↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SEU917^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:29:35 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.69s 1.48s
% Output   : Refutation 3.03s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   8 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   22 (  21 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   55 (  10   ~;   1   |;   1   &;  38   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   12 (  12   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    4 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   4   ^;  14   !;   3   ?;  23   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   2  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: ( $i > $i ) > $i ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: ( $i > $i ) > $i ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i] :
        @+[B: $i] :
          ~ ! [C: $i] :
              ( ( ( A @ B )
                = ( A @ C ) )
             => ( B = C ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i] :
        @+[B: $i] :
          ~ ( ( ( A @ ( sk1 @ A ) )
              = ( A @ B ) )
           => ( ( sk1 @ A )
              = B ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ? [A: $i > $i] :
    ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ B )
        = ( A @ C ) )
     => ( B = C ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM8_pme) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [A: $i > $i] :
      ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
        ( ( ( A @ B )
          = ( A @ C ) )
       => ( B = C ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ? [A: $i > $i] :
      ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
        ( ( ( A @ B )
          = ( A @ C ) )
       => ( B = C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( sk1 @ A ) )
        = ( A @ ( sk2 @ A ) ) )
      & ( ( sk1 @ A )
       != ( sk2 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( sk1 @ A ) )
      = ( A @ ( sk2 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( sk2 @ A ) )
      = ( A @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i] :
      ( ( sk1 @ A )
     != ( sk2 @ A ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i] :
      ( ( sk2 @ A )
     != ( sk1 @ A ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $i,A: $i > $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( sk1 @ A ) )
       != ( sk1 @ B ) )
      | ( ( A @ ( sk2 @ A ) )
       != ( sk2 @ B ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[7,8]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ( ( sk1
      @ ^ [A: $i] : A )
   != ( sk1
      @ ^ [A: $i] : A ) ),
    inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[10:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [C: $i] : C )),bind(B,$thf( ^ [C: $i] : C ))]]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[14:[]]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU917^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.09/0.22  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.22  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.22  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.22  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.22  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.22  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.22  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.22  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:46:19 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.22  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.22  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.89/0.75  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.10/0.84  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (91ms). 
% 1.10/0.84  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.53/1.04  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.53/1.04  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.53/1.08  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.53/1.10  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.53/1.10  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 1.53/1.10  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.53/1.10  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 2.69/1.47  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 2.69/1.48  % Time passed: 1120ms (effective reasoning time: 627ms)
% 2.69/1.48  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 2.69/1.48  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 2.69/1.48  % No. of inferences in proof: 11
% 2.69/1.48  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1120 ms resp. 627 ms w/o parsing
% 3.03/1.51  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.03/1.51  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------