↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEU849^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:37:35 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.62s 1.32s
% Output   : Refutation 1.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   60 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   7 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  346 (  99 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  354 (  71   ~;  87   |;  41   &; 135   @)
%                                         (  12 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   18 (  18   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   16 (  13 usr;  11 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   65 (  24   ^;  28   !;  13   ?;  65   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    vEPSILON: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    sK0: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    sK1: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    sK2: a ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    ph4: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    sK5: a ).

thf(f95,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f23,f28,f33,f51,f83,f87,f88,f94]) ).

thf(f94,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_5
    | ~ spl3_8 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f93]) ).

thf(f93,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_5
    | ~ spl3_8 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f92]) ).

thf(f92,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_5
    | ~ spl3_8 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f91,f82]) ).

thf(f82,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | ~ spl3_8 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f80]) ).

thf(f80,definition,
    ( spl3_8
  <=> ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_8])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f91,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_5 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f90]) ).

thf(f90,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $true != $true )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_5 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f18,f69]) ).

thf(f69,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
    | ~ spl3_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f67]) ).

thf(f67,definition,
    ( spl3_5
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_5])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ! [X3: a] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( sK1 @ X3 ) )
        | ( ( sK0 @ X3 )
          = $true ) )
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f17]) ).

thf(f17,definition,
    ( spl3_1
  <=> ! [X3: a] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( sK1 @ X3 ) )
        | ( ( sK0 @ X3 )
          = $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f88,plain,
    ( spl3_5
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f65,f20,f67]) ).

thf(f20,definition,
    ( spl3_2
  <=> ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
      = sK1 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f65,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[status(thm)],[f63]) ).

thf(f63,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f59]) ).

thf(f59,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f58]) ).

thf(f58,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
     != ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f57]) ).

thf(f57,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
        @ sK5 )
     != ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[status(thm)],[f21]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
     != sK1 )
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f20]) ).

thf(f87,plain,
    ( spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_7 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f86]) ).

thf(f86,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_7 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f85]) ).

thf(f85,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_7 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f65,f78]) ).

thf(f78,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
    | ~ spl3_7 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f76]) ).

thf(f76,definition,
    ( spl3_7
  <=> ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_7])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f83,plain,
    ( spl3_7
    | spl3_8
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f62,f20,f80,f76]) ).

thf(f62,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[status(thm)],[f61]) ).

thf(f61,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f60]) ).

thf(f60,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f58]) ).

thf(f51,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_2
    | spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f50]) ).

thf(f50,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_2
    | spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f45]) ).

thf(f45,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl3_2
    | spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f32,f44]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl3_2
    | spl3_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f43]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl3_2
    | spl3_3 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f27,f40]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
        | ( ( sK1 @ X1 )
          = $false ) )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f36]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( ( ( sK0 @ X1 )
            & ( sK1 @ X1 ) )
          = $true )
        | ( ( sK1 @ X1 )
          = $false ) )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f35]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( ( sK0 @ X1 )
          & ( sK1 @ X1 ) )
        = ( sK1 @ X1 ) )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f34]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( sK1 @ X1 )
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
              & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
          @ X1 ) )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(argument_congruence,[status(thm)],[f22]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
      = sK1 )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f20]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    | spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f25]) ).

thf(f25,definition,
    ( spl3_3
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f30]) ).

thf(f30,definition,
    ( spl3_4
  <=> ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( spl3_4
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f15,f20,f30]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
     != sK1 )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
              & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
       != sK1 )
      | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
          = $true )
        & ( $true
         != ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ) )
    & ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
              & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
        = sK1 )
      | ! [X3: a] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( sK1 @ X3 ) )
          | ( ( sK0 @ X3 )
            = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f9,f11,f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                  ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
                  & ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
           != X1 )
          | ? [X2: a] :
              ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
                = $true )
              & ( ( X0 @ X2 )
               != $true ) ) )
        & ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                  ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
                  & ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
            = X1 )
          | ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( $true
               != ( X1 @ X3 ) )
              | ( $true
                = ( X0 @ X3 ) ) ) ) )
   => ( ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
                & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
         != sK1 )
        | ? [X2: a] :
            ( ( $true
              = ( sK1 @ X2 ) )
            & ( $true
             != ( sK0 @ X2 ) ) ) )
      & ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
                & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
          = sK1 )
        | ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( $true
             != ( sK1 @ X3 ) )
            | ( ( sK0 @ X3 )
              = $true ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ? [X2: a] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( sK1 @ X2 ) )
        & ( $true
         != ( sK0 @ X2 ) ) )
   => ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
        = $true )
      & ( $true
       != ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
                & ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
         != X1 )
        | ? [X2: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( X0 @ X2 )
             != $true ) ) )
      & ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
                & ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
          = X1 )
        | ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( $true
             != ( X1 @ X3 ) )
            | ( $true
              = ( X0 @ X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
                & ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
         != X1 )
        | ? [X2: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( X0 @ X2 )
             != $true ) ) )
      & ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
                & ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
          = X1 )
        | ! [X2: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
             != $true )
            | ( ( X0 @ X2 )
              = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
      ( ! [X2: a] :
          ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( X0 @ X2 )
            = $true ) )
    <~> ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
              & ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
        = X1 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ! [X2: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
              = $true )
           => ( ( X0 @ X2 )
              = $true ) )
      <=> ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
                & ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
          = X1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
                & ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
          = X1 )
      <=> ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( $true
              = ( X1 @ X3 ) )
           => ( $true
              = ( X0 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ( X1
          = ( ^ [X2: a] :
                ( ( X1 @ X2 )
                & ( X0 @ X2 ) ) ) )
      <=> ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ X3 )
           => ( X0 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o] :
        ( ( X0
          = ( ^ [X2: a] :
                ( ( X0 @ X2 )
                & ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) )
      <=> ! [X2: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ X2 )
           => ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o] :
      ( ( X0
        = ( ^ [X2: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X2 )
              & ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) )
    <=> ! [X2: a] :
          ( ( X0 @ X2 )
         => ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.M55bG1ZwQH/DTF2THF_3405.p',cGAZING_THM39_pme) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f14,f20,f25]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
     != sK1 )
    | ( $true
     != ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( spl3_1
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f13,f20,f17]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ! [X3: a] :
      ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
              & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
        = sK1 )
      | ( $true
       != ( sK1 @ X3 ) )
      | ( ( sK0 @ X3 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU849^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:35:36 EST 2026
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.19/0.45  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.19/0.46  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.19/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46  % File     : SEU849^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.19/0.46  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.19/0.46  % Problem  : TPS problem GAZING-THM39
% 0.19/0.46  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.19/0.46  % English  :
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  % Refs     : [Bar92] Barker-Plummer D (1992), Gazing: An Approach to the Pr
% 0.19/0.46  %          : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.46  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.19/0.46  % Names    : tps_0342 [Bro09]
% 0.19/0.46  %          : 39 [Bar92]
% 0.19/0.46  %          : GAZING-THM39 [TPS]
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.19/0.46  % Rating   : 0.00 v8.2.0, 0.15 v8.1.0, 0.09 v7.5.0, 0.00 v7.4.0, 0.11 v7.2.0, 0.00 v7.1.0, 0.12 v7.0.0, 0.14 v6.4.0, 0.17 v6.3.0, 0.20 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v5.3.0, 0.40 v5.2.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.00 v4.0.1, 0.33 v4.0.0
% 0.19/0.46  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    2 (   1 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Number of atoms       :    1 (   1 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Number of connectives :    7 (   0   ~;   0   |;   1   &;   4   @)
% 0.19/0.46  %                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   7 avg)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Number of type conns  :    2 (   2   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Number of symbols     :    1 (   0 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Number of variables   :    4 (   1   ^;   3   !;   0   ?;   4   :)
% 0.19/0.46  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.19/0.46  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.19/0.46  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.19/0.46  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.19/0.46  %          : Polymorphic definitions expanded.
% 0.19/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46  thf(a_type,type,
% 0.19/0.46      a: $tType ).
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  thf(cGAZING_THM39_pme,conjecture,
% 0.19/0.46      ! [S: a > $o,T: a > $o] :
% 0.19/0.46        ( ( ( ^ [Xx: a] :
% 0.19/0.46                ( ( S @ Xx )
% 0.19/0.46                & ( T @ Xx ) ) )
% 0.19/0.46          = S )
% 0.19/0.46      <=> ! [Xx: a] :
% 0.19/0.46            ( ( S @ Xx )
% 0.19/0.46           => ( T @ Xx ) ) ) ).
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46  ------------------------
% 1.42/1.29  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.42/1.29  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.42/1.29  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:35:37 EST 2026
% 1.42/1.29  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.42/1.29  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.42/1.29  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.42/1.29  
% 1.42/1.29  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.M55bG1ZwQH/DTF2DTF3405.p
% See solution above
% 1.42/1.29  ------------------------
% 1.62/1.30  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.62/1.30  thf(a_type,type,
% 1.62/1.30      a: $tType ).
% 1.62/1.30  
% 1.62/1.30  thf(cGAZING_THM39_pme,conjecture,
% 1.62/1.30      ! [S: a > $o,T: a > $o] :
% 1.62/1.30        ( ( ( ^ [Xx: a] :
% 1.62/1.30                ( ( S @ Xx )
% 1.62/1.30                & ( T @ Xx ) ) )
% 1.62/1.30          = S )
% 1.62/1.30      <=> ! [Xx: a] :
% 1.62/1.30            ( ( S @ Xx )
% 1.62/1.30           => ( T @ Xx ) ) ) ).
% 1.62/1.30  ------------------------
% 1.62/1.32  % (3569)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_3405 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 1.62/1.32  % (3568)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_3405 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 1.62/1.32  % (3568)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.62/1.32  % (3568)------------------------------
% 1.62/1.32  % (3568)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.62/1.32  % (3568)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.62/1.32  % (3568)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.62/1.32  
% 1.62/1.32  % (3568)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.62/1.32  % (3568)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.62/1.32  % (3568)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 1.62/1.32  % (3568)------------------------------
% 1.62/1.32  % (3568)------------------------------
% 1.62/1.32  % (3569)First to succeed.
% 1.62/1.32  % (3569)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.62/1.32  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_3405
% 1.62/1.32  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_3405
% 1.62/1.32  thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(func_def_2, type, vEPSILON: !>[X0: $tType]:((X0 > $o) > X0)).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(func_def_8, type, sK0: a > $o).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(func_def_9, type, sK1: a > $o).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(func_def_10, type, sK2: a).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(func_def_12, type, ph4: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(func_def_13, type, sK5: a).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f95,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    $false),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f23,f28,f33,f51,f83,f87,f88,f94])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f94,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ~spl3_1 | ~spl3_5 | ~spl3_8),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f93])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f93,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    $false | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_5 | ~spl3_8)),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f92])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f92,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ($true = $false) | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_5 | ~spl3_8)),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f91,f82])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f82,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ($false = (sK0 @ sK5)) | ~spl3_8),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f80])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f80,definition,(
% 1.62/1.32    spl3_8 <=> ($false = (sK0 @ sK5))),
% 1.62/1.32    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_8])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f91,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ($true = (sK0 @ sK5)) | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_5)),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f90])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f90,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ($true = (sK0 @ sK5)) | ($true != $true) | (~spl3_1 | ~spl3_5)),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f18,f69])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f69,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ($true = (sK1 @ sK5)) | ~spl3_5),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f67])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f67,definition,(
% 1.62/1.32    spl3_5 <=> ($true = (sK1 @ sK5))),
% 1.62/1.32    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_5])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ( ! [X3 : a] : (($true != (sK1 @ X3)) | ((sK0 @ X3) = $true)) ) | ~spl3_1),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f17])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f17,definition,(
% 1.62/1.32    spl3_1 <=> ! [X3 : a] : (($true != (sK1 @ X3)) | ((sK0 @ X3) = $true))),
% 1.62/1.32    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_1])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f88,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    spl3_5 | spl3_2),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f65,f20,f67])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f20,definition,(
% 1.62/1.32    spl3_2 <=> ((^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))) = sK1)),
% 1.62/1.32    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_2])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f65,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ($true = (sK1 @ sK5)) | spl3_2),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[status(thm)],[f63])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f63,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ($true = (sK1 @ sK5)) | ($true = (sK1 @ sK5)) | spl3_2),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f59])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f59,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ($true = ((sK0 @ sK5) & (sK1 @ sK5))) | ($true = (sK1 @ sK5)) | spl3_2),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f58])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f58,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    (((sK0 @ sK5) & (sK1 @ sK5)) != (sK1 @ sK5)) | spl3_2),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f57])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f57,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    (((^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))) @ sK5) != (sK1 @ sK5)) | spl3_2),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(negative_extensionality,[status(thm)],[f21])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ((^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))) != sK1) | spl3_2),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f20])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f87,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    spl3_2 | ~spl3_7),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f86])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f86,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    $false | (spl3_2 | ~spl3_7)),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f85])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f85,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ($true = $false) | (spl3_2 | ~spl3_7)),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f65,f78])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f78,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ($false = (sK1 @ sK5)) | ~spl3_7),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f76])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f76,definition,(
% 1.62/1.32    spl3_7 <=> ($false = (sK1 @ sK5))),
% 1.62/1.32    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_7])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f83,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    spl3_7 | spl3_8 | spl3_2),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f62,f20,f80,f76])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f62,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ($false = (sK1 @ sK5)) | ($false = (sK0 @ sK5)) | spl3_2),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[status(thm)],[f61])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f61,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ($false = (sK0 @ sK5)) | ($false = (sK1 @ sK5)) | ($false = (sK1 @ sK5)) | spl3_2),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f60])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f60,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ($false = ((sK0 @ sK5) & (sK1 @ sK5))) | ($false = (sK1 @ sK5)) | spl3_2),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f58])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f51,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ~spl3_2 | spl3_3 | ~spl3_4),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f50])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f50,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    $false | (~spl3_2 | spl3_3 | ~spl3_4)),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f45])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f45,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ($true = $false) | (~spl3_2 | spl3_3 | ~spl3_4)),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f32,f44])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f44,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ((sK1 @ sK2) = $false) | (~spl3_2 | spl3_3)),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f43])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f43,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ($true != $true) | ((sK1 @ sK2) = $false) | (~spl3_2 | spl3_3)),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f27,f40])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f40,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ( ! [X1 : a] : (($true = (sK0 @ X1)) | ((sK1 @ X1) = $false)) ) | ~spl3_2),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f36])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f36,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ( ! [X1 : a] : ((((sK0 @ X1) & (sK1 @ X1)) = $true) | ((sK1 @ X1) = $false)) ) | ~spl3_2),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f35])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f35,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ( ! [X1 : a] : ((((sK0 @ X1) & (sK1 @ X1)) = (sK1 @ X1))) ) | ~spl3_2),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f34])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f34,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ( ! [X1 : a] : (((sK1 @ X1) = ((^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))) @ X1))) ) | ~spl3_2),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(argument_congruence,[status(thm)],[f22])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f22,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ((^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))) = sK1) | ~spl3_2),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f20])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f27,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ($true != (sK0 @ sK2)) | spl3_3),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f25])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f25,definition,(
% 1.62/1.32    spl3_3 <=> ($true = (sK0 @ sK2))),
% 1.62/1.32    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_3])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f32,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ((sK1 @ sK2) = $true) | ~spl3_4),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f30])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f30,definition,(
% 1.62/1.32    spl3_4 <=> ((sK1 @ sK2) = $true)),
% 1.62/1.32    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_4])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f33,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    spl3_4 | ~spl3_2),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f15,f20,f30])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ((^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))) != sK1) | ((sK1 @ sK2) = $true)),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    (((^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))) != sK1) | (((sK1 @ sK2) = $true) & ($true != (sK0 @ sK2)))) & (((^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))) = sK1) | ! [X3 : a] : (($true != (sK1 @ X3)) | ((sK0 @ X3) = $true)))),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f9,f11,f10])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ? [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : ((((^[Y0 : a]: ((X0 @ Y0) & (X1 @ Y0))) != X1) | ? [X2 : a] : (((X1 @ X2) = $true) & ((X0 @ X2) != $true))) & (((^[Y0 : a]: ((X0 @ Y0) & (X1 @ Y0))) = X1) | ! [X3 : a] : (($true != (X1 @ X3)) | ($true = (X0 @ X3))))) => ((((^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))) != sK1) | ? [X2 : a] : (($true = (sK1 @ X2)) & ($true != (sK0 @ X2)))) & (((^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))) = sK1) | ! [X3 : a] : (($true != (sK1 @ X3)) | ((sK0 @ X3) = $true))))),
% 1.62/1.32    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ? [X2 : a] : (($true = (sK1 @ X2)) & ($true != (sK0 @ X2))) => (((sK1 @ sK2) = $true) & ($true != (sK0 @ sK2)))),
% 1.62/1.32    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ? [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : ((((^[Y0 : a]: ((X0 @ Y0) & (X1 @ Y0))) != X1) | ? [X2 : a] : (((X1 @ X2) = $true) & ((X0 @ X2) != $true))) & (((^[Y0 : a]: ((X0 @ Y0) & (X1 @ Y0))) = X1) | ! [X3 : a] : (($true != (X1 @ X3)) | ($true = (X0 @ X3)))))),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ? [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : ((((^[Y0 : a]: ((X0 @ Y0) & (X1 @ Y0))) != X1) | ? [X2 : a] : (((X1 @ X2) = $true) & ((X0 @ X2) != $true))) & (((^[Y0 : a]: ((X0 @ Y0) & (X1 @ Y0))) = X1) | ! [X2 : a] : (((X1 @ X2) != $true) | ((X0 @ X2) = $true))))),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ? [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : (! [X2 : a] : (((X1 @ X2) != $true) | ((X0 @ X2) = $true)) <~> ((^[Y0 : a]: ((X0 @ Y0) & (X1 @ Y0))) = X1))),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ~! [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : (! [X2 : a] : (((X1 @ X2) = $true) => ((X0 @ X2) = $true)) <=> ((^[Y0 : a]: ((X0 @ Y0) & (X1 @ Y0))) = X1))),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ~! [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : (((^[Y0 : a]: ((X0 @ Y0) & (X1 @ Y0))) = X1) <=> ! [X3 : a] : (($true = (X1 @ X3)) => ($true = (X0 @ X3))))),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ~! [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : ((X1 = (^[X2 : a] : ((X1 @ X2) & (X0 @ X2)))) <=> ! [X3 : a] : ((X1 @ X3) => (X0 @ X3)))),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.62/1.32    ~! [X1 : a > $o,X0 : a > $o] : ((X0 = (^[X2 : a] : ((X0 @ X2) & (X1 @ X2)))) <=> ! [X2 : a] : ((X0 @ X2) => (X1 @ X2)))),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.62/1.32    ! [X1 : a > $o,X0 : a > $o] : ((X0 = (^[X2 : a] : ((X0 @ X2) & (X1 @ X2)))) <=> ! [X2 : a] : ((X0 @ X2) => (X1 @ X2)))),
% 1.62/1.32    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.M55bG1ZwQH/DTF2THF_3405.p',cGAZING_THM39_pme)).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f28,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ~spl3_3 | ~spl3_2),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f14,f20,f25])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ((^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))) != sK1) | ($true != (sK0 @ sK2))),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f23,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    spl3_1 | spl3_2),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f13,f20,f17])).
% 1.62/1.32  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.62/1.32    ( ! [X3 : a] : (((^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))) = sK1) | ($true != (sK1 @ X3)) | ((sK0 @ X3) = $true)) )),
% 1.62/1.32    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.62/1.32  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_3405
% 1.62/1.32  % (3569)------------------------------
% 1.62/1.32  % (3569)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.62/1.32  % (3569)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.62/1.32  
% 1.62/1.32  % (3569)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.62/1.32  % (3569)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 1.62/1.32  % (3569)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 1.62/1.32  % (3569)------------------------------
% 1.62/1.32  % (3569)------------------------------
% 1.62/1.32  % (3564)Success in time 0.015 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------