↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEU858^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:37:36 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.46s 1.29s
% Output   : Refutation 1.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  106 (  41 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   8 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  109 (  16   ~;  15   |;  15   &;  52   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   26 (  26   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   60 (  32   ^;  25   !;   3   ?;  60   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    vEPSILON: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    sK0: ( a > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    ph2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f16,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    $true != $true,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f11,f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK0
      @ ^ [Y0: a] : $false ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a > $o,X2: a] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
        | ( $true
          = ( sK0
            @ ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( X2 = Y0 )
                | ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
    & ( $true
      = ( sK0
        @ ^ [Y0: a] : $false ) )
    & ( $true
     != ( sK0
        @ ^ [Y0: a] : $false ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f8,f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X0: ( a > $o ) > $o] :
        ( ! [X1: a > $o,X2: a] :
            ( ( $true
             != ( X0 @ X1 ) )
            | ( $true
              = ( X0
                @ ^ [Y0: a] :
                    ( ( X2 = Y0 )
                    | ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
        & ( $true
          = ( X0
            @ ^ [Y0: a] : $false ) )
        & ( $true
         != ( X0
            @ ^ [Y0: a] : $false ) ) )
   => ( ! [X2: a,X1: a > $o] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
          | ( $true
            = ( sK0
              @ ^ [Y0: a] :
                  ( ( X2 = Y0 )
                  | ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( sK0
          @ ^ [Y0: a] : $false ) )
      & ( $true
       != ( sK0
          @ ^ [Y0: a] : $false ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ? [X0: ( a > $o ) > $o] :
      ( ! [X1: a > $o,X2: a] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( X0 @ X1 ) )
          | ( $true
            = ( X0
              @ ^ [Y0: a] :
                  ( ( X2 = Y0 )
                  | ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( X0
          @ ^ [Y0: a] : $false ) )
      & ( $true
       != ( X0
          @ ^ [Y0: a] : $false ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X0: ( a > $o ) > $o] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( X0
          @ ^ [Y0: a] : $false ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( X0
          @ ^ [Y0: a] : $false ) )
      & ! [X1: a > $o,X2: a] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( X0 @ X1 ) )
          | ( $true
            = ( X0
              @ ^ [Y0: a] :
                  ( ( X2 = Y0 )
                  | ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: ( a > $o ) > $o] :
        ( ( ( $true
            = ( X0
              @ ^ [Y0: a] : $false ) )
          & ! [X1: a > $o,X2: a] :
              ( ( $true
                = ( X0 @ X1 ) )
             => ( $true
                = ( X0
                  @ ^ [Y0: a] :
                      ( ( X2 = Y0 )
                      | ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) )
       => ( $true
          = ( X0
            @ ^ [Y0: a] : $false ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: ( a > $o ) > $o] :
        ( ( ( $true
            = ( X0
              @ ^ [Y0: a] : $false ) )
          & ! [X2: a > $o,X3: a] :
              ( ( ( X0 @ X2 )
                = $true )
             => ( $true
                = ( X0
                  @ ^ [Y0: a] :
                      ( ( X3 = Y0 )
                      | ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) )
       => ( $true
          = ( X0
            @ ^ [Y0: a] : $false ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: ( a > $o ) > $o] :
        ( ( ( X0
            @ ^ [X1: a] : $false )
          & ! [X2: a > $o,X3: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X2 )
             => ( X0
                @ ^ [X4: a] :
                    ( ( X2 @ X4 )
                    | ( X3 = X4 ) ) ) ) )
       => ( X0
          @ ^ [X5: a] : $false ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: ( a > $o ) > $o] :
        ( ( ( X0
            @ ^ [X1: a] : $false )
          & ! [X2: a > $o,X1: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X2 )
             => ( X0
                @ ^ [X3: a] :
                    ( ( X2 @ X3 )
                    | ( X1 = X3 ) ) ) ) )
       => ( X0
          @ ^ [X1: a] : $false ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: ( a > $o ) > $o] :
      ( ( ( X0
          @ ^ [X1: a] : $false )
        & ! [X2: a > $o,X1: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ X2 )
           => ( X0
              @ ^ [X3: a] :
                  ( ( X2 @ X3 )
                  | ( X1 = X3 ) ) ) ) )
     => ( X0
        @ ^ [X1: a] : $false ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NdcdhjHtbk/DTF2THF_10348.p',cTHM163_pme) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( sK0
      @ ^ [Y0: a] : $false ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU858^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.17/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:35:39 EST 2026
% 0.17/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.27/0.47  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.27/0.47  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.27/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.47  % File     : SEU858^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.27/0.47  % Domain   : Set Theory (Finite sets)
% 0.27/0.47  % Problem  : TPS problem THM163
% 0.27/0.47  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.27/0.47  % English  : A direct consequence of the definition of FINITE1.
% 0.27/0.47  
% 0.27/0.47  % Refs     : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.27/0.47  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.27/0.47  % Names    : tps_0136 [Bro09]
% 0.27/0.47  %          : THM163 [TPS]
% 0.27/0.47  
% 0.27/0.47  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.27/0.47  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.0.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v5.3.0, 0.40 v5.2.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.00 v4.0.0
% 0.27/0.47  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    2 (   0 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
% 0.27/0.47  %            Number of atoms       :    3 (   1 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.27/0.47  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   3 avg)
% 0.27/0.47  %            Number of connectives :    9 (   0   ~;   1   |;   1   &;   5   @)
% 0.27/0.47  %                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.27/0.47  %            Maximal formula depth :   11 (  11 avg)
% 0.27/0.47  %            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
% 0.27/0.47  %            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.27/0.47  %            Number of symbols     :    2 (   0 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.27/0.47  %            Number of variables   :    6 (   3   ^;   3   !;   0   ?;   6   :)
% 0.27/0.47  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.27/0.47  
% 0.27/0.47  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.27/0.47  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.27/0.47  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.27/0.47  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.27/0.47  %          : Polymorphic definitions expanded.
% 0.27/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.47  thf(a_type,type,
% 0.27/0.47      a: $tType ).
% 0.27/0.47  
% 0.27/0.47  thf(cTHM163_pme,conjecture,
% 0.27/0.47      ! [Xw: ( a > $o ) > $o] :
% 0.27/0.47        ( ( ( Xw
% 0.27/0.47            @ ^ [Xx: a] : $false )
% 0.27/0.47          & ! [Xr: a > $o,Xx: a] :
% 0.27/0.47              ( ( Xw @ Xr )
% 0.27/0.47             => ( Xw
% 0.27/0.47                @ ^ [Xt: a] :
% 0.27/0.47                    ( ( Xr @ Xt )
% 0.27/0.47                    | ( Xt = Xx ) ) ) ) )
% 0.27/0.47       => ( Xw
% 0.27/0.47          @ ^ [Xx: a] : $false ) ) ).
% 0.27/0.47  
% 0.27/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.47  ------------------------
% 1.46/1.26  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.46/1.26  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.46/1.26  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:35:39 EST 2026
% 1.46/1.26  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.46/1.26  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.46/1.26  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.46/1.26  
% 1.46/1.26  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NdcdhjHtbk/DTF2DTF10348.p
% See solution above
% 1.46/1.26  ------------------------
% 1.46/1.27  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.46/1.27  thf(a_type,type,
% 1.46/1.27      a: $tType ).
% 1.46/1.27  
% 1.46/1.27  thf(cTHM163_pme,conjecture,
% 1.46/1.27      ! [Xw: ( a > $o ) > $o] :
% 1.46/1.27        ( ( ( Xw
% 1.46/1.27            @ ^ [Xx: a] : $false )
% 1.46/1.27          & ! [Xr: a > $o,Xx: a] :
% 1.46/1.27              ( ( Xw @ Xr )
% 1.46/1.27             => ( Xw
% 1.46/1.27                @ ^ [Xt: a] :
% 1.46/1.27                    ( ( Xr @ Xt )
% 1.46/1.27                    | ( Xt = Xx ) ) ) ) )
% 1.46/1.27       => ( Xw
% 1.46/1.27          @ ^ [Xx: a] : $false ) ) ).
% 1.46/1.27  ------------------------
% 1.46/1.29  % (10504)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_10348 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 1.46/1.29  % (10503)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_10348 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 1.46/1.29  % (10504)First to succeed.
% 1.46/1.29  % (10503)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.46/1.29  % (10504)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.46/1.29  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_10348
% 1.46/1.29  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_10348
% 1.46/1.29  thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(func_def_2, type, vEPSILON: !>[X0: $tType]:((X0 > $o) > X0)).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(func_def_9, type, sK0: (a > $o) > $o).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(func_def_11, type, ph2: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    $false),
% 1.46/1.29    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f15])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    ($true != $true)),
% 1.46/1.29    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f11,f12])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    ($true = (sK0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ($false))))),
% 1.46/1.29    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    ! [X1 : a > $o,X2 : a] : (($true != (sK0 @ X1)) | ($true = (sK0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((X2 = Y0) | (X1 @ Y0)))))) & ($true = (sK0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ($false)))) & ($true != (sK0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ($false))))),
% 1.46/1.29    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f8,f9])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    ? [X0 : (a > $o) > $o] : (! [X1 : a > $o,X2 : a] : (($true != (X0 @ X1)) | ($true = (X0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((X2 = Y0) | (X1 @ Y0)))))) & ($true = (X0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ($false)))) & ($true != (X0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ($false))))) => (! [X2 : a,X1 : a > $o] : (($true != (sK0 @ X1)) | ($true = (sK0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((X2 = Y0) | (X1 @ Y0)))))) & ($true = (sK0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ($false)))) & ($true != (sK0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ($false)))))),
% 1.46/1.29    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    ? [X0 : (a > $o) > $o] : (! [X1 : a > $o,X2 : a] : (($true != (X0 @ X1)) | ($true = (X0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((X2 = Y0) | (X1 @ Y0)))))) & ($true = (X0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ($false)))) & ($true != (X0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ($false)))))),
% 1.46/1.29    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    ? [X0 : (a > $o) > $o] : (($true != (X0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ($false)))) & (($true = (X0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ($false)))) & ! [X1 : a > $o,X2 : a] : (($true != (X0 @ X1)) | ($true = (X0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((X2 = Y0) | (X1 @ Y0))))))))),
% 1.46/1.29    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    ~! [X0 : (a > $o) > $o] : ((($true = (X0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ($false)))) & ! [X1 : a > $o,X2 : a] : (($true = (X0 @ X1)) => ($true = (X0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((X2 = Y0) | (X1 @ Y0))))))) => ($true = (X0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ($false)))))),
% 1.46/1.29    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    ~! [X0 : (a > $o) > $o] : ((($true = (X0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ($false)))) & ! [X2 : a > $o,X3 : a] : (((X0 @ X2) = $true) => ($true = (X0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((X3 = Y0) | (X2 @ Y0))))))) => ($true = (X0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ($false)))))),
% 1.46/1.29    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    ~! [X0 : (a > $o) > $o] : (((X0 @ (^[X1 : a] : ($false))) & ! [X2 : a > $o,X3 : a] : ((X0 @ X2) => (X0 @ (^[X4 : a] : ((X2 @ X4) | (X3 = X4)))))) => (X0 @ (^[X5 : a] : ($false))))),
% 1.46/1.29    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.46/1.29    ~! [X0 : (a > $o) > $o] : (((X0 @ (^[X1 : a] : ($false))) & ! [X2 : a > $o,X1 : a] : ((X0 @ X2) => (X0 @ (^[X3 : a] : ((X2 @ X3) | (X1 = X3)))))) => (X0 @ (^[X1 : a] : ($false))))),
% 1.46/1.29    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.46/1.29    ! [X0 : (a > $o) > $o] : (((X0 @ (^[X1 : a] : ($false))) & ! [X2 : a > $o,X1 : a] : ((X0 @ X2) => (X0 @ (^[X3 : a] : ((X2 @ X3) | (X1 = X3)))))) => (X0 @ (^[X1 : a] : ($false))))),
% 1.46/1.29    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NdcdhjHtbk/DTF2THF_10348.p',cTHM163_pme)).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    ($true != (sK0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ($false))))),
% 1.46/1.29    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.46/1.29  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_10348
% 1.46/1.29  % (10504)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.29  % (10504)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.46/1.29  % (10504)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.46/1.29  
% 1.46/1.29  % (10504)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.46/1.29  % (10504)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.46/1.29  % (10504)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.46/1.29  % (10504)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.29  % (10504)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.29  % (10501)Success in time 0.012 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------