↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU856^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:25:50 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   18
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  157 (  30 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  240 (  65   ~;  53   |;  23   &;  93   @)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   2 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    6 (   6   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (  18   ^;  12   !;   0   ?;  30   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    epred1_0: a > $o ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    epred2_0: a > $o ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    esk3_0: a ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    esk5_0: a ).

thf(decl_28,type,
    esk6_0: a ).

thf(cGAZING_THM46_pme,conjecture,
    ! [X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ( X1 = X2 )
    <=> ( ( ^ [X3: a] :
              ( ( ( X2 @ X3 )
                & ~ ( X1 @ X3 ) )
              | ( ( X1 @ X3 )
                & ~ ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ) )
        = ( ^ [X4: a] : ~ $true ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.j0VJH0ZP2b/E---3.1_1753910.p',cGAZING_THM46_pme) ).

thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( X1 = X2 )
      <=> ( ( ^ [X3: a] :
                ( ( ( X2 @ X3 )
                  & ~ ( X1 @ X3 ) )
                | ( ( X1 @ X3 )
                  & ~ ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ) )
          = ( ^ [X4: a] : ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cGAZING_THM46_pme]) ).

thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( X1 = X2 )
      <=> ( ( ^ [Z0: a] :
                ( ( ( X2 @ Z0 )
                  & ~ ( X1 @ Z0 ) )
                | ( ( X1 @ Z0 )
                  & ~ ( X2 @ Z0 ) ) ) )
          = ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).

thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( epred1_0 != epred2_0 )
      | ( ( ^ [Z0: a] :
              ( ( ( epred2_0 @ Z0 )
                & ~ ( epred1_0 @ Z0 ) )
              | ( ( epred1_0 @ Z0 )
                & ~ ( epred2_0 @ Z0 ) ) ) )
       != ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true ) ) )
    & ( ( epred1_0 = epred2_0 )
      | ( ( ^ [Z0: a] :
              ( ( ( epred2_0 @ Z0 )
                & ~ ( epred1_0 @ Z0 ) )
              | ( ( epred1_0 @ Z0 )
                & ~ ( epred2_0 @ Z0 ) ) ) )
        = ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 != epred2_0 )
    | ( ( ^ [Z0: a] :
            ( ( ( epred2_0 @ Z0 )
              & ~ ( epred1_0 @ Z0 ) )
            | ( ( epred1_0 @ Z0 )
              & ~ ( epred2_0 @ Z0 ) ) ) )
     != ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( ^ [Z0: a] :
            ( ( ( epred2_0 @ Z0 )
              & ~ ( epred1_0 @ Z0 ) )
            | ( ( epred1_0 @ Z0 )
              & ~ ( epred2_0 @ Z0 ) ) ) )
     != ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true ) )
    | ( epred2_0 != epred1_0 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 = epred2_0 )
    | ( ( ^ [Z0: a] :
            ( ( ( epred2_0 @ Z0 )
              & ~ ( epred1_0 @ Z0 ) )
            | ( ( epred1_0 @ Z0 )
              & ~ ( epred2_0 @ Z0 ) ) ) )
      = ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 )
      & ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 ) )
    | ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
      & ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 ) )
    | ( epred2_0 != epred1_0 ) ),
    inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( ^ [Z0: a] :
            ( ( ( epred2_0 @ Z0 )
              & ~ ( epred1_0 @ Z0 ) )
            | ( ( epred1_0 @ Z0 )
              & ~ ( epred2_0 @ Z0 ) ) ) )
      = ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true ) )
    | ( epred2_0 = epred1_0 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 != epred1_0 ) ),
    inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X9: a] :
      ( ( epred2_0 = epred1_0 )
      | ~ ( ( ( epred2_0 @ X9 )
            & ~ ( epred1_0 @ X9 ) )
          | ( ( epred1_0 @ X9 )
            & ~ ( epred2_0 @ X9 ) ) ) ),
    inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( ( epred2_0 @ esk6_0 )
    <~> ( epred1_0 @ esk6_0 ) ) ),
    inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 != epred1_0 )
    | ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a] :
      ( ( epred2_0 = epred1_0 )
      | ( epred1_0 @ X3 )
      | ~ ( epred2_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk6_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk6_0 ) ),
    inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( epred2_0 @ esk5_0 )
    <~> ( epred1_0 @ esk5_0 ) )
    | ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk6_0 )
    | ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk6_0 ) ),
    inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a] :
      ( ( epred2_0 = epred1_0 )
      | ( epred2_0 @ X3 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 = epred1_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk6_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_13]) ).

thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk5_0 )
    | ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk5_0 )
    | ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 = epred1_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 = epred1_0 )
    | ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk5_0 )
    | ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_17]),c_0_13]) ).

thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk5_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk5_0 )
    | ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 = epred1_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_20]) ).

thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 = epred1_0 )
    | ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk5_0 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_20]) ).

thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    epred2_0 = epred1_0,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_17]),c_0_23]),c_0_13]),c_0_24]) ).

thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X24: a] :
      ( ( epred2_0 @ X24 )
    <=> ( epred1_0 @ X24 ) ),
    inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a] :
      ( ( epred1_0 @ X3 )
      | ~ ( epred2_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

thf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_25])]) ).

thf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    epred1_0 @ esk3_0,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_25])]),c_0_27]) ).

thf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29])]) ).

thf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a] :
      ( ( epred2_0 @ X3 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

thf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_29])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU856^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.18  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:40:01 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.19  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.23  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.25  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.j0VJH0ZP2b/E---3.1_1753910.p
% 0.09/0.27  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.09/0.27  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSN.
% 0.09/0.27  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.27  % Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.27  % Starting post_as_ho10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27  % Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27  % ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with pid 1753945 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.27  % Result found by ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall
% 0.09/0.27  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSN.
% 0.09/0.27  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.27  % Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.27  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.09/0.27  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.27  % Search class: HGHPF-FFSF00-MSSFFFNN
% 0.09/0.27  % partial match(2): HGHNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.09/0.27  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.09/0.27  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27  % Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 151s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27  % Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1753949 completed with status 10
% 0.09/0.27  % Starting new_bool_2 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27  % new_bool_2 with pid 1753957 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.27  % Result found by new_bool_2
% 0.09/0.27  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSN.
% 0.09/0.27  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.27  % Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.27  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.09/0.27  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.27  % Search class: HGHPF-FFSF00-MSSFFFNN
% 0.09/0.27  % partial match(2): HGHNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.09/0.27  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.09/0.27  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27  % Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 151s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27  % Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1753949 completed with status 10
% 0.09/0.27  % Starting new_bool_2 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.27  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.09/0.27  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.09/0.27  
% 0.09/0.27  % Proof found!
% 0.09/0.27  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.09/0.27  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.27  % Parsed axioms                        : 2
% 0.09/0.27  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.09/0.27  % Initial clauses                      : 3
% 0.09/0.27  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.09/0.27  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 2
% 0.09/0.27  % Processed clauses                    : 41
% 0.09/0.27  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.09/0.27  % ...subsumed                          : 3
% 0.09/0.27  % ...remaining for further processing  : 38
% 0.09/0.27  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.09/0.27  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.09/0.27  % Backward-subsumed                    : 9
% 0.09/0.27  % Backward-rewritten                   : 12
% 0.09/0.27  % Generated clauses                    : 60
% 0.09/0.27  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 55
% 0.09/0.27  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.09/0.27  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 8
% 0.09/0.27  % Paramodulations                      : 22
% 0.09/0.27  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.09/0.27  % NegExts                              : 4
% 0.09/0.27  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.09/0.27  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.09/0.27  % Total rewrite steps                  : 13
% 0.09/0.27  % ...of those cached                   : 11
% 0.09/0.27  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.09/0.27  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.09/0.27  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.09/0.27  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.09/0.27  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.09/0.27  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.09/0.27  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.09/0.27  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.09/0.27  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.09/0.27  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.09/0.27  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.09/0.27  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.09/0.27  % Current number of processed clauses  : 5
% 0.09/0.27  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.09/0.27  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.09/0.27  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.09/0.27  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 0.09/0.27  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17
% 0.09/0.27  % ...number of literals in the above   : 57
% 0.09/0.27  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.09/0.27  % Current number of archived clauses   : 33
% 0.09/0.27  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 56
% 0.09/0.27  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 49
% 0.09/0.27  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 20
% 0.09/0.27  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.09/0.27  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.09/0.27  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.09/0.27  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.09/0.27  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.09/0.27  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.09/0.27  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2191
% 0.09/0.27  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 76
% 0.09/0.27  
% 0.09/0.27  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.27  % User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.09/0.27  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.09/0.27  % Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.09/0.27  % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.09/0.27  
% 0.09/0.27  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.27  % User time                : 0.021 s
% 0.09/0.27  % System time              : 0.013 s
% 0.09/0.27  % Total time               : 0.034 s
% 0.09/0.27  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.09/0.27  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------