↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEU920^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:37:45 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.26s 1.18s
% Output   : Refutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   24 (  23 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   58 (  11   ~;   0   |;   5   &;  36   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   3 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   12 (  12   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   50 (   0   ^;  28   !;  22   ?;  50   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    b: $tType ).

thf(type_def_8,type,
    c: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    b: $tType ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    c: $tType ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    sK0: b > c ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    sK1: a > b ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    sK2: c ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    sK3: c > a ).

thf(f14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ! [X0: c] : ( sK2 != X0 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f12,f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X4: c] :
      ( ( sK0 @ ( sK1 @ ( sK3 @ X4 ) ) )
      = X4 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ! [X3: b] :
        ( ( sK0 @ X3 )
       != sK2 )
    & ! [X4: c] :
        ( ( sK0 @ ( sK1 @ ( sK3 @ X4 ) ) )
        = X4 ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f6,f9,f8,f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X0: b > c,X1: a > b] :
        ( ? [X2: c] :
          ! [X3: b] :
            ( ( X0 @ X3 )
           != X2 )
        & ! [X4: c] :
          ? [X5: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ ( X1 @ X5 ) )
            = X4 ) )
   => ( ? [X2: c] :
        ! [X3: b] :
          ( ( sK0 @ X3 )
         != X2 )
      & ! [X4: c] :
        ? [X5: a] :
          ( ( sK0 @ ( sK1 @ X5 ) )
          = X4 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ? [X2: c] :
      ! [X3: b] :
        ( ( sK0 @ X3 )
       != X2 )
   => ! [X3: b] :
        ( ( sK0 @ X3 )
       != sK2 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ! [X4: c] :
      ( ? [X5: a] :
          ( ( sK0 @ ( sK1 @ X5 ) )
          = X4 )
     => ( ( sK0 @ ( sK1 @ ( sK3 @ X4 ) ) )
        = X4 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X0: b > c,X1: a > b] :
      ( ? [X2: c] :
        ! [X3: b] :
          ( ( X0 @ X3 )
         != X2 )
      & ! [X4: c] :
        ? [X5: a] :
          ( ( X0 @ ( X1 @ X5 ) )
          = X4 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ? [X0: b > c,X1: a > b] :
      ( ? [X4: c] :
        ! [X5: b] :
          ( ( X0 @ X5 )
         != X4 )
      & ! [X2: c] :
        ? [X3: a] :
          ( ( X0 @ ( X1 @ X3 ) )
          = X2 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X1: a > b,X0: b > c] :
        ( ! [X2: c] :
          ? [X3: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ ( X1 @ X3 ) )
            = X2 )
       => ! [X4: c] :
          ? [X5: b] :
            ( ( X0 @ X5 )
            = X4 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: b > c,X0: a > b] :
        ( ! [X2: c] :
          ? [X3: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ ( X0 @ X3 ) )
            = X2 )
       => ! [X2: c] :
          ? [X3: b] :
            ( ( X1 @ X3 )
            = X2 ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X1: b > c,X0: a > b] :
      ( ! [X2: c] :
        ? [X3: a] :
          ( ( X1 @ ( X0 @ X3 ) )
          = X2 )
     => ! [X2: c] :
        ? [X3: b] :
          ( ( X1 @ X3 )
          = X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zxhEmD158A/DTF2THF_16331.p',cFN_THM_4_pme) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X3: b] :
      ( ( sK0 @ X3 )
     != sK2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SEU920^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:38:03 EST 2026
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.33  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.43  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.16/0.43  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.16/0.43  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43  % File     : SEU920^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.16/0.43  % Domain   : Set Theory (Functions)
% 0.16/0.43  % Problem  : TPS problem FN-THM-4
% 0.16/0.43  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.16/0.43  % English  : 
% 0.16/0.43  
% 0.16/0.43  % Refs     : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.16/0.43  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.16/0.43  % Names    : tps_0114 [Bro09]
% 0.16/0.43  %          : FN-THM-4 [TPS]
% 0.16/0.43  
% 0.16/0.43  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.16/0.43  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v5.3.0, 0.40 v5.2.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.00 v4.0.0
% 0.16/0.43  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    4 (   0 unt;   3 typ;   0 def)
% 0.16/0.43  %            Number of atoms       :    2 (   2 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.16/0.43  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   2 avg)
% 0.16/0.43  %            Number of connectives :    4 (   0   ~;   0   |;   0   &;   3   @)
% 0.16/0.43  %                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.16/0.43  %            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   6 avg)
% 0.16/0.43  %            Number of types       :    3 (   3 usr)
% 0.16/0.43  %            Number of type conns  :    2 (   2   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.16/0.43  %            Number of symbols     :    1 (   0 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.16/0.43  %            Number of variables   :    6 (   0   ^;   4   !;   2   ?;   6   :)
% 0.16/0.43  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.16/0.43  
% 0.16/0.43  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.16/0.43  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.16/0.43  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.16/0.43  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.16/0.43  %          : Polymorphic definitions expanded.
% 0.16/0.43  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43  thf(a_type,type,
% 0.16/0.43      a: $tType ).
% 0.16/0.43  
% 0.16/0.43  thf(b_type,type,
% 0.16/0.43      b: $tType ).
% 0.16/0.43  
% 0.16/0.43  thf(c_type,type,
% 0.16/0.43      c: $tType ).
% 0.16/0.43  
% 0.16/0.43  thf(cFN_THM_4_pme,conjecture,
% 0.16/0.43      ! [F: a > b,G: b > c] :
% 0.16/0.43        ( ! [Y: c] :
% 0.16/0.43          ? [X: a] :
% 0.16/0.43            ( ( G @ ( F @ X ) )
% 0.16/0.43            = Y )
% 0.16/0.43       => ! [Y: c] :
% 0.16/0.43          ? [X: b] :
% 0.16/0.43            ( ( G @ X )
% 0.16/0.43            = Y ) ) ).
% 0.16/0.43  
% 0.16/0.43  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43  ------------------------
% 1.26/1.16  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.26/1.16  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.26/1.16  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:38:04 EST 2026
% 1.26/1.16  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.26/1.16  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.26/1.16  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.26/1.16  
% 1.26/1.16  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zxhEmD158A/DTF2DTF16331.p
% See solution above
% 1.26/1.16  ------------------------
% 1.26/1.17  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.26/1.17  thf(a_type,type,
% 1.26/1.17      a: $tType ).
% 1.26/1.17  
% 1.26/1.17  thf(b_type,type,
% 1.26/1.17      b: $tType ).
% 1.26/1.17  
% 1.26/1.17  thf(c_type,type,
% 1.26/1.17      c: $tType ).
% 1.26/1.17  
% 1.26/1.17  thf(cFN_THM_4_pme,conjecture,
% 1.26/1.17      ! [F: a > b,G: b > c] :
% 1.26/1.17        ( ! [Y: c] :
% 1.26/1.17          ? [X: a] :
% 1.26/1.17            ( ( G @ ( F @ X ) )
% 1.26/1.17            = Y )
% 1.26/1.17       => ! [Y: c] :
% 1.26/1.17          ? [X: b] :
% 1.26/1.17            ( ( G @ X )
% 1.26/1.17            = Y ) ) ).
% 1.26/1.17  ------------------------
% 1.26/1.18  % (16428)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_16331 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.26/1.18  % (16428)First to succeed.
% 1.26/1.18  % (16428)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.26/1.18  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_16331
% 1.26/1.18  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_16331
% 1.26/1.18  thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
% 1.26/1.18  thf(type_def_6, type, b: $tType).
% 1.26/1.18  thf(type_def_8, type, c: $tType).
% 1.26/1.18  thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 1.26/1.18  thf(func_def_1, type, b: $tType).
% 1.26/1.18  thf(func_def_2, type, c: $tType).
% 1.26/1.18  thf(func_def_6, type, sK0: b > c).
% 1.26/1.18  thf(func_def_7, type, sK1: a > b).
% 1.26/1.18  thf(func_def_8, type, sK2: c).
% 1.26/1.18  thf(func_def_9, type, sK3: c > a).
% 1.26/1.18  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.26/1.18    $false),
% 1.26/1.18    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.26/1.18  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.26/1.18    ( ! [X0 : c] : ((sK2 != X0)) )),
% 1.26/1.18    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f12,f11])).
% 1.26/1.18  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.26/1.18    ( ! [X4 : c] : (((sK0 @ (sK1 @ (sK3 @ X4))) = X4)) )),
% 1.26/1.18    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.26/1.18  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.26/1.18    ! [X3 : b] : ((sK0 @ X3) != sK2) & ! [X4 : c] : ((sK0 @ (sK1 @ (sK3 @ X4))) = X4)),
% 1.26/1.18    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f6,f9,f8,f7])).
% 1.26/1.18  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.26/1.18    ? [X0 : b > c,X1 : a > b] : (? [X2 : c] : ! [X3 : b] : ((X0 @ X3) != X2) & ! [X4 : c] : ? [X5 : a] : ((X0 @ (X1 @ X5)) = X4)) => (? [X2 : c] : ! [X3 : b] : ((sK0 @ X3) != X2) & ! [X4 : c] : ? [X5 : a] : ((sK0 @ (sK1 @ X5)) = X4))),
% 1.26/1.18    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.26/1.18  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.26/1.18    ? [X2 : c] : ! [X3 : b] : ((sK0 @ X3) != X2) => ! [X3 : b] : ((sK0 @ X3) != sK2)),
% 1.26/1.18    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.26/1.18  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.26/1.18    ! [X4 : c] : (? [X5 : a] : ((sK0 @ (sK1 @ X5)) = X4) => ((sK0 @ (sK1 @ (sK3 @ X4))) = X4))),
% 1.26/1.18    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.26/1.18  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.26/1.18    ? [X0 : b > c,X1 : a > b] : (? [X2 : c] : ! [X3 : b] : ((X0 @ X3) != X2) & ! [X4 : c] : ? [X5 : a] : ((X0 @ (X1 @ X5)) = X4))),
% 1.26/1.18    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.26/1.18  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.26/1.18    ? [X0 : b > c,X1 : a > b] : (? [X4 : c] : ! [X5 : b] : ((X0 @ X5) != X4) & ! [X2 : c] : ? [X3 : a] : ((X0 @ (X1 @ X3)) = X2))),
% 1.26/1.18    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.26/1.18  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.26/1.18    ~! [X1 : a > b,X0 : b > c] : (! [X2 : c] : ? [X3 : a] : ((X0 @ (X1 @ X3)) = X2) => ! [X4 : c] : ? [X5 : b] : ((X0 @ X5) = X4))),
% 1.26/1.18    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.26/1.18  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.26/1.18    ~! [X1 : b > c,X0 : a > b] : (! [X2 : c] : ? [X3 : a] : ((X1 @ (X0 @ X3)) = X2) => ! [X2 : c] : ? [X3 : b] : ((X1 @ X3) = X2))),
% 1.26/1.18    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.26/1.18  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.26/1.18    ! [X1 : b > c,X0 : a > b] : (! [X2 : c] : ? [X3 : a] : ((X1 @ (X0 @ X3)) = X2) => ! [X2 : c] : ? [X3 : b] : ((X1 @ X3) = X2))),
% 1.26/1.18    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zxhEmD158A/DTF2THF_16331.p',cFN_THM_4_pme)).
% 1.26/1.18  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.26/1.18    ( ! [X3 : b] : (((sK0 @ X3) != sK2)) )),
% 1.26/1.18    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.26/1.18  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_16331
% 1.26/1.18  % (16428)------------------------------
% 1.26/1.18  % (16428)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.26/1.18  % (16428)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.26/1.18  
% 1.26/1.18  % (16428)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.26/1.18  % (16428)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.26/1.18  % (16428)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.26/1.18  % (16428)------------------------------
% 1.26/1.18  % (16428)------------------------------
% 1.26/1.18  % (16427)Success in time 0.011 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------