↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEU967^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:34:28 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.26s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU967^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.06/0.18  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.06/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.06/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.06/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:53:43 UTC 2026
% 0.06/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.06/0.18  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.06/0.21  Running first-order model finding
% 0.06/0.21  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.26  % (2961846)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.19/0.26  % (2961853)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=240539545:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.19/0.26  % (2961853) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-2961846-2961853"...
% 0.19/0.26  % (2961852)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.19/0.26  % (2961853)...printing done.
% 0.19/0.26  % (2961851)fmb+10_1_sas=cadical:bce=on:rp=on:random_seed=3658370633_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/0Mi)
% 0.19/0.26  % (2961852)dis+11_61:31_drc=ordering:lsd=5:bsr=unit_only:rp=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=1637632161:i=135531:add=off:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/135531Mi)
% 0.19/0.26  % (2961854)dis+10_1_sil=32000:sp=arity:random_seed=4258606770:i=103:fgj=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/103Mi)
% 0.19/0.26  % (2961855)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=1316791560:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.19/0.26  % (2961853)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.26  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.26  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.26  thf(type_def_5, type, sTfun: ($tType * $tType) > $tType).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(func_def_0, type, cY_0: ((($i > $i) > $o) > $i)).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(func_def_1, type, cG_0: ((($i > $i) > $o) > $i > $i)).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(func_def_2, type, cP_0: ($i > $o)).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(func_def_3, type, cH_0: ((($i > $i) > $o) > $i > $i)).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(func_def_5, type, vSIGMA: !>[X0: $tType]:(((X0 > $o) > $o))).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(func_def_6, type, db1: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(func_def_7, type, db0: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(func_def_8, type, vLAM: !>[X0: $tType, X1: $tType]:((X1) > (X0 > X1))).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(func_def_11, type, sK0: ((($i > $i) > $i > $o) > $i)).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(func_def_12, type, sK1: ((($i > $i) > $i > $o) > $i)).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(func_def_13, type, vNOT: ($o > $o)).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(func_def_15, type, db2: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.19/0.26    ~ ! [X0 : (($i > $i) > $i > $o)] : (((~(cP_0 @ (cG_0 @ (^[X2 : ($i > $i)] : (? [X1 : $i] : (X0 @ X2 @ X1))) @ (cY_0 @ (^[X2 : ($i > $i)] : (? [X1 : $i] : (X0 @ X2 @ X1)))))) & (cP_0 @ (cY_0 @ (^[X2 : ($i > $i)] : (? [X1 : $i] : (X0 @ X2 @ X1)))))) | ~ ? [X1 : $i] : (X0 @ (^[X4 : $i] : ((cG_0 @ (^[X2 : ($i > $i)] : (? [X3 : $i] : (X0 @ X2 @ X3))) @ (cH_0 @ (^[X2 : ($i > $i)] : (? [X3 : $i] : (X0 @ X2 @ X3))) @ X4)))) @ X1)) & ? [X1 : $i] : (X0 @ (cH_0 @ (^[X2 : ($i > $i)] : (? [X3 : $i] : (X0 @ X2 @ X3)))) @ X1) & ? [X1 : $i] : (X0 @ (cG_0 @ (^[X2 : ($i > $i)] : (? [X3 : $i] : (X0 @ X2 @ X3)))) @ X1))),
% 0.19/0.26    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cBUGWFFA_pme)).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.19/0.26    ~ ~ ! [X0 : (($i > $i) > $i > $o)] : (((~(cP_0 @ (cG_0 @ (^[X2 : ($i > $i)] : (? [X1 : $i] : (X0 @ X2 @ X1))) @ (cY_0 @ (^[X2 : ($i > $i)] : (? [X1 : $i] : (X0 @ X2 @ X1)))))) & (cP_0 @ (cY_0 @ (^[X2 : ($i > $i)] : (? [X1 : $i] : (X0 @ X2 @ X1)))))) | ~ ? [X1 : $i] : (X0 @ (^[X4 : $i] : ((cG_0 @ (^[X2 : ($i > $i)] : (? [X3 : $i] : (X0 @ X2 @ X3))) @ (cH_0 @ (^[X2 : ($i > $i)] : (? [X3 : $i] : (X0 @ X2 @ X3))) @ X4)))) @ X1)) & ? [X1 : $i] : (X0 @ (cH_0 @ (^[X2 : ($i > $i)] : (? [X3 : $i] : (X0 @ X2 @ X3)))) @ X1) & ? [X1 : $i] : (X0 @ (cG_0 @ (^[X2 : ($i > $i)] : (? [X3 : $i] : (X0 @ X2 @ X3)))) @ X1))),
% 0.19/0.26    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(f3,plain,(
% 0.19/0.26    ~ ~ ! [X0 : (($i > $i) > $i > $o)] : (((~(cP_0 @ (cG_0 @ (^[X1 : ($i > $i)] : (? [X2 : $i] : (X0 @ X1 @ X2))) @ (cY_0 @ (^[X3 : ($i > $i)] : (? [X4 : $i] : (X0 @ X3 @ X4)))))) & (cP_0 @ (cY_0 @ (^[X5 : ($i > $i)] : (? [X6 : $i] : (X0 @ X5 @ X6)))))) | ~ ? [X7 : $i] : (X0 @ (^[X8 : $i] : ((cG_0 @ (^[X9 : ($i > $i)] : (? [X10 : $i] : (X0 @ X9 @ X10))) @ (cH_0 @ (^[X11 : ($i > $i)] : (? [X12 : $i] : (X0 @ X11 @ X12))) @ X8)))) @ X7)) & ? [X13 : $i] : (X0 @ (cH_0 @ (^[X14 : ($i > $i)] : (? [X15 : $i] : (X0 @ X14 @ X15)))) @ X13) & ? [X16 : $i] : (X0 @ (cG_0 @ (^[X17 : ($i > $i)] : (? [X18 : $i] : (X0 @ X17 @ X18)))) @ X16))),
% 0.19/0.26    inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.19/0.26    ~ ~ ! [X0 : (($i > $i) > $i > $o)] : (((~ ($true = ((cP_0 @ (cG_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1)))) @ (cY_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1))))))))) & ($true = ((cP_0 @ (cY_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1))))))))) | ~ ? [X7 : $i] : ($true = ((X0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (cG_0 @ (^[Y1 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: (X0 @ Y1 @ Y2)))) @ (cH_0 @ (^[Y1 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: (X0 @ Y1 @ Y2)))) @ Y0))) @ X7)))) & ? [X13 : $i] : ($true = ((X0 @ (cH_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1))))) @ X13))) & ? [X16 : $i] : (((X0 @ (cG_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1))))) @ X16)) = $true))),
% 0.19/0.26    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f3])).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.19/0.26    ~ ~ ! [X0 : (($i > $i) > $i > $o)] : (((~ ($true = ((cP_0 @ (cG_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1)))) @ (cY_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1))))))))) & ($true = ((cP_0 @ (cY_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1))))))))) | ~ ? [X1 : $i] : ($true = ((X0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (cG_0 @ (^[Y1 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: (X0 @ Y1 @ Y2)))) @ (cH_0 @ (^[Y1 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: (X0 @ Y1 @ Y2)))) @ Y0))) @ X1)))) & ? [X2 : $i] : ($true = ((X0 @ (cH_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1))))) @ X2))) & ? [X3 : $i] : ($true = ((X0 @ (cG_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1))))) @ X3))))),
% 0.19/0.26    inference(rectify,[],[f4])).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.19/0.26    ! [X0 : (($i > $i) > $i > $o)] : (((($true != ((cP_0 @ (cG_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1)))) @ (cY_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1))))))))) & ($true = ((cP_0 @ (cY_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1))))))))) | ~ ? [X1 : $i] : ($true = ((X0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (cG_0 @ (^[Y1 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: (X0 @ Y1 @ Y2)))) @ (cH_0 @ (^[Y1 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: (X0 @ Y1 @ Y2)))) @ Y0))) @ X1)))) & ? [X2 : $i] : ($true = ((X0 @ (cH_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1))))) @ X2))) & ? [X3 : $i] : ($true = ((X0 @ (cG_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1))))) @ X3))))),
% 0.19/0.26    inference(flattening,[],[f5])).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.19/0.26    ! [X0 : (($i > $i) > $i > $o)] : (((($true != ((cP_0 @ (cG_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1)))) @ (cY_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1))))))))) & ($true = ((cP_0 @ (cY_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1))))))))) | ! [X1 : $i] : ($true != ((X0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (cG_0 @ (^[Y1 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: (X0 @ Y1 @ Y2)))) @ (cH_0 @ (^[Y1 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: (X0 @ Y1 @ Y2)))) @ Y0))) @ X1)))) & ? [X2 : $i] : ($true = ((X0 @ (cH_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1))))) @ X2))) & ? [X3 : $i] : ($true = ((X0 @ (cG_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1))))) @ X3))))),
% 0.19/0.26    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6])).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.19/0.26    ! [X0 : (($i > $i) > $i > $o)] : (((($true != ((cP_0 @ (cG_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1)))) @ (cY_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1))))))))) & ($true = ((cP_0 @ (cY_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1))))))))) | ! [X1 : $i] : ($true != ((X0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (cG_0 @ (^[Y1 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: (X0 @ Y1 @ Y2)))) @ (cH_0 @ (^[Y1 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: (X0 @ Y1 @ Y2)))) @ Y0))) @ X1)))) & ($true = ((X0 @ (cH_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1))))) @ (sK0 @ X0)))) & ($true = ((X0 @ (cG_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1))))) @ (sK1 @ X0)))))),
% 0.19/0.26    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[vAPP,vAPP]),skolemize(X3,sK1 @ X0),skolemize(X3,sK1 @ X0)],[f7])).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.19/0.26    ( ! [X0 : (($i > $i) > $i > $o)] : (($true = ((X0 @ (cG_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0 @ Y1))))) @ (sK1 @ X0))))) )),
% 0.19/0.26    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8])).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(f15,plain,(
% 0.19/0.26    ( ! [X0 : (($i > $i) > $i > $o)] : (($true = ((X0 @ (cG_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ (X0 @ Y0)))) @ (sK1 @ X0))))) )),
% 0.19/0.26    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f9])).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(f47,plain,(
% 0.19/0.26    ($true = (((^[Y0 : $i > $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ($false)))) @ (cG_0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (?? @ $i @ ((^[Y1 : $i > $i]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ($false)))) @ Y0)))) @ (sK1 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ($false))))))))),
% 0.19/0.26    inference(primitive_instantiation,[],[f15])).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(f62,plain,(
% 0.19/0.26    ($true = $false)),
% 0.19/0.26    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f47])).
% 0.19/0.26  thf(f63,plain,(
% 0.19/0.26    $false),
% 0.19/0.26    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f62])).
% 0.19/0.26  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.26  % (2961853)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.26  % (2961853)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.19/0.26  % (2961853)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.19/0.26  % (2961853)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.19/0.26  % (2961853)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.26  % (2961853)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.26  % (2961853)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.19/0.26  % (2961853)Instructions burned: 10 (million)
% 0.19/0.26  % (2961846)Success in time 0.036 s
% 0.19/0.26  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------