↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SEU953^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:29:38 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.54s 2.28s
% Output   : Refutation 3.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (  10 unt;   0 typ;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   29 (  28 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   70 (  13   ~;   4   |;   1   &;  46   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   11 (  11   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    5 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (  14   ^;  23   !;   4   ?;  42   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   1  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(g_decl,type,
    g: $i > $i ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $i > $i ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: ( $i > $i ) > $i ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: $i > $i] :
        ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( A @ ( g @ B ) )
          = B ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( g @ A )
          = ( g @ B ) )
       => ( A = B ) )
   => ? [A: $i > $i] :
        ( ( ^ [B: $i] : ( A @ ( g @ B ) ) )
        = ( ^ [B: $i] : B ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM591_pme) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( ( g @ A )
            = ( g @ B ) )
         => ( A = B ) )
     => ? [A: $i > $i] :
          ( ( ^ [B: $i] : ( A @ ( g @ B ) ) )
          = ( ^ [B: $i] : B ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( ( g @ A )
            = ( g @ B ) )
         => ( A = B ) )
     => ? [A: $i > $i] :
          ( ( ^ [B: $i] : ( A @ ( g @ B ) ) )
          = ( ^ [B: $i] : B ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ! [C: $i > $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( g @ A )
         != ( g @ B ) )
        | ( A = B ) )
      & ( ( ^ [D: $i] : ( C @ ( g @ D ) ) )
       != ( ^ [D: $i] : D ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( g @ A )
       != ( g @ B ) )
      | ( A = B ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( g @ A )
       != ( g @ B ) )
      | ( A = B ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ? [A: $i > $i] :
    ! [B: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( g @ B ) )
      = B ),
    inference(detectInverse,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( sk1 @ ( g @ A ) )
      = A ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[8]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( sk1 @ ( g @ A ) )
      = A ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i] :
      ( ( ^ [B: $i] : ( A @ ( g @ B ) ) )
     != ( ^ [B: $i] : B ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i] :
      ( ( ^ [B: $i] : ( A @ ( g @ B ) ) )
     != ( ^ [B: $i] : B ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i] :
      ( ( ^ [B: $i] : ( A @ ( g @ B ) ) )
     != ( ^ [B: $i] : B ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( g @ ( sk2 @ A ) ) )
     != ( sk2 @ A ) ),
    inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[11]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A
       != ( sk2 @ B ) )
      | ( ( sk1 @ ( g @ A ) )
       != ( B @ ( g @ ( sk2 @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[13,12]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ( ( sk2 @ sk1 )
   != ( sk2 @ sk1 ) ),
    inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[14:[bind(A,$thf( sk2 @ sk1 )),bind(B,$thf( sk1 ))]]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[16:[]]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU953^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.20  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:50:48 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.20  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.88/0.79  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.19/0.97  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (180ms). 
% 1.19/0.98  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.74/1.37  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.74/1.37  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.92/1.46  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.08/1.50  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.08/1.50  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.08/1.50  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.08/1.51  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.54/2.28  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.54/2.28  % Time passed: 1940ms (effective reasoning time: 1289ms)
% 3.54/2.28  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.54/2.28  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 3.54/2.28  % No. of inferences in proof: 16
% 3.54/2.28  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1940 ms resp. 1289 ms w/o parsing
% 3.74/2.33  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.74/2.33  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------