↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEV051^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:40:10 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.44s 1.28s
% Output   : Refutation 1.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   47 (  46 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   50 (  20   ~;   7   |;  18   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (  12   !;  16   ?;  28   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

tff(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

tff(func_def_1,type,
    sK0: a ).

tff(func_def_2,type,
    sK1: a ).

tff(func_def_3,type,
    sK2: a ).

tff(func_def_4,type,
    sK3: a ).

tff(f17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f16,f13]) ).

tff(f13,plain,
    sK2 = sK1,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

tff(f10,plain,
    ( ( sK0 != sK0 )
    | ( sK2 = sK1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

tff(f9,plain,
    ( ( sK0 != sK0 )
    | ( ( sK2 = sK3 )
      & ( sK3 != sK1 )
      & ( sK2 = sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f6,f8,f7]) ).

tff(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a] : ( X0 != X0 )
   => ( sK0 != sK0 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

tff(f8,plain,
    ( ? [X1: a,X2: a,X3: a] :
        ( ( X2 = X3 )
        & ( X1 != X3 )
        & ( X1 = X2 ) )
   => ( ( sK2 = sK3 )
      & ( sK3 != sK1 )
      & ( sK2 = sK1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

tff(f6,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a] : ( X0 != X0 )
    | ? [X1: a,X2: a,X3: a] :
        ( ( X2 = X3 )
        & ( X1 != X3 )
        & ( X1 = X2 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

tff(f5,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a] : ( X0 != X0 )
    | ? [X2: a,X1: a,X3: a] :
        ( ( X1 = X3 )
        & ( X2 != X3 )
        & ( X1 = X2 ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

tff(f4,plain,
    ( ? [X1: a,X2: a,X3: a] :
        ( ( X2 != X3 )
        & ( X1 = X3 )
        & ( X1 = X2 ) )
    | ? [X0: a] : ( X0 != X0 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f3]) ).

tff(f3,plain,
    ~ ( ! [X1: a,X2: a,X3: a] :
          ( ( ( X1 = X3 )
            & ( X1 = X2 ) )
         => ( X2 = X3 ) )
      & ! [X0: a] : ( X0 = X0 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X0: a] : ( X0 = X0 )
      & ! [X3: a,X1: a,X2: a] :
          ( ( ( X1 = X3 )
            & ( X2 = X3 ) )
         => ( X1 = X2 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

tff(f1,conjecture,
    ( ! [X0: a] : ( X0 = X0 )
    & ! [X3: a,X1: a,X2: a] :
        ( ( ( X1 = X3 )
          & ( X2 = X3 ) )
       => ( X1 = X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.03BQ8dpW1A/DTF2THF_18268.p',cTHM557_pme) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    sK2 != sK1,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f14,f15]) ).

tff(f15,plain,
    sK2 = sK3,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

tff(f12,plain,
    ( ( sK0 != sK0 )
    | ( sK2 = sK3 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

tff(f14,plain,
    sK3 != sK1,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

tff(f11,plain,
    ( ( sK0 != sK0 )
    | ( sK3 != sK1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SEV051^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.17/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:37:56 EST 2026
% 0.17/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.30/0.46  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.30/0.46  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.30/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.46  % File     : SEV051^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.30/0.46  % Domain   : Set Theory (Relations)
% 0.30/0.46  % Problem  : TPS problem THM557
% 0.30/0.46  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.30/0.46  % English  : Equality is an LC-relation.
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  % Refs     : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.30/0.46  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.30/0.46  % Names    : tps_0210 [Bro09]
% 0.30/0.46  %          : THM557 [TPS]
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.30/0.46  % Rating   : 0.00 v9.0.0, 0.10 v8.2.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.14 v6.1.0, 0.00 v6.0.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.00 v4.0.0
% 0.30/0.46  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    2 (   0 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of atoms       :    4 (   4 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   4 avg)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of connectives :    3 (   0   ~;   0   |;   2   &;   0   @)
% 0.30/0.46  %                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   7 avg)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of types       :    1 (   1 usr)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of symbols     :    1 (   0 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of variables   :    4 (   0   ^;   4   !;   0   ?;   4   :)
% 0.30/0.46  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.30/0.46  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.30/0.46  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.30/0.46  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.30/0.46  %          : Polymorphic definitions expanded.
% 0.30/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.46  thf(a_type,type,
% 0.30/0.46      a: $tType ).
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  thf(cTHM557_pme,conjecture,
% 0.30/0.46      ( ! [Xx: a] : ( Xx = Xx )
% 0.30/0.46      & ! [Xu: a,Xv: a,Xw: a] :
% 0.30/0.46          ( ( ( Xu = Xw )
% 0.30/0.46            & ( Xv = Xw ) )
% 0.30/0.46         => ( Xu = Xv ) ) ) ).
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.46  ------------------------
% 1.44/1.26  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.44/1.26  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.44/1.26  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:37:56 EST 2026
% 1.44/1.26  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.44/1.26  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.44/1.26  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.44/1.26  
% 1.44/1.26  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.03BQ8dpW1A/DTF2DTF18268.p
% See solution above
% 1.44/1.26  ------------------------
% 1.44/1.27  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.44/1.27  thf(a_type,type,
% 1.44/1.27      a: $tType ).
% 1.44/1.27  
% 1.44/1.27  thf(cTHM557_pme,conjecture,
% 1.44/1.27      ( ! [Xx: a] : ( Xx = Xx )
% 1.44/1.27      & ! [Xu: a,Xv: a,Xw: a] :
% 1.44/1.27          ( ( ( Xu = Xw )
% 1.44/1.27            & ( Xv = Xw ) )
% 1.44/1.27         => ( Xu = Xv ) ) ) ).
% 1.44/1.27  ------------------------
% 1.44/1.28  % (18486)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_18268 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.44/1.28  % (18486)First to succeed.
% 1.44/1.28  % (18486)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.44/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_18268
% 1.44/1.28  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_18268
% 1.44/1.28  tff(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
% 1.44/1.28  tff(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 1.44/1.28  tff(func_def_1, type, sK0: a).
% 1.44/1.28  tff(func_def_2, type, sK1: a).
% 1.44/1.28  tff(func_def_3, type, sK2: a).
% 1.44/1.28  tff(func_def_4, type, sK3: a).
% 1.44/1.28  tff(f17,plain,(
% 1.44/1.28    $false),
% 1.44/1.28    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f16,f13])).
% 1.44/1.28  tff(f13,plain,(
% 1.44/1.28    sK2 = sK1),
% 1.44/1.28    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.44/1.28  tff(f10,plain,(
% 1.44/1.28    sK0 != sK0 | sK2 = sK1),
% 1.44/1.28    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.44/1.28  tff(f9,plain,(
% 1.44/1.28    sK0 != sK0 | (sK2 = sK3 & sK3 != sK1 & sK2 = sK1)),
% 1.44/1.28    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f6,f8,f7])).
% 1.44/1.28  tff(f7,plain,(
% 1.44/1.28    ? [X0 : a] : X0 != X0 => sK0 != sK0),
% 1.44/1.28    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.44/1.28  tff(f8,plain,(
% 1.44/1.28    ? [X1 : a,X2 : a,X3 : a] : (X2 = X3 & X1 != X3 & X1 = X2) => (sK2 = sK3 & sK3 != sK1 & sK2 = sK1)),
% 1.44/1.28    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.44/1.28  tff(f6,plain,(
% 1.44/1.28    ? [X0 : a] : X0 != X0 | ? [X1 : a,X2 : a,X3 : a] : (X2 = X3 & X1 != X3 & X1 = X2)),
% 1.44/1.28    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.44/1.28  tff(f5,plain,(
% 1.44/1.28    ? [X0 : a] : X0 != X0 | ? [X2 : a,X1 : a,X3 : a] : (X1 = X3 & X2 != X3 & X1 = X2)),
% 1.44/1.28    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.44/1.28  tff(f4,plain,(
% 1.44/1.28    ? [X1 : a,X2 : a,X3 : a] : (X2 != X3 & (X1 = X3 & X1 = X2)) | ? [X0 : a] : X0 != X0),
% 1.44/1.28    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f3])).
% 1.44/1.28  tff(f3,plain,(
% 1.44/1.28    ~(! [X1 : a,X2 : a,X3 : a] : ((X1 = X3 & X1 = X2) => X2 = X3) & ! [X0 : a] : X0 = X0)),
% 1.44/1.28    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.44/1.28  tff(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.44/1.28    ~(! [X0 : a] : X0 = X0 & ! [X3 : a,X1 : a,X2 : a] : ((X1 = X3 & X2 = X3) => X1 = X2))),
% 1.44/1.28    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.44/1.28  tff(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.44/1.28    ! [X0 : a] : X0 = X0 & ! [X3 : a,X1 : a,X2 : a] : ((X1 = X3 & X2 = X3) => X1 = X2)),
% 1.44/1.28    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.03BQ8dpW1A/DTF2THF_18268.p',cTHM557_pme)).
% 1.44/1.28  tff(f16,plain,(
% 1.44/1.28    sK2 != sK1),
% 1.44/1.28    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f14,f15])).
% 1.44/1.28  tff(f15,plain,(
% 1.44/1.28    sK2 = sK3),
% 1.44/1.28    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.44/1.28  tff(f12,plain,(
% 1.44/1.28    sK0 != sK0 | sK2 = sK3),
% 1.44/1.28    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.44/1.28  tff(f14,plain,(
% 1.44/1.28    sK3 != sK1),
% 1.44/1.28    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.44/1.28  tff(f11,plain,(
% 1.44/1.28    sK0 != sK0 | sK3 != sK1),
% 1.44/1.28    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.44/1.28  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_18268
% 1.44/1.28  % (18486)------------------------------
% 1.44/1.28  % (18486)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.44/1.28  % (18486)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.44/1.28  
% 1.44/1.28  % (18486)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.44/1.28  % (18486)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.44/1.28  % (18486)------------------------------
% 1.44/1.28  % (18486)------------------------------
% 1.44/1.28  % (18485)Success in time 0.011 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------