%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : SEV149^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:36:55 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 4.77s 2.46s
% Output : Refutation 5.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 4 ( 1 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 1 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 0 avg)
% Number of connectives : 251 ( 2 ~; 12 |; 36 &; 144 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 57 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 24 ( 18 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 30 ( 30 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 1 ( 0 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 84 ( 0 ^; 84 !; 0 ?; 84 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(a_type,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: a > a > $o,B: a > a > $o,C: a,D: a] :
( ! [E: a > $o] :
( ( ! [F: a] :
( ( ( A @ C @ F )
| ( B @ C @ F ) )
=> ( E @ F ) )
& ! [F: a,G: a] :
( ( ( E @ F )
& ( ( A @ F @ G )
| ( B @ F @ G ) ) )
=> ( E @ G ) ) )
=> ( E @ D ) )
=> ! [E: a > $o] :
( ( ! [F: a] :
( ( ! [G: a > $o] :
( ( ! [H: a] :
( ( A @ C @ H )
=> ( G @ H ) )
& ! [H: a,I: a] :
( ( ( G @ H )
& ( A @ H @ I ) )
=> ( G @ I ) ) )
=> ( G @ F ) )
| ! [G: a > $o] :
( ( ! [H: a] :
( ( B @ C @ H )
=> ( G @ H ) )
& ! [H: a,I: a] :
( ( ( G @ H )
& ( B @ H @ I ) )
=> ( G @ I ) ) )
=> ( G @ F ) ) )
=> ( E @ F ) )
& ! [F: a,G: a] :
( ( ( E @ F )
& ( ! [H: a > $o] :
( ( ! [I: a] :
( ( A @ F @ I )
=> ( H @ I ) )
& ! [I: a,J: a] :
( ( ( H @ I )
& ( A @ I @ J ) )
=> ( H @ J ) ) )
=> ( H @ G ) )
| ! [H: a > $o] :
( ( ! [I: a] :
( ( B @ F @ I )
=> ( H @ I ) )
& ! [I: a,J: a] :
( ( ( H @ I )
& ( B @ I @ J ) )
=> ( H @ J ) ) )
=> ( H @ G ) ) ) )
=> ( E @ G ) ) )
=> ( E @ D ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM251B_pme) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: a > a > $o,B: a > a > $o,C: a,D: a] :
( ! [E: a > $o] :
( ( ! [F: a] :
( ( ( A @ C @ F )
| ( B @ C @ F ) )
=> ( E @ F ) )
& ! [F: a,G: a] :
( ( ( E @ F )
& ( ( A @ F @ G )
| ( B @ F @ G ) ) )
=> ( E @ G ) ) )
=> ( E @ D ) )
=> ! [E: a > $o] :
( ( ! [F: a] :
( ( ! [G: a > $o] :
( ( ! [H: a] :
( ( A @ C @ H )
=> ( G @ H ) )
& ! [H: a,I: a] :
( ( ( G @ H )
& ( A @ H @ I ) )
=> ( G @ I ) ) )
=> ( G @ F ) )
| ! [G: a > $o] :
( ( ! [H: a] :
( ( B @ C @ H )
=> ( G @ H ) )
& ! [H: a,I: a] :
( ( ( G @ H )
& ( B @ H @ I ) )
=> ( G @ I ) ) )
=> ( G @ F ) ) )
=> ( E @ F ) )
& ! [F: a,G: a] :
( ( ( E @ F )
& ( ! [H: a > $o] :
( ( ! [I: a] :
( ( A @ F @ I )
=> ( H @ I ) )
& ! [I: a,J: a] :
( ( ( H @ I )
& ( A @ I @ J ) )
=> ( H @ J ) ) )
=> ( H @ G ) )
| ! [H: a > $o] :
( ( ! [I: a] :
( ( B @ F @ I )
=> ( H @ I ) )
& ! [I: a,J: a] :
( ( ( H @ I )
& ( B @ I @ J ) )
=> ( H @ J ) ) )
=> ( H @ G ) ) ) )
=> ( E @ G ) ) )
=> ( E @ D ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(3,plain,
~ ! [A: a > a > $o,B: a > a > $o,C: a,D: a] :
( ! [E: a > $o] :
( ( ! [F: a] :
( ( ( A @ C @ F )
| ( B @ C @ F ) )
=> ( E @ F ) )
& ! [F: a,G: a] :
( ( ( E @ F )
& ( ( A @ F @ G )
| ( B @ F @ G ) ) )
=> ( E @ G ) ) )
=> ( E @ D ) )
=> ! [E: a > $o] :
( ( ! [F: a] :
( ( ! [G: a > $o] :
( ( ! [H: a] :
( ( A @ C @ H )
=> ( G @ H ) )
& ! [H: a,I: a] :
( ( ( G @ H )
& ( A @ H @ I ) )
=> ( G @ I ) ) )
=> ( G @ F ) )
| ! [G: a > $o] :
( ( ! [H: a] :
( ( B @ C @ H )
=> ( G @ H ) )
& ! [H: a,I: a] :
( ( ( G @ H )
& ( B @ H @ I ) )
=> ( G @ I ) ) )
=> ( G @ F ) ) )
=> ( E @ F ) )
& ! [F: a,G: a] :
( ( ( E @ F )
& ( ! [H: a > $o] :
( ( ! [I: a] :
( ( A @ F @ I )
=> ( H @ I ) )
& ! [I: a,J: a] :
( ( ( H @ I )
& ( A @ I @ J ) )
=> ( H @ J ) ) )
=> ( H @ G ) )
| ! [H: a > $o] :
( ( ! [I: a] :
( ( B @ F @ I )
=> ( H @ I ) )
& ! [I: a,J: a] :
( ( ( H @ I )
& ( B @ I @ J ) )
=> ( H @ J ) ) )
=> ( H @ G ) ) ) )
=> ( E @ G ) ) )
=> ( E @ D ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(110,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEV149^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.11/0.21 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.21 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.21 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.21 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.21 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.21 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.21 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.21 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 15:16:30 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.21 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.21 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.91/0.78 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.25/0.99 % [INFO] Parsing done (203ms).
% 1.25/1.00 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 2.12/1.41 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 2.12/1.42 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 2.34/1.54 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 2.34/1.59 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 2.34/1.59 % [INFO] Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF).
% 2.34/1.60 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.51/1.60 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 4.77/2.46 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.77/2.46 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 4.77/2.46 % Time passed: 2113ms (effective reasoning time: 1453ms)
% 4.77/2.46 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.77/2.46 % Axioms used in derivation (0):
% 4.77/2.46 % No. of inferences in proof: 4
% 4.77/2.46 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2113 ms resp. 1453 ms w/o parsing
% 5.11/2.50 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.11/2.50 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------