%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SEV187^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:36:15 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.26s 0.37s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 2 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 9 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 13 ( 4 ~; 1 |; 1 &; 3 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 4 ( 3 usr)
% Number of type conns : 17 ( 17 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 3 ( 1 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 0 ^; 5 !; 0 ?; 5 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort2,type,
b: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort3,type,
c: $tType ).
thf(decl_23,type,
epred1_0: ( a > b > c > $o ) > $o ).
thf(cCS3_ALL_THM_pme,conjecture,
! [X1: ( a > b > c > $o ) > $o] :
( ! [X2: a > b > c > $o] :
( ( X1 @ X2 )
=> $true )
=> $true ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DGUlCNOV5q/E---3.1_452117.p',cCS3_ALL_THM_pme) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1: ( a > b > c > $o ) > $o] :
( ! [X2: a > b > c > $o] :
( ( X1 @ X2 )
=> $true )
=> $true ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cCS3_ALL_THM_pme]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X6: a > b > c > $o] :
( ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X6 )
| $true )
& ~ $true ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SEV187^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.26 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.26 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.26 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.26 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.26 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.26 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.26 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.26 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 15:15:07 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.26 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.26 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/0.33 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.35 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DGUlCNOV5q/E---3.1_452117.p
% 0.26/0.37 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.26/0.37 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.26/0.37 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting full_lambda_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % ehoh_best3_rw with pid 452134 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Result found by ehoh_best3_rw
% 0.26/0.37 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.26/0.37 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting full_lambda_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000)
% 0.26/0.37 % SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000
% 0.26/0.37 % Search class: HUHPF-FFSF00-SHHFFFNN
% 0.26/0.37 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % SubtermCWHack with pid 452136 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.26/0.37 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.26/0.37 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting full_lambda_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000)
% 0.26/0.37 % SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000
% 0.26/0.37 % Search class: HUHPF-FFSF00-SHHFFFNN
% 0.26/0.37 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.26/0.37
% 0.26/0.37 % Proof found!
% 0.26/0.37 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/0.37 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.37 % Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.26/0.37 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3
% 0.26/0.37 % Initial clauses : 2
% 0.26/0.37 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.26/0.37 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1
% 0.26/0.37 % Processed clauses : 1
% 0.26/0.37 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % NegExts : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.37 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.37 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.37 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.37 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.37 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.37 % Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.37 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Termbank termtop insertions : 134
% 0.26/0.37 % Search garbage collected termcells : 51
% 0.26/0.37
% 0.26/0.37 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.37 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.26/0.37 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.26/0.37 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.26/0.37 % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.26/0.37
% 0.26/0.37 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.37 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.26/0.37 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.26/0.37 % Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.26/0.37 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.26/0.37 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------