↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SEV195^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:40:31 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.50s 1.29s
% Output   : Refutation 1.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   3 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  149 ( 111 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   7 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  320 (  56   ~;  24   |;  54   &; 168   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  18  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   10 (  10   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  127 (   9   ^;  98   !;  20   ?; 127   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    cP: a > a > a ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    cZ: a ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    sK0: a ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    sK1: ( a > $o ) > a ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    sK2: ( a > $o ) > a ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    ph4: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f272,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f245]) ).

thf(f245,plain,
    ( ( sK0 != sK0 )
    | ( cZ != cZ ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f18,f207]) ).

thf(f207,plain,
    ! [X0: a] :
      ( ( cZ = X0 )
      | ( sK0 != X0 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f17,f98]) ).

thf(f98,plain,
    ! [X0: a] :
      ( ( ( cP
          @ ( sK2
            @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( X0 != Y0 ) )
          @ ( sK1
            @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( X0 != Y0 ) ) )
        = X0 )
      | ( cZ = X0 ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f97]) ).

thf(f97,plain,
    ! [X0: a] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( X0 = cZ ) )
      | ( ( cP
          @ ( sK2
            @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( X0 != Y0 ) )
          @ ( sK1
            @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( X0 != Y0 ) ) )
        = X0 ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f96]) ).

thf(f96,plain,
    ! [X0: a] :
      ( ( ( cP
          @ ( sK2
            @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( X0 != Y0 ) )
          @ ( sK1
            @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( X0 != Y0 ) ) )
        = X0 )
      | ( $true
       != ( X0 != cZ ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f81]) ).

thf(f81,plain,
    ! [X0: a] :
      ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] : ( X0 != Y0 )
          @ cZ )
       != $true )
      | ( ( cP
          @ ( sK2
            @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( X0 != Y0 ) )
          @ ( sK1
            @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( X0 != Y0 ) ) )
        = X0 ) ),
    inference(leibniz_equality_elimination,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X8: a,X5: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( X5 @ ( cP @ ( sK2 @ X5 ) @ ( sK1 @ X5 ) ) )
       != $true )
      | ( ( X5 @ X8 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( X5 @ cZ )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a,X1: a] :
        ( cZ
       != ( cP @ X1 @ X0 ) )
    & ( cZ != sK0 )
    & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
        ( ( cP @ X3 @ X4 )
       != sK0 )
    & ! [X5: a > $o] :
        ( ( ( $true
            = ( X5 @ ( sK1 @ X5 ) ) )
          & ( ( X5 @ ( sK2 @ X5 ) )
            = $true )
          & ( ( X5 @ ( cP @ ( sK2 @ X5 ) @ ( sK1 @ X5 ) ) )
           != $true ) )
        | ! [X8: a] :
            ( ( X5 @ X8 )
            = $true )
        | ( ( X5 @ cZ )
         != $true ) )
    & ! [X9: a,X10: a,X11: a,X12: a] :
        ( ( ( X9 = X11 )
          & ( X10 = X12 ) )
        | ( ( cP @ X12 @ X11 )
         != ( cP @ X10 @ X9 ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f8,f10,f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X2: a] :
        ( ( cZ != X2 )
        & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
            ( ( cP @ X3 @ X4 )
           != X2 ) )
   => ( ( cZ != sK0 )
      & ! [X4: a,X3: a] :
          ( ( cP @ X3 @ X4 )
         != sK0 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X5: a > $o] :
      ( ? [X6: a,X7: a] :
          ( ( ( X5 @ X6 )
            = $true )
          & ( ( X5 @ X7 )
            = $true )
          & ( $true
           != ( X5 @ ( cP @ X7 @ X6 ) ) ) )
     => ( ( $true
          = ( X5 @ ( sK1 @ X5 ) ) )
        & ( ( X5 @ ( sK2 @ X5 ) )
          = $true )
        & ( ( X5 @ ( cP @ ( sK2 @ X5 ) @ ( sK1 @ X5 ) ) )
         != $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a,X1: a] :
        ( cZ
       != ( cP @ X1 @ X0 ) )
    & ? [X2: a] :
        ( ( cZ != X2 )
        & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
            ( ( cP @ X3 @ X4 )
           != X2 ) )
    & ! [X5: a > $o] :
        ( ? [X6: a,X7: a] :
            ( ( ( X5 @ X6 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( X5 @ X7 )
              = $true )
            & ( $true
             != ( X5 @ ( cP @ X7 @ X6 ) ) ) )
        | ! [X8: a] :
            ( ( X5 @ X8 )
            = $true )
        | ( ( X5 @ cZ )
         != $true ) )
    & ! [X9: a,X10: a,X11: a,X12: a] :
        ( ( ( X9 = X11 )
          & ( X10 = X12 ) )
        | ( ( cP @ X12 @ X11 )
         != ( cP @ X10 @ X9 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a,X0: a] :
        ( ( cP @ X0 @ X1 )
       != cZ )
    & ? [X10: a] :
        ( ( cZ != X10 )
        & ! [X11: a,X12: a] :
            ( ( cP @ X11 @ X12 )
           != X10 ) )
    & ! [X6: a > $o] :
        ( ? [X8: a,X7: a] :
            ( ( ( X6 @ X8 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( X6 @ X7 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( X6 @ ( cP @ X7 @ X8 ) )
             != $true ) )
        | ! [X9: a] :
            ( ( X6 @ X9 )
            = $true )
        | ( ( X6 @ cZ )
         != $true ) )
    & ! [X4: a,X3: a,X5: a,X2: a] :
        ( ( ( X4 = X5 )
          & ( X2 = X3 ) )
        | ( ( cP @ X3 @ X4 )
         != ( cP @ X2 @ X5 ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ? [X10: a] :
        ( ( cZ != X10 )
        & ! [X11: a,X12: a] :
            ( ( cP @ X11 @ X12 )
           != X10 ) )
    & ! [X6: a > $o] :
        ( ! [X9: a] :
            ( ( X6 @ X9 )
            = $true )
        | ? [X8: a,X7: a] :
            ( ( ( X6 @ ( cP @ X7 @ X8 ) )
             != $true )
            & ( ( X6 @ X7 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( X6 @ X8 )
              = $true ) )
        | ( ( X6 @ cZ )
         != $true ) )
    & ! [X4: a,X3: a,X5: a,X2: a] :
        ( ( ( X4 = X5 )
          & ( X2 = X3 ) )
        | ( ( cP @ X3 @ X4 )
         != ( cP @ X2 @ X5 ) ) )
    & ! [X1: a,X0: a] :
        ( ( cP @ X0 @ X1 )
       != cZ ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ( ( ! [X6: a > $o] :
            ( ( ! [X8: a,X7: a] :
                  ( ( ( ( X6 @ X7 )
                      = $true )
                    & ( ( X6 @ X8 )
                      = $true ) )
                 => ( ( X6 @ ( cP @ X7 @ X8 ) )
                    = $true ) )
              & ( ( X6 @ cZ )
                = $true ) )
           => ! [X9: a] :
                ( ( X6 @ X9 )
                = $true ) )
        & ! [X5: a,X3: a,X2: a,X4: a] :
            ( ( ( cP @ X3 @ X4 )
              = ( cP @ X2 @ X5 ) )
           => ( ( X4 = X5 )
              & ( X2 = X3 ) ) )
        & ! [X1: a,X0: a] :
            ( ( cP @ X0 @ X1 )
           != cZ ) )
     => ! [X10: a] :
          ( ( cZ = X10 )
          | ? [X11: a,X12: a] :
              ( ( cP @ X11 @ X12 )
              = X10 ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ( ( ! [X0: a,X1: a] :
            ( ( cP @ X0 @ X1 )
           != cZ )
        & ! [X2: a,X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
            ( ( ( cP @ X3 @ X4 )
              = ( cP @ X2 @ X5 ) )
           => ( ( X2 = X3 )
              & ( X4 = X5 ) ) )
        & ! [X6: a > $o] :
            ( ( ! [X7: a,X8: a] :
                  ( ( ( X6 @ X8 )
                    & ( X6 @ X7 ) )
                 => ( X6 @ ( cP @ X7 @ X8 ) ) )
              & ( X6 @ cZ ) )
           => ! [X9: a] : ( X6 @ X9 ) ) )
     => ! [X10: a] :
          ( ( cZ = X10 )
          | ? [X11: a,X12: a] :
              ( ( cP @ X11 @ X12 )
              = X10 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [X0: a,X1: a] :
            ( ( cP @ X0 @ X1 )
           != cZ )
        & ! [X1: a,X0: a,X2: a,X3: a] :
            ( ( ( cP @ X0 @ X2 )
              = ( cP @ X1 @ X3 ) )
           => ( ( X0 = X1 )
              & ( X2 = X3 ) ) )
        & ! [X4: a > $o] :
            ( ( ! [X0: a,X1: a] :
                  ( ( ( X4 @ X1 )
                    & ( X4 @ X0 ) )
                 => ( X4 @ ( cP @ X0 @ X1 ) ) )
              & ( X4 @ cZ ) )
           => ! [X0: a] : ( X4 @ X0 ) ) )
     => ! [X0: a] :
          ( ( cZ = X0 )
          | ? [X1: a,X5: a] :
              ( ( cP @ X1 @ X5 )
              = X0 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [X0: a,X1: a] :
          ( ( cP @ X0 @ X1 )
         != cZ )
      & ! [X1: a,X0: a,X2: a,X3: a] :
          ( ( ( cP @ X0 @ X2 )
            = ( cP @ X1 @ X3 ) )
         => ( ( X0 = X1 )
            & ( X2 = X3 ) ) )
      & ! [X4: a > $o] :
          ( ( ! [X0: a,X1: a] :
                ( ( ( X4 @ X1 )
                  & ( X4 @ X0 ) )
               => ( X4 @ ( cP @ X0 @ X1 ) ) )
            & ( X4 @ cZ ) )
         => ! [X0: a] : ( X4 @ X0 ) ) )
   => ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( cZ = X0 )
        | ? [X1: a,X5: a] :
            ( ( cP @ X1 @ X5 )
            = X0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.c8VKnJbKCs/DTF2THF_9129.p',cS_LEM1D_pme) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
      ( ( cP @ X3 @ X4 )
     != sK0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    cZ != sK0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEV195^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:42:34 EST 2026
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.19/0.46  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.19/0.46  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.19/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46  % File     : SEV195^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.19/0.46  % Domain   : Set Theory (Sets of sets)
% 0.19/0.46  % Problem  : TPS problem from S-THMS
% 0.19/0.46  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.19/0.46  % English  :
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  % Refs     : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.46  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.19/0.46  % Names    : tps_1034 [Bro09]
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.19/0.46  % Rating   : 0.33 v9.1.0, 0.25 v9.0.0, 0.30 v8.2.0, 0.54 v8.1.0, 0.45 v7.5.0, 0.14 v7.4.0, 0.33 v7.2.0, 0.25 v7.0.0, 0.43 v6.4.0, 0.50 v6.3.0, 0.40 v6.2.0, 0.71 v6.1.0, 0.57 v5.5.0, 1.00 v5.3.0, 0.80 v5.2.0, 1.00 v5.1.0, 0.80 v4.1.0, 0.67 v4.0.0
% 0.19/0.46  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    4 (   0 unt;   3 typ;   0 def)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Number of atoms       :    6 (   6 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   6 avg)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Number of connectives :   26 (   1   ~;   1   |;   5   &;  15   @)
% 0.19/0.46  %                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Maximal formula depth :   13 (  13 avg)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Number of symbols     :    3 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Number of variables   :   13 (   0   ^;  11   !;   2   ?;  13   :)
% 0.19/0.46  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.19/0.46  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.19/0.46  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.19/0.46  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.19/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46  thf(a_type,type,
% 0.19/0.46      a: $tType ).
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  thf(cP,type,
% 0.19/0.46      cP: a > a > a ).
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  thf(cZ,type,
% 0.19/0.46      cZ: a ).
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  thf(cS_LEM1D_pme,conjecture,
% 0.19/0.46      ( ( ! [Xx: a,Xy: a] :
% 0.19/0.46            ( ( cP @ Xx @ Xy )
% 0.19/0.46           != cZ )
% 0.19/0.46        & ! [Xx: a,Xy: a,Xu: a,Xv: a] :
% 0.19/0.46            ( ( ( cP @ Xx @ Xu )
% 0.19/0.46              = ( cP @ Xy @ Xv ) )
% 0.19/0.46           => ( ( Xx = Xy )
% 0.19/0.46              & ( Xu = Xv ) ) )
% 0.19/0.46        & ! [X: a > $o] :
% 0.19/0.46            ( ( ( X @ cZ )
% 0.19/0.46              & ! [Xx: a,Xy: a] :
% 0.19/0.46                  ( ( ( X @ Xx )
% 0.19/0.46                    & ( X @ Xy ) )
% 0.19/0.46                 => ( X @ ( cP @ Xx @ Xy ) ) ) )
% 0.19/0.46           => ! [Xx: a] : ( X @ Xx ) ) )
% 0.19/0.46     => ! [Xx: a] :
% 0.19/0.46          ( ( Xx = cZ )
% 0.19/0.46          | ? [Xy: a,Xz: a] :
% 0.19/0.46              ( Xx
% 0.19/0.46              = ( cP @ Xy @ Xz ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46  ------------------------
% 1.50/1.25  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.50/1.25  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.50/1.25  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:42:35 EST 2026
% 1.50/1.25  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.50/1.25  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.50/1.25  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.50/1.25  
% 1.50/1.25  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.c8VKnJbKCs/DTF2DTF9129.p
% See solution above
% 1.50/1.25  ------------------------
% 1.50/1.26  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.50/1.26  thf(a_type,type,
% 1.50/1.26      a: $tType ).
% 1.50/1.26  
% 1.50/1.26  thf(cP,type,
% 1.50/1.26      cP: a > a > a ).
% 1.50/1.26  
% 1.50/1.26  thf(cZ,type,
% 1.50/1.26      cZ: a ).
% 1.50/1.26  
% 1.50/1.26  thf(cS_LEM1D_pme,conjecture,
% 1.50/1.26      ( ( ! [Xx: a,Xy: a] :
% 1.50/1.26            ( ( cP @ Xx @ Xy )
% 1.50/1.26           != cZ )
% 1.50/1.26        & ! [Xx: a,Xy: a,Xu: a,Xv: a] :
% 1.50/1.26            ( ( ( cP @ Xx @ Xu )
% 1.50/1.26              = ( cP @ Xy @ Xv ) )
% 1.50/1.26           => ( ( Xx = Xy )
% 1.50/1.26              & ( Xu = Xv ) ) )
% 1.50/1.26        & ! [X: a > $o] :
% 1.50/1.26            ( ( ( X @ cZ )
% 1.50/1.26              & ! [Xx: a,Xy: a] :
% 1.50/1.26                  ( ( ( X @ Xx )
% 1.50/1.26                    & ( X @ Xy ) )
% 1.50/1.26                 => ( X @ ( cP @ Xx @ Xy ) ) ) )
% 1.50/1.26           => ! [Xx: a] : ( X @ Xx ) ) )
% 1.50/1.26     => ! [Xx: a] :
% 1.50/1.26          ( ( Xx = cZ )
% 1.50/1.26          | ? [Xy: a,Xz: a] :
% 1.50/1.26              ( Xx
% 1.50/1.26              = ( cP @ Xy @ Xz ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.50/1.26  ------------------------
% 1.50/1.28  % (9322)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_9129 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 1.50/1.28  % (9318)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_9129 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 1.50/1.28  % (9318)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.50/1.28  % (9318)------------------------------
% 1.50/1.28  % (9318)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.50/1.28  % (9318)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.50/1.28  % (9318)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.50/1.28  
% 1.50/1.28  % (9318)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.50/1.28  % (9318)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.50/1.28  % (9318)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 1.50/1.28  % (9318)------------------------------
% 1.50/1.28  % (9318)------------------------------
% 1.50/1.28  % (9323)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_9129 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 1.50/1.28  % (9322)First to succeed.
% 1.50/1.28  % (9319)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_9129 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 1.50/1.28  % (9321)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_9129 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.50/1.29  % (9320)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_9129 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.50/1.29  % (9321)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.50/1.29  % (9321)------------------------------
% 1.50/1.29  % (9321)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.50/1.29  % (9321)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.50/1.29  % (9321)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 1.50/1.29  
% 1.50/1.29  % (9321)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 1.50/1.29  % (9321)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.50/1.29  % (9321)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.50/1.29  % (9321)------------------------------
% 1.50/1.29  % (9321)------------------------------
% 1.50/1.29  % (9322)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.50/1.29  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_9129
% 1.50/1.29  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_9129
% 1.50/1.29  thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(func_def_1, type, cP: a > a > a).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(func_def_2, type, cZ: a).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(func_def_6, type, sK0: a).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(func_def_7, type, sK1: (a > $o) > a).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(func_def_8, type, sK2: (a > $o) > a).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(func_def_11, type, ph4: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(f272,plain,(
% 1.50/1.29    $false),
% 1.50/1.29    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f245])).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(f245,plain,(
% 1.50/1.29    (sK0 != sK0) | (cZ != cZ)),
% 1.50/1.29    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f18,f207])).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(f207,plain,(
% 1.50/1.29    ( ! [X0 : a] : ((cZ = X0) | (sK0 != X0)) )),
% 1.50/1.29    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f17,f98])).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(f98,plain,(
% 1.50/1.29    ( ! [X0 : a] : (((cP @ (sK2 @ (^[Y0 : a]: (~ (X0 = Y0)))) @ (sK1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: (~ (X0 = Y0))))) = X0) | (cZ = X0)) )),
% 1.50/1.29    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f97])).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(f97,plain,(
% 1.50/1.29    ( ! [X0 : a] : (($true = (X0 = cZ)) | ((cP @ (sK2 @ (^[Y0 : a]: (~ (X0 = Y0)))) @ (sK1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: (~ (X0 = Y0))))) = X0)) )),
% 1.50/1.29    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f96])).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(f96,plain,(
% 1.50/1.29    ( ! [X0 : a] : (((cP @ (sK2 @ (^[Y0 : a]: (~ (X0 = Y0)))) @ (sK1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: (~ (X0 = Y0))))) = X0) | ($true != (~ (X0 = cZ)))) )),
% 1.50/1.29    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f81])).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(f81,plain,(
% 1.50/1.29    ( ! [X0 : a] : ((((^[Y0 : a]: (~ (X0 = Y0))) @ cZ) != $true) | ((cP @ (sK2 @ (^[Y0 : a]: (~ (X0 = Y0)))) @ (sK1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: (~ (X0 = Y0))))) = X0)) )),
% 1.50/1.29    inference(leibniz_equality_elimination,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.50/1.29    ( ! [X8 : a,X5 : a > $o] : (((X5 @ (cP @ (sK2 @ X5) @ (sK1 @ X5))) != $true) | ((X5 @ X8) = $true) | ((X5 @ cZ) != $true)) )),
% 1.50/1.29    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.50/1.29    ! [X0 : a,X1 : a] : (cZ != (cP @ X1 @ X0)) & ((cZ != sK0) & ! [X3 : a,X4 : a] : ((cP @ X3 @ X4) != sK0)) & ! [X5 : a > $o] : ((($true = (X5 @ (sK1 @ X5))) & ((X5 @ (sK2 @ X5)) = $true) & ((X5 @ (cP @ (sK2 @ X5) @ (sK1 @ X5))) != $true)) | ! [X8 : a] : ((X5 @ X8) = $true) | ((X5 @ cZ) != $true)) & ! [X9 : a,X10 : a,X11 : a,X12 : a] : (((X9 = X11) & (X10 = X12)) | ((cP @ X12 @ X11) != (cP @ X10 @ X9)))),
% 1.50/1.29    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f8,f10,f9])).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.50/1.29    ? [X2 : a] : ((cZ != X2) & ! [X3 : a,X4 : a] : ((cP @ X3 @ X4) != X2)) => ((cZ != sK0) & ! [X4 : a,X3 : a] : ((cP @ X3 @ X4) != sK0))),
% 1.50/1.29    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.50/1.29    ! [X5 : a > $o] : (? [X6 : a,X7 : a] : (((X5 @ X6) = $true) & ((X5 @ X7) = $true) & ($true != (X5 @ (cP @ X7 @ X6)))) => (($true = (X5 @ (sK1 @ X5))) & ((X5 @ (sK2 @ X5)) = $true) & ((X5 @ (cP @ (sK2 @ X5) @ (sK1 @ X5))) != $true)))),
% 1.50/1.29    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.50/1.29    ! [X0 : a,X1 : a] : (cZ != (cP @ X1 @ X0)) & ? [X2 : a] : ((cZ != X2) & ! [X3 : a,X4 : a] : ((cP @ X3 @ X4) != X2)) & ! [X5 : a > $o] : (? [X6 : a,X7 : a] : (((X5 @ X6) = $true) & ((X5 @ X7) = $true) & ($true != (X5 @ (cP @ X7 @ X6)))) | ! [X8 : a] : ((X5 @ X8) = $true) | ((X5 @ cZ) != $true)) & ! [X9 : a,X10 : a,X11 : a,X12 : a] : (((X9 = X11) & (X10 = X12)) | ((cP @ X12 @ X11) != (cP @ X10 @ X9)))),
% 1.50/1.29    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.50/1.29    ! [X1 : a,X0 : a] : ((cP @ X0 @ X1) != cZ) & ? [X10 : a] : ((cZ != X10) & ! [X11 : a,X12 : a] : ((cP @ X11 @ X12) != X10)) & ! [X6 : a > $o] : (? [X8 : a,X7 : a] : (((X6 @ X8) = $true) & ((X6 @ X7) = $true) & ((X6 @ (cP @ X7 @ X8)) != $true)) | ! [X9 : a] : ((X6 @ X9) = $true) | ((X6 @ cZ) != $true)) & ! [X4 : a,X3 : a,X5 : a,X2 : a] : (((X4 = X5) & (X2 = X3)) | ((cP @ X3 @ X4) != (cP @ X2 @ X5)))),
% 1.50/1.29    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.50/1.29    ? [X10 : a] : ((cZ != X10) & ! [X11 : a,X12 : a] : ((cP @ X11 @ X12) != X10)) & (! [X6 : a > $o] : (! [X9 : a] : ((X6 @ X9) = $true) | (? [X8 : a,X7 : a] : (((X6 @ (cP @ X7 @ X8)) != $true) & (((X6 @ X7) = $true) & ((X6 @ X8) = $true))) | ((X6 @ cZ) != $true))) & ! [X4 : a,X3 : a,X5 : a,X2 : a] : (((X4 = X5) & (X2 = X3)) | ((cP @ X3 @ X4) != (cP @ X2 @ X5))) & ! [X1 : a,X0 : a] : ((cP @ X0 @ X1) != cZ))),
% 1.50/1.29    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.50/1.29    ~((! [X6 : a > $o] : ((! [X8 : a,X7 : a] : ((((X6 @ X7) = $true) & ((X6 @ X8) = $true)) => ((X6 @ (cP @ X7 @ X8)) = $true)) & ((X6 @ cZ) = $true)) => ! [X9 : a] : ((X6 @ X9) = $true)) & ! [X5 : a,X3 : a,X2 : a,X4 : a] : (((cP @ X3 @ X4) = (cP @ X2 @ X5)) => ((X4 = X5) & (X2 = X3))) & ! [X1 : a,X0 : a] : ((cP @ X0 @ X1) != cZ)) => ! [X10 : a] : ((cZ = X10) | ? [X11 : a,X12 : a] : ((cP @ X11 @ X12) = X10)))),
% 1.50/1.29    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.50/1.29    ~((! [X0 : a,X1 : a] : ((cP @ X0 @ X1) != cZ) & ! [X2 : a,X3 : a,X4 : a,X5 : a] : (((cP @ X3 @ X4) = (cP @ X2 @ X5)) => ((X2 = X3) & (X4 = X5))) & ! [X6 : a > $o] : ((! [X7 : a,X8 : a] : (((X6 @ X8) & (X6 @ X7)) => (X6 @ (cP @ X7 @ X8))) & (X6 @ cZ)) => ! [X9 : a] : (X6 @ X9))) => ! [X10 : a] : ((cZ = X10) | ? [X11 : a,X12 : a] : ((cP @ X11 @ X12) = X10)))),
% 1.50/1.29    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.50/1.29    ~((! [X0 : a,X1 : a] : ((cP @ X0 @ X1) != cZ) & ! [X1 : a,X0 : a,X2 : a,X3 : a] : (((cP @ X0 @ X2) = (cP @ X1 @ X3)) => ((X0 = X1) & (X2 = X3))) & ! [X4 : a > $o] : ((! [X0 : a,X1 : a] : (((X4 @ X1) & (X4 @ X0)) => (X4 @ (cP @ X0 @ X1))) & (X4 @ cZ)) => ! [X0 : a] : (X4 @ X0))) => ! [X0 : a] : ((cZ = X0) | ? [X1 : a,X5 : a] : ((cP @ X1 @ X5) = X0)))),
% 1.50/1.29    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.50/1.29    (! [X0 : a,X1 : a] : ((cP @ X0 @ X1) != cZ) & ! [X1 : a,X0 : a,X2 : a,X3 : a] : (((cP @ X0 @ X2) = (cP @ X1 @ X3)) => ((X0 = X1) & (X2 = X3))) & ! [X4 : a > $o] : ((! [X0 : a,X1 : a] : (((X4 @ X1) & (X4 @ X0)) => (X4 @ (cP @ X0 @ X1))) & (X4 @ cZ)) => ! [X0 : a] : (X4 @ X0))) => ! [X0 : a] : ((cZ = X0) | ? [X1 : a,X5 : a] : ((cP @ X1 @ X5) = X0))),
% 1.50/1.29    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.c8VKnJbKCs/DTF2THF_9129.p',cS_LEM1D_pme)).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.50/1.29    ( ! [X3 : a,X4 : a] : (((cP @ X3 @ X4) != sK0)) )),
% 1.50/1.29    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.50/1.29  thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.50/1.29    (cZ != sK0)),
% 1.50/1.29    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.50/1.29  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_9129
% 1.50/1.29  % (9322)------------------------------
% 1.50/1.29  % (9322)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.50/1.29  % (9322)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.50/1.29  
% 1.50/1.29  % (9322)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 1.50/1.29  % (9322)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 1.50/1.29  % (9322)Instructions burned: 19 (million)
% 1.50/1.29  % (9322)------------------------------
% 1.50/1.29  % (9322)------------------------------
% 1.50/1.29  % (9316)Success in time 0.002 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------