↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEU848^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:31:48 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.27s
% Output   : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   73 (   9 unt;   0 typ;   8 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  338 (  87 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  337 (  74   ~; 116   |;   6   &; 122   @)
%                                         (  13 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   16 (  16   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   19 (  16 usr;  12 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   57 (   0 sgn  26   !;   8   ?;  57   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    vOR: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    sK0: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    sK1: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    sK2: a ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    sK4: a ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( ^ [X2: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X2 )
              | ( X1 @ X2 ) ) )
        = X0 )
    <=> ! [X3: a] :
          ( ( X1 @ X3 )
         => ( X0 @ X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cGAZING_THM38_pme) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ( ( ^ [X2: a] :
                ( ( X0 @ X2 )
                | ( X1 @ X2 ) ) )
          = X0 )
      <=> ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ X3 )
           => ( X0 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f3,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ( ( ^ [X2: a] :
                ( ( X0 @ X2 )
                | ( X1 @ X2 ) ) )
          = X0 )
      <=> ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ X3 )
           => ( X0 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
                | ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
          = X0 )
      <=> ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X3 )
              = $true )
           => ( ( X0 @ X3 )
              = $true ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o] :
        ( ! [X2: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
              = $true )
           => ( ( X0 @ X2 )
              = $true ) )
      <=> ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
                | ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
          = X0 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
              | ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
        = X0 )
    <~> ! [X2: a] :
          ( ( ( X0 @ X2 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X1 @ X2 )
           != $true ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o] :
      ( ( ? [X2: a] :
            ( ( ( X0 @ X2 )
             != $true )
            & ( ( X1 @ X2 )
              = $true ) )
        | ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
                | ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
         != X0 ) )
      & ( ! [X2: a] :
            ( ( ( X0 @ X2 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( X1 @ X2 )
             != $true ) )
        | ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
                | ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
          = X0 ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
      ( ( ? [X2: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
             != $true )
            & ( ( X0 @ X2 )
              = $true ) )
        | ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
                | ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
         != X1 ) )
      & ( ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X3 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( X0 @ X3 )
             != $true ) )
        | ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
                | ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
          = X1 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ( ( ( $true
         != ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
        & ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
          = $true ) )
      | ( sK1
       != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
              | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
    & ( ! [X3: a] :
          ( ( ( sK1 @ X3 )
            = $true )
          | ( $true
           != ( sK0 @ X3 ) ) )
      | ( sK1
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
              | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2)],[f8]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X3: a] :
      ( ( ( sK1 @ X3 )
        = $true )
      | ( sK1
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
              | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( sK0 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( sK1
     != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( sK1
     != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
    | ( $true
     != ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f15,definition,
    ( spl3_1
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
    | spl3_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f19,definition,
    ( spl3_2
  <=> ( sK1
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( sK1
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( sK1
     != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f12,f19,f15]) ).

thf(f24,definition,
    ( spl3_3
  <=> ! [X3: a] :
        ( ( ( sK1 @ X3 )
          = $true )
        | ( $true
         != ( sK0 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( ! [X3: a] :
        ( ( ( sK1 @ X3 )
          = $true )
        | ( $true
         != ( sK0 @ X3 ) ) )
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f24]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( spl3_2
    | spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f10,f24,f19]) ).

thf(f28,definition,
    ( spl3_4
  <=> ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_2
    | spl3_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f11,f28,f19]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
        @ sK4 )
     != ( sK1 @ sK4 ) )
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK4 ) )
    | ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
        @ sK4 )
      = $true )
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f32]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
        @ sK4 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK4 )
      = $false )
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f32]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
        | ( sK1 @ sK4 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK4 )
      = $false )
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f34]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK4 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK4 )
      = $false )
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f35]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK4 )
      = $false )
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f36]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK4 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
        | ( sK1 @ sK4 ) ) )
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f33]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK4 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK4 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK4 ) )
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f39]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK4 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK4 ) )
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f40]) ).

thf(f43,definition,
    ( spl3_5
  <=> ( ( sK1 @ sK4 )
      = $false ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_5])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f45,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK4 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl3_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f43]) ).

thf(f51,plain,
    ( spl3_5
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f38,f19,f43]) ).

thf(f53,definition,
    ( spl3_7
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK4 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_7])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f55,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK4 ) )
    | ~ spl3_7 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f53]) ).

thf(f57,definition,
    ( spl3_8
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK4 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_8])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f60,plain,
    ( spl3_7
    | spl3_8
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f41,f19,f57,f53]) ).

thf(f61,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( sK1 @ X1 )
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
              | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
          @ X1 ) )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(argument_congruence,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f62,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
                | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
            @ X1 )
          = $false )
        | ( $true
          = ( sK1 @ X1 ) ) )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(iff_proxy_clausification,[],[f61]) ).

thf(f66,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( sK1 @ X1 ) )
        | ( ( ( sK0 @ X1 )
            | ( sK1 @ X1 ) )
          = $false ) )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f62]) ).

thf(f68,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( sK1 @ X1 ) )
        | ( ( sK0 @ X1 )
          = $false ) )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f66]) ).

thf(f69,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $false )
    | ( $true != $true )
    | spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f17,f68]) ).

thf(f71,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $false )
    | spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f69]) ).

thf(f74,definition,
    ( spl3_9
  <=> ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $false ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_9])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f76,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl3_9 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f74]) ).

thf(f77,plain,
    ( spl3_9
    | spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f71,f19,f15,f74]) ).

thf(f81,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl3_4
    | ~ spl3_9 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f30,f76]) ).

thf(f82,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_4
    | ~ spl3_9 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f81]) ).

thf(f83,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_4
    | ~ spl3_9 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f82]) ).

thf(f91,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( $true
     != ( sK0 @ sK4 ) )
    | ~ spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_5 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f25,f45]) ).

thf(f93,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( sK0 @ sK4 ) )
    | ~ spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_5 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f91]) ).

thf(f99,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_8
    | ~ spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f93,f43,f24,f57]) ).

thf(f100,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl3_5
    | ~ spl3_7 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f55,f45]) ).

thf(f101,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_5
    | ~ spl3_7 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f100]) ).

thf(f102,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_5
    | ~ spl3_7 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f101]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f22]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( spl3_2
    | spl3_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f26]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_2
    | spl3_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f31]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    ( spl3_2
    | spl3_5 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f51]) ).

cnf(s6,plain,
    ( spl3_2
    | spl3_7
    | spl3_8 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f60]) ).

cnf(s7,plain,
    ( spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_2
    | spl3_9 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f77]) ).

cnf(s9,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_4
    | ~ spl3_9 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f83]) ).

cnf(s14,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_5
    | ~ spl3_8 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f99]) ).

cnf(s15,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_5
    | ~ spl3_7 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f102]) ).

cnf(s18,plain,
    spl3_2,
    inference(rat,[],[s6,s14,s15,s2,s5]) ).

cnf(s19,plain,
    spl3_4,
    inference(rat,[],[s3,s18]) ).

cnf(s20,plain,
    ~ spl3_9,
    inference(rat,[],[s9,s19]) ).

cnf(s21,plain,
    ~ spl3_1,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s18]) ).

cnf(s22,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s7,s21,s18,s20]) ).

thf(f104,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s22]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU848^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.19  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:45:51 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.20  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.23  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.24  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.27  % (1340031)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.22/0.27  % (1340039)dis+1002_4:1_sfv=off:to=lpo:plsq=on:fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:spb=non_intro:acc=on:uwa=off:fd=preordered:foolp=on:s2agt=32:slsqc=1:slsq=on:random_seed=1591862007:hsq=on:hsqr=16,1:s2a=on:i=634:add=on:nm=16:nicw=on:rtra=on:gtg=position:ss=included:ixr=off:c=on:inj=on:ntd=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/634Mi)
% 0.22/0.27  % (1340039) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-1340031-1340039"...
% 0.22/0.27  % (1340039)...printing done.
% 0.22/0.27  % (1340042)WARNING Broken Constraint: if ho_split_queue_ratios(1,8) has been set then ho_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.22/0.27  % (1340042)WARNING Broken Constraint: if sine_to_age_tolerance(5) has been set then sine_to_age(off) is equal to on or sine_to_pred_levels(off) is not equal to off or sine_level_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.22/0.27  % (1340039)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.22/0.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.27  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.27  % (1340039)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.27  % (1340039)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.22/0.27  % (1340039)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.22/0.27  % (1340039)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.22/0.27  % (1340039)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/0.27  % (1340039)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.27  % (1340039)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.22/0.27  % (1340039)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.22/0.27  % (1340031)Success in time 0.019 s
% 0.22/0.27  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------