↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEV006^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:34:32 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  10 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  221 ( 220 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   39 (  12 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  902 ( 121   ~;  70   |; 130   &; 578   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   43 (  13 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   12 (  12   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   12 (  10 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  144 (   0   ^; 114   !;  30   ?; 144   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    esk1_0: a > a > a ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    esk2_0: a > a > a ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    esk3_0: a ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    esk4_0: a ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    esk5_0: a ).

thf(decl_28,type,
    esk6_0: a ).

thf(decl_29,type,
    esk7_0: a ).

thf(decl_30,type,
    esk8_0: a ).

thf(decl_31,type,
    esk9_0: a ).

thf(decl_32,type,
    esk10_0: a ).

thf(cPENTAGON_THM2D_pme,conjecture,
    ! [X1: a > a > a,X2: a > a > a] :
      ( ( ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X3 )
            = X3 )
        & ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( X2 @ X3 @ X3 )
            = X3 )
        & ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X5 )
            = ( X1 @ X3 @ ( X1 @ X4 @ X5 ) ) )
        & ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
            ( ( X2 @ ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X5 )
            = ( X2 @ X3 @ ( X2 @ X4 @ X5 ) ) )
        & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
            = ( X1 @ X4 @ X3 ) )
        & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
            ( ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 )
            = ( X2 @ X4 @ X3 ) )
        & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X4 )
            = X4 )
        & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
            ( ( X2 @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X4 )
            = X4 )
        & ? [X3: a,X4: a,X6: a,X7: a,X8: a] :
            ( ( X6 != X7 )
            & ( X6 != X8 )
            & ( X6 != X3 )
            & ( X6 != X4 )
            & ( X7 != X8 )
            & ( X7 != X3 )
            & ( X7 != X4 )
            & ( X8 != X3 )
            & ( X8 != X4 )
            & ( X3 != X4 ) )
        & ~ ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X3 @ ( X2 @ X4 @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X5 ) ) )
              = ( X2 @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X5 ) ) ) )
     => ? [X3: a,X4: a,X6: a,X7: a,X8: a] :
          ( ( ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 )
            = X4 )
          & ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
            = X3 )
          & ( ( X2 @ X3 @ X6 )
            = X6 )
          & ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X6 )
            = X3 )
          & ( ( X2 @ X3 @ X7 )
            = X7 )
          & ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X7 )
            = X3 )
          & ( ( X2 @ X3 @ X8 )
            = X8 )
          & ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X8 )
            = X3 )
          & ( ( X2 @ X6 @ X7 )
            = X4 )
          & ( ( X1 @ X6 @ X7 )
            = X3 )
          & ( ( X2 @ X6 @ X8 )
            = X6 )
          & ( ( X1 @ X6 @ X8 )
            = X8 )
          & ( ( X2 @ X6 @ X4 )
            = X4 )
          & ( ( X1 @ X6 @ X4 )
            = X6 )
          & ( ( X2 @ X7 @ X8 )
            = X4 )
          & ( ( X1 @ X7 @ X8 )
            = X3 )
          & ( ( X2 @ X7 @ X4 )
            = X4 )
          & ( ( X1 @ X7 @ X4 )
            = X7 )
          & ( ( X2 @ X8 @ X4 )
            = X4 )
          & ( ( X1 @ X8 @ X4 )
            = X8 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.C6aeS0blu2/E---3.1_1404464.p',cPENTAGON_THM2D_pme) ).

thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: a > a > a,X2: a > a > a] :
        ( ( ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X3 )
              = X3 )
          & ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( X2 @ X3 @ X3 )
              = X3 )
          & ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X5 )
              = ( X1 @ X3 @ ( X1 @ X4 @ X5 ) ) )
          & ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
              ( ( X2 @ ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X5 )
              = ( X2 @ X3 @ ( X2 @ X4 @ X5 ) ) )
          & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
              = ( X1 @ X4 @ X3 ) )
          & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
              ( ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 )
              = ( X2 @ X4 @ X3 ) )
          & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X4 )
              = X4 )
          & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
              ( ( X2 @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X4 )
              = X4 )
          & ? [X3: a,X4: a,X6: a,X7: a,X8: a] :
              ( ( X6 != X7 )
              & ( X6 != X8 )
              & ( X6 != X3 )
              & ( X6 != X4 )
              & ( X7 != X8 )
              & ( X7 != X3 )
              & ( X7 != X4 )
              & ( X8 != X3 )
              & ( X8 != X4 )
              & ( X3 != X4 ) )
          & ~ ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
                ( ( X1 @ X3 @ ( X2 @ X4 @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X5 ) ) )
                = ( X2 @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X5 ) ) ) )
       => ? [X3: a,X4: a,X6: a,X7: a,X8: a] :
            ( ( ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 )
              = X4 )
            & ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
              = X3 )
            & ( ( X2 @ X3 @ X6 )
              = X6 )
            & ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X6 )
              = X3 )
            & ( ( X2 @ X3 @ X7 )
              = X7 )
            & ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X7 )
              = X3 )
            & ( ( X2 @ X3 @ X8 )
              = X8 )
            & ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X8 )
              = X3 )
            & ( ( X2 @ X6 @ X7 )
              = X4 )
            & ( ( X1 @ X6 @ X7 )
              = X3 )
            & ( ( X2 @ X6 @ X8 )
              = X6 )
            & ( ( X1 @ X6 @ X8 )
              = X8 )
            & ( ( X2 @ X6 @ X4 )
              = X4 )
            & ( ( X1 @ X6 @ X4 )
              = X6 )
            & ( ( X2 @ X7 @ X8 )
              = X4 )
            & ( ( X1 @ X7 @ X8 )
              = X3 )
            & ( ( X2 @ X7 @ X4 )
              = X4 )
            & ( ( X1 @ X7 @ X4 )
              = X7 )
            & ( ( X2 @ X8 @ X4 )
              = X4 )
            & ( ( X1 @ X8 @ X4 )
              = X8 ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cPENTAGON_THM2D_pme]) ).

thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: a > a > a,X2: a > a > a] :
        ( ( ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X3 )
              = X3 )
          & ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( X2 @ X3 @ X3 )
              = X3 )
          & ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X5 )
              = ( X1 @ X3 @ ( X1 @ X4 @ X5 ) ) )
          & ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
              ( ( X2 @ ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X5 )
              = ( X2 @ X3 @ ( X2 @ X4 @ X5 ) ) )
          & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
              = ( X1 @ X4 @ X3 ) )
          & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
              ( ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 )
              = ( X2 @ X4 @ X3 ) )
          & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X4 )
              = X4 )
          & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
              ( ( X2 @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X4 )
              = X4 )
          & ? [X3: a,X4: a,X6: a,X7: a,X8: a] :
              ( ( X6 != X7 )
              & ( X6 != X8 )
              & ( X6 != X3 )
              & ( X6 != X4 )
              & ( X7 != X8 )
              & ( X7 != X3 )
              & ( X7 != X4 )
              & ( X8 != X3 )
              & ( X8 != X4 )
              & ( X3 != X4 ) )
          & ~ ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
                ( ( X1 @ X3 @ ( X2 @ X4 @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X5 ) ) )
                = ( X2 @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X5 ) ) ) )
       => ? [X3: a,X4: a,X6: a,X7: a,X8: a] :
            ( ( ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 )
              = X4 )
            & ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
              = X3 )
            & ( ( X2 @ X3 @ X6 )
              = X6 )
            & ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X6 )
              = X3 )
            & ( ( X2 @ X3 @ X7 )
              = X7 )
            & ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X7 )
              = X3 )
            & ( ( X2 @ X3 @ X8 )
              = X8 )
            & ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X8 )
              = X3 )
            & ( ( X2 @ X6 @ X7 )
              = X4 )
            & ( ( X1 @ X6 @ X7 )
              = X3 )
            & ( ( X2 @ X6 @ X8 )
              = X6 )
            & ( ( X1 @ X6 @ X8 )
              = X8 )
            & ( ( X2 @ X6 @ X4 )
              = X4 )
            & ( ( X1 @ X6 @ X4 )
              = X6 )
            & ( ( X2 @ X7 @ X8 )
              = X4 )
            & ( ( X1 @ X7 @ X8 )
              = X3 )
            & ( ( X2 @ X7 @ X4 )
              = X4 )
            & ( ( X1 @ X7 @ X4 )
              = X7 )
            & ( ( X2 @ X8 @ X4 )
              = X4 )
            & ( ( X1 @ X8 @ X4 )
              = X8 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).

thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X42: a,X43: a,X44: a,X45: a,X46: a,X47: a,X48: a,X49: a,X50: a,X51: a,X52: a,X53: a,X54: a,X55: a,X56: a,X57: a,X66: a,X67: a,X68: a,X69: a,X70: a] :
      ( ( ( esk1_0 @ X42 @ X42 )
        = X42 )
      & ( ( esk2_0 @ X43 @ X43 )
        = X43 )
      & ( ( esk1_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ X44 @ X45 ) @ X46 )
        = ( esk1_0 @ X44 @ ( esk1_0 @ X45 @ X46 ) ) )
      & ( ( esk2_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ X47 @ X48 ) @ X49 )
        = ( esk2_0 @ X47 @ ( esk2_0 @ X48 @ X49 ) ) )
      & ( ( esk1_0 @ X50 @ X51 )
        = ( esk1_0 @ X51 @ X50 ) )
      & ( ( esk2_0 @ X52 @ X53 )
        = ( esk2_0 @ X53 @ X52 ) )
      & ( ( esk1_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ X54 @ X55 ) @ X55 )
        = X55 )
      & ( ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ X56 @ X57 ) @ X57 )
        = X57 )
      & ( esk5_0 != esk6_0 )
      & ( esk5_0 != esk7_0 )
      & ( esk5_0 != esk3_0 )
      & ( esk5_0 != esk4_0 )
      & ( esk6_0 != esk7_0 )
      & ( esk6_0 != esk3_0 )
      & ( esk6_0 != esk4_0 )
      & ( esk7_0 != esk3_0 )
      & ( esk7_0 != esk4_0 )
      & ( esk3_0 != esk4_0 )
      & ( ( esk1_0 @ esk8_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ esk9_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ esk8_0 @ esk10_0 ) ) )
       != ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ esk8_0 @ esk9_0 ) @ ( esk1_0 @ esk8_0 @ esk10_0 ) ) )
      & ( ( ( esk2_0 @ X66 @ X67 )
         != X67 )
        | ( ( esk1_0 @ X66 @ X67 )
         != X66 )
        | ( ( esk2_0 @ X66 @ X68 )
         != X68 )
        | ( ( esk1_0 @ X66 @ X68 )
         != X66 )
        | ( ( esk2_0 @ X66 @ X69 )
         != X69 )
        | ( ( esk1_0 @ X66 @ X69 )
         != X66 )
        | ( ( esk2_0 @ X66 @ X70 )
         != X70 )
        | ( ( esk1_0 @ X66 @ X70 )
         != X66 )
        | ( ( esk2_0 @ X68 @ X69 )
         != X67 )
        | ( ( esk1_0 @ X68 @ X69 )
         != X66 )
        | ( ( esk2_0 @ X68 @ X70 )
         != X68 )
        | ( ( esk1_0 @ X68 @ X70 )
         != X70 )
        | ( ( esk2_0 @ X68 @ X67 )
         != X67 )
        | ( ( esk1_0 @ X68 @ X67 )
         != X68 )
        | ( ( esk2_0 @ X69 @ X70 )
         != X67 )
        | ( ( esk1_0 @ X69 @ X70 )
         != X66 )
        | ( ( esk2_0 @ X69 @ X67 )
         != X67 )
        | ( ( esk1_0 @ X69 @ X67 )
         != X69 )
        | ( ( esk2_0 @ X70 @ X67 )
         != X67 )
        | ( ( esk1_0 @ X70 @ X67 )
         != X70 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
      ( ( esk1_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X4 )
      = X4 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4: a,X3: a] :
      ( ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 )
      = ( esk1_0 @ X4 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X5: a,X4: a,X6: a,X7: a] :
      ( ( ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 )
       != X4 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 )
       != X3 )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X5 )
       != X5 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X5 )
       != X3 )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X6 )
       != X6 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X6 )
       != X3 )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X7 )
       != X7 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X7 )
       != X3 )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X5 @ X6 )
       != X4 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X5 @ X6 )
       != X3 )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X5 @ X7 )
       != X5 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X5 @ X7 )
       != X7 )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X5 @ X4 )
       != X4 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X5 @ X4 )
       != X5 )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X6 @ X7 )
       != X4 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X6 @ X7 )
       != X3 )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X6 @ X4 )
       != X4 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X6 @ X4 )
       != X6 )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X7 @ X4 )
       != X4 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X7 @ X4 )
       != X7 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4: a,X3: a] :
      ( ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ ( esk2_0 @ X4 @ X3 ) )
      = X3 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
      ( ( esk1_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X5 )
      = ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ ( esk1_0 @ X4 @ X5 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a] :
      ( ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X3 )
      = X3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4: a,X3: a] :
      ( ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 )
      = ( esk2_0 @ X4 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
      ( ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X4 )
      = X4 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
      ( ( ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
       != ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ ( esk1_0 @ X4 @ X3 ) )
       != ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ ( esk1_0 @ X4 @ X5 ) )
       != ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X4 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
       != ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
       != ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X5 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
       != ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
       != X3 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X5 @ X3 )
       != ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X5 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
       != X5 )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X5 @ X3 )
       != ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X4 @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
       != X4 )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
       != X3 )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X5 )
       != X5 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X5 @ X4 )
       != X4 )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X5 @ X4 )
       != X5 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_8]),c_0_8]),c_0_8]),c_0_7])]),c_0_10]),c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4: a,X3: a] :
      ( ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ ( esk1_0 @ X4 @ X3 ) )
      = X3 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
      ( ( ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
       != ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ ( esk1_0 @ X4 @ X3 ) )
       != ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ ( esk1_0 @ X4 @ X5 ) )
       != ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X4 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
       != ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
       != ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X5 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
       != ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
       != X3 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X5 @ X3 )
       != ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X5 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
       != X5 )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X5 @ X3 )
       != ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
       != X3 )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X5 )
       != X5 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X5 @ X4 )
       != X4 )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X5 @ X4 )
       != X5 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13])]) ).

thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a] :
      ( ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X3 )
      = X3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
      ( ( ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
       != X3 )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X4 @ X3 )
       != X3 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X4 @ X3 )
       != X3 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X4 @ X3 )
       != X4 )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 )
       != X4 )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ X4 @ X3 )
       != X4 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_9]),c_0_15]),c_0_9]),c_0_9]),c_0_9]),c_0_9]),c_0_15]),c_0_9]),c_0_9]),c_0_9]),c_0_15]),c_0_9])]) ).

thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_9]),c_0_9]),c_0_15])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEV006^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.18  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 15:00:22 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.18  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.22  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.24  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.C6aeS0blu2/E---3.1_1404464.p
% 0.21/0.27  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.21/0.27  % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.21/0.27  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.27  % Starting post_as_ho1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.27  % Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.27  % Starting new_ho_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.27  % Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.27  % post_as_ho1 with pid 1404477 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.27  % Result found by post_as_ho1
% 0.21/0.27  % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.21/0.27  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.27  % Starting post_as_ho1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.27  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.21/0.27  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.27  % Search class: HUHPM-FFMF00-MSSFFFNN
% 0.21/0.27  % partial match(3): HUHPF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.21/0.27  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.27  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.27  % Starting post_as_ho1 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.27  % Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.27  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.27  % Starting new_bool_2 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.27  % post_as_ho1 with pid 1404484 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.27  % Result found by post_as_ho1
% 0.21/0.27  % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.21/0.27  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.27  % Starting post_as_ho1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.27  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.21/0.27  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.27  % Search class: HUHPM-FFMF00-MSSFFFNN
% 0.21/0.27  % partial match(3): HUHPF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.21/0.27  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.27  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.27  % Starting post_as_ho1 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.27  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.27  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.27  
% 0.21/0.27  % Proof found!
% 0.21/0.27  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.27  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.27  % Parsed axioms                        : 2
% 0.21/0.27  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/0.27  % Initial clauses                      : 21
% 0.21/0.27  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.21/0.27  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 20
% 0.21/0.27  % Processed clauses                    : 45
% 0.21/0.27  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.21/0.27  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.21/0.27  % ...remaining for further processing  : 45
% 0.21/0.27  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.21/0.27  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.27  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.27  % Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 0.21/0.27  % Generated clauses                    : 49
% 0.21/0.27  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 41
% 0.21/0.27  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.27  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.27  % Paramodulations                      : 48
% 0.21/0.27  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.27  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.27  % Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.21/0.27  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.21/0.27  % Total rewrite steps                  : 80
% 0.21/0.27  % ...of those cached                   : 49
% 0.21/0.27  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.27  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.27  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.27  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.27  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.27  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.27  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.27  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.27  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.27  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.27  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.27  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.27  % Current number of processed clauses  : 21
% 0.21/0.27  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 0.21/0.27  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.21/0.27  %    Negative unit clauses             : 11
% 0.21/0.27  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 0.21/0.27  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 32
% 0.21/0.27  % ...number of literals in the above   : 130
% 0.21/0.27  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.27  % Current number of archived clauses   : 23
% 0.21/0.27  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.21/0.27  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.27  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/0.27  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.21/0.27  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.27  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 61
% 0.21/0.27  % BW rewrite match successes           : 53
% 0.21/0.27  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.27  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.27  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2949
% 0.21/0.27  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 922
% 0.21/0.27  
% 0.21/0.27  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.27  % User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.27  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.27  % Total time               : 0.012 s
% 0.21/0.27  % Maximum resident set size: 3648 pages
% 0.21/0.27  
% 0.21/0.27  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.27  % User time                : 0.030 s
% 0.21/0.27  % System time              : 0.020 s
% 0.21/0.27  % Total time               : 0.050 s
% 0.21/0.27  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.21/0.27  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------