↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SEV131^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:02:52 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.56s 3.77s
% Output   : Proof 3.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SEV131^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 01:29:38 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.56/3.77  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.56/3.77  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.56/3.77  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.56/3.77    (Not
% 3.56/3.77      (∀ (Xr : a → a → Prop) (Xx Xy : a),
% 3.56/3.77        Xr Xx Xy → ∀ (Xx0 : a → Prop), (∀ (Xy0 Xz : a), And (Xr Xy0 Xz) (Xx0 Xy0) → Xx0 Xz) → Xx0 Xx → Xx0 Xy))
% 3.56/3.77    True
% 3.56/3.77  Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq
% 3.56/3.77    (∀ (Xr : a → a → Prop) (Xx Xy : a),
% 3.56/3.77      Xr Xx Xy → ∀ (Xx0 : a → Prop), (∀ (Xy0 Xz : a), And (Xr Xy0 Xz) (Xx0 Xy0) → Xx0 Xz) → Xx0 Xx → Xx0 Xy)
% 3.56/3.77    False
% 3.56/3.77  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop),
% 3.56/3.77    Eq
% 3.56/3.77      (Not
% 3.56/3.77        (∀ (Xx Xy : a),
% 3.56/3.77          skS.0 0 a_1 Xx Xy →
% 3.56/3.77            ∀ (Xx0 : a → Prop), (∀ (Xy0 Xz : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xy0 Xz) (Xx0 Xy0) → Xx0 Xz) → Xx0 Xx → Xx0 Xy))
% 3.56/3.77      True
% 3.56/3.77  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop),
% 3.56/3.77    Eq
% 3.56/3.77      (∀ (Xx Xy : a),
% 3.56/3.77        skS.0 0 a_1 Xx Xy →
% 3.56/3.77          ∀ (Xx0 : a → Prop), (∀ (Xy0 Xz : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xy0 Xz) (Xx0 Xy0) → Xx0 Xz) → Xx0 Xx → Xx0 Xy)
% 3.56/3.77      False
% 3.56/3.77  Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 : a),
% 3.56/3.77    Eq
% 3.56/3.77      (Not
% 3.56/3.77        (∀ (Xy : a),
% 3.56/3.77          skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2) Xy →
% 3.56/3.77            ∀ (Xx0 : a → Prop),
% 3.56/3.77              (∀ (Xy0 Xz : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xy0 Xz) (Xx0 Xy0) → Xx0 Xz) → Xx0 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2) → Xx0 Xy))
% 3.56/3.77      True
% 3.56/3.77  Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 : a),
% 3.56/3.77    Eq
% 3.56/3.77      (∀ (Xy : a),
% 3.56/3.77        skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2) Xy →
% 3.56/3.77          ∀ (Xx0 : a → Prop),
% 3.56/3.77            (∀ (Xy0 Xz : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xy0 Xz) (Xx0 Xy0) → Xx0 Xz) → Xx0 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2) → Xx0 Xy)
% 3.56/3.77      False
% 3.56/3.77  Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : a),
% 3.56/3.77    Eq
% 3.56/3.77      (Not
% 3.56/3.77        (skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2) (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3) →
% 3.56/3.77          ∀ (Xx0 : a → Prop),
% 3.56/3.77            (∀ (Xy0 Xz : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xy0 Xz) (Xx0 Xy0) → Xx0 Xz) →
% 3.56/3.77              Xx0 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2) → Xx0 (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3)))
% 3.56/3.77      True
% 3.56/3.77  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : a),
% 3.56/3.77    Eq
% 3.56/3.77      (skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2) (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3) →
% 3.56/3.77        ∀ (Xx0 : a → Prop),
% 3.56/3.77          (∀ (Xy0 Xz : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xy0 Xz) (Xx0 Xy0) → Xx0 Xz) →
% 3.56/3.77            Xx0 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2) → Xx0 (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3))
% 3.56/3.77      False
% 3.56/3.77  Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : a), Eq (skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2) (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3)) True
% 3.56/3.77  Clause #9 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : a),
% 3.56/3.77    Eq
% 3.56/3.77      (∀ (Xx0 : a → Prop),
% 3.56/3.77        (∀ (Xy0 Xz : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xy0 Xz) (Xx0 Xy0) → Xx0 Xz) → Xx0 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2) → Xx0 (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3))
% 3.56/3.77      False
% 3.56/3.77  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : a) (a_4 : a → Prop),
% 3.56/3.77    Eq
% 3.56/3.77      (Not
% 3.56/3.77        ((∀ (Xy0 Xz : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xy0 Xz) (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 Xy0) → skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 Xz) →
% 3.56/3.77          skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2) → skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3)))
% 3.56/3.77      True
% 3.56/3.77  Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : a) (a_4 : a → Prop),
% 3.56/3.77    Eq
% 3.56/3.77      ((∀ (Xy0 Xz : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xy0 Xz) (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 Xy0) → skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 Xz) →
% 3.56/3.77        skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2) → skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3))
% 3.56/3.77      False
% 3.56/3.77  Clause #12 (by clausification #[11]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : a) (a_4 : a → Prop),
% 3.56/3.77    Eq (∀ (Xy0 Xz : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xy0 Xz) (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 Xy0) → skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 Xz) True
% 3.56/3.77  Clause #13 (by clausification #[11]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : a) (a_4 : a → Prop),
% 3.56/3.77    Eq (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2) → skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3)) False
% 3.56/3.77  Clause #14 (by clausification #[12]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 a_4 : a) (a_5 : a → Prop),
% 3.56/3.77    Eq (∀ (Xz : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2 Xz) (skS.0 3 a_1 a_3 a_4 a_5 a_2) → skS.0 3 a_1 a_3 a_4 a_5 Xz) True
% 3.56/3.77  Clause #15 (by clausification #[14]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5 : a) (a_6 : a → Prop),
% 3.62/3.78    Eq (And (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2 a_3) (skS.0 3 a_1 a_4 a_5 a_6 a_2) → skS.0 3 a_1 a_4 a_5 a_6 a_3) True
% 3.62/3.78  Clause #16 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5 : a) (a_6 : a → Prop),
% 3.62/3.78    Or (Eq (And (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2 a_3) (skS.0 3 a_1 a_4 a_5 a_6 a_2)) False) (Eq (skS.0 3 a_1 a_4 a_5 a_6 a_3) True)
% 3.62/3.78  Clause #17 (by clausification #[16]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : a) (a_4 : a → Prop) (a_5 a_6 : a),
% 3.62/3.78    Or (Eq (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5) True)
% 3.62/3.78      (Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a_1 a_6 a_5) False) (Eq (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_6) False))
% 3.62/3.78  Clause #18 (by superposition #[17, 8]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : a) (a_4 : a → Prop) (a_5 a_6 : a),
% 3.62/3.78    Or (Eq (skS.0 3 (fun x x_1 => a_1 x x_1) a_2 a_3 a_4 (skS.0 2 a_1 a_5 a_6)) True)
% 3.62/3.78      (Or (Eq (skS.0 3 (fun x x_1 => a_1 x x_1) a_2 a_3 a_4 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_5)) False) (Eq False True))
% 3.62/3.78  Clause #19 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : a) (a_4 : a → Prop), Eq (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2)) True
% 3.62/3.78  Clause #20 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : a) (a_4 : a → Prop), Eq (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3)) False
% 3.62/3.78  Clause #21 (by betaEtaReduce #[18]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : a) (a_4 : a → Prop) (a_5 a_6 : a),
% 3.62/3.78    Or (Eq (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 (skS.0 2 a_1 a_5 a_6)) True)
% 3.62/3.78      (Or (Eq (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_5)) False) (Eq False True))
% 3.62/3.78  Clause #22 (by clausification #[21]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : a) (a_4 : a → Prop) (a_5 a_6 : a),
% 3.62/3.78    Or (Eq (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 (skS.0 2 a_1 a_5 a_6)) True) (Eq (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_5)) False)
% 3.62/3.78  Clause #23 (by superposition #[22, 19]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : a) (a_4 : a → Prop) (a_5 : a),
% 3.62/3.78    Or (Eq (skS.0 3 (fun x x_1 => a_1 x x_1) a_2 a_3 (fun x => a_4 x) (skS.0 2 (fun x x_1 => a_1 x x_1) a_2 a_5)) True)
% 3.62/3.78      (Eq False True)
% 3.62/3.78  Clause #24 (by betaEtaReduce #[23]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : a) (a_4 : a → Prop) (a_5 : a),
% 3.62/3.78    Or (Eq (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_5)) True) (Eq False True)
% 3.62/3.78  Clause #25 (by clausification #[24]): ∀ (a_1 : a → a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : a) (a_4 : a → Prop) (a_5 : a), Eq (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_5)) True
% 3.62/3.78  Clause #26 (by superposition #[25, 20]): Eq True False
% 3.62/3.78  Clause #27 (by clausification #[26]): False
% 3.62/3.78  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------