↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU864^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:28:01 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   48
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   65 (  42 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  146 (  70 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  212 (  83   ~;  28   |;   5   &;  86   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   27 (  27   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   27 (  23 usr;  24 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   65 (  36   ^;  29   !;   0   ?;  65   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    t: a ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    epred1_0: ( a > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    esk2_0: a ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    esk3_0: a ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    esk4_0: a ).

thf(decl_28,type,
    esk5_0: a ).

thf(decl_29,type,
    esk6_0: a ).

thf(decl_30,type,
    esk7_0: a ).

thf(decl_31,type,
    esk8_0: a ).

thf(decl_32,type,
    esk9_0: a ).

thf(decl_33,type,
    esk10_1: ( a > $o ) > a ).

thf(decl_34,type,
    esk11_0: a ).

thf(decl_36,type,
    esk13_0: a ).

thf(decl_38,type,
    esk15_0: a ).

thf(decl_40,type,
    esk17_0: a ).

thf(decl_42,type,
    esk19_0: a ).

thf(decl_44,type,
    esk21_0: a ).

thf(decl_46,type,
    esk23_0: a ).

thf(decl_48,type,
    esk25_0: a ).

thf(decl_49,type,
    esk26_0: a ).

thf(decl_51,type,
    esk28_0: a ).

thf(decl_53,type,
    esk30_0: a ).

thf(decl_55,type,
    esk32_0: a ).

thf(cDOMLEMMA1_pme,conjecture,
    ! [X1: ( a > $o ) > $o] :
      ( ( ( X1
          @ ^ [X2: a] : ~ $true )
        & ! [X3: a > $o] :
            ( ( X1 @ X3 )
           => ! [X4: a] :
                ( ( t = X4 )
               => ( X1
                  @ ^ [X5: a] :
                      ( ( X3 @ X5 )
                      | ( X4 = X5 ) ) ) ) ) )
     => ( X1
        @ ^ [X2: a] : ( t = X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.m4y7NZI1Ce/E---3.1_2208812.p',cDOMLEMMA1_pme) ).

thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: ( a > $o ) > $o] :
        ( ( ( X1
            @ ^ [X2: a] : ~ $true )
          & ! [X3: a > $o] :
              ( ( X1 @ X3 )
             => ! [X4: a] :
                  ( ( t = X4 )
                 => ( X1
                    @ ^ [X5: a] :
                        ( ( X3 @ X5 )
                        | ( X4 = X5 ) ) ) ) ) )
       => ( X1
          @ ^ [X2: a] : ( t = X2 ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cDOMLEMMA1_pme]) ).

thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: ( a > $o ) > $o] :
        ( ( ( X1
            @ ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
          & ! [X3: a > $o] :
              ( ( X1 @ X3 )
             => ! [X4: a] :
                  ( ( t = X4 )
                 => ( X1
                    @ ^ [Z0: a] :
                        ( ( X3 @ Z0 )
                        | ( X4 = Z0 ) ) ) ) ) )
       => ( X1
          @ ^ [Z0: a] : ( t = Z0 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).

thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X10: a > $o,X11: a] :
      ( ( epred1_0
        @ ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
      & ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X10 )
        | ( t != X11 )
        | ( epred1_0
          @ ^ [Z0: a] :
              ( ( X10 @ Z0 )
              | ( X11 = Z0 ) ) ) )
      & ~ ( epred1_0 @ ( $eq @ t ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred1_0
    @ ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( epred1_0 @ ( $eq @ t ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred1_0
    @ ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

thf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
   != ( $eq @ t ) ),
    inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    t = esk2_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
   != ( $eq @ esk2_0 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_10,plain,
    esk2_0 = esk3_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
   != ( $eq @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    esk3_0 = esk4_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])]) ).

thf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
   != ( $eq @ esk4_0 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    esk4_0 = esk5_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])]) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
   != ( $eq @ esk5_0 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

thf(c_0_16,plain,
    esk5_0 = esk6_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])]) ).

thf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
   != ( $eq @ esk6_0 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

thf(c_0_18,plain,
    esk6_0 = esk7_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])]) ).

thf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
   != ( $eq @ esk7_0 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_20,plain,
    esk7_0 = esk8_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])]) ).

thf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
   != ( $eq @ esk8_0 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

thf(c_0_22,plain,
    esk8_0 = esk9_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])]) ).

thf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
   != ( $eq @ esk9_0 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

thf(c_0_24,plain,
    esk9_0 = esk11_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])]) ).

thf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
   != ( $eq @ esk11_0 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

thf(c_0_26,plain,
    esk11_0 = esk13_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_25])]) ).

thf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
   != ( $eq @ esk13_0 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

thf(c_0_28,plain,
    esk13_0 = esk15_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])]) ).

thf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
   != ( $eq @ esk15_0 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

thf(c_0_30,plain,
    esk15_0 = esk17_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_29])]) ).

thf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
   != ( $eq @ esk17_0 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

thf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a > $o,X2: a] :
      ( ( epred1_0
        @ ^ [Z0: a] :
            ( ( X3 @ Z0 )
            | ( X2 = Z0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 )
      | ( t != X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_33,plain,
    esk17_0 = esk19_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_31])]) ).

thf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a > $o] :
      ( ( epred1_0
        @ ^ [Z0: a] :
            ( ( X3 @ Z0 )
            | ( t = Z0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

thf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
   != ( $eq @ esk19_0 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_33]) ).

thf(c_0_36,plain,
    ! [X3: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( $eq @ esk8_0 )
       != ( ^ [Z0: a] :
              ( ( X3 @ Z0 )
              | ( t = Z0 ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_34]),c_0_8]),c_0_10]),c_0_12]),c_0_14]),c_0_16]),c_0_18]),c_0_20]) ).

thf(c_0_37,plain,
    esk19_0 = esk21_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_35])]) ).

thf(c_0_38,plain,
    ! [X3: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( ( X3 @ ( esk10_1 @ X3 ) )
          | ( esk9_0
            = ( esk10_1 @ X3 ) ) )
      <~> ( esk9_0
          = ( esk10_1 @ X3 ) ) )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]),c_0_8]),c_0_10]),c_0_12]),c_0_14]),c_0_16]),c_0_18]),c_0_20]),c_0_22]),c_0_22]) ).

thf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
   != ( $eq @ esk21_0 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_37]) ).

thf(c_0_40,plain,
    ! [X3: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( esk10_1 @ X3 )
       != esk11_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_38])]),c_0_24]) ).

thf(c_0_41,plain,
    esk21_0 = esk23_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_39])]) ).

thf(c_0_42,plain,
    ! [X3: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( esk10_1 @ X3 )
       != esk13_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_26]) ).

thf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
   != ( $eq @ esk23_0 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_41]) ).

thf(c_0_44,plain,
    ! [X3: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( esk10_1 @ X3 )
       != esk15_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_28]) ).

thf(c_0_45,plain,
    esk23_0 = esk25_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])]) ).

thf(c_0_46,plain,
    ! [X3: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( esk10_1 @ X3 )
       != esk17_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_30]) ).

thf(c_0_47,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
   != ( $eq @ esk25_0 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_45]) ).

thf(c_0_48,plain,
    ! [X3: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( esk10_1 @ X3 )
       != esk19_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_33]) ).

thf(c_0_49,plain,
    esk25_0 = esk26_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_47])]) ).

thf(c_0_50,plain,
    ! [X3: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( esk10_1 @ X3 )
       != esk21_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_37]) ).

thf(c_0_51,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
   != ( $eq @ esk26_0 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_49]) ).

thf(c_0_52,plain,
    ! [X3: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( esk10_1 @ X3 )
       != esk23_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_41]) ).

thf(c_0_53,plain,
    esk26_0 = esk28_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_51])]) ).

thf(c_0_54,plain,
    ! [X3: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( esk10_1 @ X3 )
       != esk25_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_45]) ).

thf(c_0_55,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
   != ( $eq @ esk28_0 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_53]) ).

thf(c_0_56,plain,
    ! [X3: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( esk10_1 @ X3 )
       != esk26_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_49]) ).

thf(c_0_57,plain,
    esk28_0 = esk30_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_55])]) ).

thf(c_0_58,plain,
    ! [X3: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( esk10_1 @ X3 )
       != esk28_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_53]) ).

thf(c_0_59,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Z0: a] : ~ $true )
   != ( $eq @ esk30_0 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_57]) ).

thf(c_0_60,plain,
    ! [X3: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( esk10_1 @ X3 )
       != esk30_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_57]) ).

thf(c_0_61,plain,
    esk30_0 = esk32_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_59])]) ).

thf(c_0_62,plain,
    ! [X3: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( esk10_1 @ X3 )
       != esk32_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]) ).

thf(c_0_63,plain,
    ! [X3: a > $o] :
      ( ( X3 @ ( esk10_1 @ X3 ) )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_38])]),c_0_24]),c_0_26]),c_0_28]),c_0_30]),c_0_33]),c_0_37]),c_0_41]),c_0_45]),c_0_49]),c_0_53]),c_0_57]),c_0_61]),c_0_62]) ).

thf(c_0_64,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_6]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU864^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.18  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:40:34 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.19  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.23  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.07/0.25  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.m4y7NZI1Ce/E---3.1_2208812.p
% 0.20/0.28  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.20/0.28  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
% 0.20/0.28  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.28  % Starting post_as_ho5 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.28  % Starting sh2lt with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.28  % Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.28  % Starting post_as_ho10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.28  % post_as_ho5 with pid 2208845 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.28  % Result found by post_as_ho5
% 0.20/0.28  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
% 0.20/0.28  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.28  % Starting post_as_ho5 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.28  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true))
% 0.20/0.28  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.20/0.28  % Search class: HHUSF-FFSF00-MHHFFFBN
% 0.20/0.28  % partial match(2): HHUPF-FFSF00-SHHFFFBN
% 0.20/0.28  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.28  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.28  % Starting post_as_ho5 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.28  % Starting lpo8_s with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.28  % Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.28  % Starting sh2lt with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.28  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2208850 completed with status 10
% 0.20/0.28  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.28  % post_as_ho5 with pid 2208851 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.28  % Result found by post_as_ho5
% 0.20/0.28  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
% 0.20/0.28  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.28  % Starting post_as_ho5 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.28  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true))
% 0.20/0.28  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.20/0.28  % Search class: HHUSF-FFSF00-MHHFFFBN
% 0.20/0.28  % partial match(2): HHUPF-FFSF00-SHHFFFBN
% 0.20/0.28  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.28  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.28  % Starting post_as_ho5 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.28  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.28  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.28  
% 0.20/0.28  % Proof found!
% 0.20/0.28  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.28  % Parsed axioms                        : 3
% 0.20/0.28  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2
% 0.20/0.28  % Initial clauses                      : 3
% 0.20/0.28  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.28  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
% 0.20/0.28  % Processed clauses                    : 506
% 0.20/0.28  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.20/0.28  % ...subsumed                          : 175
% 0.20/0.28  % ...remaining for further processing  : 331
% 0.20/0.28  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.20/0.28  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.28  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.28  % Backward-rewritten                   : 244
% 0.20/0.28  % Generated clauses                    : 536
% 0.20/0.28  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 779
% 0.20/0.28  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.28  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.20/0.28  % Paramodulations                      : 493
% 0.20/0.28  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.28  % NegExts                              : 34
% 0.20/0.28  % Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.20/0.28  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/0.28  % Total rewrite steps                  : 5499
% 0.20/0.28  % ...of those cached                   : 5478
% 0.20/0.28  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.28  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.28  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.28  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.28  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.28  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.28  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.28  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.28  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.28  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.28  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.28  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.28  % Current number of processed clauses  : 81
% 0.20/0.28  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 53
% 0.20/0.28  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.28  %    Negative unit clauses             : 23
% 0.20/0.28  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 5
% 0.20/0.28  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 81
% 0.20/0.28  % ...number of literals in the above   : 98
% 0.20/0.28  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.28  % Current number of archived clauses   : 249
% 0.20/0.28  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 17
% 0.20/0.28  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17
% 0.20/0.28  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.20/0.28  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 675
% 0.20/0.28  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.28  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 51
% 0.20/0.28  % BW rewrite match successes           : 51
% 0.20/0.28  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.28  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.28  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 8585
% 0.20/0.28  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 139
% 0.20/0.28  
% 0.20/0.28  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.28  % User time                : 0.019 s
% 0.20/0.28  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.28  % Total time               : 0.022 s
% 0.20/0.28  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.20/0.28  
% 0.20/0.28  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.28  % User time                : 0.073 s
% 0.20/0.28  % System time              : 0.018 s
% 0.20/0.28  % Total time               : 0.090 s
% 0.20/0.28  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.20/0.28  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------