↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEV162^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:40:26 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.78s 1.52s
% Output   : Refutation 1.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  115 (  40 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  193 (  26   ~;  20   |;   5   &; 132   @)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   73 (  73   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  151 (  92   ^;  40   !;  19   ?; 151   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    sK0: a > a > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    sK1: ( a > a > a ) > a ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    sK2: a ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    sK3: a ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    ph5: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f36,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f24,f33,f35]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    spl4_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f34]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f23,f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ! [X0: ( a > a > a ) > a] :
      ( ( sK0
        @ ( X0
          @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y0 )
        @ ( X0
          @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y1 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(condensation,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ! [X6: a,X4: ( a > a > a ) > a,X5: a] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( sK0
          @ ( X4
            @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y0 )
          @ ( X4
            @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y1 ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( sK0 @ X5 @ X6 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( ( $true
       != ( sK0
          @ ( sK1
            @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y0 )
          @ ( sK1
            @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y1 ) ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( sK0 @ sK2 @ sK3 ) ) )
    & ( ! [X4: ( a > a > a ) > a] :
          ( $true
          = ( sK0
            @ ( X4
              @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y0 )
            @ ( X4
              @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y1 ) ) )
      | ! [X5: a,X6: a] :
          ( $true
          = ( sK0 @ X5 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f8,f11,f10,f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a > a > $o] :
        ( ( ? [X1: ( a > a > a ) > a] :
              ( ( X0
                @ ( X1
                  @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y0 )
                @ ( X1
                  @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y1 ) )
             != $true )
          | ? [X2: a,X3: a] :
              ( $true
             != ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 ) ) )
        & ( ! [X4: ( a > a > a ) > a] :
              ( ( X0
                @ ( X4
                  @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y0 )
                @ ( X4
                  @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y1 ) )
              = $true )
          | ! [X5: a,X6: a] :
              ( $true
              = ( X0 @ X5 @ X6 ) ) ) )
   => ( ( ? [X1: ( a > a > a ) > a] :
            ( $true
           != ( sK0
              @ ( X1
                @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y0 )
              @ ( X1
                @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y1 ) ) )
        | ? [X3: a,X2: a] :
            ( $true
           != ( sK0 @ X2 @ X3 ) ) )
      & ( ! [X4: ( a > a > a ) > a] :
            ( $true
            = ( sK0
              @ ( X4
                @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y0 )
              @ ( X4
                @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y1 ) ) )
        | ! [X6: a,X5: a] :
            ( $true
            = ( sK0 @ X5 @ X6 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ? [X1: ( a > a > a ) > a] :
        ( $true
       != ( sK0
          @ ( X1
            @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y0 )
          @ ( X1
            @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y1 ) ) )
   => ( $true
     != ( sK0
        @ ( sK1
          @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y0 )
        @ ( sK1
          @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y1 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ? [X3: a,X2: a] :
        ( $true
       != ( sK0 @ X2 @ X3 ) )
   => ( $true
     != ( sK0 @ sK2 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ? [X0: a > a > $o] :
      ( ( ? [X1: ( a > a > a ) > a] :
            ( ( X0
              @ ( X1
                @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y0 )
              @ ( X1
                @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y1 ) )
           != $true )
        | ? [X2: a,X3: a] :
            ( $true
           != ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 ) ) )
      & ( ! [X4: ( a > a > a ) > a] :
            ( ( X0
              @ ( X4
                @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y0 )
              @ ( X4
                @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y1 ) )
            = $true )
        | ! [X5: a,X6: a] :
            ( $true
            = ( X0 @ X5 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X0: a > a > $o] :
      ( ( ? [X3: ( a > a > a ) > a] :
            ( $true
           != ( X0
              @ ( X3
                @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y0 )
              @ ( X3
                @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y1 ) ) )
        | ? [X1: a,X2: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
           != $true ) )
      & ( ! [X3: ( a > a > a ) > a] :
            ( $true
            = ( X0
              @ ( X3
                @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y0 )
              @ ( X3
                @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y1 ) ) )
        | ! [X1: a,X2: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
            = $true ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X0: a > a > $o] :
      ( ! [X1: a,X2: a] :
          ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
          = $true )
    <~> ! [X3: ( a > a > a ) > a] :
          ( $true
          = ( X0
            @ ( X3
              @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y0 )
            @ ( X3
              @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > a > $o] :
        ( ! [X1: a,X2: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
            = $true )
      <=> ! [X3: ( a > a > a ) > a] :
            ( $true
            = ( X0
              @ ( X3
                @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y0 )
              @ ( X3
                @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > a > $o] :
        ( ! [X1: a,X2: a] : ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
      <=> ! [X3: ( a > a > a ) > a] :
            ( X0
            @ ( X3
              @ ^ [X4: a,X5: a] : X4 )
            @ ( X3
              @ ^ [X6: a,X7: a] : X7 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: a > a > $o] :
        ( ! [X1: a,X2: a] : ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
      <=> ! [X3: ( a > a > a ) > a] :
            ( X0
            @ ( X3
              @ ^ [X1: a,X2: a] : X1 )
            @ ( X3
              @ ^ [X1: a,X2: a] : X2 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: a > a > $o] :
      ( ! [X1: a,X2: a] : ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
    <=> ! [X3: ( a > a > a ) > a] :
          ( X0
          @ ( X3
            @ ^ [X1: a,X2: a] : X1 )
          @ ( X3
            @ ^ [X1: a,X2: a] : X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RBxxanHNVC/DTF2THF_26495.p',cTHM184_pme) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( sK0
        @ ( sK1
          @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y0 )
        @ ( sK1
          @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y1 ) ) )
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f21]) ).

thf(f21,definition,
    ( spl4_2
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK0
        @ ( sK1
          @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y0 )
        @ ( sK1
          @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y1 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    spl4_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f31]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl4_1 ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f28]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ! [X3: ( a > a > a ) > a] :
        ( sK3
       != ( X3
          @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y1 ) )
    | spl4_1 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f26]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ! [X3: ( a > a > a ) > a] :
        ( ( sK3
         != ( X3
            @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y1 ) )
        | ( $true != $true ) )
    | spl4_1 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f19,f15]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( sK0 @ sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | spl4_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f17]) ).

thf(f17,definition,
    ( spl4_1
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f14,f21,f17]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( sK0 @ sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
     != ( sK0
        @ ( sK1
          @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y0 )
        @ ( sK1
          @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : Y1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEV162^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.17/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:41:09 EST 2026
% 0.17/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.19/0.47  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.19/0.47  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.19/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47  % File     : SEV162^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.19/0.47  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.19/0.47  % Problem  : TPS problem THM184
% 0.19/0.47  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.19/0.47  % English  : Theorem about representing relations in terms of ordered pairs.
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  % Refs     : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.47  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.19/0.47  % Names    : tps_0128 [Bro09]
% 0.19/0.47  %          : THM148 [TPS]
% 0.19/0.47  %          : THM184 [TPS]
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.19/0.47  % Rating   : 0.17 v9.1.0, 0.12 v9.0.0, 0.08 v8.2.0, 0.09 v8.1.0, 0.17 v7.4.0, 0.11 v7.3.0, 0.20 v7.2.0, 0.12 v7.1.0, 0.14 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.4.0, 0.14 v6.3.0, 0.17 v6.2.0, 0.33 v6.1.0, 0.17 v6.0.0, 0.00 v4.0.1, 0.33 v4.0.0
% 0.19/0.47  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    2 (   0 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of atoms       :    0 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Maximal formula atoms :    0 (   0 avg)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of connectives :    7 (   0   ~;   0   |;   0   &;   6   @)
% 0.19/0.47  %                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   9 avg)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of type conns  :    5 (   5   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of symbols     :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.19/0.47  %            Number of variables   :    8 (   4   ^;   4   !;   0   ?;   8   :)
% 0.19/0.47  % SPC      : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.19/0.47  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.19/0.47  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.19/0.47  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.19/0.47  %          : Polymorphic definitions expanded.
% 0.19/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47  thf(a_type,type,
% 0.19/0.47      a: $tType ).
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  thf(cTHM184_pme,conjecture,
% 0.19/0.47      ! [Xr: a > a > $o] :
% 0.19/0.47        ( ! [Xx: a,Xy: a] : ( Xr @ Xx @ Xy )
% 0.19/0.47      <=> ! [Xp: ( a > a > a ) > a] :
% 0.19/0.47            ( Xr
% 0.19/0.47            @ ( Xp
% 0.19/0.47              @ ^ [Xx: a,Xy: a] : Xx )
% 0.19/0.47            @ ( Xp
% 0.19/0.47              @ ^ [Xx: a,Xy: a] : Xy ) ) ) ).
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47  ------------------------
% 1.59/1.48  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.59/1.48  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.59/1.48  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:41:10 EST 2026
% 1.59/1.48  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.59/1.48  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.59/1.48  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.59/1.48  
% 1.59/1.48  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RBxxanHNVC/DTF2DTF26495.p
% See solution above
% 1.59/1.48  ------------------------
% 1.59/1.49  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.59/1.49  thf(a_type,type,
% 1.59/1.49      a: $tType ).
% 1.59/1.49  
% 1.59/1.49  thf(cTHM184_pme,conjecture,
% 1.59/1.49      ! [Xr: a > a > $o] :
% 1.59/1.49        ( ! [Xx: a,Xy: a] : ( Xr @ Xx @ Xy )
% 1.59/1.49      <=> ! [Xp: ( a > a > a ) > a] :
% 1.59/1.49            ( Xr
% 1.59/1.49            @ ( Xp
% 1.59/1.49              @ ^ [Xx: a,Xy: a] : Xx )
% 1.59/1.49            @ ( Xp
% 1.59/1.49              @ ^ [Xx: a,Xy: a] : Xy ) ) ) ).
% 1.59/1.49  ------------------------
% 1.78/1.51  % (26641)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_26495 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 1.78/1.51  % (26642)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_26495 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.78/1.51  % (26639)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_26495 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.78/1.51  % (26640)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_26495 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 1.78/1.51  % (26643)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_26495 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.78/1.51  % (26642)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.78/1.51  % (26642)------------------------------
% 1.78/1.51  % (26642)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.78/1.51  % (26642)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.78/1.51  % (26643)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.78/1.51  % (26643)------------------------------
% 1.78/1.51  % (26643)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.78/1.51  % (26642)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.78/1.51  
% 1.78/1.51  % (26642)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.78/1.51  % (26642)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.78/1.51  % (26642)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.78/1.51  % (26642)------------------------------
% 1.78/1.51  % (26642)------------------------------
% 1.78/1.51  % (26643)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.78/1.51  % (26643)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.78/1.51  
% 1.78/1.51  % (26643)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.78/1.51  % (26643)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.78/1.51  % (26643)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.78/1.51  % (26643)------------------------------
% 1.78/1.51  % (26643)------------------------------
% 1.78/1.51  % (26641)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.78/1.51  % (26641)------------------------------
% 1.78/1.51  % (26641)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.78/1.51  % (26641)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.78/1.51  
% 1.78/1.51  
% 1.78/1.51  % (26641)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.78/1.51  % (26641)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.78/1.51  % (26641)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 1.78/1.51  % (26641)------------------------------
% 1.78/1.51  % (26641)------------------------------
% 1.78/1.51  % (26640)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.78/1.51  % (26640)------------------------------
% 1.78/1.51  % (26640)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.78/1.51  % (26640)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.78/1.51  % (26640)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.78/1.51  
% 1.78/1.51  % (26640)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.78/1.51  % (26640)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 1.78/1.51  % (26640)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 1.78/1.51  % (26640)------------------------------
% 1.78/1.51  % (26640)------------------------------
% 1.78/1.51  % (26639)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.78/1.51  % (26639)------------------------------
% 1.78/1.51  % (26639)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.78/1.51  % (26639)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.78/1.51  
% 1.78/1.51  
% 1.78/1.51  % (26639)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 1.78/1.51  % (26639)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 1.78/1.51  % (26639)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
% 1.78/1.51  % (26639)------------------------------
% 1.78/1.51  % (26639)------------------------------
% 1.78/1.52  % (26644)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_26495 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 1.78/1.52  % (26645)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_26495 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 1.78/1.52  % (26644)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.78/1.52  % (26644)------------------------------
% 1.78/1.52  % (26644)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.78/1.52  % (26644)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.78/1.52  
% 1.78/1.52  
% 1.78/1.52  % (26644)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.78/1.52  % (26644)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.78/1.52  % (26644)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.78/1.52  % (26644)------------------------------
% 1.78/1.52  % (26644)------------------------------
% 1.78/1.52  % (26645)First to succeed.
% 1.78/1.52  % (26645)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.78/1.52  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_26495
% 1.78/1.52  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_26495
% 1.78/1.52  thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(func_def_7, type, sK0: a > a > $o).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(func_def_8, type, sK1: (a > a > a) > a).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(func_def_9, type, sK2: a).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(func_def_10, type, sK3: a).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(func_def_12, type, ph5: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f36,plain,(
% 1.78/1.52    $false),
% 1.78/1.52    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f24,f33,f35])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f35,plain,(
% 1.78/1.52    spl4_2),
% 1.78/1.52    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f34])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f34,plain,(
% 1.78/1.52    $false | spl4_2),
% 1.78/1.52    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f23,f15])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.78/1.52    ( ! [X0 : (a > a > a) > a] : (((sK0 @ (X0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0))))) @ (X0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1)))))) = $true)) )),
% 1.78/1.52    inference(condensation,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.78/1.52    ( ! [X6 : a,X4 : (a > a > a) > a,X5 : a] : (($true = (sK0 @ (X4 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0))))) @ (X4 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1))))))) | ($true = (sK0 @ X5 @ X6))) )),
% 1.78/1.52    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.78/1.52    (($true != (sK0 @ (sK1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0))))) @ (sK1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1))))))) | ($true != (sK0 @ sK2 @ sK3))) & (! [X4 : (a > a > a) > a] : ($true = (sK0 @ (X4 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0))))) @ (X4 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1))))))) | ! [X5 : a,X6 : a] : ($true = (sK0 @ X5 @ X6)))),
% 1.78/1.52    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f8,f11,f10,f9])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.78/1.52    ? [X0 : a > a > $o] : ((? [X1 : (a > a > a) > a] : ((X0 @ (X1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0))))) @ (X1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1)))))) != $true) | ? [X2 : a,X3 : a] : ($true != (X0 @ X2 @ X3))) & (! [X4 : (a > a > a) > a] : ((X0 @ (X4 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0))))) @ (X4 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1)))))) = $true) | ! [X5 : a,X6 : a] : ($true = (X0 @ X5 @ X6)))) => ((? [X1 : (a > a > a) > a] : ($true != (sK0 @ (X1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0))))) @ (X1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1))))))) | ? [X3 : a,X2 : a] : ($true != (sK0 @ X2 @ X3))) & (! [X4 : (a > a > a) > a] : ($true = (sK0 @ (X4 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0))))) @ (X4 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1))))))) | ! [X6 : a,X5 : a] : ($true = (sK0 @ X5 @ X6))))),
% 1.78/1.52    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.78/1.52    ? [X1 : (a > a > a) > a] : ($true != (sK0 @ (X1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0))))) @ (X1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1))))))) => ($true != (sK0 @ (sK1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0))))) @ (sK1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1)))))))),
% 1.78/1.52    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.78/1.52    ? [X3 : a,X2 : a] : ($true != (sK0 @ X2 @ X3)) => ($true != (sK0 @ sK2 @ sK3))),
% 1.78/1.52    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.78/1.52    ? [X0 : a > a > $o] : ((? [X1 : (a > a > a) > a] : ((X0 @ (X1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0))))) @ (X1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1)))))) != $true) | ? [X2 : a,X3 : a] : ($true != (X0 @ X2 @ X3))) & (! [X4 : (a > a > a) > a] : ((X0 @ (X4 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0))))) @ (X4 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1)))))) = $true) | ! [X5 : a,X6 : a] : ($true = (X0 @ X5 @ X6))))),
% 1.78/1.52    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.78/1.52    ? [X0 : a > a > $o] : ((? [X3 : (a > a > a) > a] : ($true != (X0 @ (X3 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0))))) @ (X3 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1))))))) | ? [X1 : a,X2 : a] : ((X0 @ X1 @ X2) != $true)) & (! [X3 : (a > a > a) > a] : ($true = (X0 @ (X3 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0))))) @ (X3 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1))))))) | ! [X1 : a,X2 : a] : ((X0 @ X1 @ X2) = $true)))),
% 1.78/1.52    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.78/1.52    ? [X0 : a > a > $o] : (! [X1 : a,X2 : a] : ((X0 @ X1 @ X2) = $true) <~> ! [X3 : (a > a > a) > a] : ($true = (X0 @ (X3 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0))))) @ (X3 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1))))))))),
% 1.78/1.52    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.78/1.52    ~! [X0 : a > a > $o] : (! [X1 : a,X2 : a] : ((X0 @ X1 @ X2) = $true) <=> ! [X3 : (a > a > a) > a] : ($true = (X0 @ (X3 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0))))) @ (X3 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1))))))))),
% 1.78/1.52    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.78/1.52    ~! [X0 : a > a > $o] : (! [X1 : a,X2 : a] : (X0 @ X1 @ X2) <=> ! [X3 : (a > a > a) > a] : (X0 @ (X3 @ (^[X4 : a, X5 : a] : (X4))) @ (X3 @ (^[X6 : a, X7 : a] : (X7)))))),
% 1.78/1.52    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.78/1.52    ~! [X0 : a > a > $o] : (! [X1 : a,X2 : a] : (X0 @ X1 @ X2) <=> ! [X3 : (a > a > a) > a] : (X0 @ (X3 @ (^[X1 : a, X2 : a] : (X1))) @ (X3 @ (^[X1 : a, X2 : a] : (X2)))))),
% 1.78/1.52    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.78/1.52    ! [X0 : a > a > $o] : (! [X1 : a,X2 : a] : (X0 @ X1 @ X2) <=> ! [X3 : (a > a > a) > a] : (X0 @ (X3 @ (^[X1 : a, X2 : a] : (X1))) @ (X3 @ (^[X1 : a, X2 : a] : (X2)))))),
% 1.78/1.52    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RBxxanHNVC/DTF2THF_26495.p',cTHM184_pme)).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f23,plain,(
% 1.78/1.52    ($true != (sK0 @ (sK1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0))))) @ (sK1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1))))))) | spl4_2),
% 1.78/1.52    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f21])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f21,definition,(
% 1.78/1.52    spl4_2 <=> ($true = (sK0 @ (sK1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0))))) @ (sK1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1)))))))),
% 1.78/1.52    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_2])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f33,plain,(
% 1.78/1.52    spl4_1),
% 1.78/1.52    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f31])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f31,plain,(
% 1.78/1.52    $false | spl4_1),
% 1.78/1.52    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f28])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f28,plain,(
% 1.78/1.52    ( ! [X3 : (a > a > a) > a] : ((sK3 != (X3 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1))))))) ) | spl4_1),
% 1.78/1.52    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f26])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f26,plain,(
% 1.78/1.52    ( ! [X3 : (a > a > a) > a] : ((sK3 != (X3 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1)))))) | ($true != $true)) ) | spl4_1),
% 1.78/1.52    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f19,f15])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f19,plain,(
% 1.78/1.52    ($true != (sK0 @ sK2 @ sK3)) | spl4_1),
% 1.78/1.52    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f17])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f17,definition,(
% 1.78/1.52    spl4_1 <=> ($true = (sK0 @ sK2 @ sK3))),
% 1.78/1.52    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_1])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f24,plain,(
% 1.78/1.52    ~spl4_1 | ~spl4_2),
% 1.78/1.52    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f14,f21,f17])).
% 1.78/1.52  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.78/1.52    ($true != (sK0 @ sK2 @ sK3)) | ($true != (sK0 @ (sK1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y0))))) @ (sK1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1)))))))),
% 1.78/1.52    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.78/1.52  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_26495
% 1.78/1.52  % (26645)------------------------------
% 1.78/1.52  % (26645)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.78/1.52  % (26645)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.78/1.52  
% 1.78/1.52  % (26645)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.78/1.52  % (26645)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.78/1.52  % (26645)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 1.78/1.52  % (26645)------------------------------
% 1.78/1.52  % (26645)------------------------------
% 1.78/1.52  % (26638)Success in time 0.027 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------