↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEV229^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:39:11 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.27s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   27
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  118 (  16 unt;   0 typ;   9 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  758 ( 155 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  788 (  81   ~; 193   |;  41   &; 356   @)
%                                         (   9 <=>;  75  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   18 (  18   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   26 (  22 usr;  15 con; 0-4 aty)
%                                         (  33  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :  101 (   0 sgn  36   !;   0   ?; 101   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    cE: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    cD: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    vPI: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    db1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    vAND: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    sK0: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    sK1: a ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    sK2: a ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    sK3: a ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ( ( ^ [X0: a > $o] :
        ! [X1: a] :
          ( ( X0 @ X1 )
         => ( ( cE @ X1 )
            & ( cD @ X1 ) ) ) )
    = ( ^ [X1: a > $o] :
          ( ! [X2: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X2 )
             => ( cE @ X2 ) )
          & ! [X2: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X2 )
             => ( cD @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cX5209_pme) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ^ [X0: a > $o] :
        ! [X1: a] :
          ( ( X0 @ X1 )
         => ( ( cE @ X1 )
            & ( cD @ X1 ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [X1: a > $o] :
          ( ! [X2: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X2 )
             => ( cE @ X2 ) )
          & ! [X2: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X2 )
             => ( cD @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f3,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: a > $o] :
        ! [X1: a] :
          ( ( X0 @ X1 )
         => ( ( cE @ X1 )
            & ( cD @ X1 ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [X2: a > $o] :
          ( ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( X2 @ X3 )
             => ( cE @ X3 ) )
          & ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( X2 @ X4 )
             => ( cD @ X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y1: a] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
             => ( ( cD @ Y1 )
                & ( cE @ Y1 ) ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
               => ( cD @ Y1 ) ) )
          & ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
               => ( cE @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y1: a] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
             => ( ( cD @ Y1 )
                & ( cE @ Y1 ) ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
               => ( cD @ Y1 ) ) )
          & ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
               => ( cE @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y1: a] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
             => ( ( cD @ Y1 )
                & ( cE @ Y1 ) ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
               => ( cD @ Y1 ) ) )
          & ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
               => ( cE @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y1: a] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
             => ( ( cD @ Y1 )
                & ( cE @ Y1 ) ) ) )
      @ sK0 )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
               => ( cD @ Y1 ) ) )
          & ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
               => ( cE @ Y1 ) ) ) )
      @ sK0 ) ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
            ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
               => ( ( cD @ Y1 )
                  & ( cE @ Y1 ) ) ) )
        @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
            ( ( !! @ a
              @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                  ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
                 => ( cD @ Y1 ) ) )
            & ( !! @ a
              @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                  ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
                 => ( cE @ Y1 ) ) ) )
        @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
            ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
               => ( ( cD @ Y1 )
                  & ( cE @ Y1 ) ) ) )
        @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
            ( ( !! @ a
              @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                  ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
                 => ( cD @ Y1 ) ) )
            & ( !! @ a
              @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                  ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
                 => ( cE @ Y1 ) ) ) )
        @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
           => ( ( cD @ Y0 )
              & ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
             => ( cD @ Y0 ) ) )
        & ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
             => ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
           => ( ( cD @ Y0 )
              & ( cE @ Y0 ) ) )
        @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
             => ( cD @ Y0 ) ) )
        & ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
             => ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
           => ( ( cD @ Y0 )
              & ( cE @ Y0 ) ) )
        @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
           => ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
           => ( cD @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
           => ( ( cD @ Y0 )
              & ( cE @ Y0 ) ) )
        @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
           => ( cE @ Y0 ) )
        @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
           => ( cD @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
           => ( ( cD @ Y0 )
              & ( cE @ Y0 ) ) )
        @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
           => ( cE @ Y0 ) )
        @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
           => ( cD @ Y0 ) )
        @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
       => ( ( cD @ sK1 )
          & ( cE @ sK1 ) ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
       => ( cE @ sK2 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
       => ( cD @ sK3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ( cD @ sK1 )
        & ( cE @ sK1 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
       => ( cE @ sK2 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
       => ( cD @ sK3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f24]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
       => ( cE @ sK2 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
       => ( cD @ sK3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f24]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( cE @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
       => ( cD @ sK3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f26]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
       => ( cD @ sK3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f26]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( cD @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( cE @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( cD @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( cE @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( cE @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
       => ( cE @ sK2 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
       => ( cD @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( cD @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( cE @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( cE @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
       => ( cD @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( cD @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f33]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( cE @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
       => ( cD @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( cD @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f33]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( cE @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( cD @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( cD @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f35]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( cE @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( cD @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f35]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( cE @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( cE @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( cD @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( cD @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f34]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( cE @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( cE @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( cD @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f34]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
           => ( ( cD @ Y0 )
              & ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
             => ( cD @ Y0 ) ) )
        & ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
             => ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
             => ( ( cD @ Y0 )
                & ( cE @ Y0 ) ) )
          @ X1 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
               => ( cD @ Y0 ) ) )
          & ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
               => ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f40]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
             => ( ( cD @ Y0 )
                & ( cE @ Y0 ) ) )
          @ X1 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
             => ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f41]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
             => ( ( cD @ Y0 )
                & ( cE @ Y0 ) ) )
          @ X1 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
             => ( cD @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f41]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
             => ( ( cD @ Y0 )
                & ( cE @ Y0 ) ) )
          @ X1 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
             => ( cD @ Y0 ) )
          @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f43]) ).

thf(f45,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( ( sK0 @ X1 )
         => ( ( cD @ X1 )
            & ( cE @ X1 ) ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ( sK0 @ X2 )
         => ( cD @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f44]) ).

thf(f46,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ( sK0 @ X2 )
         => ( cD @ X2 ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ( cD @ X1 )
          & ( cE @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f45]) ).

thf(f47,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
      | ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X2 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ( cD @ X1 )
          & ( cE @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( ( cD @ X2 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f46]) ).

thf(f49,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
      | ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X2 ) )
      | ( ( cD @ X1 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( cD @ X2 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f47]) ).

thf(f50,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
             => ( ( cD @ Y0 )
                & ( cE @ Y0 ) ) )
          @ X1 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
             => ( cE @ Y0 ) )
          @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f42]) ).

thf(f51,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( ( sK0 @ X1 )
         => ( ( cD @ X1 )
            & ( cE @ X1 ) ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ( sK0 @ X2 )
         => ( cE @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f50]) ).

thf(f52,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ( sK0 @ X2 )
         => ( cE @ X2 ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ( cD @ X1 )
          & ( cE @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f51]) ).

thf(f53,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
      | ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X2 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ( cD @ X1 )
          & ( cE @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( ( cE @ X2 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f52]) ).

thf(f54,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
      | ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X2 ) )
      | ( ( cE @ X1 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( cE @ X2 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f53]) ).

thf(f57,definition,
    ( spl4_1
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f59,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ~ spl4_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f57]) ).

thf(f61,definition,
    ( spl4_2
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f63,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f61]) ).

thf(f65,definition,
    ( spl4_3
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f67,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK1 ) )
    | ~ spl4_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f65]) ).

thf(f68,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | spl4_2
    | spl4_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f30,f65,f61,f57]) ).

thf(f70,definition,
    ( spl4_4
  <=> ( $false
      = ( cD @ sK3 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f72,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( cD @ sK3 ) )
    | ~ spl4_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f70]) ).

thf(f73,plain,
    ( spl4_4
    | spl4_2
    | spl4_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f29,f65,f61,f70]) ).

thf(f75,definition,
    ( spl4_5
  <=> ( $false
      = ( cE @ sK2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_5])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f77,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( cE @ sK2 ) )
    | ~ spl4_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f75]) ).

thf(f78,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | spl4_5
    | spl4_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f32,f65,f75,f57]) ).

thf(f79,plain,
    ( spl4_4
    | spl4_5
    | spl4_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f31,f65,f75,f70]) ).

thf(f81,definition,
    ( spl4_6
  <=> ( $false
      = ( cD @ sK1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_6])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f83,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( cD @ sK1 ) )
    | ~ spl4_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f81]) ).

thf(f85,definition,
    ( spl4_7
  <=> ( $false
      = ( cE @ sK1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_7])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f87,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( cE @ sK1 ) )
    | ~ spl4_7 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f85]) ).

thf(f88,plain,
    ( spl4_6
    | spl4_1
    | spl4_2
    | spl4_7 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f37,f85,f61,f57,f81]) ).

thf(f89,plain,
    ( spl4_6
    | spl4_4
    | spl4_2
    | spl4_7 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f36,f85,f61,f70,f81]) ).

thf(f90,plain,
    ( spl4_6
    | spl4_1
    | spl4_5
    | spl4_7 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f39,f85,f75,f57,f81]) ).

thf(f91,plain,
    ( spl4_6
    | spl4_4
    | spl4_5
    | spl4_7 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f38,f85,f75,f70,f81]) ).

thf(f93,definition,
    ( spl4_8
  <=> ! [X2: a] :
        ( ( $false
          = ( sK0 @ X2 ) )
        | ( ( cD @ X2 )
          = $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_8])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f94,plain,
    ( ! [X2: a] :
        ( ( $false
          = ( sK0 @ X2 ) )
        | ( ( cD @ X2 )
          = $true ) )
    | ~ spl4_8 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f93]) ).

thf(f95,plain,
    ( spl4_8
    | spl4_8 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f49,f93,f93]) ).

thf(f97,definition,
    ( spl4_9
  <=> ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( $false
          = ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
        | ( ( cE @ X1 )
          = $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_9])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f98,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( $false
          = ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
        | ( ( cE @ X1 )
          = $true ) )
    | ~ spl4_9 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f97]) ).

thf(f101,plain,
    ( spl4_9
    | spl4_9 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f54,f97,f97]) ).

thf(f109,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( cE @ sK2 ) )
    | ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_9 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f98,f63]) ).

thf(f112,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cE @ sK2 ) )
    | ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_9 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f109]) ).

thf(f117,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_5
    | ~ spl4_9 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f112,f77]) ).

thf(f118,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_5
    | ~ spl4_9 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f117]) ).

thf(f119,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_5
    | ~ spl4_9 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f118]) ).

thf(f121,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( cD @ sK3 ) )
    | ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_8 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f59,f94]) ).

thf(f126,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cD @ sK3 ) )
    | ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_8 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f121]) ).

thf(f131,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_4
    | ~ spl4_8 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f126,f72]) ).

thf(f132,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_4
    | ~ spl4_8 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f131]) ).

thf(f133,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_4
    | ~ spl4_8 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f132]) ).

thf(f135,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( cD @ sK1 ) )
    | ~ spl4_3
    | ~ spl4_8 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f67,f94]) ).

thf(f136,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( cE @ sK1 ) )
    | ~ spl4_3
    | ~ spl4_9 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f98,f67]) ).

thf(f139,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cE @ sK1 ) )
    | ~ spl4_3
    | ~ spl4_9 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f136]) ).

thf(f140,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cD @ sK1 ) )
    | ~ spl4_3
    | ~ spl4_8 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f135]) ).

thf(f145,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl4_3
    | ~ spl4_6
    | ~ spl4_8 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f140,f83]) ).

thf(f146,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl4_3
    | ~ spl4_6
    | ~ spl4_8 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f145]) ).

thf(f147,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_3
    | ~ spl4_6
    | ~ spl4_8 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f146]) ).

thf(f156,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl4_3
    | ~ spl4_7
    | ~ spl4_9 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f139,f87]) ).

thf(f160,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl4_3
    | ~ spl4_7
    | ~ spl4_9 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f156]) ).

thf(f161,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_3
    | ~ spl4_7
    | ~ spl4_9 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f160]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | spl4_2
    | spl4_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f68]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( spl4_2
    | spl4_3
    | spl4_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f73]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | spl4_3
    | spl4_5 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f78]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    ( spl4_3
    | spl4_4
    | spl4_5 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f79]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | spl4_2
    | spl4_6
    | spl4_7 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f88]) ).

cnf(s6,plain,
    ( spl4_2
    | spl4_4
    | spl4_6
    | spl4_7 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f89]) ).

cnf(s7,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | spl4_5
    | spl4_6
    | spl4_7 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f90]) ).

cnf(s8,plain,
    ( spl4_4
    | spl4_5
    | spl4_6
    | spl4_7 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f91]) ).

cnf(s9,plain,
    ( spl4_8
    | spl4_8 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f95]) ).

cnf(s10,plain,
    spl4_8,
    inference(rat,[],[s9]) ).

cnf(s13,plain,
    ( spl4_9
    | spl4_9 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f101]) ).

cnf(s14,plain,
    spl4_9,
    inference(rat,[],[s13]) ).

cnf(s16,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_5
    | ~ spl4_9 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f119]) ).

cnf(s18,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_4
    | ~ spl4_8 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f133]) ).

cnf(s20,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_3
    | ~ spl4_6
    | ~ spl4_8 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f147]) ).

cnf(s22,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_3
    | ~ spl4_7
    | ~ spl4_9 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f161]) ).

cnf(s23,plain,
    ( spl4_2
    | spl4_1 ),
    inference(rat,[],[s5,s20,s22,s1,s14,s10]) ).

cnf(s24,plain,
    ( spl4_5
    | spl4_1 ),
    inference(rat,[],[s7,s20,s22,s3,s14,s10]) ).

cnf(s25,plain,
    spl4_1,
    inference(rat,[],[s24,s16,s23,s14]) ).

cnf(s26,plain,
    ~ spl4_4,
    inference(rat,[],[s18,s10,s25]) ).

cnf(s27,plain,
    ( spl4_6
    | spl4_7 ),
    inference(rat,[],[s16,s8,s6,s26,s14]) ).

cnf(s28,plain,
    ~ spl4_3,
    inference(rat,[],[s27,s20,s22,s10,s14]) ).

cnf(s29,plain,
    spl4_2,
    inference(rat,[],[s2,s26,s28]) ).

cnf(s30,plain,
    spl4_5,
    inference(rat,[],[s4,s26,s28]) ).

cnf(s31,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s16,s14,s30,s29]) ).

thf(f162,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s31]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEV229^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.19  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 15:22:54 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.19  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.22  Running first-order model finding
% 0.09/0.22  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.27  % (861002)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.20/0.27  % (861008)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.20/0.27  % (861007)fmb+10_1_sas=cadical:bce=on:rp=on:random_seed=3628620705_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.27  % (861010)dis+10_1_sil=32000:sp=arity:random_seed=638810261:i=103:fgj=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/103Mi)
% 0.20/0.27  % (861008)dis+11_61:31_drc=ordering:lsd=5:bsr=unit_only:rp=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=2592508301:i=135531:add=off:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/135531Mi)
% 0.20/0.27  % (861009)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=3896523977:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.20/0.27  % (861011)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=370977962:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.20/0.27  % Exception at run slice level
% 0.20/0.27  % (861008)WARNING: Not using 'newcnf' as currently not compatible with higher-order inputs.
% 0.20/0.27  User error: Finite model building is currently not compatible with polymorphism or higher-order constructs
% 0.20/0.27  % (861008)WARNING: Look ahead literal selection is not currently compatible with higher-order. Ignoring request to use
% 0.20/0.27  % (861011)WARNING: Not using 'newcnf' as currently not compatible with higher-order inputs.
% 0.20/0.27  % (861010) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-861002-861010"...
% 0.20/0.27  % (861011) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-861002-861011"...
% 0.20/0.27  % (861008) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-861002-861008"...
% 0.20/0.27  % (861008)...printing done.
% 0.20/0.27  % (861010)...printing done.
% 0.20/0.27  % (861011)...printing done.
% 0.20/0.27  % (861009) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-861002-861009"...
% 0.20/0.27  % (861013)ott-3_16_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=arity:fd=off:rp=on:random_seed=2027578905:i=159:bs=unit_only:nicw=on:fsr=off:amm=off_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/159Mi)
% 0.20/0.27  % (861011)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.27  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.27  % (861011)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.27  % (861011)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.20/0.27  % (861011)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.20/0.27  % (861011)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.20/0.27  % (861011)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.27  % (861011)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.27  % (861011)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.20/0.27  % (861011)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
% 0.20/0.27  % (861002)Success in time 0.037 s
% 0.20/0.27  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------