%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SEU858^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:28:00 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.11s 0.26s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 1 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 25 ( 4 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 58 ( 18 ~; 5 |; 5 &; 24 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 7 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 10 ( 10 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 4 ( 1 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 27 ( 16 ^; 11 !; 0 ?; 27 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(decl_23,type,
epred1_0: ( a > $o ) > $o ).
thf(cTHM163_pme,conjecture,
! [X1: ( a > $o ) > $o] :
( ( ( X1
@ ^ [X2: a] : ~ $true )
& ! [X3: a > $o,X2: a] :
( ( X1 @ X3 )
=> ( X1
@ ^ [X4: a] :
( ( X3 @ X4 )
| ( X4 = X2 ) ) ) ) )
=> ( X1
@ ^ [X2: a] : ~ $true ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0w2hHsfaVq/E---3.1_1378642.p',cTHM163_pme) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1: ( a > $o ) > $o] :
( ( ( X1
@ ^ [X2: a] : ~ $true )
& ! [X3: a > $o,X2: a] :
( ( X1 @ X3 )
=> ( X1
@ ^ [X4: a] :
( ( X3 @ X4 )
| ( X4 = X2 ) ) ) ) )
=> ( X1
@ ^ [X2: a] : ~ $true ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM163_pme]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1: ( a > $o ) > $o] :
( ( ( X1
@ ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
& ! [X3: a > $o,X2: a] :
( ( X1 @ X3 )
=> ( X1
@ ^ [Z0: a] :
( ( X3 @ Z0 )
| ( Z0 = X2 ) ) ) ) )
=> ( X1
@ ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X9: a > $o,X10: a] :
( ( epred1_0
@ ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
& ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X9 )
| ( epred1_0
@ ^ [Z0: a] :
( ( X9 @ Z0 )
| ( Z0 = X10 ) ) ) )
& ~ ( epred1_0
@ ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( epred1_0
@ ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ( epred1_0
@ ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( epred1_0
@ ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ( epred1_0
@ ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SEU858^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.18 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.18 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.18 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.18 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.18 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.18 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.18 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.18 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:41:05 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.19 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.19 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.23 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.24 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0w2hHsfaVq/E---3.1_1378642.p
% 0.11/0.26 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.11/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
% 0.11/0.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.26 % Starting post_as_ho5 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.26 % Starting sh2lt with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.26 % Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.26 % Starting post_as_ho10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.26 % post_as_ho5 with pid 1378682 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Result found by post_as_ho5
% 0.11/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
% 0.11/0.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.26 % Starting post_as_ho5 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.26 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true))
% 0.11/0.26 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.11/0.26 % Search class: HHUNF-FFSF00-MHHFFFBN
% 0.11/0.26 % partial match(2): HHUPF-FFSF00-SHHFFFBN
% 0.11/0.26 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.26 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.26 % Starting post_as_ho5 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.26 % Starting lpo8_s with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.26 % Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.26 % Starting sh2lt with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.26 % sh5l with pid 1378690 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.11/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
% 0.11/0.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.26 % Starting post_as_ho5 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.26 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true))
% 0.11/0.26 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.11/0.26 % Search class: HHUNF-FFSF00-MHHFFFBN
% 0.11/0.26 % partial match(2): HHUPF-FFSF00-SHHFFFBN
% 0.11/0.26 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.26 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.26 % Starting post_as_ho5 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.26 % Starting lpo8_s with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.26 % Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.26 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.26 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.11/0.26
% 0.11/0.26 % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.26 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.11/0.26 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.26 % Parsed axioms : 2
% 0.11/0.26 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1
% 0.11/0.26 % Initial clauses : 3
% 0.11/0.26 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.11/0.26 % Processed clauses : 2
% 0.11/0.26 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.11/0.26 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Generated clauses : 1
% 0.11/0.26 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % NegExts : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.26 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.26 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.26 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.26 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.26 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.26 % Current number of processed clauses : 1
% 0.11/0.26 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.11/0.26 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.11/0.26 % ...number of literals in the above : 2
% 0.11/0.26 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.11/0.26 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Condensation attempts : 2
% 0.11/0.26 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.11/0.26 % Termbank termtop insertions : 350
% 0.11/0.26 % Search garbage collected termcells : 109
% 0.11/0.26
% 0.11/0.26 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.26 % User time : 0.000 s
% 0.11/0.26 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.11/0.26 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.11/0.26 % Maximum resident set size: 3580 pages
% 0.11/0.26
% 0.11/0.26 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.26 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.11/0.26 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.11/0.26 % Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.11/0.26 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.11/0.26 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------