↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SEV195^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:36:59 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 98.94s 26.72s
% Output   : Refutation 98.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   19
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  10 unt;   0 typ;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   92 (  88 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  350 (  75   ~;  38   |;  29   &; 190   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  18  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   21 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   13 (  13   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  117 (  26   ^;  76   !;  12   ?; 117   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   3  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(a_type,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(cP_decl,type,
    cP: a > a > a ).

thf(cZ_decl,type,
    cZ: a ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: ( a > $o ) > a ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: ( a > $o ) > a ).

thf(sk3_decl,type,
    sk3: a ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( ^ [A: a > $o] :
        @+[B: a] :
          ~ ! [C: a] :
              ( ( ( A @ B )
                & ( A @ C ) )
             => ( A @ ( cP @ B @ C ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( ^ [A: a > $o] :
        @+[B: a] :
          ~ ( ( ( A @ ( sk1 @ A ) )
              & ( A @ B ) )
           => ( A @ ( cP @ ( sk1 @ A ) @ B ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk3_def,definition,
    ( sk3
    = ( @+[A: a] :
          ~ ( ( A = cZ )
            | ? [B: a,C: a] :
                ( A
                = ( cP @ B @ C ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [A: a,B: a] :
          ( ( cP @ A @ B )
         != cZ )
      & ! [A: a,B: a,C: a,D: a] :
          ( ( ( cP @ A @ C )
            = ( cP @ B @ D ) )
         => ( ( A = B )
            & ( C = D ) ) )
      & ! [A: a > $o] :
          ( ( ( A @ cZ )
            & ! [B: a,C: a] :
                ( ( ( A @ B )
                  & ( A @ C ) )
               => ( A @ ( cP @ B @ C ) ) ) )
         => ! [B: a] : ( A @ B ) ) )
   => ! [A: a] :
        ( ( A = cZ )
        | ? [B: a,C: a] :
            ( A
            = ( cP @ B @ C ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cS_LEM1D_pme) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [A: a,B: a] :
            ( ( cP @ A @ B )
           != cZ )
        & ! [A: a,B: a,C: a,D: a] :
            ( ( ( cP @ A @ C )
              = ( cP @ B @ D ) )
           => ( ( A = B )
              & ( C = D ) ) )
        & ! [A: a > $o] :
            ( ( ( A @ cZ )
              & ! [B: a,C: a] :
                  ( ( ( A @ B )
                    & ( A @ C ) )
                 => ( A @ ( cP @ B @ C ) ) ) )
           => ! [B: a] : ( A @ B ) ) )
     => ! [A: a] :
          ( ( A = cZ )
          | ? [B: a,C: a] :
              ( A
              = ( cP @ B @ C ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ( ( ! [A: a,B: a] :
            ( ( cP @ A @ B )
           != cZ )
        & ! [A: a,B: a,C: a,D: a] :
            ( ( ( cP @ A @ C )
              = ( cP @ B @ D ) )
           => ( ( A = B )
              & ( C = D ) ) )
        & ! [A: a > $o] :
            ( ( ( A @ cZ )
              & ! [B: a,C: a] :
                  ( ( ( A @ B )
                    & ( A @ C ) )
                 => ( A @ ( cP @ B @ C ) ) ) )
           => ! [B: a] : ( A @ B ) ) )
     => ! [A: a] :
          ( ( A = cZ )
          | ? [B: a,C: a] :
              ( A
              = ( cP @ B @ C ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ~ ( ( ~ ? [A: a,B: a] :
              ( ( cP @ A @ B )
              = cZ )
        & ! [A: a,B: a,C: a,D: a] :
            ( ( ( cP @ A @ C )
              = ( cP @ B @ D ) )
           => ( ( A = B )
              & ( C = D ) ) )
        & ! [A: a > $o] :
            ( ( ( A @ cZ )
              & ! [B: a,C: a] :
                  ( ( ( A @ B )
                    & ( A @ C ) )
                 => ( A @ ( cP @ B @ C ) ) ) )
           => ! [B: a] : ( A @ B ) ) )
     => ! [A: a] :
          ( ( A = cZ )
          | ? [B: a,C: a] :
              ( A
              = ( cP @ B @ C ) ) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ! [J: a,I: a,H: a,G: a > $o,F: a,E: a,D: a,C: a,B: a,A: a] :
      ( ( ( cP @ A @ B )
       != cZ )
      & ( ( ( cP @ C @ E )
         != ( cP @ D @ F ) )
        | ( C = D ) )
      & ( ( ( cP @ C @ E )
         != ( cP @ D @ F ) )
        | ( E = F ) )
      & ( ~ ( G @ cZ )
        | ( G @ ( sk1 @ G ) )
        | ( G @ H ) )
      & ( ~ ( G @ cZ )
        | ( G @ ( sk2 @ G ) )
        | ( G @ H ) )
      & ( ~ ( G @ cZ )
        | ~ ( G @ ( cP @ ( sk1 @ G ) @ ( sk2 @ G ) ) )
        | ( G @ H ) )
      & ( sk3 != cZ )
      & ( sk3
       != ( cP @ I @ J ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ! [B: a,A: a > $o] :
      ( ~ ( A @ cZ )
      | ~ ( A @ ( cP @ ( sk1 @ A ) @ ( sk2 @ A ) ) )
      | ( A @ B ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [B: a,A: a > $o] :
      ( ~ ( A @ cZ )
      | ~ ( A @ ( cP @ ( sk1 @ A ) @ ( sk2 @ A ) ) )
      | ( A @ B ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(47,plain,
    ! [B: a > $o,A: a] :
      ( ~ ~ ( B @ cZ )
      | ~ ~ ( B
            @ ( cP
              @ ( sk1
                @ ^ [C: a] :
                    ~ ( B @ C ) )
              @ ( sk2
                @ ^ [C: a] :
                    ~ ( B @ C ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( B @ A ) ),
    inference(prim_subst,[status(thm)],[24:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [D: a] : ~ ( C @ D ) ))]]) ).

thf(71,plain,
    ! [B: a > $o,A: a] :
      ( ( B @ cZ )
      | ( B
        @ ( cP
          @ ( sk1
            @ ^ [C: a] :
                ~ ( B @ C ) )
          @ ( sk2
            @ ^ [C: a] :
                ~ ( B @ C ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( B @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[47]) ).

thf(72,plain,
    ! [B: a > $o,A: a] :
      ( ( B @ cZ )
      | ( B
        @ ( cP
          @ ( sk1
            @ ^ [C: a] :
                ~ ( B @ C ) )
          @ ( sk2
            @ ^ [C: a] :
                ~ ( B @ C ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( B @ A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[71]) ).

thf(11150,plain,
    ! [B: a > $o,A: a] :
      ( ( B @ cZ )
      | ~ ( B @ A )
      | ( ( B
          @ ( cP
            @ ( sk1
              @ ^ [C: a] :
                  ~ ( B @ C ) )
            @ ( sk2
              @ ^ [C: a] :
                  ~ ( B @ C ) ) ) )
       != ( B @ cZ ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[72]) ).

thf(11270,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ( A = cZ )
      | ( A != A )
      | ( ( A
          = ( cP
            @ ( sk1
              @ ^ [B: a] : ( A != B ) )
            @ ( sk2
              @ ^ [B: a] : ( A != B ) ) ) )
       != ( A = cZ ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(replace_leibeq,[status(thm)],[11150:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( (=) @ a @ A ))]]) ).

thf(11324,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ( A = cZ )
      | ( A != A )
      | ( ( A
          = ( cP
            @ ( sk1
              @ ^ [B: a] : ( A != B ) )
            @ ( sk2
              @ ^ [B: a] : ( A != B ) ) ) )
       != ( A = cZ ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[11270]) ).

thf(11681,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ( A = cZ )
      | ( ( A
          = ( cP
            @ ( sk1
              @ ^ [B: a] : ( A != B ) )
            @ ( sk2
              @ ^ [B: a] : ( A != B ) ) ) )
       != ( A = cZ ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[11324]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    sk3 != cZ,
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    sk3 != cZ,
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(17476,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ( ( A
          = ( cP
            @ ( sk1
              @ ^ [B: a] : ( A != B ) )
            @ ( sk2
              @ ^ [B: a] : ( A != B ) ) ) )
       != ( A = cZ ) )
      | ( cZ != cZ )
      | ( A != sk3 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[11681,25]) ).

thf(17477,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ( ( A
          = ( cP
            @ ( sk1
              @ ^ [B: a] : ( A != B ) )
            @ ( sk2
              @ ^ [B: a] : ( A != B ) ) ) )
       != ( A = cZ ) )
      | ( A != sk3 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[17476]) ).

thf(17478,plain,
    ( ( sk3
      = ( cP
        @ ( sk1
          @ ^ [A: a] : ( sk3 != A ) )
        @ ( sk2
          @ ^ [A: a] : ( sk3 != A ) ) ) )
   != ( sk3 = cZ ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[17477:[bind(A,$thf( sk3 ))]]) ).

thf(18269,plain,
    ( ( sk3
      = ( cP
        @ ( sk1
          @ ^ [A: a] : ( sk3 != A ) )
        @ ( sk2
          @ ^ [A: a] : ( sk3 != A ) ) ) )
    | ( sk3 = cZ ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[17478]) ).

thf(18316,plain,
    ( ( ( cP
        @ ( sk1
          @ ^ [A: a] : ( sk3 != A ) )
        @ ( sk2
          @ ^ [A: a] : ( sk3 != A ) ) )
      = sk3 )
    | ( sk3 = cZ ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[18269]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ! [B: a,A: a] :
      ( sk3
     != ( cP @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(34,plain,
    ! [B: a,A: a] :
      ( ( cP @ A @ B )
     != sk3 ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(35,plain,
    ! [B: a,A: a] :
      ( ( cP @ A @ B )
     != sk3 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[34]) ).

thf(18384,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simplifyReflect,[status(thm)],[18316,35,25]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEV195^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.09/0.20  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 15:20:07 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.20  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.87/0.80  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.21/0.99  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (193ms). 
% 1.21/1.01  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.99/1.41  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.99/1.42  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.18/1.52  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.18/1.56  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.18/1.56  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.18/1.57  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.18/1.57  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 98.94/26.71  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 98.94/26.72  % Time passed: 26375ms (effective reasoning time: 25700ms)
% 98.94/26.72  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 98.94/26.72  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 98.94/26.72  % No. of inferences in proof: 25
% 98.94/26.72  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 26375 ms resp. 25700 ms w/o parsing
% 98.94/26.75  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 98.94/26.75  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------