↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEV123^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:35:04 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   59 (   2 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   29 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  421 (  41   ~;  56   |;  28   &; 274   @)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  21  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   31 (  12 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   84 (  84   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   14 (  12 usr;   3 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   85 (   4   ^;  72   !;   9   ?;  85   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    epred1_0: ( a > a > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    epred2_0: ( a > a > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    esk1_0: a ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    esk2_0: a ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    esk3_1: ( a > a > $o ) > a ).

thf(decl_28,type,
    esk4_1: ( a > a > $o ) > a ).

thf(decl_29,type,
    epred3_1: ( a > a > $o ) > a > a > $o ).

thf(decl_30,type,
    epred4_1: ( a > a > $o ) > a > a > $o ).

thf(decl_31,type,
    esk5_4: ( a > a > $o ) > a > a > ( a > a > $o ) > a ).

thf(decl_32,type,
    esk6_4: ( a > a > $o ) > a > a > ( a > a > $o ) > a ).

thf(decl_33,type,
    epred5_3: ( a > a > $o ) > a > a > a > a > $o ).

thf(decl_34,type,
    epred6_0: a > a > $o ).

thf(cTHM254_B_pme,conjecture,
    ! [X1: ( a > a > $o ) > $o,X2: ( a > a > $o ) > $o,X3: a,X4: a] :
      ( ! [X5: a > a > $o] :
          ( ( ! [X6: a,X7: a] :
                ( ? [X8: a > a > $o] :
                    ( ? [X9: a > a > $o] :
                        ( ( X2 @ X9 )
                        & ( X8
                          = ( ^ [X10: a,X11: a] :
                              ! [X12: a > a > $o] :
                                ( ( ! [X13: a,X14: a] :
                                      ( ( X9 @ X13 @ X14 )
                                     => ( X12 @ X13 @ X14 ) )
                                  & ( X1 @ X12 ) )
                               => ( X12 @ X10 @ X11 ) ) ) ) )
                    & ( X8 @ X6 @ X7 ) )
               => ( X5 @ X6 @ X7 ) )
            & ( X1 @ X5 ) )
         => ( X5 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
     => ! [X5: a > a > $o] :
          ( ( ! [X6: a,X7: a] :
                ( ? [X8: a > a > $o] :
                    ( ( X2 @ X8 )
                    & ( X8 @ X6 @ X7 ) )
               => ( X5 @ X6 @ X7 ) )
            & ( X1 @ X5 ) )
         => ( X5 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fRm9oV68qX/E---3.1_1373699.p',cTHM254_B_pme) ).

thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: ( a > a > $o ) > $o,X2: ( a > a > $o ) > $o,X3: a,X4: a] :
        ( ! [X5: a > a > $o] :
            ( ( ! [X6: a,X7: a] :
                  ( ? [X8: a > a > $o] :
                      ( ? [X9: a > a > $o] :
                          ( ( X2 @ X9 )
                          & ( X8
                            = ( ^ [X10: a,X11: a] :
                                ! [X12: a > a > $o] :
                                  ( ( ! [X13: a,X14: a] :
                                        ( ( X9 @ X13 @ X14 )
                                       => ( X12 @ X13 @ X14 ) )
                                    & ( X1 @ X12 ) )
                                 => ( X12 @ X10 @ X11 ) ) ) ) )
                      & ( X8 @ X6 @ X7 ) )
                 => ( X5 @ X6 @ X7 ) )
              & ( X1 @ X5 ) )
           => ( X5 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
       => ! [X5: a > a > $o] :
            ( ( ! [X6: a,X7: a] :
                  ( ? [X8: a > a > $o] :
                      ( ( X2 @ X8 )
                      & ( X8 @ X6 @ X7 ) )
                 => ( X5 @ X6 @ X7 ) )
              & ( X1 @ X5 ) )
           => ( X5 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM254_B_pme]) ).

thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: ( a > a > $o ) > $o,X2: ( a > a > $o ) > $o,X3: a,X4: a] :
        ( ! [X5: a > a > $o] :
            ( ( ! [X6: a,X7: a] :
                  ( ? [X8: a > a > $o] :
                      ( ? [X9: a > a > $o] :
                          ( ( X2 @ X9 )
                          & ! [X28: a,X29: a] :
                              ( ( X8 @ X28 @ X29 )
                            <=> ! [X12: a > a > $o] :
                                  ( ( ! [X13: a,X14: a] :
                                        ( ( X9 @ X13 @ X14 )
                                       => ( X12 @ X13 @ X14 ) )
                                    & ( X1 @ X12 ) )
                                 => ( X12 @ X28 @ X29 ) ) ) )
                      & ( X8 @ X6 @ X7 ) )
                 => ( X5 @ X6 @ X7 ) )
              & ( X1 @ X5 ) )
           => ( X5 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
       => ! [X5: a > a > $o] :
            ( ( ! [X6: a,X7: a] :
                  ( ? [X8: a > a > $o] :
                      ( ( X2 @ X8 )
                      & ( X8 @ X6 @ X7 ) )
                 => ( X5 @ X6 @ X7 ) )
              & ( X1 @ X5 ) )
           => ( X5 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])]) ).

thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X34: a > a > $o,X39: a,X40: a,X41: a > a > $o,X45: a,X46: a,X48: a,X49: a,X50: a > a > $o] :
      ( ( ( epred2_0 @ ( epred4_1 @ X34 ) )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X34 )
        | ( X34 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
      & ( ( epred4_1 @ X34 @ ( esk5_4 @ X34 @ X39 @ X40 @ X41 ) @ ( esk6_4 @ X34 @ X39 @ X40 @ X41 ) )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X41 )
        | ( X41 @ X39 @ X40 )
        | ~ ( epred3_1 @ X34 @ X39 @ X40 )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X34 )
        | ( X34 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
      & ( ~ ( X41 @ ( esk5_4 @ X34 @ X39 @ X40 @ X41 ) @ ( esk6_4 @ X34 @ X39 @ X40 @ X41 ) )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X41 )
        | ( X41 @ X39 @ X40 )
        | ~ ( epred3_1 @ X34 @ X39 @ X40 )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X34 )
        | ( X34 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
      & ( ~ ( epred4_1 @ X34 @ X45 @ X46 )
        | ( epred5_3 @ X34 @ X39 @ X40 @ X45 @ X46 )
        | ( epred3_1 @ X34 @ X39 @ X40 )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X34 )
        | ( X34 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
      & ( ( epred1_0 @ ( epred5_3 @ X34 @ X39 @ X40 ) )
        | ( epred3_1 @ X34 @ X39 @ X40 )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X34 )
        | ( X34 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
      & ( ~ ( epred5_3 @ X34 @ X39 @ X40 @ X39 @ X40 )
        | ( epred3_1 @ X34 @ X39 @ X40 )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X34 )
        | ( X34 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
      & ( ( epred3_1 @ X34 @ ( esk3_1 @ X34 ) @ ( esk4_1 @ X34 ) )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X34 )
        | ( X34 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
      & ( ~ ( X34 @ ( esk3_1 @ X34 ) @ ( esk4_1 @ X34 ) )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X34 )
        | ( X34 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
      & ( ~ ( epred2_0 @ X50 )
        | ~ ( X50 @ X48 @ X49 )
        | ( epred6_0 @ X48 @ X49 ) )
      & ( epred1_0 @ epred6_0 )
      & ~ ( epred6_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X5: a > a > $o,X4: a] :
      ( ( epred6_0 @ X3 @ X4 )
      | ~ ( epred2_0 @ X5 )
      | ~ ( X5 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X4: a,X8: a > a > $o,X5: a > a > $o] :
      ( ( epred4_1 @ X5 @ ( esk5_4 @ X5 @ X3 @ X4 @ X8 ) @ ( esk6_4 @ X5 @ X3 @ X4 @ X8 ) )
      | ( X8 @ X3 @ X4 )
      | ( X5 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X8 )
      | ~ ( epred3_1 @ X5 @ X3 @ X4 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X5 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X5: a > a > $o] :
      ( ( epred2_0 @ ( epred4_1 @ X5 ) )
      | ( X5 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X5 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a > a > $o,X8: a > a > $o] :
      ( ( X5 @ X3 @ X4 )
      | ( X8 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
      | ~ ( X5 @ ( esk5_4 @ X8 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5 ) @ ( esk6_4 @ X8 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5 ) )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X5 )
      | ~ ( epred3_1 @ X8 @ X3 @ X4 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X8 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X4: a,X8: a > a > $o,X5: a > a > $o] :
      ( ( epred6_0 @ ( esk5_4 @ X5 @ X3 @ X4 @ X8 ) @ ( esk6_4 @ X5 @ X3 @ X4 @ X8 ) )
      | ( X5 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
      | ( X8 @ X3 @ X4 )
      | ~ ( epred3_1 @ X5 @ X3 @ X4 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X8 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X5 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    epred1_0 @ epred6_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a > a > $o] :
      ( ( X5 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
      | ( epred6_0 @ X3 @ X4 )
      | ~ ( epred3_1 @ X5 @ X3 @ X4 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X5 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X5: a > a > $o] :
      ( ( epred3_1 @ X5 @ ( esk3_1 @ X5 ) @ ( esk4_1 @ X5 ) )
      | ( X5 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X5 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X5: a > a > $o] :
      ( ( X5 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
      | ~ ( X5 @ ( esk3_1 @ X5 ) @ ( esk4_1 @ X5 ) )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X5 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X5: a > a > $o] :
      ( ( epred6_0 @ ( esk3_1 @ X5 ) @ ( esk4_1 @ X5 ) )
      | ( X5 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X5 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( epred6_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_9])]),c_0_14]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEV123^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.19  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 15:18:06 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.19  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.23  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.25  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fRm9oV68qX/E---3.1_1373699.p
% 0.11/0.27  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.11/0.27  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.11/0.27  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.27  % Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.11/0.27  % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.27  % Starting full_lambda_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.27  % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.27  % Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.27  % new_ho_10_unif with pid 1373713 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.27  % Result found by new_ho_10_unif
% 0.11/0.27  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.11/0.27  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.27  % Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.11/0.27  % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.27  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.27  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.27  % Search class: HGUNF-FFSF32-SHHFFMBN
% 0.11/0.27  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.27  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.27  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1373717 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.27  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.11/0.27  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.11/0.27  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.27  % Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.11/0.27  % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.27  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.27  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.27  % Search class: HGUNF-FFSF32-SHHFFMBN
% 0.11/0.27  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.27  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.27  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.27  
% 0.11/0.27  % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.27  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.11/0.27  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.27  % Parsed axioms                        : 2
% 0.11/0.27  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.11/0.27  % Initial clauses                      : 12
% 0.11/0.27  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.11/0.27  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 11
% 0.11/0.27  % Processed clauses                    : 24
% 0.11/0.27  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.11/0.27  % ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.11/0.27  % ...remaining for further processing  : 22
% 0.11/0.27  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.11/0.27  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.11/0.27  % Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 0.11/0.27  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.11/0.27  % Generated clauses                    : 22
% 0.11/0.27  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 20
% 0.11/0.27  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.11/0.27  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.11/0.27  % Paramodulations                      : 22
% 0.11/0.27  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.11/0.27  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.11/0.27  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.11/0.27  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.11/0.27  % Total rewrite steps                  : 4
% 0.11/0.27  % ...of those cached                   : 3
% 0.11/0.27  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.11/0.27  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.11/0.27  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.27  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.11/0.27  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.27  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.11/0.27  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.11/0.27  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.11/0.27  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.11/0.27  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.11/0.27  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.11/0.27  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.11/0.27  % Current number of processed clauses  : 19
% 0.11/0.27  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.11/0.27  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.27  %    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.11/0.27  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 15
% 0.11/0.27  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 0.11/0.27  % ...number of literals in the above   : 41
% 0.11/0.27  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.11/0.27  % Current number of archived clauses   : 3
% 0.11/0.27  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 127
% 0.11/0.27  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 38
% 0.11/0.27  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 7
% 0.11/0.27  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
% 0.11/0.27  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.11/0.27  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.11/0.27  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.11/0.27  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.11/0.27  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.11/0.27  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2559
% 0.11/0.27  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 635
% 0.11/0.27  
% 0.11/0.27  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.27  % User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.11/0.27  % System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.27  % Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.11/0.27  % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.11/0.27  
% 0.11/0.27  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.27  % User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.11/0.27  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.11/0.27  % Total time               : 0.013 s
% 0.11/0.27  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.11/0.27  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------