↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEV131^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:40:21 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.22s 1.19s
% Output   : Refutation 1.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   7 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  167 (  68 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   7 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  207 (  34   ~;  22   |;  26   &; 107   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  18  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   26 (  26   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   60 (   0   ^;  42   !;  18   ?;  60   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    sK0: a > a > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    sK1: a ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    sK2: a ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    sK3: a > $o ).

thf(f31,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f30]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    $true = $false,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f18,f27]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK3 @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f25,f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( sK3 @ sK2 )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 @ sK1 ) )
    & ( $true
     != ( sK3 @ sK1 ) )
    & ! [X4: a,X5: a] :
        ( ( ( sK0 @ X4 @ X5 )
         != $true )
        | ( $true
         != ( sK3 @ X4 ) )
        | ( $true
          = ( sK3 @ X5 ) ) )
    & ( ( sK3 @ sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f8,f10,f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a > a > $o,X1: a,X2: a] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( X0 @ X2 @ X1 ) )
        & ? [X3: a > $o] :
            ( ( ( X3 @ X1 )
             != $true )
            & ! [X4: a,X5: a] :
                ( ( ( X0 @ X4 @ X5 )
                 != $true )
                | ( ( X3 @ X4 )
                 != $true )
                | ( ( X3 @ X5 )
                  = $true ) )
            & ( ( X3 @ X2 )
              = $true ) ) )
   => ( ( $true
        = ( sK0 @ sK2 @ sK1 ) )
      & ? [X3: a > $o] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( X3 @ sK1 ) )
          & ! [X5: a,X4: a] :
              ( ( ( sK0 @ X4 @ X5 )
               != $true )
              | ( ( X3 @ X4 )
               != $true )
              | ( ( X3 @ X5 )
                = $true ) )
          & ( $true
            = ( X3 @ sK2 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ? [X3: a > $o] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( X3 @ sK1 ) )
        & ! [X5: a,X4: a] :
            ( ( ( sK0 @ X4 @ X5 )
             != $true )
            | ( ( X3 @ X4 )
             != $true )
            | ( ( X3 @ X5 )
              = $true ) )
        & ( $true
          = ( X3 @ sK2 ) ) )
   => ( ( $true
       != ( sK3 @ sK1 ) )
      & ! [X5: a,X4: a] :
          ( ( ( sK0 @ X4 @ X5 )
           != $true )
          | ( $true
           != ( sK3 @ X4 ) )
          | ( $true
            = ( sK3 @ X5 ) ) )
      & ( ( sK3 @ sK2 )
        = $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ? [X0: a > a > $o,X1: a,X2: a] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( X0 @ X2 @ X1 ) )
      & ? [X3: a > $o] :
          ( ( ( X3 @ X1 )
           != $true )
          & ! [X4: a,X5: a] :
              ( ( ( X0 @ X4 @ X5 )
               != $true )
              | ( ( X3 @ X4 )
               != $true )
              | ( ( X3 @ X5 )
                = $true ) )
          & ( ( X3 @ X2 )
            = $true ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X2: a > a > $o,X1: a,X0: a] :
      ( ( ( X2 @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $true )
      & ? [X3: a > $o] :
          ( ( ( X3 @ X1 )
           != $true )
          & ! [X4: a,X5: a] :
              ( ( $true
               != ( X2 @ X4 @ X5 ) )
              | ( ( X3 @ X4 )
               != $true )
              | ( ( X3 @ X5 )
                = $true ) )
          & ( $true
            = ( X3 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X0: a,X1: a,X2: a > a > $o] :
      ( ? [X3: a > $o] :
          ( ( ( X3 @ X1 )
           != $true )
          & ( $true
            = ( X3 @ X0 ) )
          & ! [X5: a,X4: a] :
              ( ( ( X3 @ X5 )
                = $true )
              | ( ( X3 @ X4 )
               != $true )
              | ( $true
               != ( X2 @ X4 @ X5 ) ) ) )
      & ( ( X2 @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a,X1: a,X2: a > a > $o] :
        ( ( ( X2 @ X0 @ X1 )
          = $true )
       => ! [X3: a > $o] :
            ( ! [X5: a,X4: a] :
                ( ( ( ( X3 @ X4 )
                    = $true )
                  & ( $true
                    = ( X2 @ X4 @ X5 ) ) )
               => ( ( X3 @ X5 )
                  = $true ) )
           => ( ( $true
                = ( X3 @ X0 ) )
             => ( ( X3 @ X1 )
                = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a,X1: a,X2: a > a > $o] :
        ( ( X2 @ X0 @ X1 )
       => ! [X3: a > $o] :
            ( ! [X4: a,X5: a] :
                ( ( ( X3 @ X4 )
                  & ( X2 @ X4 @ X5 ) )
               => ( X3 @ X5 ) )
           => ( ( X3 @ X0 )
             => ( X3 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: a,X2: a,X0: a > a > $o] :
        ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
       => ! [X3: a > $o] :
            ( ! [X4: a,X5: a] :
                ( ( ( X3 @ X4 )
                  & ( X0 @ X4 @ X5 ) )
               => ( X3 @ X5 ) )
           => ( ( X3 @ X1 )
             => ( X3 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X1: a,X2: a,X0: a > a > $o] :
      ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
     => ! [X3: a > $o] :
          ( ! [X4: a,X5: a] :
              ( ( ( X3 @ X4 )
                & ( X0 @ X4 @ X5 ) )
             => ( X3 @ X5 ) )
         => ( ( X3 @ X1 )
           => ( X3 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.mcqRVwRy35/DTF2THF_14538.p',cTHM202_pme) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK3 @ sK1 ) )
    | ( ( sK3 @ sK2 )
     != $true ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f24]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK3 @ sK1 ) )
    | ( ( sK3 @ sK2 )
     != $true )
    | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f13,f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK0 @ sK2 @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ! [X4: a,X5: a] :
      ( ( ( sK0 @ X4 @ X5 )
       != $true )
      | ( $true
        = ( sK3 @ X5 ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( sK3 @ X4 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( sK3 @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK3 @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(fool_paramodulation,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( sK3 @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEV131^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.17/0.33  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:41:14 EST 2026
% 0.17/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.20/0.44  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.20/0.44  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.20/0.44  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.44  % File     : SEV131^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.20/0.44  % Domain   : Set Theory (Relations)
% 0.20/0.44  % Problem  : TPS problem THM202
% 0.20/0.44  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.20/0.44  % English  :
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  % Refs     : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.44  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.20/0.44  % Names    : tps_0245 [Bro09]
% 0.20/0.44  %          : THM202 [TPS]
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.20/0.44  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.17 v6.1.0, 0.00 v4.0.0
% 0.20/0.44  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    2 (   0 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
% 0.20/0.44  %            Number of atoms       :    0 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.20/0.44  %            Maximal formula atoms :    0 (   0 avg)
% 0.20/0.44  %            Number of connectives :   13 (   0   ~;   0   |;   1   &;   8   @)
% 0.20/0.44  %                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.44  %            Maximal formula depth :   13 (  13 avg)
% 0.20/0.44  %            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
% 0.20/0.44  %            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.20/0.44  %            Number of symbols     :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.20/0.44  %            Number of variables   :    6 (   0   ^;   6   !;   0   ?;   6   :)
% 0.20/0.44  % SPC      : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.20/0.44  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.20/0.44  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.20/0.44  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.20/0.44  %          : Polymorphic definitions expanded.
% 0.20/0.44  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.44  thf(a_type,type,
% 0.20/0.44      a: $tType ).
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  thf(cTHM202_pme,conjecture,
% 0.20/0.44      ! [Xr: a > a > $o,Xx: a,Xy: a] :
% 0.20/0.44        ( ( Xr @ Xx @ Xy )
% 0.20/0.44       => ! [Xx0: a > $o] :
% 0.20/0.44            ( ! [Xy0: a,Xz: a] :
% 0.20/0.44                ( ( ( Xr @ Xy0 @ Xz )
% 0.20/0.44                  & ( Xx0 @ Xy0 ) )
% 0.20/0.44               => ( Xx0 @ Xz ) )
% 0.20/0.44           => ( ( Xx0 @ Xx )
% 0.20/0.44             => ( Xx0 @ Xy ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.44  ------------------------
% 1.22/1.17  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.22/1.17  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.22/1.17  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:41:15 EST 2026
% 1.22/1.17  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.22/1.17  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.22/1.17  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.22/1.17  
% 1.22/1.17  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.mcqRVwRy35/DTF2DTF14538.p
% See solution above
% 1.22/1.17  ------------------------
% 1.22/1.18  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.22/1.18  thf(a_type,type,
% 1.22/1.18      a: $tType ).
% 1.22/1.18  
% 1.22/1.18  thf(cTHM202_pme,conjecture,
% 1.22/1.18      ! [Xr: a > a > $o,Xx: a,Xy: a] :
% 1.22/1.18        ( ( Xr @ Xx @ Xy )
% 1.22/1.18       => ! [Xx0: a > $o] :
% 1.22/1.18            ( ! [Xy0: a,Xz: a] :
% 1.22/1.18                ( ( ( Xr @ Xy0 @ Xz )
% 1.22/1.18                  & ( Xx0 @ Xy0 ) )
% 1.22/1.18               => ( Xx0 @ Xz ) )
% 1.22/1.18           => ( ( Xx0 @ Xx )
% 1.22/1.18             => ( Xx0 @ Xy ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.22/1.18  ------------------------
% 1.22/1.19  % (14637)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_14538 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 1.22/1.19  % (14640)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_14538 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.22/1.19  % (14639)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_14538 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.22/1.19  % (14640)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.22/1.19  % (14640)------------------------------
% 1.22/1.19  % (14640)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.22/1.19  % (14640)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.22/1.19  % (14640)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.22/1.19  
% 1.22/1.19  % (14640)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.22/1.19  % (14640)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.22/1.19  % (14640)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.22/1.19  % (14640)------------------------------
% 1.22/1.19  % (14640)------------------------------
% 1.22/1.19  % (14637)First to succeed.
% 1.22/1.19  % (14639)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.22/1.19  % (14639)------------------------------
% 1.22/1.19  % (14639)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.22/1.19  % (14639)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.22/1.19  % (14639)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.22/1.19  
% 1.22/1.19  % (14639)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.22/1.19  % (14639)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.22/1.19  % (14639)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.22/1.19  % (14639)------------------------------
% 1.22/1.19  % (14639)------------------------------
% 1.22/1.19  % (14637)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.22/1.19  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_14538
% 1.22/1.19  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_14538
% 1.22/1.19  thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(func_def_4, type, sK0: a > a > $o).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(func_def_5, type, sK1: a).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(func_def_6, type, sK2: a).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(func_def_7, type, sK3: a > $o).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(f31,plain,(
% 1.22/1.19    $false),
% 1.22/1.19    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f30])).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(f30,plain,(
% 1.22/1.19    ($true = $false)),
% 1.22/1.19    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f18,f27])).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(f27,plain,(
% 1.22/1.19    ($true = (sK3 @ sK1))),
% 1.22/1.19    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f25,f12])).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.22/1.19    ((sK3 @ sK2) = $true)),
% 1.22/1.19    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.22/1.19    ($true = (sK0 @ sK2 @ sK1)) & (($true != (sK3 @ sK1)) & ! [X4 : a,X5 : a] : (((sK0 @ X4 @ X5) != $true) | ($true != (sK3 @ X4)) | ($true = (sK3 @ X5))) & ((sK3 @ sK2) = $true))),
% 1.22/1.19    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f8,f10,f9])).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.22/1.19    ? [X0 : a > a > $o,X1 : a,X2 : a] : (($true = (X0 @ X2 @ X1)) & ? [X3 : a > $o] : (((X3 @ X1) != $true) & ! [X4 : a,X5 : a] : (((X0 @ X4 @ X5) != $true) | ((X3 @ X4) != $true) | ((X3 @ X5) = $true)) & ((X3 @ X2) = $true))) => (($true = (sK0 @ sK2 @ sK1)) & ? [X3 : a > $o] : (($true != (X3 @ sK1)) & ! [X5 : a,X4 : a] : (((sK0 @ X4 @ X5) != $true) | ((X3 @ X4) != $true) | ((X3 @ X5) = $true)) & ($true = (X3 @ sK2))))),
% 1.22/1.19    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.22/1.19    ? [X3 : a > $o] : (($true != (X3 @ sK1)) & ! [X5 : a,X4 : a] : (((sK0 @ X4 @ X5) != $true) | ((X3 @ X4) != $true) | ((X3 @ X5) = $true)) & ($true = (X3 @ sK2))) => (($true != (sK3 @ sK1)) & ! [X5 : a,X4 : a] : (((sK0 @ X4 @ X5) != $true) | ($true != (sK3 @ X4)) | ($true = (sK3 @ X5))) & ((sK3 @ sK2) = $true))),
% 1.22/1.19    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.22/1.19    ? [X0 : a > a > $o,X1 : a,X2 : a] : (($true = (X0 @ X2 @ X1)) & ? [X3 : a > $o] : (((X3 @ X1) != $true) & ! [X4 : a,X5 : a] : (((X0 @ X4 @ X5) != $true) | ((X3 @ X4) != $true) | ((X3 @ X5) = $true)) & ((X3 @ X2) = $true)))),
% 1.22/1.19    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.22/1.19    ? [X2 : a > a > $o,X1 : a,X0 : a] : (((X2 @ X0 @ X1) = $true) & ? [X3 : a > $o] : (((X3 @ X1) != $true) & ! [X4 : a,X5 : a] : (($true != (X2 @ X4 @ X5)) | ((X3 @ X4) != $true) | ((X3 @ X5) = $true)) & ($true = (X3 @ X0))))),
% 1.22/1.19    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.22/1.19    ? [X0 : a,X1 : a,X2 : a > a > $o] : (? [X3 : a > $o] : ((((X3 @ X1) != $true) & ($true = (X3 @ X0))) & ! [X5 : a,X4 : a] : (((X3 @ X5) = $true) | (((X3 @ X4) != $true) | ($true != (X2 @ X4 @ X5))))) & ((X2 @ X0 @ X1) = $true))),
% 1.22/1.19    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.22/1.19    ~! [X0 : a,X1 : a,X2 : a > a > $o] : (((X2 @ X0 @ X1) = $true) => ! [X3 : a > $o] : (! [X5 : a,X4 : a] : ((((X3 @ X4) = $true) & ($true = (X2 @ X4 @ X5))) => ((X3 @ X5) = $true)) => (($true = (X3 @ X0)) => ((X3 @ X1) = $true))))),
% 1.22/1.19    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.22/1.19    ~! [X0 : a,X1 : a,X2 : a > a > $o] : ((X2 @ X0 @ X1) => ! [X3 : a > $o] : (! [X4 : a,X5 : a] : (((X3 @ X4) & (X2 @ X4 @ X5)) => (X3 @ X5)) => ((X3 @ X0) => (X3 @ X1))))),
% 1.22/1.19    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.22/1.19    ~! [X1 : a,X2 : a,X0 : a > a > $o] : ((X0 @ X1 @ X2) => ! [X3 : a > $o] : (! [X4 : a,X5 : a] : (((X3 @ X4) & (X0 @ X4 @ X5)) => (X3 @ X5)) => ((X3 @ X1) => (X3 @ X2))))),
% 1.22/1.19    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.22/1.19    ! [X1 : a,X2 : a,X0 : a > a > $o] : ((X0 @ X1 @ X2) => ! [X3 : a > $o] : (! [X4 : a,X5 : a] : (((X3 @ X4) & (X0 @ X4 @ X5)) => (X3 @ X5)) => ((X3 @ X1) => (X3 @ X2))))),
% 1.22/1.19    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.mcqRVwRy35/DTF2THF_14538.p',cTHM202_pme)).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(f25,plain,(
% 1.22/1.19    ($true = (sK3 @ sK1)) | ((sK3 @ sK2) != $true)),
% 1.22/1.19    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f24])).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(f24,plain,(
% 1.22/1.19    ($true = (sK3 @ sK1)) | ((sK3 @ sK2) != $true) | ($true != $true)),
% 1.22/1.19    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f13,f15])).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.22/1.19    ($true = (sK0 @ sK2 @ sK1))),
% 1.22/1.19    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.22/1.19    ( ! [X4 : a,X5 : a] : (((sK0 @ X4 @ X5) != $true) | ($true = (sK3 @ X5)) | ($true != (sK3 @ X4))) )),
% 1.22/1.19    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.22/1.19    ($false = (sK3 @ sK1))),
% 1.22/1.19    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f17])).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.22/1.19    ($true != $true) | ($false = (sK3 @ sK1))),
% 1.22/1.19    inference(fool_paramodulation,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 1.22/1.19  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.22/1.19    ($true != (sK3 @ sK1))),
% 1.22/1.19    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.22/1.19  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_14538
% 1.22/1.19  % (14637)------------------------------
% 1.22/1.19  % (14637)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.22/1.19  % (14637)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.22/1.19  
% 1.22/1.19  % (14637)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.22/1.19  % (14637)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.22/1.19  % (14637)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.22/1.19  % (14637)------------------------------
% 1.22/1.19  % (14637)------------------------------
% 1.22/1.19  % (14635)Success in time 0.01 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------