↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEU926^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:37:46 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.65s 1.30s
% Output   : Refutation 1.65s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   94 (  39 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  157 (  18   ~;   6   |;  19   &; 101   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   42 (  42   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   52 (  13   ^;  22   !;  17   ?;  52   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_5,type,
    sK0: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    sK1: ( ( $i > $i ) > $o ) > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    sK2: ( ( $i > $i ) > $o ) > $i ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    ph4: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f22,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f21]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    $true = $false,
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i] : $false
      @ ( sK1
        @ ^ [Y0: $i > $i] : $false ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(primitive_instantiation,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X1: ( $i > $i ) > $o] :
      ( ( X1 @ ( sK1 @ X1 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X1: ( $i > $i ) > $o] :
      ( ( ( X1 @ ( sK1 @ X1 ) )
        = $true )
      & ( ( $true
         != ( X1
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK1 @ X1 @ ( sK1 @ X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
        | ( ( ( sK0 @ ( sK1 @ X1 @ ( sK2 @ X1 ) ) )
           != $true )
          & ( $true
            = ( sK0 @ ( sK2 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f7,f10,f9,f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i > $o] :
      ! [X1: ( $i > $i ) > $o] :
      ? [X2: $i > $i] :
        ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
          = $true )
        & ( ( $true
           != ( X1
              @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
          | ? [X3: $i] :
              ( ( $true
               != ( X0 @ ( X2 @ X3 ) ) )
              & ( ( X0 @ X3 )
                = $true ) ) ) )
   => ! [X1: ( $i > $i ) > $o] :
      ? [X2: $i > $i] :
        ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
          = $true )
        & ( ( $true
           != ( X1
              @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
          | ? [X3: $i] :
              ( ( ( sK0 @ ( X2 @ X3 ) )
               != $true )
              & ( $true
                = ( sK0 @ X3 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ! [X1: ( $i > $i ) > $o] :
      ( ? [X2: $i > $i] :
          ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
            = $true )
          & ( ( $true
             != ( X1
                @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
            | ? [X3: $i] :
                ( ( ( sK0 @ ( X2 @ X3 ) )
                 != $true )
                & ( $true
                  = ( sK0 @ X3 ) ) ) ) )
     => ( ( ( X1 @ ( sK1 @ X1 ) )
          = $true )
        & ( ( $true
           != ( X1
              @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( sK1 @ X1 @ ( sK1 @ X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
          | ? [X3: $i] :
              ( ( ( sK0 @ ( sK1 @ X1 @ X3 ) )
               != $true )
              & ( $true
                = ( sK0 @ X3 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X1: ( $i > $i ) > $o] :
      ( ? [X3: $i] :
          ( ( ( sK0 @ ( sK1 @ X1 @ X3 ) )
           != $true )
          & ( $true
            = ( sK0 @ X3 ) ) )
     => ( ( ( sK0 @ ( sK1 @ X1 @ ( sK2 @ X1 ) ) )
         != $true )
        & ( $true
          = ( sK0 @ ( sK2 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X0: $i > $o] :
    ! [X1: ( $i > $i ) > $o] :
    ? [X2: $i > $i] :
      ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
        = $true )
      & ( ( $true
         != ( X1
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
        | ? [X3: $i] :
            ( ( $true
             != ( X0 @ ( X2 @ X3 ) ) )
            & ( ( X0 @ X3 )
              = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i > $o] :
      ? [X1: ( $i > $i ) > $o] :
      ! [X2: $i > $i] :
        ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
          = $true )
       => ( ! [X3: $i] :
              ( ( ( X0 @ X3 )
                = $true )
             => ( $true
                = ( X0 @ ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ) )
          & ( $true
            = ( X1
              @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i > $o] :
      ? [X1: ( $i > $i ) > $o] :
      ! [X2: $i > $i] :
        ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
          = $true )
       => ( ( $true
            = ( X1
              @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X2 @ ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
          & ! [X4: $i] :
              ( ( ( X0 @ X4 )
                = $true )
             => ( ( X0 @ ( X2 @ X4 ) )
                = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i > $o] :
      ? [X1: ( $i > $i ) > $o] :
      ! [X2: $i > $i] :
        ( ( X1 @ X2 )
       => ( ( X1
            @ ^ [X3: $i] : ( X2 @ ( X2 @ X3 ) ) )
          & ! [X4: $i] :
              ( ( X0 @ X4 )
             => ( X0 @ ( X2 @ X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: $i > $o] :
      ? [X1: ( $i > $i ) > $o] :
      ! [X2: $i > $i] :
        ( ( X1 @ X2 )
       => ( ( X1
            @ ^ [X3: $i] : ( X2 @ ( X2 @ X3 ) ) )
          & ! [X4: $i] :
              ( ( X0 @ X4 )
             => ( X0 @ ( X2 @ X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i > $o] :
    ? [X1: ( $i > $i ) > $o] :
    ! [X2: $i > $i] :
      ( ( X1 @ X2 )
     => ( ( X1
          @ ^ [X3: $i] : ( X2 @ ( X2 @ X3 ) ) )
        & ! [X4: $i] :
            ( ( X0 @ X4 )
           => ( X0 @ ( X2 @ X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZpJQKmtmZB/DTF2THF_8318.p',cTHM113) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU926^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.17/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:37:40 EST 2026
% 0.17/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.20/0.46  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.20/0.46  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.20/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.46  % File     : SEU926^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.20/0.46  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.20/0.46  % Problem  : TPS problem THM113
% 0.20/0.46  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.20/0.46  % English  : There is a set of functions on P closed under composition.
% 0.20/0.46  
% 0.20/0.46  % Refs     : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.46  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.20/0.46  % Names    : tps_0214 [Bro09]
% 0.20/0.46  %          : THM113 [TPS]
% 0.20/0.46  
% 0.20/0.46  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.20/0.46  % Rating   : 0.08 v9.1.0, 0.12 v9.0.0, 0.08 v8.2.0, 0.09 v8.1.0, 0.17 v7.4.0, 0.11 v7.3.0, 0.20 v7.2.0, 0.12 v7.1.0, 0.14 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.4.0, 0.14 v6.3.0, 0.17 v6.2.0, 0.33 v6.1.0, 0.17 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.50 v5.2.0, 0.00 v5.1.0, 0.25 v5.0.0, 0.00 v4.0.1, 0.33 v4.0.0
% 0.20/0.46  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    1 (   0 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
% 0.20/0.46  %            Number of atoms       :    0 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.20/0.46  %            Maximal formula atoms :    0 (   0 avg)
% 0.20/0.46  %            Number of connectives :   10 (   0   ~;   0   |;   1   &;   7   @)
% 0.20/0.46  %                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.46  %            Maximal formula depth :   10 (  10 avg)
% 0.20/0.46  %            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
% 0.20/0.46  %            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.20/0.46  %            Number of symbols     :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.20/0.46  %            Number of variables   :    5 (   1   ^;   3   !;   1   ?;   5   :)
% 0.20/0.46  % SPC      : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.20/0.46  
% 0.20/0.46  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.20/0.46  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.20/0.46  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.20/0.46  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.20/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.46  thf(cTHM113,conjecture,
% 0.20/0.46      ! [P: $i > $o] :
% 0.20/0.46      ? [M: ( $i > $i ) > $o] :
% 0.20/0.46      ! [G: $i > $i] :
% 0.20/0.46        ( ( M @ G )
% 0.20/0.46       => ( ( M
% 0.20/0.46            @ ^ [Z: $i] : ( G @ ( G @ Z ) ) )
% 0.20/0.46          & ! [Y: $i] :
% 0.20/0.46              ( ( P @ Y )
% 0.20/0.46             => ( P @ ( G @ Y ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.46  
% 0.20/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.46  ------------------------
% 1.50/1.27  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.50/1.27  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.50/1.27  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:37:41 EST 2026
% 1.50/1.27  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.50/1.27  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.50/1.27  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.50/1.27  
% 1.50/1.27  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZpJQKmtmZB/DTF2DTF8318.p
% See solution above
% 1.50/1.27  ------------------------
% 1.50/1.29  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.50/1.29  thf(cTHM113,conjecture,
% 1.50/1.29      ! [P: $i > $o] :
% 1.50/1.29      ? [M: ( $i > $i ) > $o] :
% 1.50/1.29      ! [G: $i > $i] :
% 1.50/1.29        ( ( M @ G )
% 1.50/1.29       => ( ( M
% 1.50/1.29            @ ^ [Z: $i] : ( G @ ( G @ Z ) ) )
% 1.50/1.29          & ! [Y: $i] :
% 1.50/1.29              ( ( P @ Y )
% 1.50/1.29             => ( P @ ( G @ Y ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.50/1.29  ------------------------
% 1.65/1.30  % (8498)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_8318 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.65/1.30  % (8498)First to succeed.
% 1.65/1.30  % (8498)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.65/1.30  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_8318
% 1.65/1.30  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_8318
% 1.65/1.30  thf(func_def_5, type, sK0: $i > $o).
% 1.65/1.30  thf(func_def_6, type, sK1: (($i > $i) > $o) > $i > $i).
% 1.65/1.30  thf(func_def_7, type, sK2: (($i > $i) > $o) > $i).
% 1.65/1.30  thf(func_def_10, type, ph4: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.65/1.30  thf(f22,plain,(
% 1.65/1.30    $false),
% 1.65/1.30    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f21])).
% 1.65/1.30  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.65/1.30    ($true = $false)),
% 1.65/1.30    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f16])).
% 1.65/1.30  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.65/1.30    (((^[Y0 : $i > $i]: ($false)) @ (sK1 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: ($false)))) = $true)),
% 1.65/1.30    inference(primitive_instantiation,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 1.65/1.30  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.65/1.30    ( ! [X1 : ($i > $i) > $o] : (((X1 @ (sK1 @ X1)) = $true)) )),
% 1.65/1.30    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.65/1.30  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.65/1.30    ! [X1 : ($i > $i) > $o] : (((X1 @ (sK1 @ X1)) = $true) & (($true != (X1 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK1 @ X1 @ (sK1 @ X1 @ Y0))))) | (((sK0 @ (sK1 @ X1 @ (sK2 @ X1))) != $true) & ($true = (sK0 @ (sK2 @ X1))))))),
% 1.65/1.30    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f7,f10,f9,f8])).
% 1.65/1.30  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.65/1.30    ? [X0 : $i > $o] : ! [X1 : ($i > $i) > $o] : ? [X2 : $i > $i] : (((X1 @ X2) = $true) & (($true != (X1 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ (X2 @ Y0))))) | ? [X3 : $i] : (($true != (X0 @ (X2 @ X3))) & ((X0 @ X3) = $true)))) => ! [X1 : ($i > $i) > $o] : ? [X2 : $i > $i] : (((X1 @ X2) = $true) & (($true != (X1 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ (X2 @ Y0))))) | ? [X3 : $i] : (((sK0 @ (X2 @ X3)) != $true) & ($true = (sK0 @ X3)))))),
% 1.65/1.30    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.65/1.30  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.65/1.30    ! [X1 : ($i > $i) > $o] : (? [X2 : $i > $i] : (((X1 @ X2) = $true) & (($true != (X1 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ (X2 @ Y0))))) | ? [X3 : $i] : (((sK0 @ (X2 @ X3)) != $true) & ($true = (sK0 @ X3))))) => (((X1 @ (sK1 @ X1)) = $true) & (($true != (X1 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK1 @ X1 @ (sK1 @ X1 @ Y0))))) | ? [X3 : $i] : (((sK0 @ (sK1 @ X1 @ X3)) != $true) & ($true = (sK0 @ X3))))))),
% 1.65/1.30    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.65/1.30  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.65/1.30    ! [X1 : ($i > $i) > $o] : (? [X3 : $i] : (((sK0 @ (sK1 @ X1 @ X3)) != $true) & ($true = (sK0 @ X3))) => (((sK0 @ (sK1 @ X1 @ (sK2 @ X1))) != $true) & ($true = (sK0 @ (sK2 @ X1)))))),
% 1.65/1.30    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.65/1.30  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.65/1.30    ? [X0 : $i > $o] : ! [X1 : ($i > $i) > $o] : ? [X2 : $i > $i] : (((X1 @ X2) = $true) & (($true != (X1 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ (X2 @ Y0))))) | ? [X3 : $i] : (($true != (X0 @ (X2 @ X3))) & ((X0 @ X3) = $true))))),
% 1.65/1.30    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.65/1.30  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.65/1.30    ~! [X0 : $i > $o] : ? [X1 : ($i > $i) > $o] : ! [X2 : $i > $i] : (((X1 @ X2) = $true) => (! [X3 : $i] : (((X0 @ X3) = $true) => ($true = (X0 @ (X2 @ X3)))) & ($true = (X1 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ (X2 @ Y0)))))))),
% 1.65/1.30    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.65/1.30  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.65/1.30    ~! [X0 : $i > $o] : ? [X1 : ($i > $i) > $o] : ! [X2 : $i > $i] : (((X1 @ X2) = $true) => (($true = (X1 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X2 @ (X2 @ Y0))))) & ! [X4 : $i] : (((X0 @ X4) = $true) => ((X0 @ (X2 @ X4)) = $true))))),
% 1.65/1.30    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.65/1.30  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.65/1.30    ~! [X0 : $i > $o] : ? [X1 : ($i > $i) > $o] : ! [X2 : $i > $i] : ((X1 @ X2) => ((X1 @ (^[X3 : $i] : (X2 @ (X2 @ X3)))) & ! [X4 : $i] : ((X0 @ X4) => (X0 @ (X2 @ X4)))))),
% 1.65/1.30    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.65/1.30  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.65/1.30    ~! [X0 : $i > $o] : ? [X1 : ($i > $i) > $o] : ! [X2 : $i > $i] : ((X1 @ X2) => ((X1 @ (^[X3 : $i] : (X2 @ (X2 @ X3)))) & ! [X4 : $i] : ((X0 @ X4) => (X0 @ (X2 @ X4)))))),
% 1.65/1.30    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.65/1.30  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.65/1.30    ! [X0 : $i > $o] : ? [X1 : ($i > $i) > $o] : ! [X2 : $i > $i] : ((X1 @ X2) => ((X1 @ (^[X3 : $i] : (X2 @ (X2 @ X3)))) & ! [X4 : $i] : ((X0 @ X4) => (X0 @ (X2 @ X4)))))),
% 1.65/1.30    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZpJQKmtmZB/DTF2THF_8318.p',cTHM113)).
% 1.65/1.30  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_8318
% 1.65/1.30  % (8498)------------------------------
% 1.65/1.30  % (8498)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.65/1.30  % (8498)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.65/1.30  
% 1.65/1.30  % (8498)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.65/1.30  % (8498)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.65/1.30  % (8498)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.65/1.30  % (8498)------------------------------
% 1.65/1.30  % (8498)------------------------------
% 1.65/1.30  % (8496)Success in time 0.005 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------