%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SEV047^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:34:46 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 0.33s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 6 ( 4 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 4 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 0 avg)
% Number of connectives : 14 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 8 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 6 ( 6 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 2 ( 0 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 ^; 9 !; 0 ?; 9 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(cTHM175_pme,conjecture,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 )
=> ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EIBuJj8RZ8/E---3.1_1364062.p',cTHM175_pme) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 )
=> ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM175_pme]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i,X3: $i] : $true,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SEV047^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.24 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.24 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.24 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.24 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.24 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.24 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.24 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.24 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 15:11:05 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.25 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.25 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/0.30 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.31 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EIBuJj8RZ8/E---3.1_1364062.p
% 0.25/0.33 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.25/0.33 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.25/0.33 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.33 % Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.33 % Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.33 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.33 % Starting post_as_ho4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.33 % Starting post_as_ho2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.33 % Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.33 % Starting full_lambda_10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.33 % Starting new_ho_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.33 % post_as_ho1 with pid 1364077 completed with status 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Result found by post_as_ho1
% 0.25/0.33 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.25/0.33 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.33 % Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.33 % Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.33 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.33 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.25/0.33 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.25/0.33 % Search class: HUHPF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.25/0.33 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.25/0.33 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.33 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1364083 completed with status 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.25/0.33 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.25/0.33 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.33 % Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.33 % Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.33 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.33 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.25/0.33 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.25/0.33 % Search class: HUHPF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.25/0.33 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.25/0.33 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.33 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.25/0.33
% 0.25/0.33 % Proof found!
% 0.25/0.33 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/0.33 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/0.33 % Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.25/0.33 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Initial clauses : 1
% 0.25/0.33 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1
% 0.25/0.33 % Processed clauses : 1
% 0.25/0.33 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % NegExts : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.33 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.33 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.33 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.33 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.33 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.33 % Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.25/0.33 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/0.33 % Termbank termtop insertions : 59
% 0.25/0.33 % Search garbage collected termcells : 16
% 0.25/0.33
% 0.25/0.33 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.33 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.25/0.33 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.25/0.33 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.25/0.33 % Maximum resident set size: 3580 pages
% 0.25/0.33
% 0.25/0.33 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.33 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.25/0.33 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.25/0.33 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.25/0.33 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.25/0.33 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------