↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEV181^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:37:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.29s
% Output   : Refutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   36
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   65 (  21 unt;   0 typ;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  337 ( 128 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  450 (  78   ~;  59   |;  28   &; 255   @)
%                                         (   3 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   89 (  89   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   22 (  18 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%                                         (   0  !!;  17  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   96 (   0 sgn  50   !;   4   ?;  96   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    cD_FOR_X5309: ( ( $i > $o ) > $i ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    vSIGMA: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    vAND: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    db2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    db1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    vEQ: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( X0 > X0 > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    sK0: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    sK1: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    sK2: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    sK3: $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_16,type,
    sK4: $i > $o ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( cD_FOR_X5309
    = ( ^ [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i,X1: $i] :
        ? [X2: $i > $o] :
          ( ~ ( X2 @ ( X0 @ X2 ) )
          & ( X1
            = ( X0 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cD_FOR_X5309_def) ).

thf(f2,conjecture,
    ! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
      ( ! [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( X0 @ X1 )
            = ( X0 @ X2 ) )
         => ( X1 = X2 ) )
     => ~ ( cD_FOR_X5309 @ X0 @ ( X0 @ ( cD_FOR_X5309 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM143C_pme) ).

thf(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
        ( ! [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] :
            ( ( ( X0 @ X1 )
              = ( X0 @ X2 ) )
           => ( X1 = X2 ) )
       => ~ ( cD_FOR_X5309 @ X0 @ ( X0 @ ( cD_FOR_X5309 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ( cD_FOR_X5309
    = ( ^ [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i,X1: $i] :
        ? [X2: $i > $o] :
          ( ~ ( X2 @ ( X0 @ X2 ) )
          & ( X1
            = ( X0 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ( cD_FOR_X5309
    = ( ^ [Y0: ( $i > $o ) > $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( ?? @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
                = Y1 )
              & ~ ( Y2 @ ( Y0 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
        ( ! [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] :
            ( ( ( X0 @ X1 )
              = ( X0 @ X2 ) )
           => ( X1 = X2 ) )
       => ~ ( cD_FOR_X5309 @ X0 @ ( X0 @ ( cD_FOR_X5309 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
        ( ! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
            ( ( ( X0 @ X2 )
              = ( X0 @ X1 ) )
           => ( X1 = X2 ) )
       => ( ( cD_FOR_X5309 @ X0 @ ( X0 @ ( cD_FOR_X5309 @ X0 ) ) )
         != $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
        ( ! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
            ( ( ( X0 @ X2 )
              = ( X0 @ X1 ) )
           => ( X1 = X2 ) )
       => ( ( cD_FOR_X5309 @ X0 @ ( X0 @ ( cD_FOR_X5309 @ X0 ) ) )
         != $true ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ? [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
      ( ( ( cD_FOR_X5309 @ X0 @ ( X0 @ ( cD_FOR_X5309 @ X0 ) ) )
        = $true )
      & ! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( X0 @ X2 )
           != ( X0 @ X1 ) )
          | ( X1 = X2 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ? [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
      ( ( ( cD_FOR_X5309 @ X0 @ ( X0 @ ( cD_FOR_X5309 @ X0 ) ) )
        = $true )
      & ! [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( X0 @ X2 )
           != ( X0 @ X1 ) )
          | ( X1 = X2 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cD_FOR_X5309 @ sK0 @ ( sK0 @ ( cD_FOR_X5309 @ sK0 ) ) ) )
    & ! [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] :
        ( ( ( sK0 @ X1 )
         != ( sK0 @ X2 ) )
        | ( X1 = X2 ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X0,sK0)],[f10]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( cD_FOR_X5309
    = ( ^ [Y0: ( $i > $o ) > $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( ?? @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
                = Y1 )
              & ~ ( Y2 @ ( Y0 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( sK0 @ X1 )
       != ( sK0 @ X2 ) )
      | ( X1 = X2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( cD_FOR_X5309 @ sK0 @ ( sK0 @ ( cD_FOR_X5309 @ sK0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( ^ [Y0: ( $i > $o ) > $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( ?? @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
                = Y1 )
              & ~ ( Y2 @ ( Y0 @ Y2 ) ) ) )
      @ sK0
      @ ( sK0
        @ ( ^ [Y0: ( $i > $o ) > $i,Y1: $i] :
              ( ?? @ ( $i > $o )
              @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
                  ( ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
                    = Y1 )
                  & ~ ( Y2 @ ( Y0 @ Y2 ) ) ) )
          @ sK0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f14,f12,f12]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( ?? @ ( $i > $o )
      @ ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            = ( sK0
              @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                  ( ?? @ ( $i > $o )
                  @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
                      ( ( ( sK0 @ Y2 )
                        = Y1 )
                      & ~ ( Y2 @ ( sK0 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) )
          & ~ ( Y0 @ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            = ( sK0
              @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                  ( ?? @ ( $i > $o )
                  @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
                      ( ( ( sK0 @ Y2 )
                        = Y1 )
                      & ~ ( Y2 @ ( sK0 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) )
          & ~ ( Y0 @ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
      @ sK1 )
    = $true ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
        = ( sK0
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ?? @ ( $i > $o )
              @ ^ [Y1: $i > $o] :
                  ( ( ( sK0 @ Y1 )
                    = Y0 )
                  & ~ ( Y1 @ ( sK0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) )
      & ~ ( sK1 @ ( sK0 @ sK1 ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( ~ ( sK1 @ ( sK0 @ sK1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
      = ( sK0
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ?? @ ( $i > $o )
            @ ^ [Y1: $i > $o] :
                ( ( ( sK0 @ Y1 )
                  = Y0 )
                & ~ ( Y1 @ ( sK0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( sK0
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ?? @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y1: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ( sK0 @ Y1 )
                = Y0 )
              & ~ ( Y1 @ ( sK0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) )
    = ( sK0 @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( sK1 @ ( sK0 @ sK1 ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ! [X0: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
       != ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
      | ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ?? @ ( $i > $o )
              @ ^ [Y1: $i > $o] :
                  ( ( ( sK0 @ Y1 )
                    = Y0 )
                  & ~ ( Y1 @ ( sK0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) )
        = X0 ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f13,f23]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( sK1
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ?? @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y1: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ( sK0 @ Y1 )
                = Y0 )
              & ~ ( Y1 @ ( sK0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( sK1 @ X1 )
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ?? @ ( $i > $o )
            @ ^ [Y1: $i > $o] :
                ( ( ( sK0 @ Y1 )
                  = Y0 )
                & ~ ( Y1 @ ( sK0 @ Y1 ) ) ) )
        @ X1 ) ),
    inference(argument_congruence,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ?? @ ( $i > $o )
              @ ^ [Y1: $i > $o] :
                  ( ( ( sK0 @ Y1 )
                    = Y0 )
                  & ~ ( Y1 @ ( sK0 @ Y1 ) ) ) )
          @ X1 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( sK1 @ X1 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(iff_proxy_clausification,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( sK1 @ X1 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( ?? @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
                = X1 )
              & ~ ( Y0 @ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f30]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
                = X1 )
              & ~ ( Y0 @ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
          @ X2 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( sK1 @ X1 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f39]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( sK1 @ X1 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( ( ( sK0 @ X2 )
            = X1 )
          & ~ ( X2 @ ( sK0 @ X2 ) ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f40]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( sK0 @ X2 )
          = X1 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( ~ ( X2 @ ( sK0 @ X2 ) ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( sK1 @ X1 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f41]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( sK1 @ X1 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( sK0 @ X2 )
       != X1 )
      | ( ( ~ ( X2 @ ( sK0 @ X2 ) ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f42]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( sK0 @ X2 )
       != X1 )
      | ( $true
        = ( X2 @ ( sK0 @ X2 ) ) )
      | ( ( sK1 @ X1 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f43]) ).

thf(f72,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ?? @ ( $i > $o )
              @ ^ [Y1: $i > $o] :
                  ( ( ( sK0 @ Y1 )
                    = Y0 )
                  & ~ ( Y1 @ ( sK0 @ Y1 ) ) ) )
          @ ( sK0 @ sK1 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( $true
        = ( sK1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
       != X0 ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f44,f23]) ).

thf(f75,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
       != X0 )
      | ( $true
        = ( sK1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ?? @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
                = ( sK0 @ sK1 ) )
              & ~ ( Y0 @ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f72]) ).

thf(f76,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( sK1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
       != X0 )
      | ( $true
        = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
                = ( sK0 @ sK1 ) )
              & ~ ( Y0 @ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
          @ sK4 ) ) ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f75]) ).

thf(f77,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
            = ( sK0 @ sK1 ) )
          & ~ ( sK4 @ ( sK0 @ sK4 ) ) )
        = $true )
      | ( $true
        = ( sK1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
       != X0 ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f76]) ).

thf(f78,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( sK4 @ ( sK0 @ sK4 ) ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
       != X0 )
      | ( $true
        = ( sK1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f77]) ).

thf(f79,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
          = ( sK0 @ sK1 ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( sK1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
       != X0 ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f77]) ).

thf(f80,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
        = ( sK0 @ sK4 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( sK1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
       != X0 ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f79]) ).

thf(f81,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( sK1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( ( sK4 @ ( sK0 @ sK4 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
       != X0 ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f78]) ).

thf(f83,definition,
    ( spl5_1
  <=> ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
      = ( sK0 @ sK4 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl5_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f85,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
      = ( sK0 @ sK4 ) )
    | ~ spl5_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f83]) ).

thf(f87,definition,
    ( spl5_2
  <=> ! [X0: $i] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( sK1 @ X0 ) )
        | ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
         != X0 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl5_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f88,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i] :
        ( ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
         != X0 )
        | ( $true
          = ( sK1 @ X0 ) ) )
    | ~ spl5_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f87]) ).

thf(f89,plain,
    ( spl5_1
    | spl5_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f80,f87,f83]) ).

thf(f91,definition,
    ( spl5_3
  <=> ( ( sK4 @ ( sK0 @ sK4 ) )
      = $false ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl5_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f93,plain,
    ( ( ( sK4 @ ( sK0 @ sK4 ) )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl5_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f91]) ).

thf(f94,plain,
    ( spl5_2
    | spl5_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f81,f91,f87]) ).

thf(f96,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ ( sK0 @ sK1 ) ) )
    | ~ spl5_2 ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f88]) ).

thf(f97,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl5_2 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f96,f24]) ).

thf(f98,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl5_2 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f97]) ).

thf(f99,plain,
    ~ spl5_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f98]) ).

thf(f100,plain,
    ( ( ( sK4 @ ( sK0 @ sK1 ) )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl5_1
    | ~ spl5_3 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f93,f85]) ).

thf(f103,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i] :
        ( ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
         != X0 )
        | ( ( sK4 @ ( sK0 @ sK1 ) )
          = $true )
        | ( $true
          = ( sK1 @ X0 ) ) )
    | ~ spl5_1 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f44,f85]) ).

thf(f111,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( sK1 @ X0 ) )
        | ( $true = $false )
        | ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
         != X0 ) )
    | ~ spl5_1
    | ~ spl5_3 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f103,f100]) ).

thf(f112,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i] :
        ( ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
         != X0 )
        | ( $true
          = ( sK1 @ X0 ) ) )
    | ~ spl5_1
    | ~ spl5_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f111]) ).

thf(f115,plain,
    ( spl5_2
    | ~ spl5_1
    | ~ spl5_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f112,f91,f83,f87]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( spl5_1
    | spl5_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f89]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( spl5_2
    | spl5_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f94]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ~ spl5_2,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f99]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    ( ~ spl5_1
    | spl5_2
    | ~ spl5_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f115]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    spl5_3,
    inference(rat,[],[s2,s3]) ).

cnf(s6,plain,
    ~ spl5_1,
    inference(rat,[],[s4,s3,s5]) ).

cnf(s7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s3,s6]) ).

thf(f116,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s7]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEV181^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.20  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 15:18:45 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.20  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.23  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.24  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794337)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794343)lrs+10_16_si=on:nwc=1.5:random_seed=122006146:i=18:kws=arity_squared:rtra=on:fe=abstraction:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794343) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-2794337-2794343"...
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794348)WARNING Broken Constraint: if ho_split_queue_ratios(1,8) has been set then ho_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794348)WARNING Broken Constraint: if sine_to_age_tolerance(5) has been set then sine_to_age(off) is equal to on or sine_to_pred_levels(off) is not equal to off or sine_level_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794343)...printing done.
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794346)dis+21_4_fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=off:foolp=on:random_seed=3574342876:i=24:av=off:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/24Mi)
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794342)lrs+10_40_drc=off:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=2192267250:s2a=on:i=87:rtra=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/87Mi)
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794344)lrs+10_1_cnfonf=off:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=1336314680:i=3:rtra=on:inj=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794345)dis+1002_4:1_sfv=off:to=lpo:plsq=on:fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:spb=non_intro:acc=on:uwa=off:fd=preordered:foolp=on:s2agt=32:slsqc=1:slsq=on:random_seed=4183768599:hsq=on:hsqr=16,1:s2a=on:i=634:add=on:nm=16:nicw=on:rtra=on:gtg=position:ss=included:ixr=off:c=on:inj=on:ntd=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/634Mi)
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794348)dis+1002_8_to=kbo:sil=128000:tgt=full:drc=off:si=on:sp=const_max:lma=off:spb=non_intro:cbe=off:uwa=interpreted_only:random_seed=1575539837:hsqr=1,8:i=157:s2at=5:add=on:nm=2:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/157Mi)
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794347)lrs+10_1_to=lpo:sil=128000:e2e=on:si=on:random_seed=645101006:s2a=on:i=75:s2at=3:aac=none:bd=preordered:rtra=on:fe=abstraction_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794344)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794344)------------------------------
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794344)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794344)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794344)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794344)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794344)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794344)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794344)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794343)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.09/0.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.29  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794343)------------------------------
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794343)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794343)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794343)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794343)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794343)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794343)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794343)Instructions burned: 10 (million)
% 0.09/0.29  % (2794337)Success in time 0.04 s
% 0.09/0.29  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------