↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SEV225^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sB98LvOCGi true

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:57:24 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.58s 0.82s
% Output   : Refutation 0.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   10 (   7 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   20 (   6 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   35 (   9   ~;   0   |;   3   &;  20   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   0   ^;   8   !;   0   ?;   8   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(r_type,type,
    r: $tType ).

thf(less_type,type,
    less: r > r > $o ).

thf(cIRREFLEXIVE_LAW_type,type,
    cIRREFLEXIVE_LAW: $o ).

thf(sk__1_type,type,
    sk__1: r ).

thf(c0_type,type,
    c0: r ).

thf(cIRREFLEXIVE_LAW_def,axiom,
    ( cIRREFLEXIVE_LAW
    = ( ! [Xx: r] :
          ~ ( less @ Xx @ Xx ) ) ) ).

thf('0',plain,
    ( cIRREFLEXIVE_LAW
    = ( ! [X4: r] :
          ~ ( less @ X4 @ X4 ) ) ),
    define([status(thm)]) ).

thf(cPARNAS_FIG3_A,conjecture,
    ( cIRREFLEXIVE_LAW
   => ! [Xx: r] :
        ~ ( ( less @ Xx @ c0 )
          & ( Xx = c0 ) ) ) ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,conjecture,
    ( ! [X4: r] :
        ~ ( less @ X4 @ X4 )
   => ! [X6: r] :
        ~ ( ( less @ X6 @ c0 )
          & ( X6 = c0 ) ) ) ).

thf(zf_stmt_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X4: r] :
          ~ ( less @ X4 @ X4 )
     => ! [X6: r] :
          ~ ( ( less @ X6 @ c0 )
            & ( X6 = c0 ) ) ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl1,plain,
    less @ sk__1 @ c0,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_1]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl2,plain,
    sk__1 = c0,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_1]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl3,plain,
    less @ c0 @ c0,
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl1,zip_derived_cl2]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl0,plain,
    ! [X0: r] :
      ~ ( less @ X0 @ X0 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_1]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl4,plain,
    $false,
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl3,zip_derived_cl0]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.14  % Problem  : SEV225^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.09/0.15  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sB98LvOCGi true
% 0.16/0.36  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 15:38:53 EDT 2025
% 0.16/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.37  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.16/0.37  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.37  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.16/0.37  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.16/0.37  % Running in HO mode
% 0.54/0.64  % Total configuration time : 828
% 0.54/0.64  % Estimated wc time : 1656
% 0.54/0.64  % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0
% 0.58/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s
% 0.58/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s
% 0.58/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s
% 0.58/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s
% 0.58/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s
% 0.58/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s
% 0.58/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s
% 0.58/0.82  % Solved by lams/40_c.s.sh.
% 0.58/0.82  % done 2 iterations in 0.010s
% 0.58/0.82  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.58/0.82  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.58/0.82  
% 0.58/0.82  
% 0.58/0.82  % Terminating...
% 1.81/0.86  % Runner terminated.
% 1.84/0.88  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------