%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem : SEU851^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:34:17 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.27s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 25
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 70 ( 14 unt; 0 typ; 4 def)
% Number of atoms : 476 ( 116 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 6 avg)
% Number of connectives : 584 ( 122 ~; 124 |; 86 &; 248 @)
% ( 4 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 10 ( 10 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 16 ( 13 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 2 ?; 30 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(type_def_6,type,
sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).
thf(func_def_1,type,
vOR: $o > $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_2,type,
vAND: $o > $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_3,type,
db0:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(func_def_4,type,
vNOT: $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_5,type,
vLAM:
!>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).
thf(func_def_6,type,
sK0: a > $o ).
thf(func_def_7,type,
sK1: a > $o ).
thf(func_def_10,type,
sK2: a ).
thf(f1,conjecture,
! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
( ( ^ [X2: a] :
( ( ~ ( X0 @ X2 )
& ( X1 @ X2 ) )
| ( ~ ( X1 @ X2 )
& ( X0 @ X2 ) ) ) )
= ( ^ [X2: a] :
( ( ~ ( X1 @ X2 )
& ( X0 @ X2 ) )
| ( ~ ( X0 @ X2 )
& ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cGAZING_THM42_pme) ).
thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
( ( ^ [X2: a] :
( ( ~ ( X0 @ X2 )
& ( X1 @ X2 ) )
| ( ~ ( X1 @ X2 )
& ( X0 @ X2 ) ) ) )
= ( ^ [X2: a] :
( ( ~ ( X1 @ X2 )
& ( X0 @ X2 ) )
| ( ~ ( X0 @ X2 )
& ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).
thf(f3,plain,
~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
( ( ^ [X2: a] :
( ( ~ ( X0 @ X2 )
& ( X1 @ X2 ) )
| ( ~ ( X1 @ X2 )
& ( X0 @ X2 ) ) ) )
= ( ^ [X3: a] :
( ( ~ ( X1 @ X3 )
& ( X0 @ X3 ) )
| ( ~ ( X0 @ X3 )
& ( X1 @ X3 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).
thf(f4,plain,
~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
( ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( X1 @ Y0 ) )
| ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
= ( ^ [Y0: a] :
( ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
| ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f3]) ).
thf(f5,plain,
? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
( ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( X1 @ Y0 ) )
| ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
!= ( ^ [Y0: a] :
( ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
| ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
thf(f6,plain,
( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
| ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
!= ( ^ [Y0: a] :
( ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
| ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f5]) ).
thf(f7,plain,
( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
| ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
!= ( ^ [Y0: a] :
( ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
| ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
thf(f17,plain,
( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
| ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
@ sK2 )
!= ( ^ [Y0: a] :
( ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
| ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
@ sK2 ) ),
inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f7]) ).
thf(f18,plain,
( ( $true
= ( ^ [Y0: a] :
( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
| ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
@ sK2 ) )
| ( $true
= ( ^ [Y0: a] :
( ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
| ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
@ sK2 ) ) ),
inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f17]) ).
thf(f19,plain,
( ( $false
= ( ^ [Y0: a] :
( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
| ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
@ sK2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( ^ [Y0: a] :
( ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
| ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
@ sK2 ) ) ),
inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f17]) ).
thf(f20,plain,
( ( $false
= ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
| ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ) )
| ( $false
= ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f19]) ).
thf(f21,plain,
( ( $false
= ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) )
| ( $false
= ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f20]) ).
thf(f22,plain,
( ( $false
= ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) )
| ( $false
= ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f20]) ).
thf(f23,plain,
( ( $false
= ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) )
| ( $false
= ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f22]) ).
thf(f24,plain,
( ( $true
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f23]) ).
thf(f25,plain,
( ( $true
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f24]) ).
thf(f29,plain,
( ( $true
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f25]) ).
thf(f30,plain,
( ( $true
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $true
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f29]) ).
thf(f31,plain,
( ( $true
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f30]) ).
thf(f32,plain,
( ( $false
= ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) )
| ( $false
= ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f21]) ).
thf(f33,plain,
( ( $true
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f32]) ).
thf(f35,plain,
( ( $true
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f33]) ).
thf(f36,plain,
( ( $true
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f35]) ).
thf(f37,plain,
( ( $true
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $true
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f36]) ).
thf(f38,plain,
( ( $true
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f37]) ).
thf(f41,plain,
( ( $true
= ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
| ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ) )
| ( $true
= ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f18]) ).
thf(f42,plain,
( ( $true
= ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) )
| ( $true
= ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) )
| ( $true
= ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) ),
inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f41]) ).
thf(f43,plain,
( ( $true
= ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) )
| ( $true
= ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) )
| ( $true
= ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) ),
inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f42]) ).
thf(f44,plain,
( ( $true
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $true
= ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) )
| ( $true
= ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) ),
inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f42]) ).
thf(f45,plain,
( ( $true
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $true
= ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) )
| ( $true
= ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) )
| ( $true
= ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ) ),
inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f44]) ).
thf(f47,plain,
( ( $true
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $true
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $true
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $true
= ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ) ),
inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f45]) ).
thf(f49,plain,
( ( $true
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $true
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $true
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $true
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f47]) ).
thf(f50,plain,
( ( $true
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $true
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f49]) ).
thf(f59,plain,
( ( $false
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $true
= ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) )
| ( $true
= ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) ),
inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f43]) ).
thf(f60,plain,
( ( $false
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $true
= ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) )
| ( $true
= ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) )
| ( $true
= ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ) ),
inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f59]) ).
thf(f61,plain,
( ( $false
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $true
= ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) )
| ( $true
= ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) )
| ( $true
= ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ) ),
inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f60]) ).
thf(f68,plain,
( ( $false
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $true
= ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
& ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ) ),
inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f61]) ).
thf(f69,plain,
( ( $false
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $true
= ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ) ),
inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f68]) ).
thf(f72,plain,
( ( $false
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f69]) ).
thf(f73,plain,
( ( $false
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f72]) ).
thf(f75,definition,
( spl3_1
<=> ( $false
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).
thf(f77,plain,
( ( $false
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ~ spl3_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f75]) ).
thf(f79,definition,
( spl3_2
<=> ( $true
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).
thf(f81,plain,
( ( $true
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
| ~ spl3_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f79]) ).
thf(f82,plain,
( spl3_1
| spl3_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f31,f79,f75]) ).
thf(f84,definition,
( spl3_3
<=> ( $false
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).
thf(f86,plain,
( ( $false
= ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
| ~ spl3_3 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f84]) ).
thf(f88,definition,
( spl3_4
<=> ( $true
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).
thf(f90,plain,
( ( $true
= ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
| ~ spl3_4 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f88]) ).
thf(f91,plain,
( spl3_3
| spl3_4 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f38,f88,f84]) ).
thf(f92,plain,
( spl3_4
| spl3_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f50,f79,f88]) ).
thf(f93,plain,
( spl3_3
| spl3_1 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f73,f75,f84]) ).
thf(f96,plain,
( ( $true = $false )
| ~ spl3_2
| ~ spl3_3 ),
inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f81,f86]) ).
thf(f97,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl3_2
| ~ spl3_3 ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f96]) ).
thf(f98,plain,
( ~ spl3_2
| ~ spl3_3 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f97]) ).
thf(f103,plain,
( ( $true = $false )
| ~ spl3_1
| ~ spl3_4 ),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f90,f77]) ).
thf(f104,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl3_1
| ~ spl3_4 ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f103]) ).
thf(f105,plain,
( ~ spl3_1
| ~ spl3_4 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f104]) ).
cnf(s1,plain,
( spl3_1
| spl3_2 ),
inference(sat_conversion,[],[f82]) ).
cnf(s2,plain,
( spl3_3
| spl3_4 ),
inference(sat_conversion,[],[f91]) ).
cnf(s3,plain,
( spl3_2
| spl3_4 ),
inference(sat_conversion,[],[f92]) ).
cnf(s4,plain,
( spl3_1
| spl3_3 ),
inference(sat_conversion,[],[f93]) ).
cnf(s5,plain,
( ~ spl3_2
| ~ spl3_3 ),
inference(sat_conversion,[],[f98]) ).
cnf(s7,plain,
( ~ spl3_1
| ~ spl3_4 ),
inference(sat_conversion,[],[f105]) ).
cnf(s8,plain,
spl3_1,
inference(rat,[],[s5,s1,s4]) ).
cnf(s9,plain,
~ spl3_4,
inference(rat,[],[s7,s8]) ).
cnf(s10,plain,
spl3_2,
inference(rat,[],[s3,s9]) ).
cnf(s11,plain,
spl3_3,
inference(rat,[],[s2,s9]) ).
cnf(s12,plain,
$false,
inference(rat,[],[s5,s11,s10]) ).
thf(f106,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s12]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEU851^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06 % Command : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.10/0.20 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.20 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.20 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.20 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.20 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.20 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.20 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.20 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:39:46 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.20 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.20 Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.10/0.23 Running first-order model finding
% 0.10/0.23 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.27 % (1752977)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.20/0.27 % (1752992)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=595678399:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.20/0.27 % (1752992)WARNING: Not using 'newcnf' as currently not compatible with higher-order inputs.
% 0.20/0.27 % (1752992) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-1752977-1752992"...
% 0.20/0.27 % (1752989)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.20/0.27 % (1752992)...printing done.
% 0.20/0.27 % (1752992)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.27 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.27 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.28 % (1752992)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.28 % (1752992)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.20/0.28 % (1752992)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.20/0.28 % (1752992)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.20/0.28 % (1752992)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.28 % (1752992)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.28 % (1752992)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.20/0.28 % (1752992)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.20/0.28 % (1752977)Success in time 0.032 s
% 0.20/0.28 % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------