↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SEU920^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:29:35 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.33s 2.09s
% Output   : Refutation 3.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (  11 unt;   0 typ;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   27 (  26 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   54 (  12   ~;   1   |;   1   &;  35   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   3 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    9 (   9   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   43 (   1   ^;  27   !;  11   ?;  43   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   4  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(a_type,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(b_type,type,
    b: $tType ).

thf(c_type,type,
    c: $tType ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: a > b ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: b > c ).

thf(sk3_decl,type,
    sk3: c > a ).

thf(sk4_decl,type,
    sk4: c ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: a > b] :
          ~ ! [B: b > c] :
              ( ! [C: c] :
                ? [D: a] :
                  ( ( B @ ( A @ D ) )
                  = C )
             => ! [C: c] :
                ? [D: b] :
                  ( ( B @ D )
                  = C ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( @+[A: b > c] :
          ~ ( ! [B: c] :
              ? [C: a] :
                ( ( A @ ( sk1 @ C ) )
                = B )
           => ! [B: c] :
              ? [C: b] :
                ( ( A @ C )
                = B ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk3_def,definition,
    ( sk3
    = ( ^ [A: c] :
        @+[B: a] :
          ( ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ B ) )
          = A ) ) ) ).

thf(sk4_def,definition,
    ( sk4
    = ( @+[A: c] :
          ~ ? [B: b] :
              ( ( sk2 @ B )
              = A ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: a > b,B: b > c] :
      ( ! [C: c] :
        ? [D: a] :
          ( ( B @ ( A @ D ) )
          = C )
     => ! [C: c] :
        ? [D: b] :
          ( ( B @ D )
          = C ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cFN_THM_4_pme) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: a > b,B: b > c] :
        ( ! [C: c] :
          ? [D: a] :
            ( ( B @ ( A @ D ) )
            = C )
       => ! [C: c] :
          ? [D: b] :
            ( ( B @ D )
            = C ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ! [A: a > b,B: b > c] :
        ( ! [C: c] :
          ? [D: a] :
            ( ( B @ ( A @ D ) )
            = C )
       => ! [C: c] :
          ? [D: b] :
            ( ( B @ D )
            = C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ! [B: b,A: c] :
      ( ( ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ ( sk3 @ A ) ) )
        = A )
      & ( ( sk2 @ B )
       != sk4 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ! [A: c] :
      ( ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ ( sk3 @ A ) ) )
      = A ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ! [A: c] :
      ( ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ ( sk3 @ A ) ) )
      = A ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ! [A: b] :
      ( ( sk2 @ A )
     != sk4 ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ! [A: b] :
      ( ( sk2 @ A )
     != sk4 ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ! [A: b] :
      ( ( sk2 @ A )
     != sk4 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [B: b,A: c] :
      ( ( A != sk4 )
      | ( ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ ( sk3 @ A ) ) )
       != ( sk2 @ B ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[7,9]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [A: c] : ( A != sk4 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[10:[bind(A,$thf( D )),bind(B,$thf( sk1 @ ( sk3 @ D ) ))]]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU920^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.09/0.19  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:48:26 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.19  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.89/0.78  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.24/0.97  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (181ms). 
% 1.24/0.98  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.85/1.39  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.85/1.39  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.04/1.48  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.21/1.52  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.21/1.52  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.21/1.52  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.21/1.53  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.33/2.09  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.33/2.09  % Time passed: 1749ms (effective reasoning time: 1099ms)
% 3.33/2.09  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.33/2.09  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 3.33/2.09  % No. of inferences in proof: 12
% 3.33/2.09  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1749 ms resp. 1099 ms w/o parsing
% 3.58/2.15  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.58/2.15  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------