%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : SEV225^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:37:01 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 2.81s 1.96s
% Output : Refutation 2.81s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 2 unt; 0 typ; 1 def)
% Number of atoms : 13 ( 4 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 23 ( 7 ~; 0 |; 3 &; 10 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 5 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 0 ^; 5 !; 0 ?; 5 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(r_type,type,
r: $tType ).
thf(c0_decl,type,
c0: r ).
thf(less_decl,type,
less: r > r > $o ).
thf(cIRREFLEXIVE_LAW_decl,type,
cIRREFLEXIVE_LAW: $o ).
thf(cIRREFLEXIVE_LAW_def,definition,
( cIRREFLEXIVE_LAW
= ( ! [A: r] :
~ ( less @ A @ A ) ) ) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
( cIRREFLEXIVE_LAW
=> ! [A: r] :
~ ( ( less @ A @ c0 )
& ( A = c0 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cPARNAS_FIG3_A) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( cIRREFLEXIVE_LAW
=> ! [A: r] :
~ ( ( less @ A @ c0 )
& ( A = c0 ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(3,plain,
~ ( ! [A: r] :
~ ( less @ A @ A )
=> ! [A: r] :
~ ( ( less @ A @ c0 )
& ( A = c0 ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(11,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SEV225^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.20 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.20 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.20 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.20 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.20 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.20 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.20 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.20 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 15:23:02 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.20 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.20 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.86/0.79 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.18/0.97 % [INFO] Parsing done (177ms).
% 1.18/0.98 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.74/1.37 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.74/1.37 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 1.94/1.47 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 2.09/1.50 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 2.09/1.50 % [INFO] Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF).
% 2.09/1.50 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.09/1.51 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 2.81/1.96 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 2.81/1.96 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 2.81/1.96 % Time passed: 1618ms (effective reasoning time: 971ms)
% 2.81/1.96 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 2.81/1.96 % Axioms used in derivation (0):
% 2.81/1.96 % No. of inferences in proof: 4
% 2.81/1.96 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1618 ms resp. 971 ms w/o parsing
% 2.81/1.99 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.81/1.99 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------