%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SEV158^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:35:07 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 0.31s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 28 ( 5 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 227 ( 14 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 72 ( 8 avg)
% Number of connectives : 505 ( 53 ~; 64 |; 19 &; 362 @)
% ( 3 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 18 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 60 ( 60 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 10 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 0 ^; 27 !; 2 ?; 29 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
epred1_1: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
epred2_1: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_25,type,
epred3_1: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_26,type,
epred4_1: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_27,type,
epred5_1: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_28,type,
epred6_1: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_29,type,
esk1_1: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i ).
thf(cTHM120I_1_pme,conjecture,
? [X1: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ! [X2: $i > $o] : ( X1 @ X2 @ X2 )
& ! [X2: $i > $o,X3: $i > $o,X4: $i > $o] :
( ( ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 )
& ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
=> ( X1 @ X2 @ X4 ) )
& ! [X5: $i > $o,X6: $i > $o] :
( ( ( X1 @ X5 @ X6 )
& ( X1 @ X6 @ X5 ) )
=> ! [X7: $i] :
( ( X5 @ X7 )
<=> ( X6 @ X7 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9R8Ju7oBPM/E---3.1_1418005.p',cTHM120I_1_pme) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ! [X2: $i > $o] : ( X1 @ X2 @ X2 )
& ! [X2: $i > $o,X3: $i > $o,X4: $i > $o] :
( ( ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 )
& ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
=> ( X1 @ X2 @ X4 ) )
& ! [X5: $i > $o,X6: $i > $o] :
( ( ( X1 @ X5 @ X6 )
& ( X1 @ X6 @ X5 ) )
=> ! [X7: $i] :
( ( X5 @ X7 )
<=> ( X6 @ X7 ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM120I_1_pme]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X16: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ( ( X16 @ ( epred5_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred6_1 @ X16 ) )
| ( X16 @ ( epred2_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred3_1 @ X16 ) )
| ~ ( X16 @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) ) )
& ( ( X16 @ ( epred6_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred5_1 @ X16 ) )
| ( X16 @ ( epred2_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred3_1 @ X16 ) )
| ~ ( X16 @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) ) )
& ( ~ ( epred5_1 @ X16 @ ( esk1_1 @ X16 ) )
| ~ ( epred6_1 @ X16 @ ( esk1_1 @ X16 ) )
| ( X16 @ ( epred2_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred3_1 @ X16 ) )
| ~ ( X16 @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) ) )
& ( ( epred5_1 @ X16 @ ( esk1_1 @ X16 ) )
| ( epred6_1 @ X16 @ ( esk1_1 @ X16 ) )
| ( X16 @ ( epred2_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred3_1 @ X16 ) )
| ~ ( X16 @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) ) )
& ( ( X16 @ ( epred5_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred6_1 @ X16 ) )
| ( X16 @ ( epred3_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred4_1 @ X16 ) )
| ~ ( X16 @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) ) )
& ( ( X16 @ ( epred6_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred5_1 @ X16 ) )
| ( X16 @ ( epred3_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred4_1 @ X16 ) )
| ~ ( X16 @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) ) )
& ( ~ ( epred5_1 @ X16 @ ( esk1_1 @ X16 ) )
| ~ ( epred6_1 @ X16 @ ( esk1_1 @ X16 ) )
| ( X16 @ ( epred3_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred4_1 @ X16 ) )
| ~ ( X16 @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) ) )
& ( ( epred5_1 @ X16 @ ( esk1_1 @ X16 ) )
| ( epred6_1 @ X16 @ ( esk1_1 @ X16 ) )
| ( X16 @ ( epred3_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred4_1 @ X16 ) )
| ~ ( X16 @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) ) )
& ( ( X16 @ ( epred5_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred6_1 @ X16 ) )
| ~ ( X16 @ ( epred2_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred4_1 @ X16 ) )
| ~ ( X16 @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) ) )
& ( ( X16 @ ( epred6_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred5_1 @ X16 ) )
| ~ ( X16 @ ( epred2_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred4_1 @ X16 ) )
| ~ ( X16 @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) ) )
& ( ~ ( epred5_1 @ X16 @ ( esk1_1 @ X16 ) )
| ~ ( epred6_1 @ X16 @ ( esk1_1 @ X16 ) )
| ~ ( X16 @ ( epred2_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred4_1 @ X16 ) )
| ~ ( X16 @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) ) )
& ( ( epred5_1 @ X16 @ ( esk1_1 @ X16 ) )
| ( epred6_1 @ X16 @ ( esk1_1 @ X16 ) )
| ~ ( X16 @ ( epred2_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred4_1 @ X16 ) )
| ~ ( X16 @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X16 ) ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ( X1 @ ( epred5_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred6_1 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( X1 @ ( epred2_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred4_1 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( X1 @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ( X1 @ ( epred5_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred6_1 @ X1 ) )
| ( X1 @ ( epred3_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred4_1 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( X1 @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ( X1 @ ( epred5_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred6_1 @ X1 ) )
| ( X1 @ ( epred2_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred3_1 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( X1 @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ( ( epred6_1 @ $eq )
= ( epred5_1 @ $eq ) )
| ( ( epred4_1 @ $eq )
!= ( epred2_1 @ $eq ) ) ),
inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]),c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ( ( epred6_1 @ $eq )
= ( epred5_1 @ $eq ) )
| ( ( epred4_1 @ $eq )
= ( epred3_1 @ $eq ) ) ),
inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]),c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ( ( epred6_1 @ $eq )
= ( epred5_1 @ $eq ) )
| ( ( epred2_1 @ $eq )
= ( epred3_1 @ $eq ) ) ),
inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]),c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ( epred6_1 @ $eq )
= ( epred5_1 @ $eq ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]) ).
thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ~ ( epred5_1 @ X1 @ ( esk1_1 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( epred6_1 @ X1 @ ( esk1_1 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( X1 @ ( epred2_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred4_1 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( X1 @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
! [X49: $i] :
( ( epred6_1 @ $eq @ X49 )
<=> ( epred5_1 @ $eq @ X49 ) ),
inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ( ( epred4_1 @ $eq )
!= ( epred2_1 @ $eq ) )
| ~ ( epred5_1 @ $eq @ ( esk1_1 @ $eq ) )
| ~ ( epred6_1 @ $eq @ ( esk1_1 @ $eq ) ) ),
inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]),c_0_10]) ).
thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
! [X7: $i] :
( ( epred6_1 @ $eq @ X7 )
| ~ ( epred5_1 @ $eq @ X7 ) ),
inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ( X1 @ ( epred2_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred3_1 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( epred5_1 @ X1 @ ( esk1_1 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( epred6_1 @ X1 @ ( esk1_1 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( X1 @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ( epred5_1 @ X1 @ ( esk1_1 @ X1 ) )
| ( epred6_1 @ X1 @ ( esk1_1 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( X1 @ ( epred2_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred4_1 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( X1 @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
! [X7: $i] :
( ( epred5_1 @ $eq @ X7 )
| ~ ( epred6_1 @ $eq @ X7 ) ),
inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ( ( epred4_1 @ $eq )
!= ( epred2_1 @ $eq ) )
| ~ ( epred5_1 @ $eq @ ( esk1_1 @ $eq ) ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ( epred5_1 @ X1 @ ( esk1_1 @ X1 ) )
| ( epred6_1 @ X1 @ ( esk1_1 @ X1 ) )
| ( X1 @ ( epred2_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred3_1 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( X1 @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( ( ( epred2_1 @ $eq )
= ( epred3_1 @ $eq ) )
| ~ ( epred5_1 @ $eq @ ( esk1_1 @ $eq ) ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]),c_0_14]),c_0_13]) ).
thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( ( epred4_1 @ $eq )
!= ( epred2_1 @ $eq ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17]) ).
thf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( ( epred2_1 @ $eq )
= ( epred3_1 @ $eq ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]),c_0_18]),c_0_16]),c_0_19]) ).
thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ( X1 @ ( epred3_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred4_1 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( epred5_1 @ X1 @ ( esk1_1 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( epred6_1 @ X1 @ ( esk1_1 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( X1 @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ( epred5_1 @ X1 @ ( esk1_1 @ X1 ) )
| ( epred6_1 @ X1 @ ( esk1_1 @ X1 ) )
| ( X1 @ ( epred3_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred4_1 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( X1 @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( ( epred4_1 @ $eq )
!= ( epred3_1 @ $eq ) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( ( ( epred4_1 @ $eq )
= ( epred3_1 @ $eq ) )
| ~ ( epred5_1 @ $eq @ ( esk1_1 @ $eq ) ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]),c_0_22]),c_0_13]) ).
thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
epred5_1 @ $eq @ ( esk1_1 @ $eq ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]),c_0_23]),c_0_24]),c_0_16]) ).
thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26])]),c_0_24]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEV158^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.19 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.19 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.19 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.19 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.19 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.19 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.19 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.19 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 15:17:07 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.19 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.19 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.24 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.25 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9R8Ju7oBPM/E---3.1_1418005.p
% 0.23/0.31 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.23/0.31 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.23/0.31 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.31 % Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.23/0.31 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31 % Starting full_lambda_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31 % Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31 % sh2lt with pid 1418018 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.31 % Result found by sh2lt
% 0.23/0.31 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.23/0.31 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.31 % Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.23/0.31 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true))
% 0.23/0.31 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.23/0.31 % Search class: HGHNF-FFSF11-SHHFFMBN
% 0.23/0.31 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.23/0.31 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 109s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31 % Starting sh2lt with 121s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 109s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31 % Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 109s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1418024 completed with status 10
% 0.23/0.31 % Starting lpo1_def_fix with 109s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31 % post_as_ho1 with pid 1418027 completed with status 10
% 0.23/0.31 % Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 109s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31 % sh2lt with pid 1418026 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.31 % Result found by sh2lt
% 0.23/0.31 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.23/0.31 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.31 % Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.23/0.31 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true))
% 0.23/0.31 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.23/0.31 % Search class: HGHNF-FFSF11-SHHFFMBN
% 0.23/0.31 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.23/0.31 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 109s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31 % Starting sh2lt with 121s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/0.31 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.23/0.31
% 0.23/0.31 % Proof found!
% 0.23/0.31 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/0.31 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.31 % Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.23/0.31 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/0.31 % Initial clauses : 12
% 0.23/0.31 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/0.31 % Initial clauses in saturation : 12
% 0.23/0.31 % Processed clauses : 101
% 0.23/0.31 % ...of these trivial : 7
% 0.23/0.31 % ...subsumed : 16
% 0.23/0.31 % ...remaining for further processing : 78
% 0.23/0.31 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.31 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.31 % Backward-subsumed : 5
% 0.23/0.31 % Backward-rewritten : 12
% 0.23/0.31 % Generated clauses : 163
% 0.23/0.31 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 117
% 0.23/0.31 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.31 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 8
% 0.23/0.31 % Paramodulations : 8
% 0.23/0.31 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.31 % NegExts : 5
% 0.23/0.31 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/0.31 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.23/0.31 % Total rewrite steps : 18
% 0.23/0.31 % ...of those cached : 15
% 0.23/0.31 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.31 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.31 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.31 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.31 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.31 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.31 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.31 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.31 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.31 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.31 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.31 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.31 % Current number of processed clauses : 31
% 0.23/0.31 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.23/0.31 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.31 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.23/0.31 % Non-unit-clauses : 27
% 0.23/0.31 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 35
% 0.23/0.31 % ...number of literals in the above : 131
% 0.23/0.31 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.31 % Current number of archived clauses : 47
% 0.23/0.31 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 220
% 0.23/0.31 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 95
% 0.23/0.31 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 27
% 0.23/0.31 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 40
% 0.23/0.31 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.31 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.23/0.31 % BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.23/0.31 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.31 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.31 % Termbank termtop insertions : 44006
% 0.23/0.31 % Search garbage collected termcells : 218
% 0.23/0.31
% 0.23/0.31 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.31 % User time : 0.037 s
% 0.23/0.31 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.31 % Total time : 0.044 s
% 0.23/0.31 % Maximum resident set size: 3580 pages
% 0.23/0.31
% 0.23/0.31 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.31 % User time : 0.090 s
% 0.23/0.31 % System time : 0.013 s
% 0.23/0.31 % Total time : 0.104 s
% 0.23/0.31 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.23/0.31 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------