↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEU970^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:32:03 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.05s 0.19s
% Output   : Refutation 0.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   29
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   88 (  29 unt;   0 typ;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  528 ( 126 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  597 (  42   ~;  77   |;  31   &; 367   @)
%                                         (   4 <=>;  48  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   37 (  37   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   26 (  22 usr;  10 con; 0-4 aty)
%                                         (  28  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   92 (   0 sgn  35   !;   9   ?;  92   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    s: $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    cCKB_E2: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    vPI: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    vAND: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    db2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    db1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_16,type,
    sK3: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_17,type,
    sK4: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(func_def_18,type,
    sK5: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(func_def_19,type,
    vEQ: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( X0 > X0 > $o ) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ! [X2: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ! [X3: $i] :
                ( ( X2 @ X3 )
               => ( X2 @ ( s @ ( s @ X3 ) ) ) )
            & ( X2 @ X0 ) )
         => ( X2 @ X1 ) ) )
    = cCKB_E2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cCKB_E2_def) ).

thf(f2,conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i,X0: $i] :
      ( ( ( cCKB_E2 @ X0 @ X1 )
        & ( cCKB_E2 @ X1 @ X2 ) )
     => ( cCKB_E2 @ X0 @ X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cCKB_L34000_pme) ).

thf(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X2: $i,X1: $i,X0: $i] :
        ( ( ( cCKB_E2 @ X0 @ X1 )
          & ( cCKB_E2 @ X1 @ X2 ) )
       => ( cCKB_E2 @ X0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( ( cCKB_E2 @ X2 @ X1 )
          & ( cCKB_E2 @ X1 @ X0 ) )
       => ( cCKB_E2 @ X2 @ X0 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X1: $i,X0: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( ( $true
            = ( cCKB_E2 @ X1 @ X0 ) )
          & ( $true
            = ( cCKB_E2 @ X2 @ X1 ) ) )
       => ( $true
          = ( cCKB_E2 @ X2 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ! [X2: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ! [X3: $i] :
                ( ( X2 @ X3 )
               => ( X2 @ ( s @ ( s @ X3 ) ) ) )
            & ( X2 @ X0 ) )
         => ( X2 @ X1 ) ) )
    = cCKB_E2 ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( cCKB_E2
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
                & ( !! @ $i
                  @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                      ( ( Y2 @ Y3 )
                     => ( Y2 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ) )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ? [X1: $i,X0: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( cCKB_E2 @ X2 @ X0 ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( cCKB_E2 @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( cCKB_E2 @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ? [X1: $i,X0: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( cCKB_E2 @ X2 @ X1 ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( cCKB_E2 @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      & ( $true
       != ( cCKB_E2 @ X2 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( cCKB_E2 @ X2 @ X0 ) )
      & ( ( cCKB_E2 @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $true )
      & ( $true
       != ( cCKB_E2 @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cCKB_E2 @ sK2 @ sK0 ) )
    & ( $true
      = ( cCKB_E2 @ sK0 @ sK1 ) )
    & ( ( cCKB_E2 @ sK2 @ sK1 )
     != $true ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2)],[f10]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( cCKB_E2 @ sK2 @ sK1 )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( cCKB_E2 @ sK0 @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( cCKB_E2 @ sK2 @ sK0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( cCKB_E2
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
                & ( !! @ $i
                  @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                      ( ( Y2 @ Y3 )
                     => ( Y2 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ) )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
                & ( !! @ $i
                  @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                      ( ( Y2 @ Y3 )
                     => ( Y2 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ) )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) )
      @ sK2
      @ sK0 )
    = $true ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f14,f15]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
                & ( !! @ $i
                  @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                      ( ( Y2 @ Y3 )
                     => ( Y2 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ) )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) )
      @ sK0
      @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f13,f15]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
                & ( !! @ $i
                  @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                      ( ( Y2 @ Y3 )
                     => ( Y2 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ) )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) )
      @ sK2
      @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f12,f15]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
      @ ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( Y0 @ sK2 )
            & ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                  ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
                 => ( Y0 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) )
         => ( Y0 @ sK1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( Y0 @ sK2 )
            & ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                  ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
                 => ( Y0 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) )
         => ( Y0 @ sK1 ) )
      @ sK3 )
    = $false ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK3 @ sK2 )
        & ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ( sK3 @ Y0 )
             => ( sK3 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) )
     => ( sK3 @ sK1 ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( sK3 @ sK1 )
    = $false ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( ( sK3 @ sK2 )
      & ( !! @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( sK3 @ Y0 )
           => ( sK3 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( sK3 @ Y0 )
         => ( sK3 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK3 @ sK2 ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( sK3 @ Y0 )
           => ( sK3 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y0 ) ) ) )
        @ X1 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f26]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ( sK3 @ X1 )
       => ( sK3 @ ( s @ ( s @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( sK3 @ ( s @ ( s @ X1 ) ) ) )
      | ( $false
        = ( sK3 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
      @ ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( Y0 @ sK0 )
            & ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                  ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
                 => ( Y0 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) )
         => ( Y0 @ sK1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
            ( ( ( Y0 @ sK0 )
              & ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                    ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
                   => ( Y0 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) )
           => ( Y0 @ sK1 ) )
        @ X1 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f31]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( ( X1 @ sK0 )
          & ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
               => ( X1 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) )
       => ( X1 @ sK1 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f32]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( X1 @ sK1 ) )
      | ( $false
        = ( ( X1 @ sK0 )
          & ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
               => ( X1 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f33]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
             => ( X1 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( X1 @ sK0 )
        = $false )
      | ( $true
        = ( X1 @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f34]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
             => ( X1 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y0 ) ) ) )
          @ ( sK4 @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( X1 @ sK1 ) )
      | ( ( X1 @ sK0 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f35]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( ( X1 @ ( sK4 @ X1 ) )
         => ( X1 @ ( s @ ( s @ ( sK4 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ) )
      | ( ( X1 @ sK0 )
        = $false )
      | ( $true
        = ( X1 @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f36]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( X1 @ ( s @ ( s @ ( sK4 @ X1 ) ) ) )
        = $false )
      | ( $true
        = ( X1 @ sK1 ) )
      | ( ( X1 @ sK0 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f37]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( X1 @ ( sK4 @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( ( X1 @ sK0 )
        = $false )
      | ( $true
        = ( X1 @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f37]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ( ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
      @ ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( Y0 @ sK2 )
            & ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                  ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
                 => ( Y0 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) )
         => ( Y0 @ sK0 ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
            ( ( ( Y0 @ sK2 )
              & ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                    ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
                   => ( Y0 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) )
           => ( Y0 @ sK0 ) )
        @ X1 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f40]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( $true
      = ( ( ( X1 @ sK2 )
          & ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
               => ( X1 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) )
       => ( X1 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f41]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( ( X1 @ sK2 )
          & ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
               => ( X1 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) )
        = $false )
      | ( $true
        = ( X1 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f42]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( X1 @ sK0 ) )
      | ( ( X1 @ sK2 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
             => ( X1 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f43]) ).

thf(f45,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( X1 @ sK2 )
        = $false )
      | ( $false
        = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
             => ( X1 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y0 ) ) ) )
          @ ( sK5 @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( X1 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f44]) ).

thf(f46,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( X1 @ sK2 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( ( X1 @ ( sK5 @ X1 ) )
         => ( X1 @ ( s @ ( s @ ( sK5 @ X1 ) ) ) ) )
        = $false )
      | ( $true
        = ( X1 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f45]) ).

thf(f47,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( X1 @ ( s @ ( s @ ( sK5 @ X1 ) ) ) ) )
      | ( ( X1 @ sK2 )
        = $false )
      | ( $true
        = ( X1 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f46]) ).

thf(f48,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( X1 @ ( sK5 @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( X1 @ sK0 ) )
      | ( ( X1 @ sK2 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f46]) ).

thf(f102,plain,
    ( ( ( sK3 @ sK0 )
      = $false )
    | ( $true = $false )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK3 @ ( sK4 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK3 @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f38,f30]) ).

thf(f114,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK3 @ ( sK4 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( ( sK3 @ sK0 )
      = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK3 @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f102]) ).

thf(f123,plain,
    ( ( ( sK3 @ sK2 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK3 @ ( sK5 @ sK3 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( $true = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK3 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f47,f30]) ).

thf(f133,plain,
    ( ( ( sK3 @ ( sK5 @ sK3 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK3 @ sK2 )
      = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK3 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f123]) ).

thf(f149,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( ( sK3 @ ( sK5 @ sK3 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK3 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f133,f27]) ).

thf(f150,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK3 @ sK0 ) )
    | ( ( sK3 @ ( sK5 @ sK3 ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f149]) ).

thf(f184,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK3 @ ( sK4 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( ( sK3 @ sK0 )
      = $false )
    | ( $true = $false ) ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f114,f24]) ).

thf(f185,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK3 @ ( sK4 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( ( sK3 @ sK0 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f184]) ).

thf(f189,definition,
    ( spl6_8
  <=> ( ( sK3 @ ( sK5 @ sK3 ) )
      = $false ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl6_8])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f191,plain,
    ( ( ( sK3 @ ( sK5 @ sK3 ) )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl6_8 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f189]) ).

thf(f193,definition,
    ( spl6_9
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK3 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl6_9])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f195,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK3 @ sK0 ) )
    | ~ spl6_9 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f193]) ).

thf(f196,plain,
    ( spl6_8
    | spl6_9 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f150,f193,f189]) ).

thf(f199,definition,
    ( spl6_10
  <=> ( $false
      = ( sK3 @ ( sK4 @ sK3 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl6_10])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f201,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK3 @ ( sK4 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ~ spl6_10 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f199]) ).

thf(f203,definition,
    ( spl6_11
  <=> ( ( sK3 @ sK0 )
      = $false ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl6_11])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f205,plain,
    ( ( ( sK3 @ sK0 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl6_11 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f203]) ).

thf(f206,plain,
    ( spl6_10
    | spl6_11 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f185,f203,f199]) ).

thf(f209,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK3 @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true = $false )
    | ( ( sK3 @ sK2 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl6_8 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f48,f191]) ).

thf(f210,plain,
    ( ( ( sK3 @ sK2 )
      = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK3 @ sK0 ) )
    | ~ spl6_8 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f209]) ).

thf(f212,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK3 @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl6_8 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f210,f27]) ).

thf(f213,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK3 @ sK0 ) )
    | ~ spl6_8 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f212]) ).

thf(f216,plain,
    ( spl6_9
    | ~ spl6_8 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f213,f189,f193]) ).

thf(f218,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK3 @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $true = $false )
    | ( ( sK3 @ sK0 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl6_10 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f39,f201]) ).

thf(f220,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK3 @ sK1 ) )
    | ( ( sK3 @ sK0 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl6_10 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f218]) ).

thf(f223,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( ( sK3 @ sK0 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl6_10 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f220,f24]) ).

thf(f224,plain,
    ( ( ( sK3 @ sK0 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl6_10 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f223]) ).

thf(f228,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl6_9
    | ~ spl6_10 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f224,f195]) ).

thf(f229,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl6_9
    | ~ spl6_10 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f228]) ).

thf(f230,plain,
    ( ~ spl6_9
    | ~ spl6_10 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f229]) ).

thf(f231,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl6_9
    | ~ spl6_11 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f205,f195]) ).

thf(f232,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl6_9
    | ~ spl6_11 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f231]) ).

thf(f233,plain,
    ( ~ spl6_9
    | ~ spl6_11 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f232]) ).

cnf(s9,plain,
    ( spl6_8
    | spl6_9 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f196]) ).

cnf(s11,plain,
    ( spl6_10
    | spl6_11 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f206]) ).

cnf(s13,plain,
    ( ~ spl6_8
    | spl6_9 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f216]) ).

cnf(s16,plain,
    ( ~ spl6_9
    | ~ spl6_10 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f230]) ).

cnf(s17,plain,
    ( ~ spl6_9
    | ~ spl6_11 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f233]) ).

cnf(s20,plain,
    ~ spl6_9,
    inference(rat,[],[s11,s16,s17]) ).

cnf(s21,plain,
    ~ spl6_8,
    inference(rat,[],[s13,s20]) ).

cnf(s22,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s9,s20,s21]) ).

thf(f234,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s22]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SEU970^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.05/0.13  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.05/0.13  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.05/0.13  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.05/0.13  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.05/0.13  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.05/0.13  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.05/0.13  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.05/0.13  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 14:53:04 UTC 2026
% 0.05/0.13  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.05/0.13  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.05/0.15  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.05/0.15  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.05/0.19  % (211668)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.05/0.19  % (211679)WARNING Broken Constraint: if ho_split_queue_ratios(1,8) has been set then ho_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.05/0.19  % (211679)WARNING Broken Constraint: if sine_to_age_tolerance(5) has been set then sine_to_age(off) is equal to on or sine_to_pred_levels(off) is not equal to off or sine_level_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.05/0.19  % (211676)dis+1002_4:1_sfv=off:to=lpo:plsq=on:fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:spb=non_intro:acc=on:uwa=off:fd=preordered:foolp=on:s2agt=32:slsqc=1:slsq=on:random_seed=1119641635:hsq=on:hsqr=16,1:s2a=on:i=634:add=on:nm=16:nicw=on:rtra=on:gtg=position:ss=included:ixr=off:c=on:inj=on:ntd=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/634Mi)
% 0.05/0.19  % (211675)lrs+10_1_cnfonf=off:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=797424482:i=3:rtra=on:inj=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.05/0.19  % (211674)lrs+10_16_si=on:nwc=1.5:random_seed=3024982979:i=18:kws=arity_squared:rtra=on:fe=abstraction:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.05/0.19  % (211673)lrs+10_40_drc=off:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=1624599759:s2a=on:i=87:rtra=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/87Mi)
% 0.05/0.19  % (211677)dis+21_4_fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=off:foolp=on:random_seed=3011199714:i=24:av=off:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/24Mi)
% 0.05/0.19  % (211678)lrs+10_1_to=lpo:sil=128000:e2e=on:si=on:random_seed=4230777048:s2a=on:i=75:s2at=3:aac=none:bd=preordered:rtra=on:fe=abstraction_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.05/0.19  % (211679)dis+1002_8_to=kbo:sil=128000:tgt=full:drc=off:si=on:sp=const_max:lma=off:spb=non_intro:cbe=off:uwa=interpreted_only:random_seed=142130945:hsqr=1,8:i=157:s2at=5:add=on:nm=2:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/157Mi)
% 0.05/0.19  % (211675)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.05/0.19  % (211675)------------------------------
% 0.05/0.19  % (211675)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.05/0.19  % (211675)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.05/0.19  % (211675)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.05/0.19  % (211675)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.05/0.19  % (211675)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.05/0.19  % (211675)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.05/0.19  % (211675)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.05/0.19  % (211675)------------------------------
% 0.05/0.19  % (211675)------------------------------
% 0.05/0.19  % (211679) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-211668-211679"...
% 0.05/0.19  % (211673) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-211668-211673"...
% 0.05/0.19  % (211673)...printing done.
% 0.05/0.19  % (211673)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.05/0.19  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.05/0.19  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.05/0.20  % (211673)------------------------------
% 0.05/0.20  % (211673)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.05/0.20  % (211673)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.05/0.20  % (211673)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.05/0.20  % (211673)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.05/0.20  % (211673)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.05/0.20  % (211673)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.05/0.20  % (211673)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 0.05/0.20  % (211668)Success in time 0.035 s
% 0.05/0.20  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------