↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SEU933^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:02:39 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 112.17s 112.39s
% Output   : Proof 113.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SEU933^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 05:37:08 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 112.17/112.39  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 112.17/112.39  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 112.17/112.39  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 112.17/112.39    (Not
% 112.17/112.39      (Ne a b →
% 112.17/112.39        Not
% 112.17/112.39          (∀ (Xj Xk : Iota → Iota),
% 112.17/112.39            (∀ (Xp : (Iota → Iota) → Prop),
% 112.17/112.39                And (Xp Xj) (∀ (Xj_2 : Iota → Iota), Xp Xj_2 → Xp fun Xx => Xj (Xj_2 Xx)) → Xp fun Xx => Xk (Xj Xx)) →
% 112.17/112.39              ∀ (Xp : (Iota → Iota) → Prop),
% 112.17/112.39                And (Xp Xj) (∀ (Xj_3 : Iota → Iota), Xp Xj_3 → Xp fun Xx => Xj (Xj_3 Xx)) → Xp Xk)))
% 112.17/112.39    True
% 112.17/112.39  Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq
% 112.17/112.39    (Ne a b →
% 112.17/112.39      Not
% 112.17/112.39        (∀ (Xj Xk : Iota → Iota),
% 112.17/112.39          (∀ (Xp : (Iota → Iota) → Prop),
% 112.17/112.39              And (Xp Xj) (∀ (Xj_2 : Iota → Iota), Xp Xj_2 → Xp fun Xx => Xj (Xj_2 Xx)) → Xp fun Xx => Xk (Xj Xx)) →
% 112.17/112.39            ∀ (Xp : (Iota → Iota) → Prop),
% 112.17/112.39              And (Xp Xj) (∀ (Xj_3 : Iota → Iota), Xp Xj_3 → Xp fun Xx => Xj (Xj_3 Xx)) → Xp Xk))
% 112.17/112.39    False
% 112.17/112.39  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (Ne a b) True
% 112.17/112.39  Clause #3 (by clausification #[1]): Eq
% 112.17/112.39    (Not
% 112.17/112.39      (∀ (Xj Xk : Iota → Iota),
% 112.17/112.39        (∀ (Xp : (Iota → Iota) → Prop),
% 112.17/112.39            And (Xp Xj) (∀ (Xj_2 : Iota → Iota), Xp Xj_2 → Xp fun Xx => Xj (Xj_2 Xx)) → Xp fun Xx => Xk (Xj Xx)) →
% 112.17/112.39          ∀ (Xp : (Iota → Iota) → Prop),
% 112.17/112.39            And (Xp Xj) (∀ (Xj_3 : Iota → Iota), Xp Xj_3 → Xp fun Xx => Xj (Xj_3 Xx)) → Xp Xk))
% 112.17/112.39    False
% 112.17/112.39  Clause #4 (by clausification #[2]): Ne a b
% 112.17/112.39  Clause #5 (by clausification #[3]): Eq
% 112.17/112.39    (∀ (Xj Xk : Iota → Iota),
% 112.17/112.39      (∀ (Xp : (Iota → Iota) → Prop),
% 112.17/112.39          And (Xp Xj) (∀ (Xj_2 : Iota → Iota), Xp Xj_2 → Xp fun Xx => Xj (Xj_2 Xx)) → Xp fun Xx => Xk (Xj Xx)) →
% 112.17/112.39        ∀ (Xp : (Iota → Iota) → Prop), And (Xp Xj) (∀ (Xj_3 : Iota → Iota), Xp Xj_3 → Xp fun Xx => Xj (Xj_3 Xx)) → Xp Xk)
% 112.17/112.39    True
% 112.17/112.39  Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota),
% 112.17/112.39    Eq
% 112.17/112.39      (∀ (Xk : Iota → Iota),
% 112.17/112.39        (∀ (Xp : (Iota → Iota) → Prop),
% 112.17/112.39            And (Xp a) (∀ (Xj_2 : Iota → Iota), Xp Xj_2 → Xp fun Xx => a (Xj_2 Xx)) → Xp fun Xx => Xk (a Xx)) →
% 112.17/112.39          ∀ (Xp : (Iota → Iota) → Prop), And (Xp a) (∀ (Xj_3 : Iota → Iota), Xp Xj_3 → Xp fun Xx => a (Xj_3 Xx)) → Xp Xk)
% 112.17/112.39      True
% 112.17/112.39  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota → Iota),
% 112.17/112.39    Eq
% 112.17/112.39      ((∀ (Xp : (Iota → Iota) → Prop),
% 112.17/112.39          And (Xp a) (∀ (Xj_2 : Iota → Iota), Xp Xj_2 → Xp fun Xx => a (Xj_2 Xx)) → Xp fun Xx => a_1 (a Xx)) →
% 112.17/112.39        ∀ (Xp : (Iota → Iota) → Prop), And (Xp a) (∀ (Xj_3 : Iota → Iota), Xp Xj_3 → Xp fun Xx => a (Xj_3 Xx)) → Xp a_1)
% 112.17/112.39      True
% 112.17/112.39  Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota → Iota),
% 112.17/112.39    Or
% 112.17/112.39      (Eq
% 112.17/112.39        (∀ (Xp : (Iota → Iota) → Prop),
% 112.17/112.39          And (Xp a) (∀ (Xj_2 : Iota → Iota), Xp Xj_2 → Xp fun Xx => a (Xj_2 Xx)) → Xp fun Xx => a_1 (a Xx))
% 112.17/112.39        False)
% 112.17/112.39      (Eq
% 112.17/112.39        (∀ (Xp : (Iota → Iota) → Prop), And (Xp a) (∀ (Xj_3 : Iota → Iota), Xp Xj_3 → Xp fun Xx => a (Xj_3 Xx)) → Xp a_1)
% 112.17/112.39        True)
% 112.17/112.39  Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota → Iota) (a_2 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop),
% 112.17/112.39    Or
% 112.17/112.39      (Eq
% 112.17/112.39        (∀ (Xp : (Iota → Iota) → Prop), And (Xp a) (∀ (Xj_3 : Iota → Iota), Xp Xj_3 → Xp fun Xx => a (Xj_3 Xx)) → Xp a_1)
% 112.17/112.39        True)
% 112.17/112.39      (Eq
% 112.17/112.39        (Not
% 112.17/112.39          (And (skS.0 0 a a_1 a_2 a)
% 112.17/112.39              (∀ (Xj_2 : Iota → Iota), skS.0 0 a a_1 a_2 Xj_2 → skS.0 0 a a_1 a_2 fun Xx => a (Xj_2 Xx)) →
% 112.17/112.39            skS.0 0 a a_1 a_2 fun Xx => a_1 (a Xx)))
% 112.17/112.39        True)
% 112.17/112.39  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota → Iota) (a_2 a_3 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop),
% 112.17/112.39    Or
% 112.17/112.39      (Eq
% 112.17/112.39        (Not
% 112.17/112.39          (And (skS.0 0 a a_1 a_2 a)
% 112.17/112.39              (∀ (Xj_2 : Iota → Iota), skS.0 0 a a_1 a_2 Xj_2 → skS.0 0 a a_1 a_2 fun Xx => a (Xj_2 Xx)) →
% 112.17/112.39            skS.0 0 a a_1 a_2 fun Xx => a_1 (a Xx)))
% 112.17/112.39        True)
% 112.17/112.39      (Eq (And (a_3 a) (∀ (Xj_3 : Iota → Iota), a_3 Xj_3 → a_3 fun Xx => a (Xj_3 Xx)) → a_3 a_1) True)
% 112.17/112.39  Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota → Iota) (a_3 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop),
% 112.17/112.39    Or (Eq (And (a a_1) (∀ (Xj_3 : Iota → Iota), a Xj_3 → a fun Xx => a_1 (Xj_3 Xx)) → a a_2) True)
% 112.24/112.42      (Eq
% 112.24/112.42        (And (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_1)
% 112.24/112.42            (∀ (Xj_2 : Iota → Iota), skS.0 0 a_1 a_2 a_3 Xj_2 → skS.0 0 a_1 a_2 a_3 fun Xx => a_1 (Xj_2 Xx)) →
% 112.24/112.42          skS.0 0 a_1 a_2 a_3 fun Xx => a_2 (a_1 Xx))
% 112.24/112.42        False)
% 112.24/112.42  Clause #12 (by clausification #[11]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota → Iota) (a_2 a_3 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop),
% 112.24/112.42    Or
% 112.24/112.42      (Eq
% 112.24/112.42        (And (skS.0 0 a a_1 a_2 a)
% 112.24/112.42            (∀ (Xj_2 : Iota → Iota), skS.0 0 a a_1 a_2 Xj_2 → skS.0 0 a a_1 a_2 fun Xx => a (Xj_2 Xx)) →
% 112.24/112.42          skS.0 0 a a_1 a_2 fun Xx => a_1 (a Xx))
% 112.24/112.42        False)
% 112.24/112.42      (Or (Eq (And (a_3 a) (∀ (Xj_3 : Iota → Iota), a_3 Xj_3 → a_3 fun Xx => a (Xj_3 Xx))) False) (Eq (a_3 a_1) True))
% 112.24/112.42  Clause #13 (by clausification #[12]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota → Iota) (a_3 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop),
% 112.24/112.42    Or (Eq (And (a a_1) (∀ (Xj_3 : Iota → Iota), a Xj_3 → a fun Xx => a_1 (Xj_3 Xx))) False)
% 112.24/112.42      (Or (Eq (a a_2) True)
% 112.24/112.42        (Eq
% 112.24/112.42          (And (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_1)
% 112.24/112.42            (∀ (Xj_2 : Iota → Iota), skS.0 0 a_1 a_2 a_3 Xj_2 → skS.0 0 a_1 a_2 a_3 fun Xx => a_1 (Xj_2 Xx)))
% 112.24/112.42          True))
% 112.24/112.42  Clause #14 (by clausification #[12]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota → Iota) (a_3 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop),
% 112.24/112.42    Or (Eq (And (a a_1) (∀ (Xj_3 : Iota → Iota), a Xj_3 → a fun Xx => a_1 (Xj_3 Xx))) False)
% 112.24/112.42      (Or (Eq (a a_2) True) (Eq (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2 a_3 fun Xx => a_2 (a_1 Xx)) False))
% 112.24/112.42  Clause #15 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota → Iota) (a_3 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop),
% 112.24/112.42    Or (Eq (a a_1) True)
% 112.24/112.42      (Or
% 112.24/112.42        (Eq
% 112.24/112.42          (And (skS.0 0 a_2 a_1 a_3 a_2)
% 112.24/112.42            (∀ (Xj_2 : Iota → Iota), skS.0 0 a_2 a_1 a_3 Xj_2 → skS.0 0 a_2 a_1 a_3 fun Xx => a_2 (Xj_2 Xx)))
% 112.24/112.42          True)
% 112.24/112.42        (Or (Eq (a a_2) False) (Eq (∀ (Xj_3 : Iota → Iota), a Xj_3 → a fun Xx => a_2 (Xj_3 Xx)) False)))
% 112.24/112.42  Clause #17 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota → Iota) (a_3 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop),
% 112.24/112.42    Or (Eq (a a_1) True)
% 112.24/112.42      (Or (Eq (a a_2) False)
% 112.24/112.42        (Or (Eq (∀ (Xj_3 : Iota → Iota), a Xj_3 → a fun Xx => a_2 (Xj_3 Xx)) False) (Eq (skS.0 0 a_2 a_1 a_3 a_2) True)))
% 112.24/112.42  Clause #32 (by clausification #[17]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota → Iota) (a_3 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_4 : Iota → Iota),
% 112.24/112.42    Or (Eq (a a_1) True)
% 112.24/112.42      (Or (Eq (a a_2) False)
% 112.24/112.42        (Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a_2 a_1 a_3 a_2) True)
% 112.24/112.42          (Eq (Not (a (skS.0 2 a a_2 a_4) → a fun Xx => a_2 (skS.0 2 a a_2 a_4 Xx))) True)))
% 112.24/112.42  Clause #33 (by clausification #[32]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota → Iota) (a_3 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_4 : Iota → Iota),
% 112.24/112.42    Or (Eq (a a_1) True)
% 112.24/112.42      (Or (Eq (a a_2) False)
% 112.24/112.42        (Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a_2 a_1 a_3 a_2) True)
% 112.24/112.42          (Eq (a (skS.0 2 a a_2 a_4) → a fun Xx => a_2 (skS.0 2 a a_2 a_4 Xx)) False)))
% 112.24/112.42  Clause #35 (by clausification #[33]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota → Iota) (a_3 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_4 : Iota → Iota),
% 112.24/112.42    Or (Eq (a a_1) True)
% 112.24/112.42      (Or (Eq (a a_2) False) (Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a_2 a_1 a_3 a_2) True) (Eq (a fun Xx => a_2 (skS.0 2 a a_2 a_4 Xx)) False)))
% 112.24/112.42  Clause #45 (by clausification #[14]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota → Iota) (a_3 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop),
% 112.24/112.42    Or (Eq (a a_1) True)
% 112.24/112.42      (Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a_2 a_1 a_3 fun Xx => a_1 (a_2 Xx)) False)
% 112.24/112.42        (Or (Eq (a a_2) False) (Eq (∀ (Xj_3 : Iota → Iota), a Xj_3 → a fun Xx => a_2 (Xj_3 Xx)) False)))
% 112.24/112.42  Clause #46 (by clausification #[45]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota → Iota) (a_3 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_4 : Iota → Iota),
% 112.24/112.42    Or (Eq (a a_1) True)
% 112.24/112.42      (Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a_2 a_1 a_3 fun Xx => a_1 (a_2 Xx)) False)
% 112.24/112.42        (Or (Eq (a a_2) False) (Eq (Not (a (skS.0 3 a a_2 a_4) → a fun Xx => a_2 (skS.0 3 a a_2 a_4 Xx))) True)))
% 112.24/112.42  Clause #47 (by clausification #[46]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota → Iota) (a_3 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_4 : Iota → Iota),
% 112.24/112.42    Or (Eq (a a_1) True)
% 112.24/112.45      (Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a_2 a_1 a_3 fun Xx => a_1 (a_2 Xx)) False)
% 112.24/112.45        (Or (Eq (a a_2) False) (Eq (a (skS.0 3 a a_2 a_4) → a fun Xx => a_2 (skS.0 3 a a_2 a_4 Xx)) False)))
% 112.24/112.45  Clause #49 (by clausification #[47]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota → Iota) (a_3 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_4 : Iota → Iota),
% 112.24/112.45    Or (Eq (a a_1) True)
% 112.24/112.45      (Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a_2 a_1 a_3 fun Xx => a_1 (a_2 Xx)) False)
% 112.24/112.45        (Or (Eq (a a_2) False) (Eq (a fun Xx => a_2 (skS.0 3 a a_2 a_4 Xx)) False)))
% 112.24/112.45  Clause #73 (by neHoist #[35]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Iota) → Sort _abstMVar.0) (a_1 a_2 : (x : Iota → Iota) → a x) (a_3 a_4 : Iota → Iota)
% 112.24/112.45    (a_5 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_6 : Iota → Iota),
% 112.24/112.45    Or (Eq ((fun x => Ne (a_1 x) (a_2 x)) a_3) True)
% 112.24/112.45      (Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a_4 a_3 a_5 a_4) True)
% 112.24/112.45        (Or (Eq ((fun x => Ne (a_1 x) (a_2 x)) fun Xx => a_4 (skS.0 2 (fun x => Ne (a_1 x) (a_2 x)) a_4 a_6 Xx)) False)
% 112.24/112.45          (Or (Eq True False) (Eq (a_1 a_4) (a_2 a_4)))))
% 112.24/112.45  Clause #963 (by betaEtaReduce #[73]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Iota) → Sort _abstMVar.0) (a_1 : Iota → Iota) (a_2 a_3 : (x : Iota → Iota) → a x) (a_4 : Iota → Iota)
% 112.24/112.45    (a_5 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_6 : Iota → Iota),
% 112.24/112.45    Or (Eq (Ne (a_2 a_1) (a_3 a_1)) True)
% 112.24/112.45      (Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a_4 a_1 a_5 a_4) True)
% 112.24/112.45        (Or
% 112.24/112.45          (Eq
% 112.24/112.45            (Ne (a_2 fun Xx => a_4 (skS.0 2 (fun x => Ne (a_2 x) (a_3 x)) a_4 a_6 Xx))
% 112.24/112.45              (a_3 fun Xx => a_4 (skS.0 2 (fun x => Ne (a_2 x) (a_3 x)) a_4 a_6 Xx)))
% 112.24/112.45            False)
% 112.24/112.45          (Or (Eq True False) (Eq (a_2 a_4) (a_3 a_4)))))
% 112.24/112.45  Clause #964 (by clausification #[963]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota → Iota) (a_2 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_3 : (Iota → Iota) → Sort _abstMVar.0)
% 112.24/112.45    (a_4 a_5 : (x : Iota → Iota) → a_3 x) (a_6 : Iota → Iota),
% 112.24/112.45    Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a a_1 a_2 a) True)
% 112.24/112.45      (Or
% 112.24/112.45        (Eq
% 112.24/112.45          (Ne (a_4 fun Xx => a (skS.0 2 (fun x => Ne (a_4 x) (a_5 x)) a a_6 Xx))
% 112.24/112.45            (a_5 fun Xx => a (skS.0 2 (fun x => Ne (a_4 x) (a_5 x)) a a_6 Xx)))
% 112.24/112.45          False)
% 112.24/112.45        (Or (Eq True False) (Or (Eq (a_4 a) (a_5 a)) (Ne (a_4 a_1) (a_5 a_1)))))
% 112.24/112.45  Clause #965 (by clausification #[964]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota → Iota) (a_2 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_3 : (Iota → Iota) → Sort _abstMVar.0)
% 112.24/112.45    (a_4 a_5 : (x : Iota → Iota) → a_3 x) (a_6 : Iota → Iota),
% 112.24/112.45    Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a a_1 a_2 a) True)
% 112.24/112.45      (Or (Eq True False)
% 112.24/112.45        (Or (Eq (a_4 a) (a_5 a))
% 112.24/112.45          (Or (Ne (a_4 a_1) (a_5 a_1))
% 112.24/112.45            (Eq (a_4 fun Xx => a (skS.0 2 (fun x => Ne (a_4 x) (a_5 x)) a a_6 Xx))
% 112.24/112.45              (a_5 fun Xx => a (skS.0 2 (fun x => Ne (a_4 x) (a_5 x)) a a_6 Xx))))))
% 112.24/112.45  Clause #966 (by clausification #[965]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota → Iota) (a_2 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_3 : (Iota → Iota) → Sort _abstMVar.0)
% 112.24/112.45    (a_4 a_5 : (x : Iota → Iota) → a_3 x) (a_6 : Iota → Iota),
% 112.24/112.45    Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a a_1 a_2 a) True)
% 112.24/112.45      (Or (Eq (a_4 a) (a_5 a))
% 112.24/112.45        (Or (Ne (a_4 a_1) (a_5 a_1))
% 112.24/112.45          (Eq (a_4 fun Xx => a (skS.0 2 (fun x => Ne (a_4 x) (a_5 x)) a a_6 Xx))
% 112.24/112.45            (a_5 fun Xx => a (skS.0 2 (fun x => Ne (a_4 x) (a_5 x)) a a_6 Xx)))))
% 112.24/112.45  Clause #968 (by equality resolution #[966]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota) (a_1 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_2 : Iota → Iota),
% 112.24/112.45    Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a (fun x => x) a_1 a) True)
% 112.24/112.45      (Or (Eq ((fun x x => x) a) ((fun x => x) a))
% 112.24/112.45        (Eq ((fun x x => x) fun Xx => a (skS.0 2 (fun x => Ne ((fun x x => x) x) ((fun x => x) x)) a a_2 Xx))
% 112.24/112.45          ((fun x => x) fun Xx => a (skS.0 2 (fun x => Ne ((fun x x => x) x) ((fun x => x) x)) a a_2 Xx))))
% 112.24/112.45  Clause #5325 (by betaEtaReduce #[968]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota) (a_1 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_2 : Iota → Iota),
% 112.24/112.45    Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a (fun x => x) a_1 a) True)
% 112.24/112.45      (Or (Eq (fun x => x) a) (Eq (fun x => x) fun Xx => a (skS.0 2 (Ne fun x => x) a a_2 Xx)))
% 112.24/112.45  Clause #5387 (by argument congruence #[5325]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota) (a_1 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_2 : Iota) (a_3 : Iota → Iota),
% 112.24/112.45    Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a (fun x => x) a_1 a) True)
% 112.24/112.45      (Or (Eq ((fun x => x) a_2) (a a_2)) (Eq (fun x => x) fun Xx => a (skS.0 2 (Ne fun x => x) a a_3 Xx)))
% 112.24/112.45  Clause #6202 (by betaEtaReduce #[5387]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota) (a_1 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_2 : Iota) (a_3 : Iota → Iota),
% 113.23/113.41    Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a (fun x => x) a_1 a) True)
% 113.23/113.41      (Or (Eq a_2 (a a_2)) (Eq (fun x => x) fun Xx => a (skS.0 2 (Ne fun x => x) a a_3 Xx)))
% 113.23/113.41  Clause #6228 (by superposition #[6202, 4]): ∀ (a_1 : Iota → Iota) (a_2 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_3 : Iota → Iota),
% 113.23/113.41    Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a_1 (fun x => x) a_2 a_1) True)
% 113.23/113.41      (Or (Eq (fun x => x) fun Xx => a_1 (skS.0 2 (Ne fun x => x) a_1 a_3 Xx)) (Ne a (a_1 b)))
% 113.23/113.41  Clause #7128 (by equality resolution #[6228]): ∀ (a_1 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop) (a_2 : Iota → Iota),
% 113.23/113.41    Or (Eq (skS.0 0 (fun x => a) (fun x => x) a_1 fun x => a) True)
% 113.23/113.41      (Eq (fun x => x) fun Xx => (fun x => a) (skS.0 2 (Ne fun x => x) (fun x => a) a_2 Xx))
% 113.23/113.41  Clause #7150 (by betaEtaReduce #[7128]): ∀ (a_1 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop),
% 113.23/113.41    Or (Eq (skS.0 0 (fun x => a) (fun x => x) a_1 fun x => a) True) (Eq (fun x => x) fun Xx => a)
% 113.23/113.41  Clause #7152 (by superposition #[7150, 49]): ∀ (a_1 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop),
% 113.23/113.41    Or (Eq (fun x => x) fun Xx => a)
% 113.23/113.41      (Or (Eq (a_1 fun x => x) True) (Or (Eq True False) (Or (Eq (a_1 fun x => a) False) (Eq (a_1 fun Xx => a) False))))
% 113.23/113.41  Clause #7339 (by clausification #[7152]): ∀ (a_1 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop),
% 113.23/113.41    Or (Eq (fun x => x) fun Xx => a)
% 113.23/113.41      (Or (Eq (a_1 fun x => x) True) (Or (Eq (a_1 fun x => a) False) (Eq (a_1 fun Xx => a) False)))
% 113.23/113.41  Clause #7340 (by eliminate duplicate literals #[7339]): ∀ (a_1 : (Iota → Iota) → Prop),
% 113.23/113.41    Or (Eq (fun x => x) fun Xx => a) (Or (Eq (a_1 fun x => x) True) (Eq (a_1 fun x => a) False))
% 113.23/113.41  Clause #7342 (by neHoist #[7340]): ∀ (a_1 : (Iota → Iota) → Sort _abstMVar.1) (a_2 a_3 : (x : Iota → Iota) → a_1 x),
% 113.23/113.41    Or (Eq (fun x => x) fun Xx => a)
% 113.23/113.41      (Or (Eq ((fun x => Ne (a_2 x) (a_3 x)) fun x => x) True)
% 113.23/113.41        (Or (Eq True False) (Eq (a_2 fun x => a) (a_3 fun x => a))))
% 113.23/113.41  Clause #7569 (by betaEtaReduce #[7342]): ∀ (a_1 : (Iota → Iota) → Sort _abstMVar.1) (a_2 a_3 : (x : Iota → Iota) → a_1 x),
% 113.23/113.41    Or (Eq (fun x => x) fun Xx => a)
% 113.23/113.41      (Or (Eq (Ne (a_2 fun x => x) (a_3 fun x => x)) True) (Or (Eq True False) (Eq (a_2 fun x => a) (a_3 fun x => a))))
% 113.23/113.41  Clause #7570 (by clausification #[7569]): ∀ (a_1 : (Iota → Iota) → Sort _abstMVar.1) (a_2 a_3 : (x : Iota → Iota) → a_1 x),
% 113.23/113.41    Or (Eq (fun x => x) fun Xx => a)
% 113.23/113.41      (Or (Eq True False) (Or (Eq (a_2 fun x => a) (a_3 fun x => a)) (Ne (a_2 fun x => x) (a_3 fun x => x))))
% 113.23/113.41  Clause #7571 (by clausification #[7570]): ∀ (a_1 : (Iota → Iota) → Sort _abstMVar.1) (a_2 a_3 : (x : Iota → Iota) → a_1 x),
% 113.23/113.41    Or (Eq (fun x => x) fun Xx => a) (Or (Eq (a_2 fun x => a) (a_3 fun x => a)) (Ne (a_2 fun x => x) (a_3 fun x => x)))
% 113.23/113.41  Clause #7572 (by equality resolution #[7571]): Or (Eq (fun x => x) fun Xx => a) (Eq ((fun x => x) fun x => a) ((fun x x => x) fun x => a))
% 113.23/113.41  Clause #7602 (by betaEtaReduce #[7572]): Or (Eq (fun x => x) fun Xx => a) (Eq (fun x => a) fun x => x)
% 113.23/113.41  Clause #7604 (by equality factoring #[7602]): Or (Ne (fun x => a) fun Xx => a) (Eq (fun x => x) fun Xx => a)
% 113.23/113.41  Clause #7606 (by eliminate resolved literals #[7604]): Eq (fun x => x) fun Xx => a
% 113.23/113.41  Clause #7647 (by argument congruence #[7606]): ∀ (a_1 : Iota), Eq ((fun x => x) a_1) ((fun Xx => a) a_1)
% 113.23/113.41  Clause #7762 (by betaEtaReduce #[7647]): ∀ (a_1 : Iota), Eq a_1 a
% 113.23/113.41  Clause #7763 (by backward contextual literal cutting #[7762, 4]): False
% 113.23/113.41  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------