%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SEV129^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:35:05 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 0.30s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 29 ( 11 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 65 ( 5 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 16 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 610 ( 37 ~; 62 |; 44 &; 428 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 39 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 25 ( 9 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 93 ( 93 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 13 ( 11 usr; 3 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 142 ( 10 ^; 123 !; 9 ?; 142 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(decl_23,type,
epred1_0: ( a > a > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
esk1_0: a ).
thf(decl_25,type,
esk2_0: a ).
thf(decl_26,type,
esk3_1: ( a > a > $o ) > a ).
thf(decl_27,type,
esk4_1: ( a > a > $o ) > a ).
thf(decl_28,type,
epred2_1: ( a > a > $o ) > a > a > $o ).
thf(decl_29,type,
esk5_1: ( a > a > $o ) > a ).
thf(decl_30,type,
esk6_1: ( a > a > $o ) > a ).
thf(decl_31,type,
esk7_1: ( a > a > $o ) > a ).
thf(decl_32,type,
epred3_0: a > a > $o ).
thf(decl_33,type,
epred4_3: a > a > ( a > a > $o ) > a > a > $o ).
thf(cTHM253_A_pme,conjecture,
! [X1: ( a > a > $o ) > $o,X2: a,X3: a] :
( ! [X4: a > a > $o] :
( ( ! [X5: a,X6: a] :
( ? [X7: a > a > $o] :
( ( X1 @ X7 )
& ( X7 @ X5 @ X6 ) )
=> ( X4 @ X5 @ X6 ) )
& ! [X5: a,X6: a,X8: a] :
( ( ( X4 @ X5 @ X6 )
& ( X4 @ X6 @ X8 ) )
=> ( X4 @ X5 @ X8 ) ) )
=> ( X4 @ X2 @ X3 ) )
=> ! [X4: a > a > $o] :
( ( ! [X5: a,X6: a] :
( ? [X7: a > a > $o] :
( ? [X9: a > a > $o] :
( ( X1 @ X9 )
& ( X7
= ( ^ [X10: a,X11: a] :
! [X12: a > a > $o] :
( ( ! [X13: a,X14: a] :
( ( X9 @ X13 @ X14 )
=> ( X12 @ X13 @ X14 ) )
& ! [X13: a,X14: a,X8: a] :
( ( ( X12 @ X13 @ X14 )
& ( X12 @ X14 @ X8 ) )
=> ( X12 @ X13 @ X8 ) ) )
=> ( X12 @ X10 @ X11 ) ) ) ) )
& ( X7 @ X5 @ X6 ) )
=> ( X4 @ X5 @ X6 ) )
& ! [X5: a,X6: a,X8: a] :
( ( ( X4 @ X5 @ X6 )
& ( X4 @ X6 @ X8 ) )
=> ( X4 @ X5 @ X8 ) ) )
=> ( X4 @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lFwfwT1N89/E---3.1_1174603.p',cTHM253_A_pme) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1: ( a > a > $o ) > $o,X2: a,X3: a] :
( ! [X4: a > a > $o] :
( ( ! [X5: a,X6: a] :
( ? [X7: a > a > $o] :
( ( X1 @ X7 )
& ( X7 @ X5 @ X6 ) )
=> ( X4 @ X5 @ X6 ) )
& ! [X5: a,X6: a,X8: a] :
( ( ( X4 @ X5 @ X6 )
& ( X4 @ X6 @ X8 ) )
=> ( X4 @ X5 @ X8 ) ) )
=> ( X4 @ X2 @ X3 ) )
=> ! [X4: a > a > $o] :
( ( ! [X5: a,X6: a] :
( ? [X7: a > a > $o] :
( ? [X9: a > a > $o] :
( ( X1 @ X9 )
& ( X7
= ( ^ [X10: a,X11: a] :
! [X12: a > a > $o] :
( ( ! [X13: a,X14: a] :
( ( X9 @ X13 @ X14 )
=> ( X12 @ X13 @ X14 ) )
& ! [X13: a,X14: a,X8: a] :
( ( ( X12 @ X13 @ X14 )
& ( X12 @ X14 @ X8 ) )
=> ( X12 @ X13 @ X8 ) ) )
=> ( X12 @ X10 @ X11 ) ) ) ) )
& ( X7 @ X5 @ X6 ) )
=> ( X4 @ X5 @ X6 ) )
& ! [X5: a,X6: a,X8: a] :
( ( ( X4 @ X5 @ X6 )
& ( X4 @ X6 @ X8 ) )
=> ( X4 @ X5 @ X8 ) ) )
=> ( X4 @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM253_A_pme]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1: ( a > a > $o ) > $o,X2: a,X3: a] :
( ! [X4: a > a > $o] :
( ( ! [X5: a,X6: a] :
( ? [X7: a > a > $o] :
( ( X1 @ X7 )
& ( X7 @ X5 @ X6 ) )
=> ( X4 @ X5 @ X6 ) )
& ! [X5: a,X6: a,X8: a] :
( ( ( X4 @ X5 @ X6 )
& ( X4 @ X6 @ X8 ) )
=> ( X4 @ X5 @ X8 ) ) )
=> ( X4 @ X2 @ X3 ) )
=> ! [X4: a > a > $o] :
( ( ! [X5: a,X6: a] :
( ? [X7: a > a > $o] :
( ? [X9: a > a > $o] :
( ( X1 @ X9 )
& ( X7
= ( ^ [Z0: a,Z1: a] :
! [X12: a > a > $o] :
( ( ! [X13: a,X14: a] :
( ( X9 @ X13 @ X14 )
=> ( X12 @ X13 @ X14 ) )
& ! [X13: a,X14: a,X8: a] :
( ( ( X12 @ X13 @ X14 )
& ( X12 @ X14 @ X8 ) )
=> ( X12 @ X13 @ X8 ) ) )
=> ( X12 @ Z0 @ Z1 ) ) ) ) )
& ( X7 @ X5 @ X6 ) )
=> ( X4 @ X5 @ X6 ) )
& ! [X5: a,X6: a,X8: a] :
( ( ( X4 @ X5 @ X6 )
& ( X4 @ X6 @ X8 ) )
=> ( X4 @ X5 @ X8 ) ) )
=> ( X4 @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X36: a > a > $o,X44: a,X45: a,X46: a > a > $o,X47: a > a > $o,X48: a,X49: a,X50: a] :
( ( ( X36 @ ( esk5_1 @ X36 ) @ ( esk6_1 @ X36 ) )
| ( epred1_0 @ ( epred2_1 @ X36 ) )
| ( X36 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( X36 @ ( esk6_1 @ X36 ) @ ( esk7_1 @ X36 ) )
| ( epred1_0 @ ( epred2_1 @ X36 ) )
| ( X36 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ~ ( X36 @ ( esk5_1 @ X36 ) @ ( esk7_1 @ X36 ) )
| ( epred1_0 @ ( epred2_1 @ X36 ) )
| ( X36 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( X36 @ ( esk5_1 @ X36 ) @ ( esk6_1 @ X36 ) )
| ( epred2_1 @ X36 @ ( esk3_1 @ X36 ) @ ( esk4_1 @ X36 ) )
| ( X36 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( X36 @ ( esk6_1 @ X36 ) @ ( esk7_1 @ X36 ) )
| ( epred2_1 @ X36 @ ( esk3_1 @ X36 ) @ ( esk4_1 @ X36 ) )
| ( X36 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ~ ( X36 @ ( esk5_1 @ X36 ) @ ( esk7_1 @ X36 ) )
| ( epred2_1 @ X36 @ ( esk3_1 @ X36 ) @ ( esk4_1 @ X36 ) )
| ( X36 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( X36 @ ( esk5_1 @ X36 ) @ ( esk6_1 @ X36 ) )
| ~ ( X36 @ ( esk3_1 @ X36 ) @ ( esk4_1 @ X36 ) )
| ( X36 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( X36 @ ( esk6_1 @ X36 ) @ ( esk7_1 @ X36 ) )
| ~ ( X36 @ ( esk3_1 @ X36 ) @ ( esk4_1 @ X36 ) )
| ( X36 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ~ ( X36 @ ( esk5_1 @ X36 ) @ ( esk7_1 @ X36 ) )
| ~ ( X36 @ ( esk3_1 @ X36 ) @ ( esk4_1 @ X36 ) )
| ( X36 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X47 )
| ( X46
!= ( ^ [Z0: a,Z1: a] :
! [X12: a > a > $o] :
( ( ! [X13: a,X14: a] :
( ( X47 @ X13 @ X14 )
=> ( X12 @ X13 @ X14 ) )
& ! [X13: a,X14: a,X8: a] :
( ( ( X12 @ X13 @ X14 )
& ( X12 @ X14 @ X8 ) )
=> ( X12 @ X13 @ X8 ) ) )
=> ( X12 @ Z0 @ Z1 ) ) ) )
| ~ ( X46 @ X44 @ X45 )
| ( epred3_0 @ X44 @ X45 ) )
& ( ~ ( epred3_0 @ X48 @ X49 )
| ~ ( epred3_0 @ X49 @ X50 )
| ( epred3_0 @ X48 @ X50 ) )
& ~ ( epred3_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: a > a > $o,X6: a,X7: a > a > $o,X8: a] :
( ( epred3_0 @ X6 @ X8 )
| ~ ( epred1_0 @ X4 )
| ( X7
!= ( ^ [Z0: a,Z1: a] :
! [X66: a > a > $o] :
( ( ! [X67: a,X68: a] :
( ( X4 @ X67 @ X68 )
=> ( X66 @ X67 @ X68 ) )
& ! [X69: a,X70: a,X71: a] :
( ( ( X66 @ X69 @ X70 )
& ( X66 @ X70 @ X71 ) )
=> ( X66 @ X69 @ X71 ) ) )
=> ( X66 @ Z0 @ Z1 ) ) ) )
| ~ ( X7 @ X6 @ X8 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X2: a,X3: a,X4: a > a > $o] :
( ( epred3_0 @ X2 @ X3 )
| ~ ! [X72: a > a > $o] :
( ( ! [X73: a,X74: a] :
( ( X4 @ X73 @ X74 )
=> ( X72 @ X73 @ X74 ) )
& ! [X75: a,X76: a,X77: a] :
( ( ( X72 @ X75 @ X76 )
& ( X72 @ X76 @ X77 ) )
=> ( X72 @ X75 @ X77 ) ) )
=> ( X72 @ X2 @ X3 ) )
| ~ ( epred1_0 @ X4 ) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X2: a,X3: a,X4: a > a > $o] :
( ( epred3_0 @ X2 @ X3 )
| ~ ( epred4_3 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X2 @ X3 )
| ~ ( epred1_0 @ X4 ) ),
inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X2: a,X3: a,X6: a,X5: a,X4: a > a > $o] :
( ( epred4_3 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5 @ X6 )
| ( epred3_0 @ X2 @ X3 )
| ~ ( X4 @ X5 @ X6 )
| ~ ( epred1_0 @ X4 ) ),
inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
! [X2: a,X4: a > a > $o,X3: a] :
( ( epred3_0 @ X2 @ X3 )
| ~ ( epred1_0 @ X4 )
| ~ ( X4 @ X2 @ X3 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: a > a > $o] :
( ( X4 @ ( esk6_1 @ X4 ) @ ( esk7_1 @ X4 ) )
| ( epred2_1 @ X4 @ ( esk3_1 @ X4 ) @ ( esk4_1 @ X4 ) )
| ( X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: a > a > $o] :
( ( X4 @ ( esk6_1 @ X4 ) @ ( esk7_1 @ X4 ) )
| ( epred1_0 @ ( epred2_1 @ X4 ) )
| ( X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: a > a > $o] :
( ( X4 @ ( esk6_1 @ X4 ) @ ( esk7_1 @ X4 ) )
| ( X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( X4 @ ( esk3_1 @ X4 ) @ ( esk4_1 @ X4 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: a > a > $o] :
( ( epred3_0 @ ( esk3_1 @ X4 ) @ ( esk4_1 @ X4 ) )
| ( X4 @ ( esk6_1 @ X4 ) @ ( esk7_1 @ X4 ) )
| ( X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]) ).
thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ ( epred3_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: a > a > $o] :
( ( X4 @ ( esk5_1 @ X4 ) @ ( esk6_1 @ X4 ) )
| ( epred2_1 @ X4 @ ( esk3_1 @ X4 ) @ ( esk4_1 @ X4 ) )
| ( X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: a > a > $o] :
( ( X4 @ ( esk5_1 @ X4 ) @ ( esk6_1 @ X4 ) )
| ( epred1_0 @ ( epred2_1 @ X4 ) )
| ( X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: a > a > $o] :
( ( epred2_1 @ X4 @ ( esk3_1 @ X4 ) @ ( esk4_1 @ X4 ) )
| ( X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( X4 @ ( esk5_1 @ X4 ) @ ( esk7_1 @ X4 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: a > a > $o] :
( ( epred1_0 @ ( epred2_1 @ X4 ) )
| ( X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( X4 @ ( esk5_1 @ X4 ) @ ( esk7_1 @ X4 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
! [X2: a,X3: a,X5: a] :
( ( epred3_0 @ X2 @ X5 )
| ~ ( epred3_0 @ X2 @ X3 )
| ~ ( epred3_0 @ X3 @ X5 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
epred3_0 @ ( esk6_1 @ epred3_0 ) @ ( esk7_1 @ epred3_0 ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]) ).
thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: a > a > $o] :
( ( X4 @ ( esk5_1 @ X4 ) @ ( esk6_1 @ X4 ) )
| ( X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( X4 @ ( esk3_1 @ X4 ) @ ( esk4_1 @ X4 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: a > a > $o] :
( ( epred3_0 @ ( esk3_1 @ X4 ) @ ( esk4_1 @ X4 ) )
| ( X4 @ ( esk5_1 @ X4 ) @ ( esk6_1 @ X4 ) )
| ( X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).
thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: a > a > $o] :
( ( epred3_0 @ ( esk3_1 @ X4 ) @ ( esk4_1 @ X4 ) )
| ( X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( X4 @ ( esk5_1 @ X4 ) @ ( esk7_1 @ X4 ) ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_16]),c_0_17]) ).
thf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
! [X2: a] :
( ( epred3_0 @ X2 @ ( esk7_1 @ epred3_0 ) )
| ~ ( epred3_0 @ X2 @ ( esk6_1 @ epred3_0 ) ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
epred3_0 @ ( esk5_1 @ epred3_0 ) @ ( esk6_1 @ epred3_0 ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_13]) ).
thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: a > a > $o] :
( ( X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( X4 @ ( esk5_1 @ X4 ) @ ( esk7_1 @ X4 ) )
| ~ ( X4 @ ( esk3_1 @ X4 ) @ ( esk4_1 @ X4 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
epred3_0 @ ( esk3_1 @ epred3_0 ) @ ( esk4_1 @ epred3_0 ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]),c_0_13]) ).
thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ ( epred3_0 @ ( esk5_1 @ epred3_0 ) @ ( esk7_1 @ epred3_0 ) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_13]) ).
thf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEV129^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.19 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.19 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.19 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.19 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.19 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.19 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 15:13:34 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.20 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.20 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.24 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.26 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lFwfwT1N89/E---3.1_1174603.p
% 0.23/0.30 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.23/0.30 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.23/0.30 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.30 % Starting full_lambda_6 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.23/0.30 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.30 % Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.30 % Starting ho_unfolding_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.30 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.30 % Starting ho_unfolding_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.30 % full_lambda_6 with pid 1174616 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.30 % Result found by full_lambda_6
% 0.23/0.30 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.23/0.30 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.30 % Starting full_lambda_6 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.23/0.30 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true))
% 0.23/0.30 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.23/0.30 % Search class: HGUSF-FFSF11-DHHFFMBN
% 0.23/0.30 % partial match(1): HGUSF-FFSF11-SHHFFMBN
% 0.23/0.30 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.23/0.30 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.30 % Starting full_lambda_6 with 91s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.30 % Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 82s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.30 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1174622 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.30 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.23/0.30 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.23/0.30 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.30 % Starting full_lambda_6 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.23/0.30 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true))
% 0.23/0.30 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.23/0.30 % Search class: HGUSF-FFSF11-DHHFFMBN
% 0.23/0.30 % partial match(1): HGUSF-FFSF11-SHHFFMBN
% 0.23/0.30 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.23/0.30 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.30 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.30
% 0.23/0.30 % Proof found!
% 0.23/0.30 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/0.30 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.30 % Parsed axioms : 2
% 0.23/0.30 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1
% 0.23/0.30 % Initial clauses : 12
% 0.23/0.30 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/0.30 % Initial clauses in saturation : 12
% 0.23/0.30 % Processed clauses : 52
% 0.23/0.30 % ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.23/0.30 % ...subsumed : 9
% 0.23/0.30 % ...remaining for further processing : 40
% 0.23/0.30 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.23/0.30 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.30 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.30 % Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.23/0.30 % Generated clauses : 81
% 0.23/0.30 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 64
% 0.23/0.30 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.30 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 0.23/0.30 % Paramodulations : 77
% 0.23/0.30 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.30 % NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.30 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.23/0.30 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.23/0.30 % Total rewrite steps : 26
% 0.23/0.30 % ...of those cached : 22
% 0.23/0.30 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.30 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.30 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.30 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.30 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.30 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.30 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.30 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.30 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.30 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.30 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.30 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.30 % Current number of processed clauses : 35
% 0.23/0.30 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.23/0.30 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.30 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.23/0.30 % Non-unit-clauses : 29
% 0.23/0.30 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 20
% 0.23/0.30 % ...number of literals in the above : 98
% 0.23/0.30 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.30 % Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.23/0.30 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 199
% 0.23/0.30 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 129
% 0.23/0.30 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 12
% 0.23/0.30 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 32
% 0.23/0.30 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.30 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.23/0.30 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.23/0.30 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.30 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.30 % Termbank termtop insertions : 4055
% 0.23/0.30 % Search garbage collected termcells : 503
% 0.23/0.30
% 0.23/0.30 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.30 % User time : 0.010 s
% 0.23/0.30 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/0.30 % Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.23/0.30 % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.23/0.30
% 0.23/0.30 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.30 % User time : 0.026 s
% 0.23/0.30 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.23/0.30 % Total time : 0.035 s
% 0.23/0.30 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.23/0.30 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------