↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEU854^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:34:18 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.10s 0.23s
% Output   : Refutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   24
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   86 (  10 unt;   0 typ;   7 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  536 ( 151 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  616 ( 131   ~; 172   |;  55   &; 229   @)
%                                         (  11 <=>;  16  =>;   0  <=;   2 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   27 (  27   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   21 (  18 usr;  11 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   96 (   0 sgn  53   !;  18   ?;  96   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    vOR: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    vAND: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    sK0: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    sK1: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    sK2: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    sK3: a ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    sK5: a ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ( ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ X3 )
           => ( X2 @ X3 ) )
        & ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ X3 )
           => ( X2 @ X3 ) ) )
     => ( ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ X3 )
           => ( X1 @ X3 ) )
      <=> ( ( ^ [X4: a] :
                ( ( X1 @ X4 )
                | ( ~ ( X0 @ X4 )
                  & ( X2 @ X4 ) ) ) )
          = X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cGAZING_THM34_pme) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X3 )
             => ( X2 @ X3 ) )
          & ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X3 )
             => ( X2 @ X3 ) ) )
       => ( ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X3 )
             => ( X1 @ X3 ) )
        <=> ( ( ^ [X4: a] :
                  ( ( X1 @ X4 )
                  | ( ~ ( X0 @ X4 )
                    & ( X2 @ X4 ) ) ) )
            = X2 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f3,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X3 )
             => ( X2 @ X3 ) )
          & ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X4 )
             => ( X2 @ X4 ) ) )
       => ( ! [X5: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X5 )
             => ( X1 @ X5 ) )
        <=> ( ( ^ [X6: a] :
                  ( ( X1 @ X6 )
                  | ( ~ ( X0 @ X6 )
                    & ( X2 @ X6 ) ) ) )
            = X2 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( ( X1 @ X3 )
                = $true )
             => ( ( X2 @ X3 )
                = $true ) )
          & ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( ( X0 @ X4 )
                = $true )
             => ( ( X2 @ X4 )
                = $true ) ) )
       => ( ! [X5: a] :
              ( ( ( X0 @ X5 )
                = $true )
             => ( ( X1 @ X5 )
                = $true ) )
        <=> ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                  ( ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                    & ~ ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
                  | ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
            = X2 ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ( ! [X5: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X5 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( X0 @ X5 )
             != $true ) )
      <~> ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                  & ~ ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
                | ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
          = X2 ) )
      & ! [X3: a] :
          ( ( ( X2 @ X3 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X1 @ X3 )
           != $true ) )
      & ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( ( X2 @ X4 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X0 @ X4 )
           != $true ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ( ! [X5: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X5 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( X0 @ X5 )
             != $true ) )
      <~> ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                  & ~ ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
                | ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
          = X2 ) )
      & ! [X3: a] :
          ( ( ( X2 @ X3 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X1 @ X3 )
           != $true ) )
      & ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( ( X2 @ X4 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X0 @ X4 )
           != $true ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                  & ~ ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
                | ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
         != X2 )
        | ? [X5: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X5 )
             != $true )
            & ( ( X0 @ X5 )
              = $true ) ) )
      & ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                  & ~ ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
                | ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
          = X2 )
        | ! [X5: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X5 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( X0 @ X5 )
             != $true ) ) )
      & ! [X3: a] :
          ( ( ( X2 @ X3 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X1 @ X3 )
           != $true ) )
      & ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( ( X2 @ X4 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X0 @ X4 )
           != $true ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                  & ~ ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
                | ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
         != X2 )
        | ? [X5: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X5 )
             != $true )
            & ( ( X0 @ X5 )
              = $true ) ) )
      & ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                  & ~ ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
                | ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
          = X2 )
        | ! [X5: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X5 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( X0 @ X5 )
             != $true ) ) )
      & ! [X3: a] :
          ( ( ( X2 @ X3 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X1 @ X3 )
           != $true ) )
      & ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( ( X2 @ X4 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X0 @ X4 )
           != $true ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                  & ~ ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
                | ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
         != X2 )
        | ? [X3: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X3 )
             != $true )
            & ( ( X0 @ X3 )
              = $true ) ) )
      & ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                  & ~ ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
                | ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
          = X2 )
        | ! [X4: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X4 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( X0 @ X4 )
             != $true ) ) )
      & ! [X5: a] :
          ( ( $true
            = ( X2 @ X5 ) )
          | ( ( X1 @ X5 )
           != $true ) )
      & ! [X6: a] :
          ( ( ( X2 @ X6 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X0 @ X6 )
           != $true ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2
       != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
                & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
              | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      | ( ( $true
         != ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
        & ( $true
          = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ) )
    & ( ( sK2
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
                & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
              | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      | ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( $true
            = ( sK1 @ X4 ) )
          | ( $true
           != ( sK0 @ X4 ) ) ) )
    & ! [X5: a] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( sK2 @ X5 ) )
        | ( $true
         != ( sK1 @ X5 ) ) )
    & ! [X6: a] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( sK2 @ X6 ) )
        | ( $true
         != ( sK0 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2),skolemize(X3,sK3)],[f9]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X6: a] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( sK0 @ X6 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( sK2 @ X6 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X5: a] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( sK1 @ X5 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( sK2 @ X5 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ! [X4: a] :
      ( ( sK2
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
                & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
              | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( sK1 @ X4 ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( sK0 @ X4 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( sK2
     != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( sK2
     != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
    | ( $true
     != ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f19,definition,
    ( spl4_1
  <=> ! [X4: a] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( sK1 @ X4 ) )
        | ( $true
         != ( sK0 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ! [X4: a] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( sK0 @ X4 ) )
        | ( $true
          = ( sK1 @ X4 ) ) )
    | ~ spl4_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f22,definition,
    ( spl4_2
  <=> ( sK2
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( sK2
     != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( sK2
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f13,f22,f19]) ).

thf(f27,definition,
    ( spl4_3
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ~ spl4_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( spl4_3
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f14,f22,f27]) ).

thf(f32,definition,
    ( spl4_4
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | spl4_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f32]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_4
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f15,f22,f32]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ~ spl4_3 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f11,f29]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ~ spl4_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f36]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( sK2 @ X1 )
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
                & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
              | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
          @ X1 ) )
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(argument_congruence,[],[f24]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( $false
          = ( sK2 @ X1 ) )
        | ( $true
          = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
                  & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
                | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
            @ X1 ) ) )
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(iff_proxy_clausification,[],[f38]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( $false
          = ( sK2 @ X1 ) )
        | ( $true
          = ( ( ( sK2 @ X1 )
              & ~ ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
            | ( sK1 @ X1 ) ) ) )
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f40]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( $false
          = ( sK2 @ X1 ) )
        | ( $true
          = ( sK1 @ X1 ) )
        | ( $true
          = ( ( sK2 @ X1 )
            & ~ ( sK0 @ X1 ) ) ) )
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f41]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( $false
          = ( sK2 @ X1 ) )
        | ( $true
          = ( sK1 @ X1 ) )
        | ( $true
          = ( ~ ( sK0 @ X1 ) ) ) )
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f42]) ).

thf(f45,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( $false
          = ( sK2 @ X1 ) )
        | ( $true
          = ( sK1 @ X1 ) )
        | ( $false
          = ( sK0 @ X1 ) ) )
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f43]) ).

thf(f74,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_3 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f37,f45]) ).

thf(f80,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f74]) ).

thf(f86,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_3
    | spl4_4 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f80,f34]) ).

thf(f89,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_3
    | spl4_4 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f86,f29]) ).

thf(f94,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_3
    | spl4_4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f89]) ).

thf(f95,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_3
    | spl4_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f94]) ).

thf(f108,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
     != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
        @ sK5 ) )
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f109,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
        @ sK5 ) )
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f108]) ).

thf(f110,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
        @ sK5 ) )
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f108]) ).

thf(f111,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f110]) ).

thf(f112,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f111]) ).

thf(f113,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f111]) ).

thf(f114,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f113]) ).

thf(f115,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f114]) ).

thf(f116,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f115]) ).

thf(f117,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f109]) ).

thf(f118,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f117]) ).

thf(f120,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f118]) ).

thf(f121,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f120]) ).

thf(f124,definition,
    ( spl4_5
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_5])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f126,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | ~ spl4_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f124]) ).

thf(f128,definition,
    ( spl4_6
  <=> ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_6])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f130,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ~ spl4_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f128]) ).

thf(f131,plain,
    ( spl4_5
    | spl4_6
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f116,f22,f128,f124]) ).

thf(f133,definition,
    ( spl4_7
  <=> ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_7])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f135,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
    | ~ spl4_7 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f133]) ).

thf(f136,plain,
    ( spl4_7
    | spl4_6
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f112,f22,f128,f133]) ).

thf(f137,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f121,f12]) ).

thf(f156,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_6 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f137,f130]) ).

thf(f157,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_6 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f156]) ).

thf(f158,plain,
    ( spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_6 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f157]) ).

thf(f159,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
    | ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_5 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f20,f126]) ).

thf(f162,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
    | ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_5 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f159]) ).

thf(f163,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_5
    | ~ spl4_7 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f162,f135]) ).

thf(f164,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_5
    | ~ spl4_7 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f163]) ).

thf(f165,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_5
    | ~ spl4_7 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f164]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f25]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_2
    | spl4_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f30]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f35]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_3
    | spl4_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f95]) ).

cnf(s8,plain,
    ( spl4_2
    | spl4_5
    | spl4_6 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f131]) ).

cnf(s9,plain,
    ( spl4_2
    | spl4_6
    | spl4_7 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f136]) ).

cnf(s12,plain,
    ( spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_6 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f158]) ).

cnf(s13,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_5
    | ~ spl4_7 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f165]) ).

cnf(s14,plain,
    ~ spl4_2,
    inference(rat,[],[s5,s2,s3]) ).

cnf(s15,plain,
    ~ spl4_6,
    inference(rat,[],[s12,s14]) ).

cnf(s16,plain,
    spl4_7,
    inference(rat,[],[s9,s15,s14]) ).

cnf(s17,plain,
    spl4_1,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s14]) ).

cnf(s18,plain,
    spl4_5,
    inference(rat,[],[s8,s14,s15]) ).

cnf(s19,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s13,s16,s17,s18]) ).

thf(f166,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s19]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU854^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.10/0.16  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.16  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.16  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.16  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.16  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.16  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.16  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.16  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:40:01 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.16  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.17  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.10/0.19  Running first-order model finding
% 0.10/0.19  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753813)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753820)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753823)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=3317321881:i=116_3000 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/116Mi)
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753822)dis+10_1_sil=32000:sp=arity:random_seed=630434065:i=103:fgj=on_3000 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/103Mi)
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753819)fmb+10_1_sas=cadical:bce=on:rp=on:random_seed=3660433803_3000 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/0Mi)
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753824)ott+1_1_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=reverse_arity:erd=off:random_seed=4229911532:i=131_3000 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/131Mi)
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753820)dis+11_61:31_drc=ordering:lsd=5:bsr=unit_only:rp=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=2426743844:i=135531:add=off:rawr=on_3000 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/135531Mi)
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753821)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=3350565569:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_3000 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/88024Mi)
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753823)WARNING: Not using 'newcnf' as currently not compatible with higher-order inputs.
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753825)ott-3_16_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=arity:fd=off:rp=on:random_seed=509607640:i=159:bs=unit_only:nicw=on:fsr=off:amm=off_3000 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/159Mi)
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753820)WARNING: Not using 'newcnf' as currently not compatible with higher-order inputs.
% 0.10/0.23  % Exception at run slice level
% 0.10/0.23  User error: Finite model building is currently not compatible with polymorphism or higher-order constructs
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753820)WARNING: Look ahead literal selection is not currently compatible with higher-order. Ignoring request to use
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753823) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-2753813-2753823"...
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753822) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-2753813-2753822"...
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753824) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-2753813-2753824"...
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753820) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-2753813-2753820"...
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753825) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-2753813-2753825"...
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753822)...printing done.
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753823)...printing done.
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753824)...printing done.
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753820)...printing done.
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753825)...printing done.
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753822)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.10/0.23  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.10/0.23  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753822)------------------------------
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753822)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753822)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753822)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753822)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753822)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753822)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753822)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
% 0.10/0.23  % (2753813)Success in time 0.028 s
% 0.10/0.23  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------