↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEU885^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:37:40 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.60s 1.35s
% Output   : Refutation 1.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  129 (  54 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   7 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  138 (  23   ~;  12   |;  23   &;  66   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (   0   ^;  19   !;  16   ?;  35   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    b: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    b: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    cF: b > a ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    cV: b > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    cU: b > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    sK0: a ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    sK1: b ).

thf(f22,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f21,f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( cV @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f18]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cV @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f11,f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( cU @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cU @ sK1 ) )
    & ( sK0
      = ( cF @ sK1 ) )
    & ! [X2: b] :
        ( ( sK0
         != ( cF @ X2 ) )
        | ( ( cV @ X2 )
         != $true ) )
    & ! [X3: b] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( cU @ X3 ) )
        | ( ( cV @ X3 )
          = $true ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f7,f9,f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a] :
        ( ? [X1: b] :
            ( ( ( cU @ X1 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( cF @ X1 )
              = X0 ) )
        & ! [X2: b] :
            ( ( ( cF @ X2 )
             != X0 )
            | ( ( cV @ X2 )
             != $true ) ) )
   => ( ? [X1: b] :
          ( ( ( cU @ X1 )
            = $true )
          & ( ( cF @ X1 )
            = sK0 ) )
      & ! [X2: b] :
          ( ( sK0
           != ( cF @ X2 ) )
          | ( ( cV @ X2 )
           != $true ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X1: b] :
        ( ( ( cU @ X1 )
          = $true )
        & ( ( cF @ X1 )
          = sK0 ) )
   => ( ( $true
        = ( cU @ sK1 ) )
      & ( sK0
        = ( cF @ sK1 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a] :
        ( ? [X1: b] :
            ( ( ( cU @ X1 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( cF @ X1 )
              = X0 ) )
        & ! [X2: b] :
            ( ( ( cF @ X2 )
             != X0 )
            | ( ( cV @ X2 )
             != $true ) ) )
    & ! [X3: b] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( cU @ X3 ) )
        | ( ( cV @ X3 )
          = $true ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ? [X1: a] :
        ( ? [X2: b] :
            ( ( $true
              = ( cU @ X2 ) )
            & ( ( cF @ X2 )
              = X1 ) )
        & ! [X3: b] :
            ( ( ( cF @ X3 )
             != X1 )
            | ( ( cV @ X3 )
             != $true ) ) )
    & ! [X0: b] :
        ( ( ( cU @ X0 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( cV @ X0 )
          = $true ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ( ! [X0: b] :
          ( ( ( cU @ X0 )
            = $true )
         => ( ( cV @ X0 )
            = $true ) )
     => ! [X1: a] :
          ( ? [X2: b] :
              ( ( $true
                = ( cU @ X2 ) )
              & ( ( cF @ X2 )
                = X1 ) )
         => ? [X3: b] :
              ( ( ( cV @ X3 )
                = $true )
              & ( ( cF @ X3 )
                = X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ( ! [X0: b] :
          ( ( cU @ X0 )
         => ( cV @ X0 ) )
     => ! [X1: a] :
          ( ? [X2: b] :
              ( ( cU @ X2 )
              & ( ( cF @ X2 )
                = X1 ) )
         => ? [X3: b] :
              ( ( cV @ X3 )
              & ( ( cF @ X3 )
                = X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X0: b] :
          ( ( cU @ X0 )
         => ( cV @ X0 ) )
     => ! [X0: a] :
          ( ? [X1: b] :
              ( ( cU @ X1 )
              & ( ( cF @ X1 )
                = X0 ) )
         => ? [X1: b] :
              ( ( cV @ X1 )
              & ( ( cF @ X1 )
                = X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ( ! [X0: b] :
        ( ( cU @ X0 )
       => ( cV @ X0 ) )
   => ! [X0: a] :
        ( ? [X1: b] :
            ( ( cU @ X1 )
            & ( ( cF @ X1 )
              = X0 ) )
       => ? [X1: b] :
            ( ( cV @ X1 )
            & ( ( cF @ X1 )
              = X0 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FBQpOuZx1Y/DTF2THF_23623.p',cTHM30A_pme) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X3: b] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( cU @ X3 ) )
      | ( ( cV @ X3 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( cV @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ! [X2: b] :
      ( ( ( cF @ X2 )
       != ( cF @ sK1 ) )
      | ( ( cV @ X2 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f12,f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( sK0
    = ( cF @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X2: b] :
      ( ( sK0
       != ( cF @ X2 ) )
      | ( ( cV @ X2 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU885^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:36:18 EST 2026
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.18/0.46  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.18/0.46  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.18/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.46  % File     : SEU885^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.18/0.46  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.18/0.46  % Problem  : TPS problem THM30A
% 0.18/0.46  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.18/0.46  % English  :
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  % Refs     : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.18/0.46  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.18/0.46  % Names    : tps_0241 [Bro09]
% 0.18/0.46  %          : THM30A [TPS]
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.18/0.46  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v5.3.0, 0.40 v5.2.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.00 v4.0.0
% 0.18/0.46  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    6 (   0 unt;   5 typ;   0 def)
% 0.18/0.46  %            Number of atoms       :    6 (   2 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.18/0.46  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   6 avg)
% 0.18/0.46  %            Number of connectives :   11 (   0   ~;   0   |;   2   &;   6   @)
% 0.18/0.46  %                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.18/0.46  %            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   7 avg)
% 0.18/0.46  %            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
% 0.18/0.46  %            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.18/0.46  %            Number of symbols     :    4 (   3 usr;   0 con; 1-2 aty)
% 0.18/0.46  %            Number of variables   :    4 (   0   ^;   2   !;   2   ?;   4   :)
% 0.18/0.46  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.18/0.46  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.18/0.46  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.18/0.46  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.18/0.46  %          : Polymorphic definitions expanded.
% 0.18/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.46  thf(b_type,type,
% 0.18/0.46      b: $tType ).
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  thf(a_type,type,
% 0.18/0.46      a: $tType ).
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  thf(cF,type,
% 0.18/0.46      cF: b > a ).
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  thf(cV,type,
% 0.18/0.46      cV: b > $o ).
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  thf(cU,type,
% 0.18/0.46      cU: b > $o ).
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  thf(cTHM30A_pme,conjecture,
% 0.18/0.46      ( ! [Xx: b] :
% 0.18/0.46          ( ( cU @ Xx )
% 0.18/0.46         => ( cV @ Xx ) )
% 0.18/0.46     => ! [Xx: a] :
% 0.18/0.46          ( ? [Xt: b] :
% 0.18/0.46              ( ( cU @ Xt )
% 0.18/0.46              & ( Xx
% 0.18/0.46                = ( cF @ Xt ) ) )
% 0.18/0.46         => ? [Xt: b] :
% 0.18/0.46              ( ( cV @ Xt )
% 0.18/0.46              & ( Xx
% 0.18/0.46                = ( cF @ Xt ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.46  ------------------------
% 1.60/1.31  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.60/1.32  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.60/1.32  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:36:19 EST 2026
% 1.60/1.32  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.60/1.32  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.60/1.32  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.60/1.32  
% 1.60/1.32  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FBQpOuZx1Y/DTF2DTF23623.p
% See solution above
% 1.60/1.32  ------------------------
% 1.60/1.33  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.60/1.33  thf(b_type,type,
% 1.60/1.33      b: $tType ).
% 1.60/1.33  
% 1.60/1.33  thf(a_type,type,
% 1.60/1.33      a: $tType ).
% 1.60/1.33  
% 1.60/1.33  thf(cF,type,
% 1.60/1.33      cF: b > a ).
% 1.60/1.33  
% 1.60/1.33  thf(cV,type,
% 1.60/1.33      cV: b > $o ).
% 1.60/1.33  
% 1.60/1.33  thf(cU,type,
% 1.60/1.33      cU: b > $o ).
% 1.60/1.33  
% 1.60/1.33  thf(cTHM30A_pme,conjecture,
% 1.60/1.33      ( ! [Xx: b] :
% 1.60/1.33          ( ( cU @ Xx )
% 1.60/1.33         => ( cV @ Xx ) )
% 1.60/1.33     => ! [Xx: a] :
% 1.60/1.33          ( ? [Xt: b] :
% 1.60/1.33              ( ( cU @ Xt )
% 1.60/1.33              & ( Xx
% 1.60/1.33                = ( cF @ Xt ) ) )
% 1.60/1.33         => ? [Xt: b] :
% 1.60/1.33              ( ( cV @ Xt )
% 1.60/1.33              & ( Xx
% 1.60/1.33                = ( cF @ Xt ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.60/1.33  ------------------------
% 1.60/1.34  % (23827)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_23623 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 1.60/1.34  % (23830)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_23623 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.60/1.34  % (23830)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.60/1.34  % (23830)------------------------------
% 1.60/1.34  % (23830)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.60/1.34  % (23830)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.60/1.34  % (23830)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.60/1.34  
% 1.60/1.34  % (23830)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.60/1.34  % (23830)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.60/1.34  % (23830)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.60/1.34  % (23830)------------------------------
% 1.60/1.34  % (23830)------------------------------
% 1.60/1.34  % (23828)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_23623 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 1.60/1.34  % (23827)First to succeed.
% 1.60/1.35  % (23828)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.60/1.35  % (23827)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.60/1.35  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_23623
% 1.60/1.35  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_23623
% 1.60/1.35  thf(type_def_5, type, b: $tType).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(type_def_6, type, a: $tType).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(func_def_0, type, b: $tType).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(func_def_1, type, a: $tType).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(func_def_2, type, cF: b > a).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(func_def_3, type, cV: b > $o).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(func_def_4, type, cU: b > $o).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(func_def_8, type, sK0: a).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(func_def_9, type, sK1: b).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(f22,plain,(
% 1.60/1.35    $false),
% 1.60/1.35    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f21,f20])).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(f20,plain,(
% 1.60/1.35    ($true = (cV @ sK1))),
% 1.60/1.35    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f18])).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.60/1.35    ($true = (cV @ sK1)) | ($true != $true)),
% 1.60/1.35    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f11,f14])).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.60/1.35    ($true = (cU @ sK1))),
% 1.60/1.35    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.60/1.35    ((($true = (cU @ sK1)) & (sK0 = (cF @ sK1))) & ! [X2 : b] : ((sK0 != (cF @ X2)) | ((cV @ X2) != $true))) & ! [X3 : b] : (($true != (cU @ X3)) | ((cV @ X3) = $true))),
% 1.60/1.35    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f7,f9,f8])).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.60/1.35    ? [X0 : a] : (? [X1 : b] : (((cU @ X1) = $true) & ((cF @ X1) = X0)) & ! [X2 : b] : (((cF @ X2) != X0) | ((cV @ X2) != $true))) => (? [X1 : b] : (((cU @ X1) = $true) & ((cF @ X1) = sK0)) & ! [X2 : b] : ((sK0 != (cF @ X2)) | ((cV @ X2) != $true)))),
% 1.60/1.35    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.60/1.35    ? [X1 : b] : (((cU @ X1) = $true) & ((cF @ X1) = sK0)) => (($true = (cU @ sK1)) & (sK0 = (cF @ sK1)))),
% 1.60/1.35    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.60/1.35    ? [X0 : a] : (? [X1 : b] : (((cU @ X1) = $true) & ((cF @ X1) = X0)) & ! [X2 : b] : (((cF @ X2) != X0) | ((cV @ X2) != $true))) & ! [X3 : b] : (($true != (cU @ X3)) | ((cV @ X3) = $true))),
% 1.60/1.35    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.60/1.35    ? [X1 : a] : (? [X2 : b] : (($true = (cU @ X2)) & ((cF @ X2) = X1)) & ! [X3 : b] : (((cF @ X3) != X1) | ((cV @ X3) != $true))) & ! [X0 : b] : (((cU @ X0) != $true) | ((cV @ X0) = $true))),
% 1.60/1.35    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.60/1.35    ~(! [X0 : b] : (((cU @ X0) = $true) => ((cV @ X0) = $true)) => ! [X1 : a] : (? [X2 : b] : (($true = (cU @ X2)) & ((cF @ X2) = X1)) => ? [X3 : b] : (((cV @ X3) = $true) & ((cF @ X3) = X1))))),
% 1.60/1.35    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.60/1.35    ~(! [X0 : b] : ((cU @ X0) => (cV @ X0)) => ! [X1 : a] : (? [X2 : b] : ((cU @ X2) & ((cF @ X2) = X1)) => ? [X3 : b] : ((cV @ X3) & ((cF @ X3) = X1))))),
% 1.60/1.35    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.60/1.35    ~(! [X0 : b] : ((cU @ X0) => (cV @ X0)) => ! [X0 : a] : (? [X1 : b] : ((cU @ X1) & ((cF @ X1) = X0)) => ? [X1 : b] : ((cV @ X1) & ((cF @ X1) = X0))))),
% 1.60/1.35    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.60/1.35    ! [X0 : b] : ((cU @ X0) => (cV @ X0)) => ! [X0 : a] : (? [X1 : b] : ((cU @ X1) & ((cF @ X1) = X0)) => ? [X1 : b] : ((cV @ X1) & ((cF @ X1) = X0)))),
% 1.60/1.35    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FBQpOuZx1Y/DTF2THF_23623.p',cTHM30A_pme)).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.60/1.35    ( ! [X3 : b] : (($true != (cU @ X3)) | ((cV @ X3) = $true)) )),
% 1.60/1.35    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.60/1.35    ($true != (cV @ sK1))),
% 1.60/1.35    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f15])).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.60/1.35    ( ! [X2 : b] : (((cF @ X2) != (cF @ sK1)) | ((cV @ X2) != $true)) )),
% 1.60/1.35    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f12,f13])).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.60/1.35    (sK0 = (cF @ sK1))),
% 1.60/1.35    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.60/1.35  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.60/1.35    ( ! [X2 : b] : ((sK0 != (cF @ X2)) | ((cV @ X2) != $true)) )),
% 1.60/1.35    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.60/1.35  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_23623
% 1.60/1.35  % (23827)------------------------------
% 1.60/1.35  % (23827)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.60/1.35  % (23827)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.60/1.35  
% 1.60/1.35  % (23827)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.60/1.35  % (23827)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.60/1.35  % (23827)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.60/1.35  % (23827)------------------------------
% 1.60/1.35  % (23827)------------------------------
% 1.60/1.35  % (23825)Success in time 0.016 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------