↑ Up

Nitpick---2016.CSA-FMo.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Nitpick---2016
% Problem  : SEU880^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s

% Computer : n067.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.75MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jan 18 14:25:00 EST 2017

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 34.20s
% Output   : FiniteModel 34.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU880^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.02/0.23  % Computer : n067.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.02/0.23  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.23  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.02/0.23  % Memory   : 32218.75MB
% 0.02/0.23  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.02/0.23  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.23  % DateTime : Sun Jan 15 23:38:19 CST 2017
% 0.02/0.23  % CPUTime  : 
% 34.20/17.92  Nitpicking formula...
% 34.20/17.92  Timestamp: 23:38:28
% 34.20/17.92  Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 34.20/17.92  "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 34.20/17.92  Skipping 5000 scopes. (Consider using "mono" or "merge_type_vars" to prevent
% 34.20/17.92  this.)
% 34.20/17.92  Batch 1 of 1000: Trying 5 scopes:
% 34.20/17.92    card bnd_a = 1 and card bnd_b = 1
% 34.20/17.92    card bnd_a = 1 and card bnd_b = 2
% 34.20/17.92    card bnd_a = 2 and card bnd_b = 1
% 34.20/17.92    card bnd_a = 2 and card bnd_b = 2
% 34.20/17.92    card bnd_a = 1 and card bnd_b = 3
% 34.20/17.92  Limit reached: too high cardinality (65536); skipping scope
% 34.20/17.92  Limit reached: too high cardinality (65536); skipping scope
% 34.20/17.92  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 34.20/17.92  Nitpick found a counterexample for card bnd_a = 1 and card bnd_b = 1:
% 34.20/17.92  
% 34.20/17.92    Constants:
% 34.20/17.92      bnd_cA =
% 34.20/17.92        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 34.20/17.92        ((\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := True) := False,
% 34.20/17.92         (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := False) := False)
% 34.20/17.92      bnd_cB =
% 34.20/17.92        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 34.20/17.92        ((\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := True) := True,
% 34.20/17.92         (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := False) := True)
% 34.20/17.92      bnd_f =
% 34.20/17.92        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 34.20/17.92        ((\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := True) := (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := False),
% 34.20/17.92         (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := False) := (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := False))
% 34.20/17.92  % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 34.20/17.92  Total time: 9.0 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------