41  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.41  % File     : SEU841^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.19/0.41  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.19/0.41  % Problem  : TPS problem GAZING-THM7
% 0.19/0.41  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.19/0.41  % English  :
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  % Refs     : [Bar92] Barker-Plummer D (1992), Gazing: An Approach to the Pr
% 0.19/0.41  %          : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.41  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.19/0.41  % Names    : tps_0186 [Bro09]
% 0.19/0.41  %          : 7 [Bar92]
% 0.19/0.41  %          : GAZING-THM7 [TPS]
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.19/0.41  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.0.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v5.3.0, 0.40 v5.2.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.00 v4.0.0
% 0.19/0.41  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    2 (   0 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
% 0.19/0.41  %            Number of atoms       :    3 (   3 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.19/0.41  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   3 avg)
% 0.19/0.41  %            Number of connectives :    2 (   0   ~;   0   |;   1   &;   0   @)
% 0.19/0.41  %                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.19/0.41  %            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   6 avg)
% 0.19/0.41  %            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
% 0.19/0.41  %            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.19/0.41  %            Number of symbols     :    1 (   0 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.41  %            Number of variables   :    3 (   0   ^;   3   !;   0   ?;   3   :)
% 0.19/0.41  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.19/0.41  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.19/0.41  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.19/0.41  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.19/0.41  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.41  thf(a_type,type,
% 0.19/0.41      a: $tType ).
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  thf(cGAZING_THM7,conjecture,
% 0.19/0.41      ! [S: a > $o,T: a > $o,U: a > $o] :
% 0.19/0.41        ( ( ( S = T )
% 0.19/0.41          & ( T = U ) )
% 0.19/0.41       => ( S = U ) ) ).
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.41  ------------------------
% 1.66/1.44  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.66/1.44  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.66/1.44  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:35:17 EST 2026
% 1.66/1.44  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.66/1.44  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.66/1.44  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.66/1.44  
% 1.66/1.44  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.V7fV0iNxpv/DTF2DTF15608.p
% See solution above
% 1.66/1.44  ------------------------
% 1.66/1.45  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.66/1.45  thf(a_type,type,
% 1.66/1.45      a: $tType ).
% 1.66/1.45  
% 1.66/1.45  thf(cGAZING_THM7,conjecture,
% 1.66/1.45      ! [S: a > $o,T: a > $o,U: a > $o] :
% 1.66/1.45        ( ( ( S = T )
% 1.66/1.45          & ( T = U ) )
% 1.66/1.45       => ( S = U ) ) ).
% 1.66/1.45  ------------------------
% 1.66/1.47  % (15708)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_15608 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.66/1.47  % (15705)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_15608 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.66/1.47  % (15710)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_15608 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 1.66/1.47  % (15711)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_15608 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 1.66/1.47  % (15707)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_15608 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 1.66/1.47  % (15705)First to succeed.
% 1.66/1.47  % (15708)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.66/1.47  % (15709)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_15608 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.66/1.47  % (15707)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.66/1.47  % (15705)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.66/1.47  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_15608
% 1.66/1.47  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_15608
% 1.66/1.47  thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
% 1.66/1.47  thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 1.66/1.47  thf(func_def_3, type, sK0: a > $o).
% 1.66/1.47  thf(func_def_4, type, sK1: a > $o).
% 1.66/1.47  thf(func_def_5, type, sK2: a > $o).
% 1.66/1.47  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.66/1.47    $false),
% 1.66/1.47    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 1.66/1.47  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.66/1.47    (sK2 != sK2)),
% 1.66/1.47    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f10,f13])).
% 1.66/1.47  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.66/1.47    (sK1 = sK2)),
% 1.66/1.47    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f11,f12])).
% 1.66/1.47  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.66/1.47    (sK0 = sK2)),
% 1.66/1.47    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.66/1.47  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.66/1.47    (sK0 = sK2) & (sK1 = sK0) & (sK1 != sK2)),
% 1.66/1.47    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f7,f8])).
% 1.66/1.47  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.66/1.47    ? [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o] : ((X0 = X2) & (X0 = X1) & (X1 != X2)) => ((sK0 = sK2) & (sK1 = sK0) & (sK1 != sK2))),
% 1.66/1.47    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.66/1.47  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.66/1.47    ? [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o] : ((X0 = X2) & (X0 = X1) & (X1 != X2))),
% 1.66/1.47    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.66/1.47  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.66/1.47    ? [X2 : a > $o,X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : ((X1 = X2) & (X0 = X2) & (X0 != X1))),
% 1.66/1.47    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.66/1.47  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.66/1.47    ? [X1 : a > $o,X0 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o] : ((X0 != X1) & ((X0 = X2) & (X1 = X2)))),
% 1.66/1.47    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.66/1.47  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.66/1.47    ~! [X1 : a > $o,X0 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o] : (((X0 = X2) & (X1 = X2)) => (X0 = X1))),
% 1.66/1.47    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.66/1.47  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.66/1.47    ~! [X0 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : (((X1 = X2) & (X0 = X1)) => (X0 = X2))),
% 1.66/1.47    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.66/1.47  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.66/1.47    ! [X0 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : (((X1 = X2) & (X0 = X1)) => (X0 = X2))),
% 1.66/1.47    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.V7fV0iNxpv/DTF2THF_15608.p',cGAZING_THM7)).
% 1.66/1.47  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.66/1.47    (sK1 = sK0)),
% 1.66/1.47    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.66/1.47  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.66/1.47    (sK1 != sK2)),
% 1.66/1.47    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.66/1.47  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_15608
% 1.66/1.47  % (15705)------------------------------
% 1.66/1.47  % (15705)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.66/1.47  % (15705)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.66/1.47  
% 1.66/1.47  % (15705)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.66/1.47  % (15705)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.66/1.47  % (15705)------------------------------
% 1.66/1.47  % (15705)------------------------------
% 1.66/1.47  % (15704)Success in time 0.017 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------