↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEU846^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:37:34 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.49s 1.28s
% Output   : Refutation 1.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  235 (  98 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (  12 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  291 (  54   ~;  29   |;  54   &; 127   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  27  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   27 (  27   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   72 (   0   ^;  54   !;  18   ?;  72   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    sK0: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    sK1: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    sK2: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    sK3: a ).

thf(f22,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f21,f19]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f16,f18]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    & ( $true
     != ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    & ( ( $true
        = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) )
    & ! [X4: a] :
        ( ( ( sK2 @ X4 )
         != $true )
        | ( $true
          = ( sK1 @ X4 ) ) )
    & ! [X5: a] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( sK2 @ X5 ) )
        | ( $true
          = ( sK0 @ X5 ) ) )
    & ! [X6: a] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( sK1 @ X6 ) )
        | ( ( sK0 @ X6 )
         != $true ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f9,f11,f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ? [X3: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X3 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( X0 @ X3 )
             != $true )
            & ( ( ( X2 @ X3 )
                = $true )
              | ( ( X1 @ X3 )
               != $true ) ) )
        & ! [X4: a] :
            ( ( ( X2 @ X4 )
             != $true )
            | ( $true
              = ( X1 @ X4 ) ) )
        & ! [X5: a] :
            ( ( $true
             != ( X2 @ X5 ) )
            | ( $true
              = ( X0 @ X5 ) ) )
        & ! [X6: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X6 )
              = $true )
            | ( $true
             != ( X0 @ X6 ) ) ) )
   => ( ? [X3: a] :
          ( ( $true
            = ( sK1 @ X3 ) )
          & ( ( sK0 @ X3 )
           != $true )
          & ( ( ( sK2 @ X3 )
              = $true )
            | ( $true
             != ( sK1 @ X3 ) ) ) )
      & ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( ( sK2 @ X4 )
           != $true )
          | ( $true
            = ( sK1 @ X4 ) ) )
      & ! [X5: a] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( sK2 @ X5 ) )
          | ( $true
            = ( sK0 @ X5 ) ) )
      & ! [X6: a] :
          ( ( $true
            = ( sK1 @ X6 ) )
          | ( ( sK0 @ X6 )
           != $true ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ? [X3: a] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( sK1 @ X3 ) )
        & ( ( sK0 @ X3 )
         != $true )
        & ( ( ( sK2 @ X3 )
            = $true )
          | ( $true
           != ( sK1 @ X3 ) ) ) )
   => ( ( $true
        = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
      & ( $true
       != ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
      & ( ( $true
          = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
        | ( $true
         != ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ? [X3: a] :
          ( ( ( X1 @ X3 )
            = $true )
          & ( ( X0 @ X3 )
           != $true )
          & ( ( ( X2 @ X3 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( X1 @ X3 )
             != $true ) ) )
      & ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( ( X2 @ X4 )
           != $true )
          | ( $true
            = ( X1 @ X4 ) ) )
      & ! [X5: a] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( X2 @ X5 ) )
          | ( $true
            = ( X0 @ X5 ) ) )
      & ! [X6: a] :
          ( ( ( X1 @ X6 )
            = $true )
          | ( $true
           != ( X0 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ? [X6: a] :
          ( ( ( X1 @ X6 )
            = $true )
          & ( $true
           != ( X0 @ X6 ) )
          & ( ( $true
              = ( X2 @ X6 ) )
            | ( ( X1 @ X6 )
             != $true ) ) )
      & ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( ( X2 @ X4 )
           != $true )
          | ( $true
            = ( X1 @ X4 ) ) )
      & ! [X5: a] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( X2 @ X5 ) )
          | ( $true
            = ( X0 @ X5 ) ) )
      & ! [X3: a] :
          ( ( ( X1 @ X3 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X0 @ X3 )
           != $true ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
      ( ? [X6: a] :
          ( ( ( $true
              = ( X2 @ X6 ) )
            | ( ( X1 @ X6 )
             != $true ) )
          & ( ( X1 @ X6 )
            = $true )
          & ( $true
           != ( X0 @ X6 ) ) )
      & ! [X3: a] :
          ( ( ( X1 @ X3 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X0 @ X3 )
           != $true ) )
      & ! [X5: a] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( X2 @ X5 ) )
          | ( $true
            = ( X0 @ X5 ) ) )
      & ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( ( X2 @ X4 )
           != $true )
          | ( $true
            = ( X1 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ( ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( ( X0 @ X3 )
                = $true )
             => ( ( X1 @ X3 )
                = $true ) )
          & ! [X5: a] :
              ( ( $true
                = ( X2 @ X5 ) )
             => ( $true
                = ( X0 @ X5 ) ) )
          & ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( ( X2 @ X4 )
                = $true )
             => ( $true
                = ( X1 @ X4 ) ) ) )
       => ! [X6: a] :
            ( ( ( ( X1 @ X6 )
                = $true )
              & ( $true
               != ( X0 @ X6 ) ) )
           => ( ( $true
               != ( X2 @ X6 ) )
              & ( ( X1 @ X6 )
                = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( ( X0 @ X3 )
                = $true )
             => ( ( X1 @ X3 )
                = $true ) )
          & ! [X5: a] :
              ( ( $true
                = ( X2 @ X5 ) )
             => ( $true
                = ( X0 @ X5 ) ) )
          & ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( ( X2 @ X4 )
                = $true )
             => ( $true
                = ( X1 @ X4 ) ) ) )
       => ! [X6: a] :
            ( ( ( $true
               != ( X0 @ X6 ) )
              & ( ( X1 @ X6 )
                = $true ) )
           => ( ( ( X1 @ X6 )
                = $true )
              & ( $true
               != ( X2 @ X6 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X3 )
             => ( X1 @ X3 ) )
          & ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( X2 @ X4 )
             => ( X1 @ X4 ) )
          & ! [X5: a] :
              ( ( X2 @ X5 )
             => ( X0 @ X5 ) ) )
       => ! [X6: a] :
            ( ( ~ ( X0 @ X6 )
              & ( X1 @ X6 ) )
           => ( ( X1 @ X6 )
              & ~ ( X2 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X0: a > $o] :
        ( ( ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X3 )
             => ( X2 @ X3 ) )
          & ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X3 )
             => ( X2 @ X3 ) )
          & ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X3 )
             => ( X1 @ X3 ) ) )
       => ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( ~ ( X1 @ X3 )
              & ( X2 @ X3 ) )
           => ( ( X2 @ X3 )
              & ~ ( X0 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X0: a > $o] :
      ( ( ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ X3 )
           => ( X2 @ X3 ) )
        & ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ X3 )
           => ( X2 @ X3 ) )
        & ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ X3 )
           => ( X1 @ X3 ) ) )
     => ! [X3: a] :
          ( ( ~ ( X1 @ X3 )
            & ( X2 @ X3 ) )
         => ( ( X2 @ X3 )
            & ~ ( X0 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.57nratQ5IL/DTF2THF_3349.p',cGAZING_THM11_pme) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
     != ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f17,f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X5: a] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( sK0 @ X5 ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( sK2 @ X5 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU846^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.17/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:35:36 EST 2026
% 0.17/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.20/0.46  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.20/0.46  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.20/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.46  % File     : SEU846^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.20/0.46  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.20/0.46  % Problem  : TPS problem GAZING-THM11
% 0.20/0.46  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.20/0.46  % English  :
% 0.20/0.46  
% 0.20/0.46  % Refs     : [Bar92] Barker-Plummer D (1992), Gazing: An Approach to the Pr
% 0.20/0.46  %          : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.46  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.20/0.46  % Names    : tps_0268 [Bro09]
% 0.20/0.46  %          : 11 [Bar92]
% 0.20/0.46  %          : GAZING-THM11 [TPS]
% 0.20/0.46  
% 0.20/0.46  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.20/0.46  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.17 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.25 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.0.0
% 0.20/0.46  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    2 (   0 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
% 0.20/0.46  %            Number of atoms       :    0 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.20/0.46  %            Maximal formula atoms :    0 (   0 avg)
% 0.20/0.46  %            Number of connectives :   21 (   2   ~;   0   |;   4   &;  10   @)
% 0.20/0.46  %                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.46  %            Maximal formula depth :   10 (  10 avg)
% 0.20/0.46  %            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
% 0.20/0.46  %            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.20/0.46  %            Number of symbols     :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.20/0.46  %            Number of variables   :    7 (   0   ^;   7   !;   0   ?;   7   :)
% 0.20/0.46  % SPC      : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.20/0.46  
% 0.20/0.46  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.20/0.46  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.20/0.46  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.20/0.46  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.20/0.46  %          : Polymorphic definitions expanded.
% 0.20/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.46  thf(a_type,type,
% 0.20/0.46      a: $tType ).
% 0.20/0.46  
% 0.20/0.46  thf(cGAZING_THM11_pme,conjecture,
% 0.20/0.46      ! [S: a > $o,T: a > $o,U: a > $o] :
% 0.20/0.46        ( ( ! [Xx: a] :
% 0.20/0.46              ( ( S @ Xx )
% 0.20/0.46             => ( U @ Xx ) )
% 0.20/0.46          & ! [Xx: a] :
% 0.20/0.46              ( ( T @ Xx )
% 0.20/0.46             => ( U @ Xx ) )
% 0.20/0.46          & ! [Xx: a] :
% 0.20/0.46              ( ( S @ Xx )
% 0.20/0.46             => ( T @ Xx ) ) )
% 0.20/0.46       => ! [Xx: a] :
% 0.20/0.46            ( ( ( U @ Xx )
% 0.20/0.46              & ~ ( T @ Xx ) )
% 0.20/0.46           => ( ( U @ Xx )
% 0.20/0.46              & ~ ( S @ Xx ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.46  
% 0.20/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.46  ------------------------
% 1.49/1.25  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.49/1.25  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.49/1.25  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:35:37 EST 2026
% 1.49/1.25  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.49/1.25  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.49/1.25  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.49/1.25  
% 1.49/1.25  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.57nratQ5IL/DTF2DTF3349.p
% See solution above
% 1.49/1.25  ------------------------
% 1.49/1.26  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.49/1.26  thf(a_type,type,
% 1.49/1.26      a: $tType ).
% 1.49/1.26  
% 1.49/1.26  thf(cGAZING_THM11_pme,conjecture,
% 1.49/1.26      ! [S: a > $o,T: a > $o,U: a > $o] :
% 1.49/1.26        ( ( ! [Xx: a] :
% 1.49/1.26              ( ( S @ Xx )
% 1.49/1.26             => ( U @ Xx ) )
% 1.49/1.26          & ! [Xx: a] :
% 1.49/1.26              ( ( T @ Xx )
% 1.49/1.26             => ( U @ Xx ) )
% 1.49/1.26          & ! [Xx: a] :
% 1.49/1.26              ( ( S @ Xx )
% 1.49/1.26             => ( T @ Xx ) ) )
% 1.49/1.26       => ! [Xx: a] :
% 1.49/1.26            ( ( ( U @ Xx )
% 1.49/1.26              & ~ ( T @ Xx ) )
% 1.49/1.26           => ( ( U @ Xx )
% 1.49/1.26              & ~ ( S @ Xx ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.49/1.26  ------------------------
% 1.49/1.27  % (3542)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_3349 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.49/1.27  % (3538)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_3349 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.49/1.27  % (3542)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.49/1.27  % (3542)------------------------------
% 1.49/1.27  % (3542)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.49/1.27  % (3542)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.49/1.27  % (3542)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.49/1.27  
% 1.49/1.27  % (3542)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.49/1.27  % (3542)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.49/1.27  % (3542)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.49/1.27  % (3542)------------------------------
% 1.49/1.27  % (3542)------------------------------
% 1.49/1.27  % (3538)First to succeed.
% 1.49/1.28  % (3538)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.49/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_3349
% 1.49/1.28  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_3349
% 1.49/1.28  thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(func_def_4, type, sK0: a > $o).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(func_def_5, type, sK1: a > $o).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(func_def_6, type, sK2: a > $o).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(func_def_7, type, sK3: a).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f22,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    $false),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f21,f19])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f19,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ($true = (sK2 @ sK3))),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f16,f18])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ($true = (sK1 @ sK3))),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    (($true = (sK1 @ sK3)) & ($true != (sK0 @ sK3)) & (($true = (sK2 @ sK3)) | ($true != (sK1 @ sK3)))) & ! [X4 : a] : (((sK2 @ X4) != $true) | ($true = (sK1 @ X4))) & ! [X5 : a] : (($true != (sK2 @ X5)) | ($true = (sK0 @ X5))) & ! [X6 : a] : (($true = (sK1 @ X6)) | ((sK0 @ X6) != $true))),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f9,f11,f10])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ? [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o] : (? [X3 : a] : (((X1 @ X3) = $true) & ((X0 @ X3) != $true) & (((X2 @ X3) = $true) | ((X1 @ X3) != $true))) & ! [X4 : a] : (((X2 @ X4) != $true) | ($true = (X1 @ X4))) & ! [X5 : a] : (($true != (X2 @ X5)) | ($true = (X0 @ X5))) & ! [X6 : a] : (((X1 @ X6) = $true) | ($true != (X0 @ X6)))) => (? [X3 : a] : (($true = (sK1 @ X3)) & ((sK0 @ X3) != $true) & (((sK2 @ X3) = $true) | ($true != (sK1 @ X3)))) & ! [X4 : a] : (((sK2 @ X4) != $true) | ($true = (sK1 @ X4))) & ! [X5 : a] : (($true != (sK2 @ X5)) | ($true = (sK0 @ X5))) & ! [X6 : a] : (($true = (sK1 @ X6)) | ((sK0 @ X6) != $true)))),
% 1.49/1.28    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ? [X3 : a] : (($true = (sK1 @ X3)) & ((sK0 @ X3) != $true) & (((sK2 @ X3) = $true) | ($true != (sK1 @ X3)))) => (($true = (sK1 @ sK3)) & ($true != (sK0 @ sK3)) & (($true = (sK2 @ sK3)) | ($true != (sK1 @ sK3))))),
% 1.49/1.28    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ? [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o] : (? [X3 : a] : (((X1 @ X3) = $true) & ((X0 @ X3) != $true) & (((X2 @ X3) = $true) | ((X1 @ X3) != $true))) & ! [X4 : a] : (((X2 @ X4) != $true) | ($true = (X1 @ X4))) & ! [X5 : a] : (($true != (X2 @ X5)) | ($true = (X0 @ X5))) & ! [X6 : a] : (((X1 @ X6) = $true) | ($true != (X0 @ X6))))),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ? [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o] : (? [X6 : a] : (((X1 @ X6) = $true) & ($true != (X0 @ X6)) & (($true = (X2 @ X6)) | ((X1 @ X6) != $true))) & ! [X4 : a] : (((X2 @ X4) != $true) | ($true = (X1 @ X4))) & ! [X5 : a] : (($true != (X2 @ X5)) | ($true = (X0 @ X5))) & ! [X3 : a] : (((X1 @ X3) = $true) | ((X0 @ X3) != $true)))),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ? [X0 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : (? [X6 : a] : ((($true = (X2 @ X6)) | ((X1 @ X6) != $true)) & (((X1 @ X6) = $true) & ($true != (X0 @ X6)))) & (! [X3 : a] : (((X1 @ X3) = $true) | ((X0 @ X3) != $true)) & ! [X5 : a] : (($true != (X2 @ X5)) | ($true = (X0 @ X5))) & ! [X4 : a] : (((X2 @ X4) != $true) | ($true = (X1 @ X4)))))),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ~! [X0 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : ((! [X3 : a] : (((X0 @ X3) = $true) => ((X1 @ X3) = $true)) & ! [X5 : a] : (($true = (X2 @ X5)) => ($true = (X0 @ X5))) & ! [X4 : a] : (((X2 @ X4) = $true) => ($true = (X1 @ X4)))) => ! [X6 : a] : ((((X1 @ X6) = $true) & ($true != (X0 @ X6))) => (($true != (X2 @ X6)) & ((X1 @ X6) = $true))))),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ~! [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o] : ((! [X3 : a] : (((X0 @ X3) = $true) => ((X1 @ X3) = $true)) & ! [X5 : a] : (($true = (X2 @ X5)) => ($true = (X0 @ X5))) & ! [X4 : a] : (((X2 @ X4) = $true) => ($true = (X1 @ X4)))) => ! [X6 : a] : ((~($true = (X0 @ X6)) & ((X1 @ X6) = $true)) => (((X1 @ X6) = $true) & ~($true = (X2 @ X6)))))),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ~! [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o] : ((! [X3 : a] : ((X0 @ X3) => (X1 @ X3)) & ! [X4 : a] : ((X2 @ X4) => (X1 @ X4)) & ! [X5 : a] : ((X2 @ X5) => (X0 @ X5))) => ! [X6 : a] : ((~(X0 @ X6) & (X1 @ X6)) => ((X1 @ X6) & ~(X2 @ X6))))),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.49/1.28    ~! [X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o,X0 : a > $o] : ((! [X3 : a] : ((X1 @ X3) => (X2 @ X3)) & ! [X3 : a] : ((X0 @ X3) => (X2 @ X3)) & ! [X3 : a] : ((X0 @ X3) => (X1 @ X3))) => ! [X3 : a] : ((~(X1 @ X3) & (X2 @ X3)) => ((X2 @ X3) & ~(X0 @ X3))))),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.49/1.28    ! [X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o,X0 : a > $o] : ((! [X3 : a] : ((X1 @ X3) => (X2 @ X3)) & ! [X3 : a] : ((X0 @ X3) => (X2 @ X3)) & ! [X3 : a] : ((X0 @ X3) => (X1 @ X3))) => ! [X3 : a] : ((~(X1 @ X3) & (X2 @ X3)) => ((X2 @ X3) & ~(X0 @ X3))))),
% 1.49/1.28    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.57nratQ5IL/DTF2THF_3349.p',cGAZING_THM11_pme)).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ($true = (sK2 @ sK3)) | ($true != (sK1 @ sK3))),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ($true != (sK2 @ sK3))),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f20])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f20,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ($true != (sK2 @ sK3)) | ($true != $true)),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f17,f14])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ( ! [X5 : a] : (($true = (sK0 @ X5)) | ($true != (sK2 @ X5))) )),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.49/1.28  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.49/1.28    ($true != (sK0 @ sK3))),
% 1.49/1.28    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.49/1.28  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_3349
% 1.49/1.28  % (3538)------------------------------
% 1.49/1.28  % (3538)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.49/1.28  % (3538)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.49/1.28  
% 1.49/1.28  % (3538)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.49/1.28  % (3538)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.49/1.28  % (3538)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.49/1.28  % (3538)------------------------------
% 1.49/1.28  % (3538)------------------------------
% 1.49/1.28  % (3537)Success in time 0.004 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------