↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEV104^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:35:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 0.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   97 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  300 (  26   ~;  27   |;  36   &; 193   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  18  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   28 (   8 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   74 (   0   ^;  71   !;   3   ?;  74   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort2,type,
    b: $tType ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    cR: a > a > $o ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    z: a ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    f: a > b > $o ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    cS: b > b > $o ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    esk1_1: a > b ).

thf(decl_28,type,
    esk2_0: b ).

thf(decl_29,type,
    esk3_0: a ).

thf(decl_30,type,
    esk4_0: a ).

thf(cTHM552D_pme,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [X1: a,X2: a,X3: a] :
          ( ( ( cR @ X1 @ X2 )
            & ( cR @ X3 @ X2 ) )
         => ( cR @ X1 @ X3 ) )
      & ! [X4: a] : ( cR @ X4 @ X4 ) )
   => ( ( ! [X4: a] :
          ? [X5: b] : ( f @ X4 @ X5 )
        & ! [X4: a,X6: b,X7: b] :
            ( ( ( f @ X4 @ X6 )
              & ( f @ X4 @ X7 ) )
           => ( cS @ X6 @ X7 ) )
        & ! [X8: a,X9: a,X5: b] :
            ( ( ( f @ X8 @ X5 )
              & ( f @ X9 @ X5 ) )
           => ( cR @ X8 @ X9 ) ) )
     => ! [X5: b,X8: a,X9: a] :
          ( ( ! [X3: a] :
                ( ( f @ X8 @ X5 )
                | ( ~ ( f @ X3 @ X5 )
                  & ( cR @ X8 @ z ) ) )
            & ! [X3: a] :
                ( ( f @ X9 @ X5 )
                | ( ~ ( f @ X3 @ X5 )
                  & ( cR @ X9 @ z ) ) ) )
         => ( cR @ X8 @ X9 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ARyR4FNxm2/E---3.1_3482745.p',cTHM552D_pme) ).

thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [X1: a,X2: a,X3: a] :
            ( ( ( cR @ X1 @ X2 )
              & ( cR @ X3 @ X2 ) )
           => ( cR @ X1 @ X3 ) )
        & ! [X4: a] : ( cR @ X4 @ X4 ) )
     => ( ( ! [X4: a] :
            ? [X5: b] : ( f @ X4 @ X5 )
          & ! [X4: a,X6: b,X7: b] :
              ( ( ( f @ X4 @ X6 )
                & ( f @ X4 @ X7 ) )
             => ( cS @ X6 @ X7 ) )
          & ! [X8: a,X9: a,X5: b] :
              ( ( ( f @ X8 @ X5 )
                & ( f @ X9 @ X5 ) )
             => ( cR @ X8 @ X9 ) ) )
       => ! [X5: b,X8: a,X9: a] :
            ( ( ! [X3: a] :
                  ( ( f @ X8 @ X5 )
                  | ( ~ ( f @ X3 @ X5 )
                    & ( cR @ X8 @ z ) ) )
              & ! [X3: a] :
                  ( ( f @ X9 @ X5 )
                  | ( ~ ( f @ X3 @ X5 )
                    & ( cR @ X9 @ z ) ) ) )
           => ( cR @ X8 @ X9 ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM552D_pme]) ).

thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [X1: a,X2: a,X3: a] :
            ( ( ( cR @ X1 @ X2 )
              & ( cR @ X3 @ X2 ) )
           => ( cR @ X1 @ X3 ) )
        & ! [X4: a] : ( cR @ X4 @ X4 ) )
     => ( ( ! [X4: a] :
            ? [X5: b] : ( f @ X4 @ X5 )
          & ! [X4: a,X6: b,X7: b] :
              ( ( ( f @ X4 @ X6 )
                & ( f @ X4 @ X7 ) )
             => ( cS @ X6 @ X7 ) )
          & ! [X8: a,X9: a,X5: b] :
              ( ( ( f @ X8 @ X5 )
                & ( f @ X9 @ X5 ) )
             => ( cR @ X8 @ X9 ) ) )
       => ! [X5: b,X8: a,X9: a] :
            ( ( ! [X3: a] :
                  ( ( f @ X8 @ X5 )
                  | ( ~ ( f @ X3 @ X5 )
                    & ( cR @ X8 @ z ) ) )
              & ! [X3: a] :
                  ( ( f @ X9 @ X5 )
                  | ( ~ ( f @ X3 @ X5 )
                    & ( cR @ X9 @ z ) ) ) )
           => ( cR @ X8 @ X9 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).

thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X27: a,X28: a,X29: a,X30: a,X31: a,X33: a,X34: b,X35: b,X36: a,X37: a,X38: b,X42: a,X43: a] :
      ( ( ~ ( cR @ X27 @ X28 )
        | ~ ( cR @ X29 @ X28 )
        | ( cR @ X27 @ X29 ) )
      & ( cR @ X30 @ X30 )
      & ( f @ X31 @ ( esk1_1 @ X31 ) )
      & ( ~ ( f @ X33 @ X34 )
        | ~ ( f @ X33 @ X35 )
        | ( cS @ X34 @ X35 ) )
      & ( ~ ( f @ X36 @ X38 )
        | ~ ( f @ X37 @ X38 )
        | ( cR @ X36 @ X37 ) )
      & ( ~ ( f @ X42 @ esk2_0 )
        | ( f @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
      & ( ( cR @ esk3_0 @ z )
        | ( f @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
      & ( ~ ( f @ X43 @ esk2_0 )
        | ( f @ esk4_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
      & ( ( cR @ esk4_0 @ z )
        | ( f @ esk4_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
      & ~ ( cR @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: a,X3: a,X2: a] :
      ( ( cR @ X1 @ X3 )
      | ~ ( cR @ X1 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( cR @ X3 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cR @ esk4_0 @ z )
    | ( f @ esk4_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( f @ esk4_0 @ esk2_0 )
      | ( cR @ X1 @ esk4_0 )
      | ~ ( cR @ X1 @ z ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cR @ esk3_0 @ z )
    | ( f @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( cR @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( f @ esk4_0 @ esk2_0 )
      | ~ ( f @ X1 @ esk2_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: a,X2: a,X5: b] :
      ( ( cR @ X1 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( f @ X1 @ X5 )
      | ~ ( f @ X2 @ X5 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    f @ esk4_0 @ esk2_0,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]),c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( f @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0 )
      | ~ ( f @ X1 @ esk2_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( cR @ X1 @ esk4_0 )
      | ~ ( f @ X1 @ esk2_0 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    f @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEV104^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.19  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 15:08:40 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.19  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.24  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.25  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ARyR4FNxm2/E---3.1_3482745.p
% 0.23/0.28  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.23/0.28  % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.28  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.28  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.28  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28  % Starting full_lambda_5 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28  % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28  % new_bool_1 with pid 3482759 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.23/0.28  % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.28  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.28  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.28  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.23/0.28  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.28  % Search class: HGUNS-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.28  % partial match(1): HGUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.28  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.28  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28  % SubtermCWHack with pid 3482764 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.23/0.28  % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.28  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.28  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.28  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.23/0.28  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.28  % Search class: HGUNS-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.28  % partial match(1): HGUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.28  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.28  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.28  
% 0.23/0.28  % Proof found!
% 0.23/0.28  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/0.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.28  % Parsed axioms                        : 7
% 0.23/0.28  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 6
% 0.23/0.28  % Initial clauses                      : 10
% 0.23/0.28  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 10
% 0.23/0.28  % Processed clauses                    : 16
% 0.23/0.28  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % ...remaining for further processing  : 16
% 0.23/0.28  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 0.23/0.28  % Generated clauses                    : 16
% 0.23/0.28  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 11
% 0.23/0.28  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.23/0.28  % Paramodulations                      : 16
% 0.23/0.28  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Total rewrite steps                  : 8
% 0.23/0.28  % ...of those cached                   : 4
% 0.23/0.28  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.23/0.28  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.23/0.28  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.28  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.23/0.28  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.28  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.23/0.28  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.23/0.28  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.23/0.28  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.23/0.28  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.23/0.28  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.23/0.28  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.23/0.28  % Current number of processed clauses  : 11
% 0.23/0.28  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.23/0.28  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.28  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.23/0.28  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 6
% 0.23/0.28  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 0.23/0.28  % ...number of literals in the above   : 9
% 0.23/0.28  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Current number of archived clauses   : 5
% 0.23/0.28  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5
% 0.23/0.28  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.23/0.28  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.23/0.28  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.23/0.28  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.23/0.28  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1281
% 0.23/0.28  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 427
% 0.23/0.28  
% 0.23/0.28  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.28  % User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.28  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.23/0.28  % Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.28  % Maximum resident set size: 3580 pages
% 0.23/0.28  
% 0.23/0.28  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.28  % User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.28  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.28  % Total time               : 0.013 s
% 0.23/0.28  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.23/0.28  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------