↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEU842^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:37:33 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.02s 0.91s
% Output   : Refutation 1.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   8 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   22 (   9 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   63 (   8   ~;   0   |;  18   &;  36   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   12 (  12   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    5 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (  18   ^;   8   !;   4   ?;  30   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    vEPSILON: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    sK0: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    sK1: a > $o ).

thf(f10,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
          & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
          & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
          & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
          & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f6,f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
              & ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
       != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
              & ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
   => ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
     != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
            & ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
     != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
            & ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
              & ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
              & ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [X2: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X2 )
              & ( X0 @ X2 ) ) )
        = ( ^ [X3: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X3 )
              & ( X0 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [X2: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X2 )
              & ( X0 @ X2 ) ) )
        = ( ^ [X2: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X2 )
              & ( X0 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
      ( ( ^ [X2: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ X2 )
            & ( X0 @ X2 ) ) )
      = ( ^ [X2: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ X2 )
            & ( X0 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lFxGdCGhDn/DTF2THF_26782.p',cGAZING_THM25_pme) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.06  % Problem  : SEU842^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.07/0.25  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.25  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.25  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.25  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.25  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.25  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.25  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.25  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:35:15 EST 2026
% 0.07/0.25  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.25  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.07/0.31  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.07/0.31  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.07/0.31  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.31  % File     : SEU842^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.31  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.07/0.31  % Problem  : TPS problem GAZING-THM25
% 0.07/0.31  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.07/0.31  % English  :
% 0.07/0.31  
% 0.07/0.31  % Refs     : [Bar92] Barker-Plummer D (1992), Gazing: An Approach to the Pr
% 0.07/0.31  %          : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.07/0.31  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.07/0.31  % Names    : tps_0195 [Bro09]
% 0.07/0.31  %          : 25 [Bar92]
% 0.07/0.31  %          : GAZING-THM25 [TPS]
% 0.07/0.31  
% 0.07/0.31  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.07/0.31  % Rating   : 0.00 v8.2.0, 0.08 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.4.0, 0.11 v7.2.0, 0.00 v7.1.0, 0.12 v7.0.0, 0.14 v6.4.0, 0.17 v6.3.0, 0.20 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v5.3.0, 0.40 v5.2.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.00 v4.0.1, 0.33 v4.0.0
% 0.07/0.31  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    2 (   1 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
% 0.07/0.31  %            Number of atoms       :    1 (   1 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.07/0.31  %            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.07/0.31  %            Number of connectives :    6 (   0   ~;   0   |;   2   &;   4   @)
% 0.07/0.31  %                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.07/0.31  %            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   3 avg)
% 0.07/0.31  %            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
% 0.07/0.31  %            Number of type conns  :    2 (   2   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.07/0.31  %            Number of symbols     :    1 (   0 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.07/0.31  %            Number of variables   :    4 (   2   ^;   2   !;   0   ?;   4   :)
% 0.07/0.31  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.07/0.31  
% 0.07/0.31  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.07/0.31  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.07/0.31  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.07/0.31  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.07/0.31  %          : Polymorphic definitions expanded.
% 0.07/0.31  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.31  thf(a_type,type,
% 0.07/0.31      a: $tType ).
% 0.07/0.31  
% 0.07/0.31  thf(cGAZING_THM25_pme,conjecture,
% 0.07/0.31      ! [S: a > $o,T: a > $o] :
% 0.07/0.31        ( ( ^ [Xx: a] :
% 0.07/0.31              ( ( S @ Xx )
% 0.07/0.31              & ( T @ Xx ) ) )
% 0.07/0.31        = ( ^ [Xx: a] :
% 0.07/0.31              ( ( T @ Xx )
% 0.07/0.31              & ( S @ Xx ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.07/0.31  
% 0.07/0.31  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.31  ------------------------
% 0.83/0.89  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 0.83/0.89  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 0.83/0.89  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:35:16 EST 2026
% 0.83/0.89  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 0.83/0.89  %%% Logic specification used:
% 0.83/0.89  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 0.83/0.89  
% 0.83/0.89  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lFxGdCGhDn/DTF2DTF26782.p
% See solution above
% 0.83/0.89  ------------------------
% 1.02/0.90  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.02/0.90  thf(a_type,type,
% 1.02/0.90      a: $tType ).
% 1.02/0.90  
% 1.02/0.90  thf(cGAZING_THM25_pme,conjecture,
% 1.02/0.90      ! [S: a > $o,T: a > $o] :
% 1.02/0.90        ( ( ^ [Xx: a] :
% 1.02/0.90              ( ( S @ Xx )
% 1.02/0.90              & ( T @ Xx ) ) )
% 1.02/0.90        = ( ^ [Xx: a] :
% 1.02/0.90              ( ( T @ Xx )
% 1.02/0.90              & ( S @ Xx ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.02/0.90  ------------------------
% 1.02/0.91  % (26882)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_26782 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 1.02/0.91  % (26886)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_26782 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 1.02/0.91  % (26882)First to succeed.
% 1.02/0.91  % (26880)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_26782 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.02/0.91  % (26886)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.02/0.91  % (26882)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.02/0.91  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_26782
% 1.02/0.91  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_26782
% 1.02/0.91  thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
% 1.02/0.91  thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 1.02/0.91  thf(func_def_2, type, vEPSILON: !>[X0: $tType]:((X0 > $o) > X0)).
% 1.02/0.91  thf(func_def_8, type, sK0: a > $o).
% 1.02/0.91  thf(func_def_9, type, sK1: a > $o).
% 1.02/0.91  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.02/0.91    $false),
% 1.02/0.91    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.02/0.91  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.02/0.91    ((^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))) != (^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))))),
% 1.02/0.91    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.02/0.91  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.02/0.91    ((^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))) != (^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))))),
% 1.02/0.91    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f6,f7])).
% 1.02/0.91  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.02/0.91    ? [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : ((^[Y0 : a]: ((X0 @ Y0) & (X1 @ Y0))) != (^[Y0 : a]: ((X0 @ Y0) & (X1 @ Y0)))) => ((^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))) != (^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))))),
% 1.02/0.91    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.02/0.91  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.02/0.91    ? [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : ((^[Y0 : a]: ((X0 @ Y0) & (X1 @ Y0))) != (^[Y0 : a]: ((X0 @ Y0) & (X1 @ Y0))))),
% 1.02/0.91    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.02/0.91  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.02/0.91    ~! [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : ((^[Y0 : a]: ((X0 @ Y0) & (X1 @ Y0))) = (^[Y0 : a]: ((X0 @ Y0) & (X1 @ Y0))))),
% 1.02/0.91    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.02/0.91  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.02/0.91    ~! [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : ((^[X2 : a] : ((X1 @ X2) & (X0 @ X2))) = (^[X3 : a] : ((X1 @ X3) & (X0 @ X3))))),
% 1.02/0.91    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.02/0.91  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.02/0.91    ~! [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : ((^[X2 : a] : ((X1 @ X2) & (X0 @ X2))) = (^[X2 : a] : ((X1 @ X2) & (X0 @ X2))))),
% 1.02/0.91    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.02/0.91  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.02/0.91    ! [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : ((^[X2 : a] : ((X1 @ X2) & (X0 @ X2))) = (^[X2 : a] : ((X1 @ X2) & (X0 @ X2))))),
% 1.02/0.91    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lFxGdCGhDn/DTF2THF_26782.p',cGAZING_THM25_pme)).
% 1.02/0.91  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_26782
% 1.02/0.91  % (26882)------------------------------
% 1.02/0.91  % (26882)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.02/0.91  % (26882)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.02/0.91  
% 1.02/0.91  % (26882)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.02/0.91  % (26882)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.02/0.91  % (26882)------------------------------
% 1.02/0.91  % (26882)------------------------------
% 1.02/0.91  % (26879)Success in time 0.01 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------