↑ Up

Nitpick---2016.CSA-FMo.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Nitpick---2016
% Problem  : SEU911^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s

% Computer : n048.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.75MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jan 18 14:25:04 EST 2017

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 27.33s
% Output   : FiniteModel 27.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU911^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.03/0.23  % Computer : n048.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.23  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.23  % Memory   : 32218.75MB
% 0.03/0.23  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.24  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.24  % DateTime : Sun Jan 15 23:39:48 CST 2017
% 0.03/0.24  % CPUTime  : 
% 27.33/20.34  Nitpicking formula...
% 27.33/20.34  Timestamp: 23:39:57
% 27.33/20.34  The type bnd_c passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be able to skip
% 27.33/20.34  some scopes
% 27.33/20.34  Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 27.33/20.34  "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 27.33/20.34  Skipping 995000 scopes. (Consider using "mono" or "merge_type_vars" to
% 27.33/20.34  prevent this.)
% 27.33/20.34  Batch 1 of 1000: Trying 5 scopes:
% 27.33/20.34    card bnd_c = 1, card bnd_a = 1, and card bnd_b = 1
% 27.33/20.34    card bnd_c = 2, card bnd_a = 2, and card bnd_b = 2
% 27.33/20.34    card bnd_c = 3, card bnd_a = 3, and card bnd_b = 3
% 27.33/20.34    card bnd_c = 4, card bnd_a = 4, and card bnd_b = 4
% 27.33/20.34    card bnd_c = 5, card bnd_a = 5, and card bnd_b = 5
% 27.33/20.34  Limit reached: arity 64 of bound variable too large; skipping scope
% 27.33/20.34  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 27.33/20.34  Nitpick found a counterexample for card bnd_c = 1, card bnd_a = 1, and
% 27.33/20.34  card bnd_b = 1:
% 27.33/20.34  
% 27.33/20.34    Skolem constant:
% 27.33/20.34      Xx = (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := True)
% 27.33/20.34    Constants:
% 27.33/20.34      bnd_cA =
% 27.33/20.34        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 27.33/20.34        ((\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := True) := False,
% 27.33/20.34         (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := False) := True)
% 27.33/20.34      bnd_cB =
% 27.33/20.34        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 27.33/20.34        ((\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := True) := True,
% 27.33/20.34         (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := False) := True)
% 27.33/20.34      bnd_cC =
% 27.33/20.34        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 27.33/20.34        ((\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := True) := True,
% 27.33/20.34         (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := False) := False)
% 27.33/20.34      bnd_f =
% 27.33/20.34        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 27.33/20.34        ((\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := True) := (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := False),
% 27.33/20.34         (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := False) := (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := False))
% 27.33/20.34      bnd_g =
% 27.33/20.34        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 27.33/20.34        ((\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := True) := (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := False),
% 27.33/20.34         (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := False) := (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := False))
% 27.33/20.34  % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 27.33/20.34  Total time: 8.6 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------