%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SEU846^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:27:59 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.09s 0.28s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 4 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 18 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 79 ( 13 ~; 6 |; 13 &; 37 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 6 ( 6 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 5 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 ^; 18 !; 0 ?; 18 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(decl_23,type,
epred1_0: a > $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
epred2_0: a > $o ).
thf(decl_25,type,
epred3_0: a > $o ).
thf(decl_26,type,
esk1_0: a ).
thf(cGAZING_THM11_pme,conjecture,
! [X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X3: a > $o] :
( ( ! [X4: a] :
( ( X1 @ X4 )
=> ( X3 @ X4 ) )
& ! [X4: a] :
( ( X2 @ X4 )
=> ( X3 @ X4 ) )
& ! [X4: a] :
( ( X1 @ X4 )
=> ( X2 @ X4 ) ) )
=> ! [X4: a] :
( ( ( X3 @ X4 )
& ~ ( X2 @ X4 ) )
=> ( ( X3 @ X4 )
& ~ ( X1 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.UdWDVA5QQN/E---3.1_1752245.p',cGAZING_THM11_pme) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X3: a > $o] :
( ( ! [X4: a] :
( ( X1 @ X4 )
=> ( X3 @ X4 ) )
& ! [X4: a] :
( ( X2 @ X4 )
=> ( X3 @ X4 ) )
& ! [X4: a] :
( ( X1 @ X4 )
=> ( X2 @ X4 ) ) )
=> ! [X4: a] :
( ( ( X3 @ X4 )
& ~ ( X2 @ X4 ) )
=> ( ( X3 @ X4 )
& ~ ( X1 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cGAZING_THM11_pme]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X15: a,X16: a,X17: a] :
( ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X15 )
| ( epred3_0 @ X15 ) )
& ( ~ ( epred2_0 @ X16 )
| ( epred3_0 @ X16 ) )
& ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X17 )
| ( epred2_0 @ X17 ) )
& ( epred3_0 @ esk1_0 )
& ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 )
& ( ~ ( epred3_0 @ esk1_0 )
| ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 )
| ~ ( epred3_0 @ esk1_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
epred3_0 @ esk1_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: a] :
( ( epred2_0 @ X4 )
| ~ ( epred1_0 @ X4 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
epred1_0 @ esk1_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEU846^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.20 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.20 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.20 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.20 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.20 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.20 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.20 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.20 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:39:31 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.20 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.20 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.25 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.26 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.UdWDVA5QQN/E---3.1_1752245.p
% 0.09/0.28 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.09/0.28 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.09/0.28 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.28 % Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.28 % Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.28 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.28 % Starting post_as_ho4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.28 % Starting post_as_ho2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.28 % Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.28 % Starting full_lambda_10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.28 % Starting new_ho_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.28 % new_bool_9 with pid 1752259 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Result found by new_bool_9
% 0.09/0.28 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.09/0.28 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.28 % Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.28 % Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.28 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0))
% 0.09/0.28 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
% 0.09/0.28 % Search class: HHUNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.09/0.28 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.09/0.28 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.28 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1752266 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.09/0.28 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.09/0.28 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.28 % Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.28 % Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.28 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0))
% 0.09/0.28 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
% 0.09/0.28 % Search class: HHUNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.09/0.28 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.09/0.28 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.28 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.09/0.28
% 0.09/0.28 % Proof found!
% 0.09/0.28 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.09/0.28 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.28 % Parsed axioms : 2
% 0.09/0.28 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1
% 0.09/0.28 % Initial clauses : 6
% 0.09/0.28 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.09/0.28 % Processed clauses : 4
% 0.09/0.28 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % ...remaining for further processing : 4
% 0.09/0.28 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Generated clauses : 1
% 0.09/0.28 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Paramodulations : 1
% 0.09/0.28 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % NegExts : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.09/0.28 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.28 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.28 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.28 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.28 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.28 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.28 % Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.09/0.28 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.09/0.28 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.09/0.28 % Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.09/0.28 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.09/0.28 % ...number of literals in the above : 4
% 0.09/0.28 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.09/0.28 % Termbank termtop insertions : 533
% 0.09/0.28 % Search garbage collected termcells : 205
% 0.09/0.28
% 0.09/0.28 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.28 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.09/0.28 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.09/0.28 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.09/0.28 % Maximum resident set size: 3576 pages
% 0.09/0.28
% 0.09/0.28 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.28 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.09/0.28 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.09/0.28 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.09/0.28 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.09/0.28 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------