↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEU844^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:37:34 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.50s 1.25s
% Output   : Refutation 1.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (   3 unt;   0 typ;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  200 (  59 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  164 (  37   ~;  32   |;  17   &;  60   @)
%                                         (   4 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   24 (  24   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   13 (  10 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   0   ^;  34   !;   6   ?;  40   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    cS: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    cT: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    vEPSILON: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    sK0: a ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    sK1: a ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    ph3: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f64,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f24,f29,f34,f35,f52,f61]) ).

thf(f61,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f60]) ).

thf(f60,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f59]) ).

thf(f59,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f19,f55]) ).

thf(f55,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a > $o] :
        ( ( X0 @ sK0 )
        = $true )
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f53]) ).

thf(f53,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a > $o] :
        ( ( ( X0 @ sK0 )
          = $true )
        | ( $false = $true ) )
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f28,f37]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ! [X2: a > $o,X3: a > $o,X4: a] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( X2 @ X4 ) )
      | ( ( X3 @ X4 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f36]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ! [X2: a > $o,X3: a > $o,X4: a] :
      ( ( X3 @ X4 )
      = ( X2 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(argument_congruence,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X2: a > $o,X3: a > $o] : ( X2 = X3 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ( cS @ sK0 )
         != $true )
        & ( ( cT @ sK0 )
          = $true ) )
      | ( ( ( cT @ sK1 )
         != $true )
        & ( ( cS @ sK1 )
          = $true ) ) )
    & ! [X2: a > $o,X3: a > $o] : ( X2 = X3 ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f7,f9,f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a] :
        ( ( ( cS @ X0 )
         != $true )
        & ( $true
          = ( cT @ X0 ) ) )
   => ( ( ( cS @ sK0 )
       != $true )
      & ( ( cT @ sK0 )
        = $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X1: a] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( cT @ X1 ) )
        & ( ( cS @ X1 )
          = $true ) )
   => ( ( ( cT @ sK1 )
       != $true )
      & ( ( cS @ sK1 )
        = $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ( ? [X0: a] :
          ( ( ( cS @ X0 )
           != $true )
          & ( $true
            = ( cT @ X0 ) ) )
      | ? [X1: a] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( cT @ X1 ) )
          & ( ( cS @ X1 )
            = $true ) ) )
    & ! [X2: a > $o,X3: a > $o] : ( X2 = X3 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ( ? [X3: a] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( cS @ X3 ) )
          & ( ( cT @ X3 )
            = $true ) )
      | ? [X2: a] :
          ( ( ( cT @ X2 )
           != $true )
          & ( ( cS @ X2 )
            = $true ) ) )
    & ! [X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o] : ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ( ! [X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o] : ( X0 = X1 )
     => ( ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( ( cT @ X3 )
              = $true )
           => ( $true
              = ( cS @ X3 ) ) )
        & ! [X2: a] :
            ( ( ( cS @ X2 )
              = $true )
           => ( ( cT @ X2 )
              = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ( ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] : ( X0 = X1 )
     => ( ! [X2: a] :
            ( ( cS @ X2 )
           => ( cT @ X2 ) )
        & ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( cT @ X3 )
           => ( cS @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o] : ( X0 = X1 )
     => ( ! [X2: a] :
            ( ( cS @ X2 )
           => ( cT @ X2 ) )
        & ! [X2: a] :
            ( ( cT @ X2 )
           => ( cS @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ( ! [X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o] : ( X0 = X1 )
   => ( ! [X2: a] :
          ( ( cS @ X2 )
         => ( cT @ X2 ) )
      & ! [X2: a] :
          ( ( cT @ X2 )
         => ( cS @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KAbvPESplC/DTF2THF_11846.p',cGAZING_THM8_pme) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ( ( cT @ sK0 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f26]) ).

thf(f26,definition,
    ( spl2_3
  <=> ( ( cT @ sK0 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( ( cS @ sK0 )
     != $true )
    | spl2_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f17]) ).

thf(f17,definition,
    ( spl2_1
  <=> ( ( cS @ sK0 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f52,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_2
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f51]) ).

thf(f51,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl2_2
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f48]) ).

thf(f48,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ~ spl2_2
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f33,f44]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a > $o] :
        ( ( X0 @ sK1 )
        = $true )
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f41]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a > $o] :
        ( ( ( X0 @ sK1 )
          = $true )
        | ( $false = $true ) )
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f23,f37]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( ( cS @ sK1 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f21]) ).

thf(f21,definition,
    ( spl2_2
  <=> ( ( cS @ sK1 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( ( ( cT @ sK1 )
     != $true )
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f31]) ).

thf(f31,definition,
    ( spl2_4
  <=> ( ( cT @ sK1 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f15,f17,f31]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( ( cT @ sK1 )
     != $true )
    | ( ( cS @ sK0 )
     != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( spl2_3
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f13,f31,f26]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( ( cT @ sK0 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( cT @ sK1 )
     != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( spl2_3
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f12,f21,f26]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( ( cT @ sK0 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( cS @ sK1 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f14,f21,f17]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( ( cS @ sK0 )
     != $true )
    | ( ( cS @ sK1 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU844^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.18/0.34  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.18/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.18/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:36:33 EST 2026
% 0.18/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.28/0.47  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.28/0.47  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.28/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.47  % File     : SEU844^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.28/0.47  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.28/0.47  % Problem  : TPS problem GAZING-THM8
% 0.28/0.47  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.28/0.47  % English  :
% 0.28/0.47  
% 0.28/0.47  % Refs     : [Bar92] Barker-Plummer D (1992), Gazing: An Approach to the Pr
% 0.28/0.47  %          : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.28/0.47  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.28/0.47  % Names    : tps_0208 [Bro09]
% 0.28/0.47  %          : 8 [Bar92]
% 0.28/0.47  %          : GAZING-THM8 [TPS]
% 0.28/0.47  
% 0.28/0.47  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.28/0.47  % Rating   : 0.11 v9.1.0, 0.12 v9.0.0, 0.20 v8.2.0, 0.08 v8.1.0, 0.09 v7.5.0, 0.14 v7.4.0, 0.22 v7.2.0, 0.12 v7.0.0, 0.14 v6.4.0, 0.17 v6.3.0, 0.20 v6.2.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v5.3.0, 0.40 v5.2.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.00 v4.0.0
% 0.28/0.47  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    4 (   0 unt;   3 typ;   0 def)
% 0.28/0.47  %            Number of atoms       :    5 (   1 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.28/0.47  %            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   5 avg)
% 0.28/0.47  %            Number of connectives :    8 (   0   ~;   0   |;   1   &;   4   @)
% 0.28/0.47  %                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.28/0.47  %            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   6 avg)
% 0.28/0.47  %            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
% 0.28/0.47  %            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.28/0.47  %            Number of symbols     :    3 (   2 usr;   0 con; 1-2 aty)
% 0.28/0.47  %            Number of variables   :    4 (   0   ^;   4   !;   0   ?;   4   :)
% 0.28/0.47  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.28/0.47  
% 0.28/0.47  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.28/0.47  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.28/0.47  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.28/0.47  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.28/0.47  %          : Polymorphic definitions expanded.
% 0.28/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.47  thf(a_type,type,
% 0.28/0.47      a: $tType ).
% 0.28/0.47  
% 0.28/0.47  thf(cS,type,
% 0.28/0.47      cS: a > $o ).
% 0.28/0.47  
% 0.28/0.47  thf(cT,type,
% 0.28/0.47      cT: a > $o ).
% 0.28/0.47  
% 0.28/0.47  thf(cGAZING_THM8_pme,conjecture,
% 0.28/0.47      ( ! [S0: a > $o,T0: a > $o] : ( S0 = T0 )
% 0.28/0.47     => ( ! [Xx: a] :
% 0.28/0.47            ( ( cS @ Xx )
% 0.28/0.47           => ( cT @ Xx ) )
% 0.28/0.47        & ! [Xx: a] :
% 0.28/0.47            ( ( cT @ Xx )
% 0.28/0.47           => ( cS @ Xx ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.28/0.47  
% 0.28/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.47  ------------------------
% 1.50/1.22  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.50/1.22  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.50/1.22  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:36:34 EST 2026
% 1.50/1.22  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.50/1.22  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.50/1.22  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.50/1.22  
% 1.50/1.22  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KAbvPESplC/DTF2DTF11846.p
% See solution above
% 1.50/1.22  ------------------------
% 1.50/1.23  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.50/1.23  thf(a_type,type,
% 1.50/1.23      a: $tType ).
% 1.50/1.23  
% 1.50/1.23  thf(cS,type,
% 1.50/1.23      cS: a > $o ).
% 1.50/1.23  
% 1.50/1.23  thf(cT,type,
% 1.50/1.23      cT: a > $o ).
% 1.50/1.23  
% 1.50/1.23  thf(cGAZING_THM8_pme,conjecture,
% 1.50/1.23      ( ! [S0: a > $o,T0: a > $o] : ( S0 = T0 )
% 1.50/1.23     => ( ! [Xx: a] :
% 1.50/1.23            ( ( cS @ Xx )
% 1.50/1.23           => ( cT @ Xx ) )
% 1.50/1.23        & ! [Xx: a] :
% 1.50/1.23            ( ( cT @ Xx )
% 1.50/1.23           => ( cS @ Xx ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.50/1.23  ------------------------
% 1.50/1.24  % (12114)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_11846 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.50/1.24  % (12112)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_11846 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 1.50/1.24  % (12114)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.50/1.24  % (12114)------------------------------
% 1.50/1.24  % (12114)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.50/1.24  % (12114)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.50/1.24  % (12114)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.50/1.24  
% 1.50/1.24  % (12114)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.50/1.24  % (12114)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.50/1.24  % (12114)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 1.50/1.24  % (12114)------------------------------
% 1.50/1.24  % (12114)------------------------------
% 1.50/1.25  % (12112)First to succeed.
% 1.50/1.25  % (12112)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.50/1.25  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_11846
% 1.50/1.25  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_11846
% 1.50/1.25  thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(func_def_1, type, cS: a > $o).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(func_def_2, type, cT: a > $o).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(func_def_4, type, vEPSILON: !>[X0: $tType]:((X0 > $o) > X0)).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(func_def_7, type, sK0: a).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(func_def_8, type, sK1: a).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(func_def_10, type, ph3: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f64,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    $false),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f24,f29,f34,f35,f52,f61])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f61,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    spl2_1 | ~spl2_3),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f60])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f60,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    $false | (spl2_1 | ~spl2_3)),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f59])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f59,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ($true != $true) | (spl2_1 | ~spl2_3)),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f19,f55])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f55,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ( ! [X0 : a > $o] : (((X0 @ sK0) = $true)) ) | ~spl2_3),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f53])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f53,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ( ! [X0 : a > $o] : (((X0 @ sK0) = $true) | ($false = $true)) ) | ~spl2_3),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f28,f37])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f37,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ( ! [X2 : a > $o,X3 : a > $o,X4 : a] : (($false = (X2 @ X4)) | ((X3 @ X4) = $true)) )),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f36])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f36,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ( ! [X2 : a > $o,X3 : a > $o,X4 : a] : (((X3 @ X4) = (X2 @ X4))) )),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(argument_congruence,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ( ! [X2 : a > $o,X3 : a > $o] : ((X2 = X3)) )),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ((((cS @ sK0) != $true) & ((cT @ sK0) = $true)) | (((cT @ sK1) != $true) & ((cS @ sK1) = $true))) & ! [X2 : a > $o,X3 : a > $o] : (X2 = X3)),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f7,f9,f8])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ? [X0 : a] : (((cS @ X0) != $true) & ($true = (cT @ X0))) => (((cS @ sK0) != $true) & ((cT @ sK0) = $true))),
% 1.50/1.25    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ? [X1 : a] : (($true != (cT @ X1)) & ((cS @ X1) = $true)) => (((cT @ sK1) != $true) & ((cS @ sK1) = $true))),
% 1.50/1.25    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    (? [X0 : a] : (((cS @ X0) != $true) & ($true = (cT @ X0))) | ? [X1 : a] : (($true != (cT @ X1)) & ((cS @ X1) = $true))) & ! [X2 : a > $o,X3 : a > $o] : (X2 = X3)),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    (? [X3 : a] : (($true != (cS @ X3)) & ((cT @ X3) = $true)) | ? [X2 : a] : (((cT @ X2) != $true) & ((cS @ X2) = $true))) & ! [X1 : a > $o,X0 : a > $o] : (X0 = X1)),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ~(! [X1 : a > $o,X0 : a > $o] : (X0 = X1) => (! [X3 : a] : (((cT @ X3) = $true) => ($true = (cS @ X3))) & ! [X2 : a] : (((cS @ X2) = $true) => ((cT @ X2) = $true))))),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ~(! [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : (X0 = X1) => (! [X2 : a] : ((cS @ X2) => (cT @ X2)) & ! [X3 : a] : ((cT @ X3) => (cS @ X3))))),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.50/1.25    ~(! [X1 : a > $o,X0 : a > $o] : (X0 = X1) => (! [X2 : a] : ((cS @ X2) => (cT @ X2)) & ! [X2 : a] : ((cT @ X2) => (cS @ X2))))),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.50/1.25    ! [X1 : a > $o,X0 : a > $o] : (X0 = X1) => (! [X2 : a] : ((cS @ X2) => (cT @ X2)) & ! [X2 : a] : ((cT @ X2) => (cS @ X2)))),
% 1.50/1.25    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KAbvPESplC/DTF2THF_11846.p',cGAZING_THM8_pme)).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f28,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ((cT @ sK0) = $true) | ~spl2_3),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f26])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f26,definition,(
% 1.50/1.25    spl2_3 <=> ((cT @ sK0) = $true)),
% 1.50/1.25    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_3])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f19,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ((cS @ sK0) != $true) | spl2_1),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f17])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f17,definition,(
% 1.50/1.25    spl2_1 <=> ((cS @ sK0) = $true)),
% 1.50/1.25    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_1])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f52,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ~spl2_2 | spl2_4),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f51])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f51,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    $false | (~spl2_2 | spl2_4)),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f48])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f48,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ($true != $true) | (~spl2_2 | spl2_4)),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f33,f44])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f44,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ( ! [X0 : a > $o] : (((X0 @ sK1) = $true)) ) | ~spl2_2),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f41])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f41,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ( ! [X0 : a > $o] : (((X0 @ sK1) = $true) | ($false = $true)) ) | ~spl2_2),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f23,f37])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f23,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ((cS @ sK1) = $true) | ~spl2_2),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f21])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f21,definition,(
% 1.50/1.25    spl2_2 <=> ((cS @ sK1) = $true)),
% 1.50/1.25    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_2])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f33,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ((cT @ sK1) != $true) | spl2_4),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f31])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f31,definition,(
% 1.50/1.25    spl2_4 <=> ((cT @ sK1) = $true)),
% 1.50/1.25    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_4])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f35,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ~spl2_4 | ~spl2_1),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f15,f17,f31])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ((cT @ sK1) != $true) | ((cS @ sK0) != $true)),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f34,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    spl2_3 | ~spl2_4),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f13,f31,f26])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ((cT @ sK0) = $true) | ((cT @ sK1) != $true)),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f29,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    spl2_3 | spl2_2),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f12,f21,f26])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ((cT @ sK0) = $true) | ((cS @ sK1) = $true)),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f24,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ~spl2_1 | spl2_2),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f14,f21,f17])).
% 1.50/1.25  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.50/1.25    ((cS @ sK0) != $true) | ((cS @ sK1) = $true)),
% 1.50/1.25    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.50/1.25  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_11846
% 1.50/1.25  % (12112)------------------------------
% 1.50/1.25  % (12112)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.50/1.25  % (12112)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.50/1.25  
% 1.50/1.25  % (12112)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.50/1.25  % (12112)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.50/1.25  % (12112)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.50/1.25  % (12112)------------------------------
% 1.50/1.25  % (12112)------------------------------
% 1.50/1.25  % (12109)Success in time 0.013 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------