↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SEV059^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:02:48 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 5.65s 5.89s
% Output   : Proof 5.65s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem    : SEV059^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.11  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.10/0.32  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 01:23:08 EDT 2025
% 0.10/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 5.65/5.89  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 5.65/5.89  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 5.65/5.89    (Not
% 5.65/5.89      (And
% 5.65/5.89          (And (∀ (Xx Xy Xz : a), And (c_less_ Xx Xy) (c_less_ Xy Xz) → c_less_ Xx Xz)
% 5.65/5.89            (∀ (X : b), c_less_ (cA X) (cA (cF X))))
% 5.65/5.89          (Eq cG fun Z => cF (cF Z)) →
% 5.65/5.89        ∀ (Y : b), c_less_ (cA Y) (cA (cG Y))))
% 5.65/5.89    True
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq
% 5.65/5.89    (And
% 5.65/5.89        (And (∀ (Xx Xy Xz : a), And (c_less_ Xx Xy) (c_less_ Xy Xz) → c_less_ Xx Xz)
% 5.65/5.89          (∀ (X : b), c_less_ (cA X) (cA (cF X))))
% 5.65/5.89        (Eq cG fun Z => cF (cF Z)) →
% 5.65/5.89      ∀ (Y : b), c_less_ (cA Y) (cA (cG Y)))
% 5.65/5.89    False
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): Eq
% 5.65/5.89    (And
% 5.65/5.89      (And (∀ (Xx Xy Xz : a), And (c_less_ Xx Xy) (c_less_ Xy Xz) → c_less_ Xx Xz)
% 5.65/5.89        (∀ (X : b), c_less_ (cA X) (cA (cF X))))
% 5.65/5.89      (Eq cG fun Z => cF (cF Z)))
% 5.65/5.89    True
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #3 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (∀ (Y : b), c_less_ (cA Y) (cA (cG Y))) False
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #4 (by clausification #[2]): Eq (Eq cG fun Z => cF (cF Z)) True
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #5 (by clausification #[2]): Eq (And (∀ (Xx Xy Xz : a), And (c_less_ Xx Xy) (c_less_ Xy Xz) → c_less_ Xx Xz) (∀ (X : b), c_less_ (cA X) (cA (cF X))))
% 5.65/5.89    True
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #6 (by clausification #[4]): Eq cG fun Z => cF (cF Z)
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #7 (by argument congruence #[6]): ∀ (a : b), Eq (cG a) ((fun Z => cF (cF Z)) a)
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #8 (by betaEtaReduce #[7]): ∀ (a : b), Eq (cG a) (cF (cF a))
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #12 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : b), Eq (Not (c_less_ (cA (skS.0 0 a)) (cA (cG (skS.0 0 a))))) True
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #13 (by clausification #[12]): ∀ (a : b), Eq (c_less_ (cA (skS.0 0 a)) (cA (cG (skS.0 0 a)))) False
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #14 (by clausification #[5]): Eq (∀ (X : b), c_less_ (cA X) (cA (cF X))) True
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #15 (by clausification #[5]): Eq (∀ (Xx Xy Xz : a), And (c_less_ Xx Xy) (c_less_ Xy Xz) → c_less_ Xx Xz) True
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #16 (by clausification #[14]): ∀ (a : b), Eq (c_less_ (cA a) (cA (cF a))) True
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #17 (by superposition #[16, 8]): ∀ (a : b), Eq (c_less_ (cA (cF a)) (cA (cG a))) True
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #20 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a_1 : a), Eq (∀ (Xy Xz : a), And (c_less_ a_1 Xy) (c_less_ Xy Xz) → c_less_ a_1 Xz) True
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #21 (by clausification #[20]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 : a), Eq (∀ (Xz : a), And (c_less_ a_1 a_2) (c_less_ a_2 Xz) → c_less_ a_1 Xz) True
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #22 (by clausification #[21]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a : a), Eq (And (c_less_ a_1 a_2) (c_less_ a_2 a) → c_less_ a_1 a) True
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #23 (by clausification #[22]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a : a), Or (Eq (And (c_less_ a_1 a_2) (c_less_ a_2 a)) False) (Eq (c_less_ a_1 a) True)
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #24 (by clausification #[23]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a : a), Or (Eq (c_less_ a_1 a_2) True) (Or (Eq (c_less_ a_1 a) False) (Eq (c_less_ a a_2) False))
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #25 (by superposition #[24, 16]): ∀ (a_1 : b) (a : a), Or (Eq (c_less_ (cA a_1) a) True) (Or (Eq (c_less_ (cA (cF a_1)) a) False) (Eq False True))
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #28 (by clausification #[25]): ∀ (a_1 : b) (a : a), Or (Eq (c_less_ (cA a_1) a) True) (Eq (c_less_ (cA (cF a_1)) a) False)
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #30 (by superposition #[28, 17]): ∀ (a : b), Or (Eq (c_less_ (cA a) (cA (cG a))) True) (Eq False True)
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #34 (by clausification #[30]): ∀ (a : b), Eq (c_less_ (cA a) (cA (cG a))) True
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #35 (by superposition #[34, 13]): Eq True False
% 5.65/5.89  Clause #40 (by clausification #[35]): False
% 5.65/5.89  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------