%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Nitpick---2016 % Problem : SEV172^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % Computer : n104.star.cs.uiowa.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz % Memory : 32218.75MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Jan 18 14:56:38 EST 2017 % Result : CounterSatisfiable 23.76s % Output : FiniteModel 23.76s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEV172^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n104.star.cs.uiowa.edu % 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz % 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 32218.75MB % 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 00:01:04 CST 2017 % 0.03/0.24 % CPUTime : % 23.76/9.69 Nitpicking formula... % 23.76/9.69 Timestamp: 00:01:13 % 23.76/9.69 The type bnd_b passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be able to skip % 23.76/9.69 some scopes % 23.76/9.69 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured: % 23.76/9.69 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light" % 23.76/9.69 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes: % 23.76/9.69 card bnd_b = 1 % 23.76/9.69 card bnd_b = 2 % 23.76/9.69 card bnd_b = 3 % 23.76/9.69 card bnd_b = 4 % 23.76/9.69 card bnd_b = 5 % 23.76/9.69 Limit reached: arity 17 of Kodkod relation associated with "Xx" too large % 23.76/9.69 for a universe of size 5; skipping scope % 23.76/9.69 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel % 23.76/9.69 Nitpick found a counterexample for card bnd_b = 1: % 23.76/9.69 % 23.76/9.69 Skolem constants: % 23.76/9.69 X = b1 % 23.76/9.69 Xx = (\<lambda>x. _) % 23.76/9.69 ((\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := b1)) := b1) % 23.76/9.69 Y = b1 % 23.76/9.69 Constants: % 23.76/9.69 bnd_cR = (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := False) % 23.76/9.69 bnd_cS = (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := True) % 23.76/9.69 bnd_cZ = (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := False) % 23.76/9.69 % SZS output end FiniteModel % 23.76/9.69 Total time: 555 ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------